Brigitte Gabriel on Islam - YouTube Videos

YouTube videos Brigitte Gabriel and others on Islam

The Third Jihad

The War You Don't know about: Radical Islam's Vision for America. WAKE UP AMERICA!!

Geert Wilders in the U.S. Updates and more

Thanks go out to Lili for sending me the below about Geert Wilders and FREE SPEECH.

Video: Geert Wilders calls for an International First Amendment in NYCBy Adams • on February 25, 2009
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025016.php#respond
February 25, 2009

Wilders: "Our enemies should know: we will never apologize for being free men, we will never bow for the combined forces of Mecca and the left"

Here is Geert Wilders' speech at the Four Seasons in New York on February 23:

Thank you. Thank you very much for inviting me. And – to the immigration authorities – thank you for letting me into this country. It is always a pleasure to cross a border without being sent back on the first plane.

Today, the dearest of our many freedoms is under attack all throughout Europe. Free speech is no longer a given. What we once considered a natural element of our existence, our birth right, is now something we once again have to battle for.

As you might know, I will be prosecuted, because of my film Fitna, my remarks regarding Islam, and my view concerning what some call a ‘religion of peace’. A few years from now, I might be a criminal.
Whether or not I end up in jail is not the most pressing issue; I gave up my freedom four years ago. I am under full-time police protection ever since. The real question is: will free speech be put behind bars? And the larger question for the West is: will we leave Europe’s children the values of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem, or the values of Mecca, Teheran and Gaza?

This is what video blogger Pat Condell said in one of his latest you tube appearances. He says: “If I talked about Muslims the way their holy book talks about me, I’d be arrested for hate speech.” Now, Mr Condell is a stand-up comedian, but in the video he is dead serious and the joke is on us. Hate speech will always be used against the people defending the West – in order to please and appease Muslims. They can say whatever they want: throw gays from apartment buildings, kill the Jews, slaughter the infidel, destroy Israel, jihad against the West. Whatever their book tells them.
Today, I come before you to warn of a great threat. It is called Islam. It poses as a religion, but its goals are very worldly: world domination, holy war, sharia law, the end of the separation of church and state, slavery of women, the end of democracy. It is NOT a religion, it is an political ideology. It demands your respect, but has no respect for you.

There might be moderate Muslims, but there is no moderate Islam. Islam will never change, because it is built on two rocks that are forever, two fundamental beliefs that will never change, and will never alter. First, there is the Quran, Allah’s personal word, uncreated, forever, with orders that need to be fulfilled regardless of place or time. And second, there is al-insal al-kamil, the perfect man, Muhammad the role model, whose deeds are to be imitated by all Muslims. And since Muhammad was a warlord and a conqueror we know what to expect. Islam means submission, so there cannot be any mistake about it’s goal. That’s a given. It’s fact.

This is Europe 2009. Muslim settlers calling for our destruction, and free speech on trial. All this is the outcome of a sick and evil ideology, the ideology that is weakening us, the surrender ideology of cultural relativism. It believes that all cultures are equal, and therefore Islam deserves an equal place in the West. It is their duty, the left thinks, to facilitate Islam. This way the cultural relativists paradise comes within reach and we will all be happy, and sing kumbaya.

The forces of Islam couldn’t agree more. Islam being facilitated by government is their agenda too. But they see it as jizya, the money dhimmis pay in order not to be killed or raped by their Muslim masters. Therefore, they happily accept the welfare cheque or the subsidies for their mosque or the money governments donate to their organizations.

This is just one example of cultural relativists and Muslim settlers having the same agenda. There is another. Islam considers itself a religion and therefore we are not permitted to criticize it. The left agrees. Although it hated Christianity for decades, now that Islam appears on the scene, they suddenly change course and demand ‘respect’ for something they call a religion.
Again we see the left and Islam having the same agenda: it is a religion, so shut up.

This all culminates in a third coming-together: nor the left nor Islam is in favor of criticism. In fact, given the opportunity, they would simply outlaw it. Multiculturalism is the left’s pet project. It is actually their religion. Their love of it is so great, if you oppose it, it must be hate. And if you say it, it is labeled hate speech. Now here is something the Islam can agree on.
This is the essence of my short introduction today: where the left and Islam come together, freedom will suffer.

