Obama sends troops to Uganda

Here is a news report showing Muslims praising Col. Qadafi in Uganda and the vast mosque which Qadafi paid for. Now we are sending troops to help Uganda. Our foreign policy is about as about as good as our Green Industry policy, a total fraud. Maybe we should call the President's policy on the Middle East and the Islam problem "Green" - quite appropriate as the symbol of Islam is green just look at the many flags of the Islamic countries. Green also means inexperience but in our opinion President Obama knows exactly what he is doing when it comes to doing the Islamists bidding.


http://www.shoebat.com/videos/obamganda.htm

Post from email from Shoebat Foundation. It's so important that I am posting it here so that you can add this to your list: OVOMIT

The Fantasy World of America's Numero Uno Dummy

Wall Street Journal Sizes up Obama - They've Got Him Figured Out


A "deadly" article regarding Obama, at the Wall Street Journal, which today is the most widely circulated newspaper in America .


Article from the Wall Street Journal - by Eddie Sessions:

"I have this theory about Barack Obama. I think he's led a kind of make-believe life in which money was provided and doors were opened because at some point early on somebody or some group (George Soros anybody?) took a look at this tall, good looking, half-white, half-black, young man with an exotic African/Muslim name and concluded he could be guided toward a life in politics where his facile speaking skills could even put him in the White House.

In a very real way, he has been a young man in a very big hurry. Who else do you know has written two memoirs before the age of 45? "Dreams of My Father" was published in 1995 when he was only 34 years old. The "Audacity of Hope" followed in 2006. If, indeed, he did write them himself. There are some who think that his mentor and friend, Bill Ayers, a man who calls himself a "communist with a small 'c'" was the real author.

His political skills consisted of rarely voting on anything that might be deemed controversial. He went from a legislator in the Illinois legislature to the Senator from that state because he had the good fortune of having Mayor Daley's formidable political machine at his disposal.

He was in the U.S. Senate so briefly that his bid for the presidency was either an act of astonishing self-confidence or part of some greater game plan that had been determined before he first stepped foot in the Capital. How, many must wonder, was he selected to be a 2004 keynote speaker at the Democrat convention that nominated John Kerry when virtually no one had ever even heard of him before?

He outmaneuvered Hillary Clinton in primaries. He took Iowa by storm. A charming young man, an anomaly in the state with a very small black population, he oozed "cool" in a place where agriculture was the antithesis of cool. He dazzled the locals. And he had an army of volunteers drawn to a charisma that hid any real substance.

And then he had the great good fortune of having the Republicans select one of the most inept candidates for the presidency since Bob Dole And then John McCain did something crazy. He picked Sarah Palin, an unknown female governor from the very distant state of Alaska .. It was a ticket that was reminiscent of 1984's Walter Mondale and Geraldine Ferraro and they went down to defeat.

The mainstream political media fell in love with him. It was a schoolgirl crush with febrile commentators like Chris Mathews swooning then and now over the man. The venom directed against McCain and, in particular, Palin, was extraordinary.

Now, nearly a full 2 years into his first term, all of those gilded years leading up to the White House have left him unprepared to be President. Left to his own instincts, he has a talent for saying the wrong thing at the wrong time. It swiftly became a joke that he could not deliver even the briefest of statements without the ever-present Tele-Prompters.

Far worse, however, is his capacity to want to "wish away" some terrible realities, not the least of which is the Islamist intention to destroy America and enslave the West. Any student of history knows how swiftly Islam initially spread. It knocked on the doors of Europe, having gained a foothold in Spain .

The great crowds that greeted him at home or on his campaign "world tour" were no substitute for having even the slightest grasp of history and the reality of a world filled with really bad people with really bad intentions.

Oddly and perhaps even inevitably, his political experience, a cakewalk, has positioned him to destroy the Democrat Party's hold on power in Congress because in the end it was never about the Party. It was always about his communist ideology, learned at an early age from family, mentors, college professors, and extreme leftist friends and colleagues.

Obama is a man who could deliver a snap judgment about a Boston police officer who arrested an "obstreperous" Harvard professor-friend, but would warn Americans against "jumping to conclusions" about a mass murderer at Fort Hood who shouted "Allahu Akbar." The absurdity of that was lost on no one. He has since compounded this by calling the Christmas bomber "an isolated extremist" only to have to admit a day or two later that he was part of an al Qaeda plot.

He is a man who could strive to close down our detention facility at Guantanamo even though those released were known to have returned to the battlefield against America . He could even instruct his Attorney General to afford the perpetrator of 9/11 a civil trial when no one else would ever even consider such an obscenity. And he is a man who could wait three days before having anything to say about the perpetrator of yet another terrorist attack on Americans and then have to elaborate on his remarks the following day because his first statement was so lame.

The pattern repeats itself. He either blames any problem on the Bush administration or he naively seeks to wish away the truth.

Knock, knock. Anyone home? Anyone there? Barack Obama exists only as the sock puppet of his handlers, of the people who have maneuvered and manufactured this pathetic individual's life.

When anyone else would quickly and easily produce a birth certificate, this man has spent over a million dollars to deny access to his. Most other documents, the paper trail we all leave in our wake, have been sequestered from review. He has lived a make-believe life whose true facts remain hidden.

We laugh at the ventriloquist's dummy, but what do you do when the dummy at the teleprompter is President of the United States of America?

Report--Obama quietly appoints Muslim Brotherhood to key posts

[Excerpt: "Events which are currently unfolding in the Middle East are a consequence of the behind-the-scenes work of Islamic advocates within the Administration."]

click HERE for more disgusting details.

Obama - Ikhwan Alliance

Barack Hussein Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood

Rise of the Socialist buddies of the world

I can't quite put it together, hopefully, someone else will uncover the connection - I am thinking that the rise of socialism in the U.S., the sabatoge of the BP oil wells in the Gulf of Mexico and the election of Dilma Rouseff to the Presidency of Brazil and the growing Brazilian oil business are somehow connected with the highest ranking Socialists in the U.S.

Of course, the usual media whores and pimps for Socialism are trumpting her election as the first woman President of Brazil, down playing the fact that she is a "former" Marxist rebel. What proof does anyone have that either she or Obama are "former" Marxists.

It all remains to be seen and sniffed out by real investigative Journalists who believe their own nose when they smell a rotten socialist connection. Is it a coincidence that the rise of socialism is making great gains in once representative government?

What is negrophilia and why does it matter?

