Jihadist Materials in American Mosques

Jihadist Materials in American Mosques Have You Signed the Petition Calling For Congressional Hearings?

It is now public knowledge that there are extremist materials that have been and are being distributed in mosques in America, materials that advocate jihad against America and “unbelievers,” incite terror and violence, and call for the abolition of our constitutional form of government.

A study of 100 American mosques earlier this year uncovered such materials in 75 of those mosques. It’s likely such materials are in a mosque near you!

Isn’t it time our elected representatives did something about this?

Last week we announced the most important grassroots project we have ever undertaken, a national petition drive calling on Congress to conduct hearings to examine materials found in American mosques that advocate jihad, terror and the abolition of our constitutional form of government.

WHY?
To determine if these materials violate federal statutes pertaining to tax-exempt organizations, terrorism, and sedition and insurrection.

Nearly 5,000 people have already signed the petition – a good start.
If you have, thank you!

If you have forwarded the petition to others, thank you!

If you haven’t, please don’t delay. Please sign the petition today. It takes only a few minutes to read and add your name to the petition.

WHY IS THIS SO IMPORTANT?
The very existence of this campaign will raise awareness among the American people of the extremist materials being distributed in mosques.

The more names that are added, the more pressure we’ll be able to place on Congress. It will demonstrate to Congress that the American people are very concerned about the threat of Islamofascism.

So, if you haven’t yet signed the petition, please sign it today!

THANK YOU

ACTION ALERT: US to help Radical Saudi's develop nuclear technology

Today the United American Committee is alerting its members to an issue at hand that the UAC finds utterly disgusting, troubling, and gravely dangerous.

The United States government has agreed to help the radical kingdom called Saudi Arabia develop nuclear technology for power and other "peaceful" purposes. See the news article here: http://voanews.com/english/2008-05-16-voa23.cfm

The UAC wishes to remind everyone of an article from 2003: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/sep/18/nuclear.saudiarabia describing the Saudi kingdom's intense desire to develop a nuclear bomb.

Due to overwhelming evidence and hard facts, the UAC firmly believes that the Saudi kingdom is the chief exporter of terrorism and extremism in the world.

The kingdom spend billions of dollars on exporting their extremist ideology through the construction of radical mosques and madrassas throughout the world, as well as direct support to terror support in the form of money to the families of suicide bombers, as well as direct contributions to charities in the United States who believe in establishing Islamic law in America. The kingdom also spends billions of dollars supporting lobbying activities to influence our government officials.

We urge every American and activist within the anti-jihad resistance to contact their congressman and senators to let your opinion be known.



Find your congressman: https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml


Find your senator: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

ACT! for America Issues & Legislation

ISSUES
Following is a partial listing of issues ACT! for America is concerned about.

FBI discrimination against Christians and Jews who apply to be Arabic translators.

The existence of Islamic paramilitary camps operating on American soil.

Radical Muslims posing as "refugees" and gaining entrance to the United States under the Humanitarian Refugee Act.

The need for First Amendment protection for journalists who report on militant Islamic activities.

Increasing pro-Islamist and anti-American and anti-Israeli bias in high school and college courses and textbooks.

The growing number of Madrassas (Islamic schools) proliferating in the United States, schools that frequently teach hatred of Christians, Jews, Americans, and non-Muslims.

Anti-American, anti-Christian and anti-Jewish hate speech in mosques in America.

Islamic radicals posing as Hispanic immigrants to enter the United States across our southern border.

Islamic radicals teaming up with illegal immigrant gangs in illicit activities, such as drug smuggling, to provide funding for terrorist organizations.

Iran's nuclear weapons program.

Islamic charities that serve as conduits for funding of Islamic terrorist organizations.

The existence of terrorist sleeper cells in the U.S.

The need to reduce American dependence on Middle Eastern oil.

Defeating al-Qaeda in Iraq.