My friends, make no mistake, my prosecution is a full-fledged attack by the left on freedom of speech in order to please Muslims. It was started by a member of the Dutch Labour party, and the entire legal proceeding is done by well-to-do liberals, the radical chic of Dutch society, the snobbish left. Too much money, too much time, too little love of liberty. If you read what the court of Amsterdam has written about me, you read the same texts that cultural relativists produce.

How low can we go in the Netherlands? About my prosecution, The Wall Street Journal noted: “this is no small victory for Islamic regimes seeking to export their censorship laws to wherever Muslims reside”. The Journal concluded that by The Netherlands accepting the free speech standards of, “Saudi-Arabia”, I stand correct in my observation that - I quote - “Muslim immigration is eroding traditional Dutch liberties”.

Now, if the Wall Street Journal has the moral clarity to see that my prosecution is the logical outcome of our disastrous, self-hating, multiculturalists immigration policies, then why can’t the European liberal establishment see the same thing? Why aren’t they getting at least a little bit scared by the latest news out of, for example, the UK. News that tells that the Muslim population in Britain is growing ten times as fast as the rest of society. Why don’t they care?

The answer is: they don’t care because they are blinded by their cultural relativism. Their disdain of the West is so much greater than the appreciation of our many liberties. And therefore, they are willing to sacrifice everything. The left once stood for women rights, gay rights, equality, democracy. Now, they favour immigration policies that will end all this. Many even lost their decency. Elite politicians have no problem to participate in or finance demonstrations where settlers shout “Death to the Jews”. Seventy years after Auschwitz they know of no shame.

Two weeks ago, I tried to get into Britain, a fellow EU country. I was invited to give a speech in Parliament. However, upon arrival at London airport, I was refused entry into the UK, and sent back on the first plane to Holland. I would have loved to have reminded the audience of a great man who once spoke in the House of Commons. In 1982 President Reagan gave a speech there very few people liked. Reagan called upon the West to reject communism and defend freedom. He introduced a phrase: ‘evil empire’. Reagan’s speech stands out as a clarion call to preserve our liberties. I quote: If history teaches anything, it teaches self-delusion in the face of unpleasant facts is folly. What Reagan meant is that you cannot run away from history, you cannot escape the dangers of ideologies that are out to destroy you. Denial is no option.

So, what should we do? Is this a good moment for freedom-loving people to give in or to change course? To all-of-a-sudden start singing praise of Islam, or proclaiming there is such a thing as a moderate Islam? Will we now accept the continuation of Muslim mass immigration to the West? Will we appease sharia and jihad? Should we sacrifice gay rights and women rights? Or democracy? Should we sell out Israel, our dearest ally, and a frontline state of Islam?
Well, my humble opinion is: No way, Jose!

I suggest to defend freedom in general and freedom of speech in particular. I propose the withdrawal of all hate speech legislation in Europe. I propose a European First Amendment. In Europe we should defend freedom of speech like you Americans do. In Europe freedom of speech should be extended, instead of restricted. Of course, calling for violence or unjustly yelling “fire” in a crowded theatre have to be punished, but the right to criticize ideologies or religions are necessary conditions for a vital democracry. As George Orwell once said: “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear”.Let us defend freedom of speech and let us gain strength and work hard to become even stronger. Millions think just like you and me. Millions think liberty is precious. That democracy is better than sharia. And after all, why should we be afraid? Our many freedoms and our prosperity are the result of centuries of endeavour. Centuries of hard work and sacrifice. We do not stand alone, and we stand on the shoulders of giants.

Late December 1944 the American army was suddenly faced with a last-ditch effort by the Germans. In the Ardennes, in the Battle of the Bulge, Hitler and his national-socialists fought for their last chance. And they were very successful. Americans faced defeat, and death.

In the darkest of winter, in the freezing cold, in a lonely forest with snow and ice as even fiercer enemies than the Nazi war machine itself, the American army was told to surrender. That might be their only chance to survive. But General McAuliffe thought otherwise. He gave the Germans a short message. This message contained just four letters. Four letters only, but never in the history of freedom was a desire for liberty and perseverance in the face of evil expressed more eloquently than in that message. It spelled N – U – T – S. “Nuts”.