What is negrophilia and why does it matter?



I recently finished reading the book Negrophilia: From Slave Block to Pedestal-- America ’s Racial Obsession, by Erik Rush, a black American author. I thought it worth sharing what this term means in the context of what is happening in America . The information in Rush’s book needs to be disseminated throughout the country if we are to survive Barack Hussein Obama.



If I may paraphrase, the condition of negrophilia, spawned from political correctness (PC), is the irrational state of refusing to see evil in some blacks and attributing to all blacks a mythical “holiness.” Sort of a twisted reasoning that blacks can do no wrong because they have suffered so much. Never mind that other races and groups have suffered as much or more, whites (even the sane ones) have been so indoctrinated through PC that they can’t see the idiocy in this thinking. That is deadly.



Consider these examples.



Obama has tried as best he can to put obstacles in the way of efforts to protect the Gulf coastline from the oil spill. He literally denied state officials the resources that they needed and requested. Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana went around him. Equipment is now being employed to dredge the oil away from the shore. Obama (through the Coast Guard) recently stopped the dredging. The excuse is that moving the sand harms the environment. The oil, of course, will do more damage to the environment and the economies of the states affected.



Why then would conservative leaders, such as Newt Gingrich, still be attributing the abysmal responses on Obama’s part to “incompetence?” Any right-minded person can see that these actions are by design. They are to destroy the oil industry and eventually the nation. Why can’t a man as intelligent as Gingrich grasp this fact? I think negrophilia fits here. Gingrich can’t bring himself to admit that Obama is an evil, disturbed man, because Obama is half-black.



Obama and his sycophants posed a six-month drilling moratorium until they can determine how to prevent another spill of this magnitude. Newsflash: As long as humans run an endeavor, there will always be accidents and mishaps. The evil in this move is glaring. Thousands of Americans will lose their jobs. If they do receive the shakedown money stolen from British Petroleum (BP), what are they to do after six months? The jobs won’t be there; they will go to foreign countries. These people are self-sufficient workers; welfare does not work for them. Why won’t the Republican conservative leadership get behind the people taking legal action against Obama on this issue? Why aren’t they announcing broadly that the behavior is not against BP but against average Americans? What besides a disorder such as negrophilia can possibly account for this craven weakness in the opponents of Barack Obama?



Governor Jan Brewer and the citizens of Arizona decided that they would take action to protect themselves against the incursion of illegal aliens. Attorney General Eric Holder and Obama (both black men) immediately attacked their actions, without first having read the law that Arizona citizens proposed. Why was there such a tepid response from Republican leaders on this behavior? As an American, it shamed me that there was not more damaging outcry from so-called leaders.



Further, why is there not an actionable response to Obama’s disrespectful treatment of Governor Brewer? He simply ignored her as she pleaded for assistance. What white President could get away with that kind of crap? Not one. Yet the fear of Obama’s blackness, the disorder of negrophilia in play, ensured that the airwaves would be silent of people who could actually do something about the behavior: political leaders. I am livid witnessing the degree of spinelessness in face of such unprecedented lawlessness from Obama. It’s enough to make a sane person do something drastic—like join a militia.



And more, a general and his staff have made statements that reflect their true disgust toward a weak, pansy of a Commander-in-Chief, who despises them all. Obama has done more to cripple the American military than any enemy past or present could ever have hoped to accomplish. He is set on corrupting unit cohesion with open homosexual behavior in the ranks; he shows disdain for the fighting forces by rubbing his affinity for Muslims in their face, when Muslim Islamists are the very people they are fighting; and he despises the Judeo-Christian faith to which the majority of the soldiers adhere. That all Americans who oppose this miscreant Barack Obama are not standing before the White House gates with pitchforks and flaming torches (or the 21st Century equivalents) is a sickening travesty. How much more will Americans allow this despicable person to do before they get in his face and say “No More!”?



Sadly, the only outcome that I can foresee (barring a real game changer at the polls in November 2010) is that the vast majority of Americans—the non-elites, the non-talking heads, and particularly, those who are not afflicted with negrophilia—will revolt. Whichever side wins that confrontation, Americans or Obama and the Left, will face the task of rebuilding the nation, either in the image that the Founders relying on Judeo-Christian principles intended or the image that Obama and the Left intend. If the Left wins, there will be no America , as we once knew it.



Sylvia Thompson

6/23/2010

A Multitude of fools

This quote came from the Czech Republic . Someone over there has it figured out. We have a lot of work to do.

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America . Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."

More Obama Corruption, Lies and Incompetence

The Washington Examiner strikes again! This one's a mess!!!


This is incredible! Please read it and check it out yourself.







Subject: MUST READ !!!!!! CHRYSLER RAILROAD STORY!!!! Our Gov't A Legacy of Corruption


Chrysler Railroad story

Sooner or later it will all come to light!

This could be a scandal of epic proportions and one that makes Nixon's Watergate or Clinton 's Monica Lewinsky affair pale by comparison. Why was there neither rhyme nor reason as to which dealerships of the Chrysler Corporation were to be closed?

Roll the clock back to the weeks just before Chrysler declared bankruptcy. Chrysler, like GM, was in dire financial straits and federal government "graciously" offered to "buy the company" and keep them out of bankruptcy and "save jobs."

Chrysler was, in the words of Obama and his administration, "Too big to fail," same story with GM.

The feds organized their "Automotive Task Force" to fix Chrysler and GM. Obama, in an act that is 100% unconstitutional, appointed a guy named Steve Rattner to be the White House's official Car Czar -
literally, that's what his title is.

Rattner is the liaison between Obama, Chrysler, and GM.

Initially, the national media reported that Chrysler 'had made this list of dealerships'. Not true!

The Washington Examiner, Newsmax, Fox News and a host of other news agencies discovered that the list of dealerships was put together by the "Automotive Task Force" headed by no one other than Mr. Steve
Rattner.

Now the plot thickens.

Remember earlier we said that there was neither rhyme nor reason why certain dealerships were closed?

Actually there's a very interesting pattern as to who was closed down.
Again, on May 27, 2009, The Washington Examiner and Newsmax exposed the connection.

Amazingly, of the 789 dealerships closed by the federal government, 788 had donated money, exclusively to Republican political causes, while contributing nothing to Democratic political causes. The only "Democratic" dealership on the list was found to have donated $7,700 to Hillary's campaign, and a bit over $2,000 to John Edwards. This same dealership, reportedly, also gave $200.00 to Obama's campaign.