Purveyors of political correctnesss: How the political Left in America denies, apologizes for, or blames America for the rise in Islamic extremism and terrorism.


LEGISLATION
The "John Doe" Bill With the help of our members, earlier in 2007 Congress passed the "John Doe" bill, introduced by New Mexico Congressman Steve Pearce, which provides protection from lawsuits for individuals who report what they reasonably suspect is potential terrorist activity.

The catalyst for the bill was a lawsuit filed by the so-called "flying Imams," a group of Islamic clerics who were removed from a US Airways flight in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Imams engaged in suspicious behavior, including changing seats on the flight, asking for seat belt extenders when they didn't need them, and making loud threats against America. The Imams subsequently filed a lawsuit that included unnamed "John Doe's," the people who reported the suspicious behavior.

This lawsuit illustrates a growing trend by Muslims and Muslim organizations to use legal action (litagation jihad) to intimidate people from speaking out against Islamic extremism.

More on Obama's ties to Islamic Terrorists

One of my favorite Blogs......a MUST READ daily!

http://mjwilsonblog.blogspot.com/

Senator Barack Obama is a citizen of Kenya

Senator Barack Obama is a citizen of Kenya


Thu Feb 08,2007 - NEWS FROM:ANDY MARTIN, Executive editor

ATTENTION: ASSIGNMENT/DAYBOOK EDITORS

ANNOUNCEMENT OF BLOCKBUSTER CHICAGO NEWS CONFERENCE DISCLOSING THAT UNDER KENYAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, BARACK OBAMA IS A KENYAN CITIZEN:

(CHICAGO)(February 8, 2007) Chicago-based Internet journalist, broadcaster and critic Andy Martin will hold a news conference Friday, February 9th at 11:00 A.M. to announce that U. S. Senator Barack Obama is a citizen of Kenya and became a citizen of Kenya under the Independence Constitution of Kenya in 1963. Obama has never renounced his Kenyan citizenship. He is also a U. S. Citizen.

“For our ‘Obama Week’ leading up to Barry O’s announcement on Saturday that he feels qualified to lead the free world, ContrarianCommentary.com unleashed a worldwide team of constitutional law experts to delve into Kenyan law and the question of Obama’s citizenship. They were also participating in our CIA-style psychological profile of Obama that will be released Saturday in Chicago. And what we discovered was amazing, a political blockbuster,” says Executive Editor Andy Martin.

“Under the Independence Constitution of Kenya, Obama became a Kenyan citizen on December 12, 1963. He has never renounced his Kenyan citizenship. On his senate web site, Obama tap dances around his own dual nationality when discussing his father. Obama obviously knows, because his father told him, that he also held/holds Kenyan nationality.

“Once again, we find Barry O concealing fascinating information about his identity. There is nothing unusual about dual nationality. Indeed, ancient Roman Law doctrines of jus sanguini and jus soli come into play, because both Kenya and the U. S. recognize dual nationality. Once again, the issue is not ‘legality.’ The issue is the cover-up; Obama’s concealment of his own identity. From us, and most of all from himself.

“I find it amusing that Channel 2 in Chicago is (Thursday night) running a series on ‘Do we know the real Barack Obama?’ when they don’t really know, because 2’s news is produced by the same old hacks that take spoon-feeding from Obama & Co.

“Friday we will blow Obama out of the water with disclosure of his lifelong deceit and concealment. Obama’s attempts to portray his father as an ignorant ‘goat herd,’ moreover, were part of his attempts at ‘identity theft’ against his own father, designed to create an imaginary picture of Barack Sr. It is inconceivable that Obama’s father was ignorant of Kenyan law, since he served as a government official and held a Ph.D. from Harvard. And it is inconceivable that Obama Sr. never told his son that he was a Kenyan national. Why has ‘junior’ hidden this information for decades?” Martin will demand Friday.

“The American people, when deciding who to support for president, have a right to know if their ‘president’ is also a citizen of Kenya and owes dual loyalty to Kenya because he has never renounced his Kenyan citizenship.