My friends, the national-socialists got the message. Because it left no room for interpretation!

I suggest we walk in the tradition of giants like General McAuliffe and the American soldiers who fought and died for the freedom of my country and for a secular and democratic Europe, and we tell the enemies of freedom just that. NUTS! Because that’s all there is to it. No explanations. No beating around the bush. No caveats.
Our enemies should know: we will never apologize for being free men, we will never bow for the combined forces of Mecca and the left. And we will never surrender. We stand on the shoulders of giants. There is no stronger power than the force of free men fighting for the great cause of liberty. Because freedom is the birthright of all man.

++++++++++++
http://www.geertwilders.nl/
If you have not yet, please view FITNA - GREET WILDER'S Movie, which is considered a controversial one, for exposing Global Islamic overt practices.

Http://video.Google.com/videoplay?docid=3369102968312745410

Video: Fitna the Movie: Geert Wilders' film about the Quran (English) - Mar 27, 2008
Geert Wilders - mypetjawa.mu.nu
.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024898.php#respond


*Wilders coming to U.S., Newsweek in a snit

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123457003637386317.html?mod=djemEditorialPage
Held at Heathrow FEBRUARY 14, 2009
Geert Wilders is banned in Britain.

*By Bat Yeor -Geert Wilders and the Fight for Europe
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZGVhOWZlNjk4N2E0NDk1NDgwYWRhNzlhMTdmNWZlNjI=

Does defending Western values constitute “inciting hatred”?


*Nonie Darwish - Prosecuted for Stating Truths
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=87668C51-09B4-4B5F-92DE-60D20897831F
FrontPageMagazine.com | Monday, January 26, 200

Muslim scholars agree with Geert Wilders.

*Dr. Sami Alrabaa Saturday, Prosecuting Geert Wilders, Islam, Koran, Hadeeth, Violence and hatred, Radical Muslims
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/8066

Wilders Prosecution is a Welcome Opportunity to Expose Islam
January 31, 2009

*Mayor Bloomberg Supports Wilders
By Baron Bodissey • on January 29, 2009
http://www.internationalfreepresssociety.org/2009/01/mayor-bloomberg-supports-wilders/*Phyllis Chesler February 23rd, 2009 6:15 pm
http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllischesler/2009/02/23/a-dutch-hero-comes-to-warn-us-seek-our-support-the-incomparable-geert-wilders-mp-in-new-york-city/

A Dutch Hero Comes to Warn Us, Seek Our Support. The Incomparable Geert Wilders, MP, in New York City.

*Posted By Andrew Bostom On February 15, 2009
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/02/barring-wilders-killing-the-messenger.html
BARRING WILDERS: KILLING THE MESSENGER

Geert Wilders, Islamic Law in Britain, and Zaki Badawi, The Late Lionized “
--

Recommended book
"Fogs of War and Peace: A Midstream Analysis of World War III"
by Robert L. Dilworth and Shlomo Maital

http://www.amazon.com/Fogs-War-Peace-Midstream-Analysis/dp/0313360499

http://book-reviews-citadel.blogspot.com/2008/12/fogs-of-war-and-peace-midstream.html

--



Recommended book
"Fogs of War and Peace: A Midstream Analysis of World War III"
by Robert L. Dilworth and Shlomo Maital

http://www.amazon.com/Fogs-War-Peace-Midstream-Analysis/dp/0313360499

http://book-reviews-citadel.blogspot.com/2008/12/fogs-of-war-and-peace-midstream.html

Wake Up America - CAIR , American Muslims largest advocacy group a terrorist front for Hamas

From Congresswoman Sue Myrick

FBI Cuts Ties With Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)

In April 2008, Rep. Myrick released her Wake Up America Agenda. One of ten points in this plan called for an investigation of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

Less than a year later, the FBI has cut all ties with CAIR. The organization is listed as an un-indicted co-conspirator in an FBI case involving Hamas fundraisers. Hamas is identified as a terrorist organization by the United States.

Click here for a news clip on the FBI's actions.

We just wanted you to know that our relentless pursuit of those who wish to bring harm to America is paying off.