Does that seem a little odd to you?

Steve Rattner is the guy who put the list together. Well, he happens to be married to a Maureen White. Maureen happens to be the former national finance chairman of the Democratic National Committee. As
such, she has access to campaign donation records from everyone in the nation- Republican or Democrat. But of course, this is just a wacky
"coincidence," we're certain.

Then comes another really wacky "coincidence."

On that list of dealerships being closed down, a weird thing happened in Arkansas , North Louisiana, and Southern Missouri . It seems that Bill Clinton's former White House Chief of Staff, Mack McClarty, owns
a chain of dealership in that region, partnered with a fellow by the name of Robert Johnson.

Johnson happens to be founder of Black Entertainment Television and was a huge Obama supporter and financier.

These guys own a half dozen Chrysler stores under the company title of RLJ-McClarty-Landers. Interestingly, none of their dealerships were
ordered closed - not one!

While all of their competing Chrysler/Dodge and Jeep dealership were!

Eight dealerships located near the dealerships owned by McClarty and Johnson were ordered shut down. Thus by pure luck, these two major Obama supporters now have virtual monopoly on Chrysler sales in their zone.

Isn't that amazing?

Go look in The Washington Examiner, the story's there, and it's in a dozen or so other web-based news organizations; this isn't being made up.


Now if you thought Chrysler was owned by Fiat, you are mistaken. Under the federal court ruling, 65% of Chrysler is now owned by the federal government and the United Auto Workers union!

Fiat owns 20%.

The other 15% is still privately owned and presumably will be traded on the stock market. Obama smiles and says he doesn't want to run the
auto industry.

As horrifying as this is to comprehend, and being as how this used to be the United States of America , it would appear that the president has the power to destroy private businesses and eliminate upwards of
100,000 jobs just because they don't agree with his political agenda.


There are voices in Washington demanding an explanation, but the "Automotive Task Force" has released no information to the public or to any of the senators demanding answers for what has been done.

Keep your ear to the ground for more on this story. If you've ever wanted to make a difference about anything in your life, get on the phone to your national senator or representative in the House and
demand an investigation into this.

Benjamin Franklin had it right when he said, "All that's necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."

Car Czar No More

An amazing thing happened as this story was going to press. Obama's Car Czar, Steve Rattner, resigned on July 13 and was promptly replaced by former steel workers union boss Ron Bloom.
According to CBS News, Rattner left "to return to private life and spend time with his family."

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said, "I hope that he takes another opportunity to bring his unique skills to government service in the future."

By the way, Rattner is under investigation for a multi-million dollar pay-to-play investment bank scandal in New York ....

Uh-oh!

But, we're certain that had nothing to do with his resignation.

And, according to several news sources out there, there are rumors he's being investigated for what could be pay-to-play scandal involving the closing of Chrysler and GM dealerships. Really? Again,
that couldn't have anything to with his resignation-that's ridiculous!
Like CBS said, this guy just wants to "spend more quality time with his family."

Obama has 32 personally appointed "czars" who answer to no one but him, all of whom are acting without any Constitutional authority.

But hey, we're sure they all have "unique skills,"......as Tim Geithner likes to say!

SOOOOO.HOWS THE CHANGE WORKING FOR YOU?..

Check it out at the following websites.....

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Furor-grows-over-partisan-car-dealer-closings-46261447.html

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obamas-auto-policy-All-in-the-Democratic-family-44414452.html

This goes beyond corruption in high places - to gross criminal actions on the part of our government! I hope you will spread this far and wide, and hopefully the taxpaying public will demand some of that
transparency we were promised......followed by criminal prosecution of the perpetrators!

What a crooked government, we have!!!!! Vote 'em all out...November, 2010!

JOBS REPORT A NIGHTMARE FOR OBAMA: More Lies and Incompetence!

Washington Post

Jobs report a nightmare for Obama progressivism


By George F. Will
Thursday, June 10, 2010

Concerning the job numbers from May, one can almost echo Henry James's exclamation after examining letters pertaining to Lord Byron's incest: "Nauseating perhaps, but how quite inexpressibly significant." Except that the May numbers' significance can be expressed: A theory is being nibbled to death by facts.

Private-sector job creation almost stopped in May. The 41,000 jobs created were dwarfed by the 411,000 temporary and low-wage government jobs needed to administer the census. Last year's stimulus having failed to hold unemployment below 8 percent as predicted, Barack Obama might advocate another stimulus -- amending Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution, which mandates a census every 10 years. If it were every year, he could take credit for creating 564,000 -- the current number of census takers -- permanent jobs.

May's 41,000 jobs were one-fifth of the April number and substantially fewer than half the number needed to keep pace with the normal growth of the labor force. This is evidence against the theory that a growing government can be counted on to produce prosperity because a government dollar spent has a reliable multiplier effect as it ripples through the economy from which the government took the dollar.

Today's evidence suggesting sluggish job creation might give pause to a less confident person than Obama. But pauses are not in his repertoire of governance. Instead, yielding to what must be a metabolic urge toward statism, he says the Gulf of Mexico oil spill is yet another reason for yet another explosion of government's control of economic life. The spill supposedly makes it urgent to adopt a large tax increase in the form of cap-and-trade energy legislation, which also is climate legislation, the primary purpose of which is, or once was, to combat global warming, such as it is.

At any time, some economic conditions would be better than others, but the more certainty about conditions the better. Today investors and employers are certain that uncertainties are multiplying.

They are uncertain about when interest rates will rise, and by how much. They do not know how badly the economy will be burdened by the expiration, approximately 200 days from now, of the Bush tax cuts for high earners -- a.k.a. investors and employers. They know the costs of Obamacare will be higher than was advertised, but not how much higher. They do not know the potential costs of cap-and-trade and other energy policies. They do not know whether "card check" -- abolition of the right of secret-ballot elections in unionization decisions -- will pass, or how much the economy will be injured by making unions more muscular. They do not know how the functioning of the financial sector will be altered and impeded by the many new regulatory rules and agencies created by the financial reform legislation. The economy has become dependent on government stimulation of demand, and no one knows what will happen as the stimulus spending wanes.

Uncertainty is a consequence of hyperkinetic government, which is a consequence of the governmental confidence that is a consequence of progressivism. The premise of progressivism is that all will be well if enough power is concentrated in Washington, and enough Washington power is concentrated in the executive branch, and enough really clever experts are concentrated in the executive branch. This is why the government's perceived impotence concerning the gulf oil spill is subversive of the Obama administration's master narrative.