“Further, I defy Obama or any of his flacks to defeat or deny the historical constitutional facts on which our blockbuster disclosures are based. We have nailed Barry O with his own hidden truths once again.”

NEWS CONFERENCE DETAILS:

WHO: Internet journalist/editor Andy Martin

WHERE: Southeast corner of Wabash and Huron Streets,
Chicago, (St. James Cathedral)

WHEN: Friday, February 9, 2007 11:00 A.M.

WHAT: Andy Martin will announce that under Kenyan law Barack
Obama is a citizen of Kenya and has never renounced
his Kenyan citizenship

MEDIA
CONTACT: (312) 440-4124

WEBSITE: ContrarianCommentary.com

E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com
------------------------------------------
Chicago-based Internet journalist, broadcaster and critic Andy Martin is the Executive Editor and publisher of ContrarianCommentary.com. © Copyright by Andy Martin 2007. Martin covers national and world politics with forty years of personal experience. Columns also posted at politicalgateway.com; ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; contrariancommentary.wordpress.com. Comments? E-mail: AndyMart20@aol.com. Media contact: (866) 706-2639.

Demand to Know - Did Obama Hussein attend TERRORIST Training Camp in Pakistan?

The NY Times has an article about Bush's comments about appeasing terrorists and the liberal appologist are mad because it offended Obama. There is a rumor the Clintons may have evidence that Obama met with, and may have trained with, terrorists while he was in Pakistan and that he needs to give a full accounting of his time while he was there.

Maybe the reason Mr. Obama took it so personally is because of rumors that the Clinton campaign may have evidence he met with terrorists, and may have even trained with them, while he was in Pakistan during college.

Perhaps this is also the reason he states in his book "Audacity of Hope," pg. 261, "if the political winds turn ugly, I will stand with the Muslims," why Obama has also stated "Nobody is suffering more than the Palestinian people", why one of his aides already met with Hamas, and why Obama is the only candidate that Hamas has ever endorsed for President.

Demand that Barry Hussein O disclose what he was doing and who he met with while he was in Pakistan!!!!


I'm asking everyone to go to the site and post a comment demanding that Obama disclose what he did and who he associated with while he was in Pakistan.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/15/blogtalk-bush-appeasement-uproar/



Original post from MJMiller, Tweaked by me thank you very much.

"Moderate" Muslims and what Islam teaches about "Kafirs"

Kafir Dreams, By Jamie Glazov, FrontPageMagazine.com 5/7/2008

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Bill Warner, the director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) and spokesman for PoliticalIslam.com.

FP: Bill Warner, welcome to Frontpage Interview.
Warner: Thank you Jamie.

FP: I’d like to talk to you today about how many of the names, words and phrases we use about Islam are muddled and incorrect. Many non-Muslims create certain terms about Islam to try to make the world seem safer and to feel good about themselves. But many of these terms have no actual basis in Islamic theology or culture and have no real meaning in an Islamic context.
I think the best way to start this discussion is to begin with the term “moderate Muslim."

Warner: “Moderate Muslim” is a perfect example of the muddle and incorrect terminology that kafirs (unbelievers) use.
This term is intended to describe a Muslim who doesn’t seem dangerous or advocate violence. But “moderate Muslim” is a non-Muslim name, one that kafirs made up. The doctrine of Islam does talk about the different kinds of Muslims. The measure of a Muslim is the Koran and the Sunna. Anyone who follows these teachings is a moderate Muslim, by definition. Islamic doctrine defines what is moderate and not moderate. Since we are dealing with Islam, we need to know that the doctrine is dualistic. Islam can have two doctrines about any issue. This follows from the Koran. The early Koran, which was written in Mecca is generally religious. The Koran written in Medina is very political and includes jihad. The two Korans are not only very different, but they also contradict each other in major ways.