Why we must pay attention to the Mumbai Terrorist Attacks

Why We Must Pay Attention to the Mumbai Terrorist Attacks
By Sean Osborne, Associate Director

27 November 2008:
The Al Qaeda-inspired terrorist attacks in Mumbai (formerly known as Bombay) India may well be a bellwether for Western counter-terrorist operations, particularly in the United States. Given the 25 November FBI/DHS advisory regarding “a plausible but unsubstantiated report” on “discussions” within Al-Qa’ida communications channels, all things must be considered relevant in order to counter the threat of Islamic jihadist strikes in America.

There is no doubt that Al Qa’ida discussions half a world away in Mumbai evolved beyond the “aspirational planning.” I think it necessary at this point to reiterate that one of the primary forms of “aspirational planning” discussions among Al Qa’ida jihadists are found on the forums resident with internet websites. As Randy Taylor reported 18 days ago, an Al Qa’ida “aspirational planning” document was posted on one of their primary forums. Item number 9 in the 15-item “aspirational planning” list of desired targets is the subject of the current FBI/DHS advisory.

Based upon analysis of this communication, as well as other more recent communications, the Northeast Intelligence Network most certainly may be in possession of further information, as have you and every other entity which read Mr. Taylor’s report. This kind of information is known within the United States Intelligence Community (US IC) as Indications & Warnings (I&W). Moreover, the list in the communication we collected goes far beyond strikes in the manner of the London or Madrid suicide bombers on the transportation sector in the northeastern United States and Canada. This communication discussed strikes against nine different nuclear power stations located across the entire northeast region and the entire electrical grid. In multiple and overwhelming instances it references strikes against the financial infrastructure of the United States based in New York City. It discusses what can only be mass tactical assaults on seven passenger laden commercial airports. It discussed the financial impact upon the United States during a time of financial crisis as well as the minimal cost to the Islamic jihadists in executing the strikes, and that they will occur at some particular point in time without warning.

Let’s shift our focus to Mumbai. How do these multiple attacks in India compare to what I’ve just discussed? They are well-coordinated mass attacks across a single major Indian city. But more importantly I think it should be obvious that the tactical execution of these attacks evidences a significant departure from the previous template of broad-daylight terrorist strikes. These Indian jihadists utilized darkness as tactical cover for the execution of a major, multi-faceted terrorist operation by launching the entire operation at 10 PM local time in Mumbai.

This evident change in tactics begs some analytical questions. Was this change in tactics based upon an Al Qa’ida leadership operational directive, or was it left to the local cell leadership to determine? Is this what occurred in the attacks against the World Trade Center in New York City in February 1993 and again in September 2001? It would appear so – the local commander determined the timing of attack, Al Qa’ida’s central command merely approved the concept and targets of the strike, and was generally aware in advance that the strikes would occur. Al Qa’ida central was briefed on the plan of attack, it did not originate them.

All of this has brought about a change in my thinking about the execution of terrorist attacks. Al-Qaeda is a decentralized terrorist entity. It was years ago at the urging of Mustafa Setmariam Nasar (Abu Mus'ab al-Suri), the Al Qa’ida master tactician, theoretician and composer of the Al Qa’ida warfighting doctrine, who urged individual jihadists and cells worldwide to execute independent jihad operations on its behalf.

Since the Al Qaeda leadership places no constraints on the timing of attacks by its worldwide cells, there exists the distinct possibility that the leader of a given terrorist cell could choose an Islamic or Infidel date of significance or anniversary upon which to execute a strike. In this respect the "setting of dates" by individual jihadi posters on their forums cannot be completely ignored or discounted. Just because this "setting of dates" has not been the case in the past does not mean it won't be the case in the present or in the future. In fact, Islamic jihadists have repeatedly struck Israeli civilian targets on Hebrew dates of significance or holidays on many occasions over many years. The point here is that one additional and very recent jihadi forum post cites a specific date during the first week of January 2009 in which a “settling of accounts” with President George W. Bush will occur. We’ll see what actually transpires relative to these near-term threats, yet I believe it is prudent for all concerned to learn from past events as well as the recent.

http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/node/1493

Sean Osborne

Associate Director
Northeast Intelligence Network

It's ISLAMIC Terrorism in Mumbai, you media whores!