Obama is the first president whose presidential campaign was his qualification for the office he sought. He almost said so on Sept. 1, 2008, as a large hurricane made landfall on the Gulf Coast. Megan McArdle of the Atlantic has resurrected Obama's answer when he was asked whether could handle such a crisis.

Using perhaps the royal plural -- a harbinger of grandiosity to come -- Obama cited the size, cost and complexity of his campaign: "Our ability to manage large systems and to execute, I think, has been made clear over the last couple of years," and "indicates the degree to which we can provide the kinds of support and good service that the American people expect."

Progressives generally, and Obama especially, encourage expectations as large as the 1,428-page (cap-and-trade), 1,566-page (financial reform) and 2,409-page (health care) bills they churn out as "comprehensive" solutions to this and that. For a proper progressive, anything short of a "comprehensive" solution to, say, the problem of illegal immigration is unworthy of consideration. For today's progressive president, the prospect of a jobless recovery is a comprehensive nightmare.

Obama Incompetence and blame

*Never thought I'd see the day. The media is turning on Obama. And nowhere is it more stunningly evident than in this astounding article by Rolling Stone on the Gulf oil spill. The Obama administration has been loudly declaring that the spill is all Bush's fault and that the White House is adequately covering the ecological disaster. Rolling Stone, however, isn't buying any of it. As their devastating article makes clear, Obama is fully to blame for what has gone wrong.

It was Obama - not Bush - who authorized BP to begin drilling in the Gulf. And it was Obama - not Bush - who refused to clean up the Minerals Management Service ("MMS") which oversees oil drilling in America. Long before Obama took office, the MMS had been revealed as massively corrupt. Instead of policing oil companies, MMS had instead allowed the companies to do that themselves (amazingly, the companies were allowed to write the 'investigation' reports in pencil, whereupon MMS would simply copy over it in ink). In exchange for this, MMS officials were given cash, drugs and sex - and oil companies like BP were allowed to drill without proper safety precautions.

Amid great fanfare, Obama appointed Ken Salazar as Interior Secretary to clean up this corruption. Salazar's orders were explicit - force the offshore oil companies to adhere to proper safety standards and clean up MMS. Unfortunately, Salazar did neither. As the article reveals in devastating detail, Salazar not only allowed the oil companies to continue ignoring safety standards, he even increased the amount of offshore drilling to higher levels than any previous administration. As for MSS? Salazar made only token 'cleanup' of the agency; corrupt individuals were allowed to keep their jobs and, sadly, continue the lax oversight of the past. Result? A Gulf oil spill which now is on track to becoming this nation's worst ecological disaster ever.

The bitter irony is that Obama allowed this deadly offshore drilling in order to help the environment. Obama, it turns out, was desperate to pass his 'Cap & Trade' environmental bill in the next few months; however, he knew he couldn't do it unless he had the oil companies on board. Ergo, he made a Faustian deal with them - if he would allow them to drill offshore, they would not oppose his 'Cap & Trade' bill. (And we can all see how well that turned out.)

What amazes me, however, about Rolling Stone's article is not that it covers all this in extreme detail (8 pages but worth the read) but that it blasts Obama for his role in it. Rolling Stone's anger at Obama is evident in every page - which is truly surprising; up until now, the magazine has been one of Obama's most fervent admirers. That admiration, however, has now officially ground to a halt. Folks, it's official. The media is finally admitting that the Emperor has no clothes.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/111965?RS_show_page=0

Like the attacks by Al Qaeda, the disaster in the Gulf was preceded by ample warnings – yet the administration had ignored them. Instead of cracking down on MMS, as he had vowed to do even before taking office, Obama left in place many of the top officials who oversaw the agency's culture of corruption. He permitted it to rubber-stamp dangerous drilling operations by BP – a firm with the worst safety record of any oil company – with virtually no environmental safeguards, using industry-friendly regulations drafted during the Bush years. He calibrated his response to the Gulf spill based on flawed and misleading estimates from BP – and then deployed his top aides to lowball the flow rate at a laughable 5,000 barrels a day, long after the best science made clear this catastrophe would eclipse the Exxon Valdez.

-----
It's tempting to believe that the Gulf spill, like so many disasters inherited by Obama, was the fault of the Texas oilman who preceded him in office. But, though George W. Bush paved the way for the catastrophe, it was Obama who gave BP the green light to drill. "Bush owns eight years of the mess," says Rep. Darrell Issa, a Republican from California. "But after more than a year on the job, Salazar owns it too."

**American Thinker

June 10, 2010
Options to plug the BP oil spill available, but Obama ignores them
Tom Rowan


Consider;
-Natural oil eating bacteria was successfully used to clean up the ocean and shores after the Exxon Valdez accident. To date, the company which produces up to 200,000 gallons a day of the oil eating bacteria has not had their phone calls returned by Obama's White House or BP.

-Kevin Costner has a small fleet of oil cleaning centrifuges at the ready. This device actually recovers lost oil. Again, Obama's White House is dithering and BP will not return Costner's appeals. Costner testified in front of Congress that he was ready to help on day one of the spill over 50 days ago.

-The Dutch government offered to help with the spill on day one. Obama and BP told them "no thanks" over 50 days ago. The Dutch have fleets of oil recovery barges and sand berm protection floats at the ready. Over 50 days of dithering.

-BP's first attempted fix was to drop a 4 story tall steel & concrete box on the leak. The siphon on the top of the box froze and would not take up the oil. Okay...so??? How bout leaving the damn 4 story concrete box on top of the leaking pipes?

-A 1920 maritime law prevents the US Navy from deploying any assistance to the scene. Obama could wave this relic law of the sea and use the Navy's expertise in deep waters. Obama will not waive the law. Why not? If Ted Kennedy can call in the US Navy to find JFK Jr's downed airplane, how come Obama cannot call in the Navy? What is stopping him?

-Governor Jindal has been begging Obama for supplies to shield his state's beaches. Over 50 days after the request Obama is still dithering.

-Obama declared a State of Emergency for the non-existent threat of Swine Flu. Governor Jindal declared a State of Emergency...how come Obama has not?

These are but a few of the many things Obama could be doing. Instead, he is looking for someone's "ass to kick" and feigning anger.

During the Iraq War, President Bush sent in Red Adair's oil capping company into Kuwait. Red Adair's private company capped 628 sabotaged, booby-trapped, and blown up burning rigs in less than 9 months.