So we have the possibility of two kinds of moderate Muslims, since we have two doctrines. Osama bin Laden is a moderate Muslim, who follows the Koran of Medina, the Koran of jihad. Kafirs call him an extremist or radical Muslim. Actually, Osama obeys the Koran of Medina and the Sunna of Mohammed, so he is a moderate, pious Medinan Muslim.

The jihadists on September 11, 2001 were all moderate Medinan Muslims. They were not extremists or radicals.
The other kind of moderate Muslim follows the Koran of Mecca and he is more generally what kafirs mean when they say “moderate Muslim.” But how moderate is a Meccan Muslim? A moderate Muslim thinks that you are a kafir, but he isn’t violent, just antagonistic.

FP: So tell us exactly what “kafir” means. We take it to mean unbeliever but I presume it is more complicated than that.

Warner: The usual translation of this Arabic word is unbeliever, but unbeliever is only a very small part of its meaning. It is the Koran that defines the word “kafir” and it says the most terrible things can happen to them. The Koranic doctrine about kafirs says they are hated and are Satan’s friends. Kafirs can be robbed, killed, tortured, raped, mocked, cursed, condemned and plotted against. The Koran does not have one good thing to say about kafirs. (There are some psuedo-good words, but more about them later.)

For over the last 1400 years, 270 million kafirs have died as a result of the political doctrine of Islam. It is the biggest single source of suffering in the history of the world. The word kafir is the worst word in the human language. It is far worse than the n-word, because the n-word is a personal opinion, whereas, kafir is Allah’s decree. Nearly two thirds of the Koran is devoted to the kafir. Islam is fixated on the kafir and the moderate Muslim thinks that you are a kafir. How moderate is that?

FP: I guess not very moderate.
Warner: Well the moderation does not stop there. A moderate Muslim follows Islamic ethics. Not only is the Koran a dualistic document, but also Islamic ethics are dualistic. Islam has one set of rules for Muslims and another set of rules for the kafirs. A Muslim does not lie, cheat, kill, or harm another Muslim. But, if it will advance Islam, a kafir may be cheated, deceived, murdered, tortured and raped. Or a Muslim may treat a kafir like a brother.
It is the dualism of Islam that gives it such power. It has the entire good cop/bad cop psychology built into its very DNA. There have been other groups with dualistic ethics, the KKK for instance. But a member of the KKK hates all blacks all the time. There is a certain bald-faced honesty in the hatred of the KKK. But Islam has the good cop face to the world most of the time. The bad cop is held in reserve the same way that a police detective carries a hidden weapon.

The ethical dualism means that Islam does not take part in the shared reciprocity of altruism. As an example, Islam is very big on charity, but Islamic charity only goes to Muslims. When Saudi Arabia sent money to New Orleans after hurricane Katrina, the money only went to Muslims, not to suffering kafirs.

FP: Can you expand a bit on reciprocity of altruism?
Warner: Reciprocity of altruism[1] is the very basis of civilization. Islam does not share this trait. This is one of the reasons that Islam is not a part, nor can it be, of kafir civilization. Islam is built on different ethics and logic than the kafirs. Islam’s dualistic ethics prohibit reciprocity of altruism. Islamic civilization and kafir civilization do not share similar values.

So a moderate non-violent Muslim thinks that you are a kafir and that a kafir does not have to be treated the same as another Muslim. The moderate Muslim (Islamic meaning) thinks that you are Allah’s scum and you can be treated like trash. Or not (dualism always has options).

How can such a person be a true friend, if he believes the Koran. In some 14 verses, the Koran says that the Muslim is not the friend of a kafir. But what if the person actually is your friend? We can deal with this very important question if you wish.

In any case, the term moderate Muslim has two totally different meanings. The kafir meaning is warm, fuzzy and incorrect. The Islamic meaning is cruel, precise and correct.


Read the complete article online at http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=76B12F33-3165-47D1-80ED-C3F1ACD07D8A




American Congress for Truth