Today's HEADLINES:

Witnesses: Terrorists looked for Brits, Americans; Muslim fanatics attack innocent Indians, Americans; bloodbath; Terrorists coordinate attacks across Bombay; Mumbai police: 4 suspects killed, 9 arrested; Analysis: a new tactic by Islamist militants; Mumbai's anti-terrorism squad chief killed; Feds warn of terror plot against NYC subways; Al Qaida targets New York's Penn Station

Several regions of India under attack by ISLAMIC TERRORISTS: Hostages taken, Hotels, Train Stations and Hospitals under attack. Stay tuned for continuing ISLAMIC TERRORISM throughout the globe.

What do YOUR news sources tell you about what is happening in India? Do they tell you it is ISLAMISTS doing the killing, bombing and burning?

P.S. For all you liberal college educated saps out there: Mumbai is Bombay - Bombay is Mumbai.

The Brutal Truth of Islam

Brigitte Gabriel speaks at the Heritage Foundation

CLICK HERE

HELP PROTECT FREEDOM OF SPEECH - ACT NOW!

Support the Free Speech Protection Act - Urgent!

If free speech is important to you, if you believe that people like me, Rachel Ehrenfeld, Sean Hannity, Steve Emerson, Bob Spencer and others who write and expose vital information about the threat of Islamofacism to our liberty and freedoms should be protected to continue sounding the alarm, PLEASE copy and paste the letter below and send it to Members and staff on the Judiciary Committees in the House and Senate (listed below). Identify yourself as a patriotic voter, and that you strongly request that they support the passage of the Free Speech Protection Act.

You can also enter your elected officials' phone numbers in your cell phone and call them while you are stuck in traffic and voice your opinion. Every email or phone call represents 1000 voters. Here is the science behind the numbers: If 40 people in each state contact their elected official about an issue, that number represents 40,000 voters on election day. That can make or break an election. This is why every phone call gets the elected official's attention.

Let's jam their lines and swamp their emails. Together we can make a difference!

Rising in defense of our security, our liberty and our values.

Thank you, Brigitte Gabriel




Dear....

The Free Speech Protection Act of 2008 ( S-2977 & H.R. 5814), was introduced by U.S. Rep. Pete King (R., N.Y.) and co-sponsored by Rep. Anthony Weiner (D., N.Y.), and a Senate companion bill by Senator Arlen Specter (R., PA) and Joseph Lieberman (I- CT), and co-sponsored by NY senior Senator Chuck Schumer. With Schumer on board, and others joining, the Free Speech Protection Act can be adopted before Congress adjourns this summer.

It’s important to take immediate measures to defend our ability to inform the public and protect our free speech rights - now under attack by Saudis using the British legal system. I can’t think of a more important and urgent law Congress and you can be proud of than the Free Speech Protection Act.

This legislation builds on New York State's "Libel Terrorism Protection Act," aka "Rachel's Law.” The NY law, and the proposed federal legislation, grew from the court battles of New York journalist and terrorism investigator, Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, whom a Saudi billionaire sued in Great Britain for Funding Evil: How Terrorism is Financed - And How to Stop It—although she is American and her book sold here, not in the U.K. But plaintiff-friendly British libel laws have made London a Mecca for libel tourists wishing to intimidate authors worldwide.

The suit against Dr. Ehrenfeld–like 40 previous cases that silenced many other American and New York authors–is an obvious attempt to dilute First Amendment protections of free press, and prevent investigations of terror-financing.

The British Guardian wrote on July 15, “English libel law is an international menace, a national disgrace, a pre-democratic anachronism. It defends crooks, terrorists and tyrants from investigation. It threatens the free speech of people all over the world and causes untold damage to the reputation of this country.”

In a tremendous victory for free speech rights and to provide legal protections from "libel terrorism" to New York authors and publishers, the Libel Terrorism Protection Act, aka "Rachel's Law," was adopted unanimously—in less than 3 months(!) by the NY legislature and signed into law by Gov. David Patterson on April 30, 2008.

Pat Schroder, President of the Association of American publishers stated: “We’ve supported Rachel Ehrenfeld in her court battles....Now we’d like to see the fight taken to another level with enactment of federal legislation.”