Obama has capped exactly 0 oil wells in almost 2 months.

How's that government boot on the throat of BP working out for ya?




Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/06/options_to_plug_the_bp_oil_spi.html at June 10, 2010 - 10:39:43 AM CDT


***EPA and the “National Contingency Plan”
Did any of you know that the US supposedly has a National Contingency Plan for dealing with very large oil spills? And that EPA has legal responsibility for maintaining readiness for such an eventuality? Who knew? I’ve watched hours of coverage and this hasn’t been mentioned anywhere.

The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan Act was signed into law in 1994 (superceding previous legislation that went back to the 1969 Torrey Canyon oil spill.) Laws and regulations are collated here. The EPA has an online book describing the National Continency Plan. See for example http://www.epa.gov/oem/docs/oil/edu/oilspill_book/chap7.pdf (change the number to get other chapters.)
The EPA manual says:

WHEN A MAJOR oil spill occurs in the United States, coordinated teams of local, state, and national personnel are called upon to help contain the spill, clean it up, and ensure that damage to human health and the environment is minimized. Without careful planning and clear organization, efforts to deal with large oil spills could be slow, ineffective, and potentially harmful to response personnel and the environment. In the United States, the system for organizing responses to major oil spills is called the National Response System.

One of the principles of the National Contingency Plan is that an effective and prompt response is a national priority. The chair and vice-chair of the National Response Team are to come from EPA and the Coast Guard. The EPA manual says:

AFTER THE PLAN is developed, it is important to test it to see if it works as anticipated. Testing usually takes the form of an exercise or drill to practice responding to a spill.

Also, in a first reading, the presumption of the legislation is that dealing with major problems is a national interest and the government will take charge. The idea behind the plan is that there will be national readiness to deal with oil spills and that EPA will lead the national readiness. Section 3.1.1 (h) states:

Direct planning and preparedness responsibilities of NRT [national Response team] include: (1) Maintaining national preparedness to respond to a major discharge of oil that is beyond regional capabilities.

MMS, who have borne the brunt of criticism of government activities, play little to no role in the National Contingency Plan – based on my initial reading – and definitely a very minor role relative to EPA. MMS does not appear to be a member of the National Response Team (though 300.175 notes that MMS may have useful information and can be called on through the Dept of Interior representative).

I’ve noticed EPA involvement in worrying about dispersant toxicity, but otherwise EPA seems to have been surprisingly invisible given the prominent role assigned to them in the National Contingency Plan.

I’ve only browsed the legislation and manuals and it’s not an area about which I speak authoritatively. I invite readers to look through the Act, regulations and manuals and comment on the degree to which EPA and other agencies have met their statutory obligations. Please do so in relatively technical terms and avoid the temptation to hyperventilate.






* Thanks Carolyn
** and *** Thanks Jack W.

Anatomy of a Failing President

A friend of a friend(thanks, Gid and Carolyn) just sent me the article below from 'American Thinker'. In well spoken language, the article explains that the cause of Obama's failure as an American President is because Obama cannot understand this nation or its people. And the reason he can't understand Americans is because Obama isn't one himself.

What Obama specifically doesn't understand are the three basic beliefs - political, moral and spiritual - which comprise the makeup of an American citizen. The reason he doesn't understand these beliefs is because none of them have ever had a place in his life.

For instance, America's political belief is that of democracy. Obama, however, believes in the enemy of democracy - Marxism and the terrorist credo of Saul Alinsky, etc.

Secondly, America is a deeply moral nation that values human life and adheres to a strict moral code. Obama, however, voted three times to prevent aid to babies who'd survived late term abortions; plus he chose as a political mentor a Weatherman terrorist (Bill Ayers) who complained he didn't get to kill more Americans. As for moral codes are concerned, Obama's earliest role model in Hawaii was a Marxist child molester (Frank Marshall Davis) whose pornographic autobiography ("Sex Rebel Black") bragged of sadomasochism and sleeping with a 13 year old.

Lastly, America is an intensely Christian nation; Obama is not and never was a Christian. He merely practiced the facade of being one by attending church in Chicago. It wasn't, however, because he'd discovered Christ but because he'd discovered political reality - voters in Chicago wouldn't elect someone who wasn't a church-goer. It is telling that the church Obama chose was one whose racist pastor (Rev. Wright) screamed that America invented AIDS in order to kill the black man and that America deserved 9/11 because it was our 'chickens coming home to roost'. It is also telling that Obama's first act directly after being elected President was to abandon church entirely; from that time forward he has not stepped foot inside a church unless forced to for political purposes (attend funerals, give a campaign speech, etc.).

Yes, the article below is quite accurate in pointing out Obama's lack of love for this nation and its beliefs. But the article misses one thing - he isn't the only one. America's news media shares that same hatred. From the publisher (Pinch Sulzberger) of the NY Times who infamously boasted that if an American soldier met a Viet Cong, Pinch hoped the American would die; to Vanity Fair magazine's publishers who've never met a Marxist they didn't love or a Christian they didn't hate; to AP who refuses to print a single story praising American soldiers but will publish the lies of Hamas and the PLO in a heartbeat (even after those Photo-shopped lies are exposed), etc., the American media has almost completely embraced the same hatred of Americans and American beliefs as Obama. It is true Schadenfreude watching the media fail as disastrously as Obama - even more so when it is clear that neither has a clue why this is happening to them. (Apparently what neither Obama and the media have figured out is that when you abandon a country, you also abandon the understanding of it.)

Of course, I could explain it to both of them. But I'll leave that 'explanation' until Nov. 2, 2010. In the meantime, anyone for a cup of tea?





Anatomy of a Failing President....
An article from American Thinker by Geoffrey P. Hunt
The following is an interesting article. You might ask how long Dr. Hunt can remain at NIH once the White House gets wind of this article.
Dr. Hunt is a social and cultural anthropologist. He has had nearly 30 years experience in planning, conducting, and managing research in the field of youth studies, and drug and alcohol research. Currently Dr. Hunt is a Senior Research Scientist at the Institute for Scientific Analysis and the Principal Investigator on three National Institutes on Health projects. He is also a writer for American Thinker.
____________________________________________________
An article from American Thinker by Geoffrey P. Hunt
Anatomy of a Failing Presidency
Barack Obama is on track to have the most spectacularly failed presidency since Woodrow Wilson. In the modern era, we've seen several failed presidencies--led by Jimmy Carter and LBJ. Failed presidents have one strong common trait-- they are repudiated, in the vernacular, spat out. Of course, LBJ wisely took the exit ramp early, avoiding a shove into oncoming traffic by his own party. Richard Nixon indeed resigned in disgrace, yet his reputation as a statesman has been partially restored by his triumphant overture to China 20.
But, Barack Obama is failing. Failing big. Failing fast. And failing everywhere: foreign policy, domestic initiatives, and most importantly, in forging connections with the American people. The incomparable Dorothy Rabinowitz in the Wall Street Journal put her finger on it: He is failing because he has no understanding of the American people, and may indeed loathe them. Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard says he is failing because he has lost control of his message, and is overexposed. Clarice Feldman of American Thinker produced a dispositive commentary showing that Obama is failing because fundamentally he is neither smart nor articulate; his intellectual dishonesty is conspicuous by its audacity and lack of shame.
But, there is something more seriously wrong: How could a new president riding in on a wave of unprecedented promise and goodwill have forfeited his tenure and become a lame duck in six months? His poll ratings are in free fall. In generic balloting, the Republicans have now seized a five point advantage. This truly is unbelievable. What's going on?
No narrative. Obama doesn't have a narrative. No, not a narrative about himself. He has a self-narrative, much of it fabricated, cleverly disguised or written by someone else. But this self-narrative is isolated and doesn't connect with us. He doesn't have an American narrative that draws upon the rest of us. All successful presidents have a narrative about the American character that intersects with their own where they display a command of history and reveal an authenticity at the core of their personality that resonates in a positive endearing way with the majority of Americans. We admire those presidents whose narratives not only touch our own, but who seem stronger, wiser, and smarter than we are. Presidents we admire are aspirational peers, even those whose politics don't align exactly with our own: Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Harry Truman, Ike, and Reagan.
But not this president. It's not so much that he's a phony, knows nothing about economics, and is historically illiterate and woefully small minded for the size of the task--all contributory of course. It's that he's not one of us. And whatever he is, his profile is fuzzy and devoid of content, like a cardboard cutout made from delaminated corrugated paper. Moreover, he doesn't command our respect and is unable to appeal to our own common sense. His notions of right and wrong are repugnant and how things work just don't add up. They are not existential. His descriptions of the world we live in don't make sense and don't correspond with our experience.
In the meantime, while we've been struggling to take a measurement of this man, he's dissed just about every one of us--financiers, energy producers, banks, insurance executives, police officers, doctors, nurses, hospital administrators, post office workers, and anybody else who has a non-green job. Expect Obama to lament at his last press conference in 2012: "For those of you I offended, I apologize. For those of you who were not offended, you just didn't give me enough time; if only I'd had a second term, I could have offended you too."
Mercifully, the Founders at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 devised a useful remedy for such a desperate state--staggered terms for both houses of the legislature and the executive. An equally abominable Congress can get voted out next year. With a new Congress, there's always hope of legislative gridlock until we vote for president again two short years after that.
Yes, small presidents do fail, Barack Obama among them. The coyotes howl but the wagon train keeps rolling along.

The Religion of "Peace" Strikes Again, Another Coincidence

The killing of 500 Christians by the soldiers of Allah in a three-hour orgy of machete chopping recently took place in Nigeria.

Oh, but, of course, this is just a coincidence and the reports that the bravest of good Muslims carrying out the commands of Mohammad were screaming the usual "Allah Akhbar" does not mean that the murder of innocent unbelievers was a violent act, although it is demanded of the good Muslim and condoned by the press and Islamic apologists and the just plain ignorant! Ban Ki-Moon, U.N. Fraud In Charge called for "restraint", which sounds seriously like he is calling for nothing to be done to the murdering scum Jihadists! I am surprised that he didn't issue an order to STFU to the victims families. I can almost hear him now "You are lucky you weren't sexually tortured like the unbelievers in Mumbai, so STFU and thank Allah (PPBUH)that your _____________________(fill in the blank: Mother, Father, Son, Daughter, Husband, Wife, Sister, Brother, etc.) was only hacked to death! Don't you know this is the 10,999th instance of Islamists:
1) Misunderstanding the Qur'an and the word of Mohammad;
2) A small group of criminals hijacking the religion;
3) A false media report;
4) An unjust and untrue story, so what if hundreds of people reported it and that there are photographs - photographs can be altered, but the Islamists don't alter their photographs, they only accuse others of doing that;
5) A report by Islamophobes;
6) It was sectarian violence
6) The unbelievers deserved to die (yes, even the children or as the wonderful Muslim Students from San Francisco State University are fond of screaming at street rallies "WE WANT YOU TO WATCH US AS WE COVER YOUR CHILDREN IN THEIR OWN BLOOD";and Yes, I heard this with my own ears and I heard the applause and approval of the American useful idiot tools, leftists, liberal goons and Berkely Marxists who believe THEIR children will be immune ...oh wait! I forgot, they chose to murder/abort their own children - even more morally correct in their own twisted logic, than having them, raising them and then use them as Human Shields, which they most likely believe is their RIGHT!)

One local paper said the gangs shouted Allah Akhbar (God is Great) before breaking into homes and setting them alight in the early hours of Sunday. Churches were among the buildings that were burned down. (I guess they didn't have time to desecrate the Christian Graveyards, or maybe no one noticed yet........this is a typical M.O. of the Islamic Jihadist bags of sour sheep S**T) (notice how they carried out their mission on the Christian day of worship) "First the Saturday People, then the Sunday People".

Furthermore, as a young Farsi teacher told me recently at an Islamic Center: "Islam was NOT spread by the sword and Jesus and Mohammad spread their religion and their word in the same manner. I bet you weren't aware of that either, eh?

Killing sprees after killing sprees by the murderers screaming "Allah Akhbar" are more believeable than the lies told to prospective converts and other useful idiots who take the word of someone who wants them destroyed. It's easier, apparently, Not to believe your own ears and eyes isn't it?

And what makes you apologists for Islam think this can't happen to you or your family???? As long as Obama, the undocumented Maxist in the White House coddles and gives millions of your tax dollars to terrorists ($900 million to HAMAS in the Stimulus Package and the recent Executive Order of Obama to give HAMAS an additional $20.3 Million (HB 1388)for Migration Assistance to Palestinian refugees and conflict victims" in Gaza - too bad many used their own children as human shields or they could have loaded up our schools with more children and forced bankruptcy even sooner than the incompetent and corrupt school officials have already accomplished}, YOUR FAMILY may be next! Wake Up!!