Senators Specter and Lieberman note that the English Libel Laws threaten the "free-flowing marketplace of ideas" which "enables the ideals of democracy to defeat the totalitarian vision of al-Qaida and other terrorist organizations." Free speech in the U.S. “is under sharp attack through foreign courts, where dozens of mendacious libel suits have intimidated and silenced American authors and U.S. publishers.”

“The new legislation would not shield those who recklessly or maliciously print false information. It would ensure that Americans are held to and protected by American standards,“ wrote Senators Specter and Lieberman. The new Free Speech Act bars U.S. courts from enforcing libel judgments issued in foreign courts against U.S. residents, if the speech would not be libelous under American law. The bill also permits American authors and publishers to countersue if the material is protected by the First Amendment. If a jury finds that the foreign suit is part of a scheme to suppress free speech rights, it may award damages.

PLEASE, Help vote the Free Speech Act into Law. American Writers need it to be able to unearth the truth, and publish it without any censorship by foreign courts.

Sincerely,


YOUR NAME HERE



Below is contact information for the Senatorial Judiciary Committee, the Congressional Judiciary Committee, and Staff.

General Judiciary Committee - http://judiciary.house.gov/about/contact.html

Staff Majority Communications Director Jonathan Godfrey - (202) 225-3951

Majority Press Secretary/Spokesperson Melanie Roussell - (202) 225-3951

Majority Staff Director/Chief Counsel Perry Apelbaum - (202) 225-3951

Minority Chief of Staff/General Counselor - (202) 226-0002

Minority Communications Director Kim Smith - (202) 225-6906

Senators on Committee

NY Charles Schumer - http://schumer.senate.gov/SchumerWebsite/contact/webform.cfm
Press Secretary Brian Fallon - (202) 224-7433

VT Patrick J. Leahy - http://leahy.senate.gov/contact.cfm
Press Secretary Erica Chabot - (202) 224-2154

MA Edward Kennedy - http://kennedy.senate.gov/senator/contact.cfm
Press Secretary Melissa Wagoner - (202) 224-2633

DE Joseph Biden - http://biden.senate.gov/services/contact/
Press Secretary Elizabeth Alexander - (202) 224-2154

WI Herbert Kohl - http://kohl.senate.gov/gen_contact.html
Press Secretary Lynn Becker - (202) 224-2240

WI Russ Feingold - http://feingold.senate.gov/contact_opinion.html
Press Secretary Zach Lowe - (202) 224-8657

CA Dianne Feinstein - http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactUs.EmailMe
Press Secretary Scott Gerber - (202) 224-8657

IL Richard Durbin - http://durbin.senate.gov/contact.cfm#contact
Press Secretary Joe Shoemaker - (202) 224-7028

MD Benjamin Cardin - http://cardin.senate.gov/contact/
Press Secretary Sue Walitsky - (202) 224-7433

RI Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse - http://whitehouse.senate.gov/contact/
Press Secretary Alex Swartsel - (202) 224-7433

PA Arlen Specter - http://specter.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm
Press Secretary Chris Gindlesperger - (202) 224-5225

UT Orrin Hatch - http://hatch.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Offices.Contact
Press Secretary Mark Eddington (202) 224-5251
IA Charles Grassley - http://grassley.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home
Press Secretary Beth Levine - (202) 224-6197

AZ Jon Kyl - http://kyl.senate.gov/contact_form.cfm
Press Secretary Andrew Wilder - (202) 224-4521

AL Jeff Sessions - http://sessions.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ConstituentServices.ContactMe
Press Secretary Michael Brumas - (202) 224-4124

SC Lindsey Graham - http://lgraham.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.EmailSenatorGraham
Press Secretary Wes Hickman - (202) 224-5972

TX John Cornyn - http://cornyn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm
Press Secretary Brian Walsh - (202) 224-2934

KS Sam Brownback - http://brownback.senate.gov/CMEmailMe.cfm
Press Secretary John Rankin - (202) 224-6521

OK Tom Coburn - http://coburn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactSenatorCoburn.Home
Press Secretary John Hart - (202) 224-5754

Congressional Representatives

NY-9th Anthony Weiner - http://weiner.house.gov/email_anthony.aspx

NY-8th Jerrold Nadler – Tel: 202-225-5635
http://www.house.gov/nadler/emailform.shtml