Islamists are hard at work destroying your children's future while you support those haters with your votes and your campaign contributions. If you aren't already terrorized you are brain dead..................oh, I'm sorry, I forgot....Muslims are perpetual victims and they hate living in the west, although many are quick to take welfare and interest free Fanny Mae Shariah Finance Mortgage loans............Naw, no, Obama and ACORN had nothing what-so-ever to do with THAT scam. It's just another coincidence.

Obama’s New OIC Envoy Defended Activist Who Aided Terrorist Group

If this latest Obama appointee and friend to Islamic terrorists isn't enough proof for you that something stinks in the White House and that you should be very very afraid that Obama himself is a terrorist plant in the highest office in the U.S., then you are BRAIN DEAD!!!

lOOK AT THIS STORY FROM CNS NEWS:

Obama’s New OIC Envoy Defended Activist Who Aided Terrorist Group
Monday, February 15, 2010
By Patrick Goodenough, International Editor


(Editor's note: This story was updated on Feb. 16, 2010.)

I agree with those IMPEACH OBAMA billboards that are popping up around the country! The man said in his own book that he would ALWAYS support the Muslims and it appears that he also meant that he will always support the Muslim Terrorists too!

First Obama will not allow anyone connected with the White House to call them "Terrorists", let alone, Islamic terrorists.....he and Janet Incompetano insists on calling Islamic acts of terrorism "Man-made diasters", then Obama giveS Islamic terrorists, the same constitutional rights as Americans in a court of law, he refuses to acknowledge that these POSs are enemies who are screaming that they hate America, Americans and that they want to and work toward destroying us! He closes Gitmo against the wishes of the majority of Americans and experts, then tries to not only resettle the war criminals in American communities, but Congress must pass a law to stop him from giving the war criminals welfare!!!! IMPEACH THIS IMPOSTER! THIS UNION ORGANIZER, NOBODY WITH STRONG MUSLIMS CONNECTIONS IN SAUDI ARABIA AND INDONESIA! I could go on and on about how he favors Muslims war criminals and Islamists over American security, but that would be repeating myself, as I've posted alot of information and facts on this POS in the WH. IMPECH THIS ISLAMIC TERRORIST SUPPORTER AND ENABLER......all the apologizing and bowing and arse kissing to these bums and their financiers has not lessened the threat of more Islamic terrorist attacks, quite the contrary, it has emboldened them, as our own so-called national security people have told us that a massive terrorist attack before July 2010 is a virtual certainity. IMPEACH OBAMA, HE CAN USE A LESSON IN HUMILITY!!!!

Terrorized by our own government while the Jihadists laugh their heads off

A fraud of a president who supports and defends Islamic terrorism and is himself either a Muslim or an apostate. A fraud of a President who in his own words said he will defend the Muslim always, which it is evident he is doing. A completely egotistical and pompous nobody of a union organizer and thug!

A totally incompetent bufoon as head of Homeland Insecurity, Janet Napalitano, appointed by Obama and furthering the cause of protecting those working to destroy us.

An Attorney General appointee of Obama, Eric Holder, worse even than Janet Napalitano and furthering the cause of protecting those working to destroy us.

The nigcompoops in Congress who approve Obama's failed and fraudulent attempts to kick start the economy that Obama and the congress helped to create: Reid, Pelosi, Franks, Kennedy, Stark, just to name a few of the suicidal elitists who call the voters they are supposed to represent, Nazis and terrorists!!! (excuse me while I vomit). VOTE THE BUMS OUT!!

Submitted legislation to disallow freed Gitmo prisoners from receiving welfare:

H.R. 2338 - No Welfare for Terrorists Act

Sponsor: Todd Tiahrt (R-4th/KS)
Committee: House Oversight and Government Reform

Bill Summary: To prohibit any alien formerly detained at the Department of Defense detention facility at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and brought into the United States from receiving any Federal, State, or local public benefit.

The Marandizing of war criminals. Obama offering several million dollars to any city or state who will hold the trail in their

The Flight 93 Memorial, which is supposed to be a memorial to the people murdered on 9/11/01, is instead a blantant and offensive memorial to the Islamic terrorists and the political system hiding behind religion that demanded their actions:

Many features of the chosen Flight 93 Memorial design are intolerable:

1. THE GIANT CRESCENT. The centerpiece of the original “Crescent of Embrace” design was a giant red Islamic shaped crescent. Every particle of this original crescent design remains completely intact in the so-called redesign, which only added a few irrelevant trees. The giant crescent is still there.

2. IT POINTS TO MECCA. The giant crescent points to Mecca. A crescent that Muslims face into to face Mecca is called a \"mihrab,\" and is the central feature around which every mosque is built. The Flight 93 Memorial is on track to become the world\'s largest mosque.

3. THE ISLAMIC SUNDIAL. The minaret-like Tower of Voices is a year-round accurate Islamic prayer-time sundial (one of many typical mosque features that are realized in the crescent design, all on the same epic scale as the half mile wide central crescent).

4. THE 44 BLOCKS. There are 44 glass blocks on the flight path, equaling the number of passengers, crew, AND terrorists.

Intentional or not, these features are entirely unacceptable. This travesty must stop and investigations must begin.
1) We the undersigned call on our state and federal legislators to undertake their own thorough and independent investigations of the Flight 93 Memorial design. The truth must come out.
2) We ask that the crescent design be scrapped entirely and that it be replaced with a new design that is not tainted by Islamic or terrorist memorializing symbolism.
3) We demand a fitting and proper memorial that HONORS the brave men and women of Flight 93.


Call for Congressional investigation of Islamic symbolism in the Flight 93 memorial

SIGN THE PETITION

Yes Al Qaeda, Osama, the Saudi King and the Hilter of Iran and their dirty devilish minions are having a good laugh at the expense of our security and probably thanking Allah that they have been successful in placing one of their own in the White House.

God help us!

Jon Stewart Rips Obama

You know things are getting bad when a leftist comic like Jon Stewart sneers at Obama for demanding TWO teleprompters, plus a podium with the Presidential Seal, before Obama felt brave enough to face --- SIXTH GRADERS! (Good Lord, Republicans must reduce Obama to wearing Depends.)

http://videos.mediaite.com/video/Even-Jon-Stewart-Goes-After-Obama

Watch Stewart's video and hear him mock Obama. It's hilarious.