CA-24th Elton Gallegly - https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml

CA-3rd Dan Lungren - https://forms.house.gov/lungren/forms/email.shtml

CA-29th Adam Schiff - http://schiff.house.gov/HoR/CA29/Contact+Information/Contact+Form.htm

CA-28th Howard Berman - http://www.house.gov/berman/contact/index.shtml

CA-16th Zoe Lofgren - http://lofgren.house.gov/emailform.shtml

CA-35th Maxine Waters - http://www.house.gov/waters/IMA/issue.htm

CA-39th Linda Sanchez - http://www.lorettasanchez.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=218&Itemid=17

CA-27th Brad Sherman - http://www.house.gov/sherman/contact/

CA-49th Darrell Issa - http://issa.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm

MI 14th John Conyers (Chair) - http://capwiz.com/aipac/webreturn/?url=http://www.house.gov/conyers

VA-9th Rick Boucher - http://www.boucher.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=645&Itemid

VA-3rd Bobby Scott – https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml

VA-6th Bob Goodlatte - http://www.house.gov/goodlatte/emailbob.htm

VA-4th Randy Forbes - http://forbes.house.gov/zipauth.html

NC-12th Rep. Melvin Watt - http://www.house.gov/formwatt/IMA/issue_subscribe.htm

MA-10th William Delahunt - William.Delahunt@mail.house.gov

FL-8th Ric Keller - https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml

FL-24th Tom Feeney - carissa@tomfeeney.com

FL-20th Debbie Wasserman Schultz - http://wassermanschultz.house.gov/zipauth.htm

FL-19th Robert Wexler - http://wexler.house.gov/email.shtml

TN-9th Stephen Cohen - http://cohen.house.gov/index.php?option=com_email_form&Itemid=111

GA-4th Hank Johnson - http://hankjohnson.house.gov/contact_hank_write.shtml

OH-13th Betty Sutton - http://sutton.house.gov/about/emailform.cfm

IL-4th Luis Gutierrez - http://luisgutierrez.house.gov/singlepage.aspx?newsid=1262

WI-2nd Tammy Baldwin - http://tammybaldwin.house.gov/get_address.html

AL-7th Artur Davis - http://www.house.gov/arturdavis/zipauth.shtml

MN-5th Keith Ellison - http://ellison.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=87

TX-21st Lamar S. Smith (Ranking Member) - http://lamarsmith.house.gov/contact.aspx?section=Mail

TX-18th Sheila Jackson Lee - https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml

TX-1st Louie Gohmert - http://gohmert.house.gov/contact_louie.htm

WI-5th F. James Sensenbrenner - http://sensenbrenner.house.gov/email_zip.htm

NC-6th Howard Coble - howard.coble@mail.house.gov

UT-3rd Chris Cannon - cannon.ut03@mail.house.gov

IN-6th Mike Pence - https://forms.house.gov/pence/IMA/contact_form.htm

IA-5th Steve King – pete.king@mail.house.gov

AZ-2nd Trent Franks - https://forms.house.gov/franks/email_zipcheck.shtml

OH-4th Jim Jordan - http://jordan.house.gov/contactform_zipcheck.shtml

OH-1st Steve Chabot - http://www.house.gov/chabot/zipauth.shtml

Dhimmi Dummy of the Day: Individual Category

Abysmally clueless: SENATOR JOSEPH BIDEN
"to compare terrorism with an all-encompassing ideology like communism and fascism is evidence of profound confusion"

Uh, EXCUSE ME?! WHO is PROFOUNDLY CONFUSED?! Get off the PROSAIC, Mister! The Islamofascist terrorists are laughing their behinds off at your total ignorance OR at your corrpution and selling out of America! SHAME ON YOU and SHAME on the people of Delaware for electing you to represent them! You are a disgrace to your country!



from our friends at Jihad Watch.com

May 24, 2008
Abysmally clueless Biden: "to compare terrorism with an all-encompassing ideology like communism and fascism is evidence of profound confusion"
This is the fruit, of course, of talking about terrorism rather than jihad. In "Republicans and Our Enemies" in the Wall Street Journal, May 23 (thanks to George), Senator Joe Biden shows that he, like almost everyone else, still has no idea of the ideology motivating jihad terrorists:

The intersection of al Qaeda with the world's most lethal weapons is a deadly serious problem. Al Qaeda must be destroyed. But to compare terrorism with an all-encompassing ideology like communism and fascism is evidence of profound confusion.
Terrorism is a means, not an end, and very different groups and countries are using it toward very different goals. Messrs. Bush and McCain lump together, as a single threat, extremist groups and states more at odds with each other than with us: Sunnis and Shiites, Persians and Arabs, Iraq and Iran, al Qaeda and Shiite militias. If they can't identify the enemy or describe the war we're fighting, it's difficult to see how we will win.