Or I should say, it's hilarious until you realize that a video showing our Commander in Chief scared of a roomful of kids is the same video being watched by Al Qaida. (Yeah, that's not so funny.)



Thanks Carolyn :-)

Rush talks to Obama

Rush has a heart to heart with Obama - and Mr. Big Ears is NOT going to like it!

------------

RUSH: I penned a message to Obama that I would like to deliver now. Because Mr. Obama, I think it's time we had a heart to heart talk. Let me be the father that you never had or never really knew, because I think you need some guidance. It's time to man up. It's time to grow up. That speech last night was an embarrassment. You couldn't focus, you lashed out in all directions, you refused to accept responsibility for your own actions, and you were angry.

And he was, folks! He was mad. Being president is a big job. It's a big responsibility. You wanted the position, Barack. You campaigned for it. You told the public to trust you with it, and they elected you -- and you're now president of the greatest country mankind has ever known, and yet you act like this was all coming to you, like you deserve it, that you're better than the people you are supposed to serve and that you have no tolerance for debate or dissent. That's not the way it works as president, Barack. We have a Constitution, we have checks and balances, we have separation of powers, we have states -- and most of all, we have the people. You don't get to impose your programs and policies on the nation and the people without our consent.

This is a representative republic, not a banana republic, and let me remind you: Karl Marx and Saul Alinsky are not our Founding Fathers. This is a nation built on individuality, built on liberty, free markets, and faith. Yet you, Barack, demand fidelity to a different belief system: A system that crushes individual initiative and free will. The president does not berate Supreme Court justices who are guests of the Congress and who have no ability to respond to your attacks. You've made such a mess of things, Barack, and it's time to stop deluding yourself. It's time to stop blaming others. You are delusional. You are delirious. It's time for you to assume the responsibilities of a president rather than pretending to be one.

You've driven the nation's debt over the edge. It is your responsibility to fix it now. Otherwise, our young people will have no future. You were wrong to grant terrorists constitutional rights. Even the libs in New York don't want the trial there now! You, Mr. President, are endangering the security of this nation. Now fix it! Reverse course, and end the terrorists -- all of them -- back to Guantanamo Bay, where they belong. You are wrong to nationalize one industry after another from automobiles to banks. You are destroying competition and jobs. You need to stop what you were doing before million of more families go broke from your misguided policies. It's not too late to stop this. I know you're not going to stop it because last night you said you don't quit, and I know what you mean.

You're gonna keep plugging for the same agenda, which is going to destroy this country even more -- which makes me think, Barack, that's your objective. You know, Barack, unlike most presidents you're dealing with a Congress that has super majorities in both houses, fellow Democrats. It amazes me that with all the talk about your ability to persuade and communicate, that you can't even hold your own party members together anymore. Is that Bush's fault, too? Is it is fault of the banks and the insurance companies and the lobbyists that you can't keep your own Democrat Party unified -- or is it a problem with your leadership, Barack, or lack of leadership? It's the latter, Mr. President. I'll tell you, you are not a leader. You are an agitator and an organizer, and a process guy, but you are not a leader. It is you who are doing something wrong.

The people in Virginia don't like it. The people in New Jersey don't like it. The people in Massachusetts don't like it. The people in Massachusetts and all over the country have the ability to inform themselves outside of your sycophant press corps, and they are doing so. Members of your own governing majority don't like what you are doing. I mean, this calls for some self-reflection and some circumspection. Has it occurred to you, Mr. President, even once that you're not as cool as you think you are? Has it occurred to you that you are screwing up? And if it has, are you happy about that? Has it occurred to you that you have a great deal to learn and that you need to take your own measure, or are you Mr. Perfect? Are you God-sent?

Are you The One that you've been waiting for? See, I have a little concern there may be a psychological issue at play here. I don't say this to demean you, Barack. I say it because I'm concerned. I mean, Tom Daschle was always "concerned" and I like the word. I'm concerned. You seem to have a whole lot of enemies, at least in your own mind. A partial list would include Fox News, insurance companies, banks, oil companies, the "special interests," the Supreme Court, Republicans, talk show hosts, executives, anyone or any business that earns over $250,000 a year, mortgage companies, credit card companies -- and the list goes on and on and on. You have the longest enemies list of anybody I've ever known.

These people are not your enemies, though, Barack. They are Americans. They are part of this country. They are part of what makes the nation work. You are not. You have nothing to do, and have had nothing to do, with this nation's greatness. You can't lay claim to greatness on any scale, not even rhetorical. But you have no direct relationship to the greatness of this country. You are damaging the possibility of further greatness. Nevertheless, like a bully, you continue to threaten all of these people. The Supreme Court, Big Oil, Big Pharmaceutical, Big Retail, talk show hosts, Fox News, the list goes on. You threaten anybody who does not agree with you. You try to intimidate them. You smear them. Your sycophantic media goes right along and carries your water. But this is not what presidents do.

You're supposed to lead not by threatening people but by encouraging them, by embracing them, by thanking them, by inspiring them. Most of all you don't seem to appreciate the magnificence of this nation! I know you don't. The way you've been educated about this country it's painfully obvious. You think this country is guilty, period. Guilty and unjust. You seem to think this country needs to be torn down so you can rebuild it. But you were elected to be president, not some kind of dictator. You must operate within the confines of the Constitution. You are not bigger than the law, and you are not bigger than the people. You were elected to serve the people, not dictate to them. Anyway, I'm sure this little lecture will not do you much good, particularly given the spectacle of your speech last night. You really are full of yourself. But I truly hope that this little talk does do you some good down the way, because something is going to have to change in you or we are doomed for at least the next three years.




Thanks Carolyn

Lt. Col Allen West on Islamic Jihad and our Government's Ignorance

Once at the site, scroll down for the videos on Islamic Jihad

Prove it Mister! What's the problem?

Pelosi and White House Thugs PROVE that they Hate Americans

Pissing on our heads and calling it rain is still not enough deceit for these thugs and Americaphobes. Click HERE to read several stories about what they think of the average American:



1) Pelosi: Town hall protesters
'simply un-American'



2)White House website condemns,
ridicules health care objections



3) Scripted protests?
Polls say otherwise



4) Is Obama building internment
camps for dissidents?



5) Under fire on health care,
Democrats backtrack



6) Leftist fascists want
white babies aborted

Senator DeMint Speaks Out Against Obama's Take Over of Health Care