"If they can't identify the enemy or describe the war we're fighting, it's difficult to see how we will win." That is true. But if Biden can't see the ideology unifying significant numbers of Sunnis and Shiites, Persians and Arabs, people in Iraq and Iran, and al Qaeda and Shiite militias, he is just as clueless as those he is criticizing.

Here, Senator, is a good recent capsule description of that ideology: http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/021127.php

Jihadist Materials in American Mosques

Jihadist Materials in American Mosques Have You Signed the Petition Calling For Congressional Hearings?

It is now public knowledge that there are extremist materials that have been and are being distributed in mosques in America, materials that advocate jihad against America and “unbelievers,” incite terror and violence, and call for the abolition of our constitutional form of government.

A study of 100 American mosques earlier this year uncovered such materials in 75 of those mosques. It’s likely such materials are in a mosque near you!

Isn’t it time our elected representatives did something about this?

Last week we announced the most important grassroots project we have ever undertaken, a national petition drive calling on Congress to conduct hearings to examine materials found in American mosques that advocate jihad, terror and the abolition of our constitutional form of government.

WHY?
To determine if these materials violate federal statutes pertaining to tax-exempt organizations, terrorism, and sedition and insurrection.

Nearly 5,000 people have already signed the petition – a good start.
If you have, thank you!

If you have forwarded the petition to others, thank you!

If you haven’t, please don’t delay. Please sign the petition today. It takes only a few minutes to read and add your name to the petition.

WHY IS THIS SO IMPORTANT?
The very existence of this campaign will raise awareness among the American people of the extremist materials being distributed in mosques.

The more names that are added, the more pressure we’ll be able to place on Congress. It will demonstrate to Congress that the American people are very concerned about the threat of Islamofascism.

So, if you haven’t yet signed the petition, please sign it today!

THANK YOU

A few rays of hope and an apology

First I'd like to point out my error and apologize for that error. I usually don't believe in apologies but this time it is warranted.

I apologize to US Rep Pete Hoekstra, R-Michigan for posting and awarding him the dhimmi of the day award. Apparently this congressman is far from being a dhimmi and as I have done more research on him, it becomes apparent that he get's it about Islamofascism. Mr. Hoesktra is the Chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Here is a quote from the Congressman as regards the latest FY09 Intelligence Authorization Bill:

“Trying to impose speech codes on how to describe our enemy smacks of McCarthyism in reverse,” Hoekstra said. “Al-Qaeda knows point blank that they want to kill Americans. How sad is it that as we approach the seventh anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, we are still debating how to define our enemy?”

In trying to find more information about this bill, I hit a roadblock, finding that via "insidedefense" is a paid subscription site, and I simply don't have the money to join. If YOU know more about the bill please post something here in comments.

As I understand it, among other things the bill prohibits the intelligence community and other government agencies from using the words "jihad" and "Islamofascism".

My interest is really peaked now. Just who authored this bill and what are their connections? Why do we care about insulting our enemies? We should be insulting the Jihadists and more in the opinion of the majority of Americans who understand what is going on!

Please check out this link found at CAIR Watch.com. Congressman Hoesktra and Congresswoman Myrick are just two of the public officials who seem to finally get what the ISLAMOFASCISTS, JIHADISTS are up to. http://www.americansagainsthate.org/cw/honors_cw.php


Write, Call, FAX, E-mail some or all of these people to show your support in saving our country from the ignorance and arrogance of our corrupt politicans, the traitorous media and the terrorists supporting CAIR, thank you very much.

Fitna, the Movie, working link

See the movie HERE Save it before it's taken down by the dhimmi dummies!