Sunday, January 31, 2010

Terrorized by our own government while the Jihadists laugh their heads off

A fraud of a president who supports and defends Islamic terrorism and is himself either a Muslim or an apostate. A fraud of a President who in his own words said he will defend the Muslim always, which it is evident he is doing. A completely egotistical and pompous nobody of a union organizer and thug!

A totally incompetent bufoon as head of Homeland Insecurity, Janet Napalitano, appointed by Obama and furthering the cause of protecting those working to destroy us.

An Attorney General appointee of Obama, Eric Holder, worse even than Janet Napalitano and furthering the cause of protecting those working to destroy us.

The nigcompoops in Congress who approve Obama's failed and fraudulent attempts to kick start the economy that Obama and the congress helped to create: Reid, Pelosi, Franks, Kennedy, Stark, just to name a few of the suicidal elitists who call the voters they are supposed to represent, Nazis and terrorists!!! (excuse me while I vomit). VOTE THE BUMS OUT!!

Submitted legislation to disallow freed Gitmo prisoners from receiving welfare:

H.R. 2338 - No Welfare for Terrorists Act

Sponsor: Todd Tiahrt (R-4th/KS)
Committee: House Oversight and Government Reform

Bill Summary: To prohibit any alien formerly detained at the Department of Defense detention facility at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and brought into the United States from receiving any Federal, State, or local public benefit.

The Marandizing of war criminals. Obama offering several million dollars to any city or state who will hold the trail in their

The Flight 93 Memorial, which is supposed to be a memorial to the people murdered on 9/11/01, is instead a blantant and offensive memorial to the Islamic terrorists and the political system hiding behind religion that demanded their actions:

Many features of the chosen Flight 93 Memorial design are intolerable:

1. THE GIANT CRESCENT. The centerpiece of the original “Crescent of Embrace” design was a giant red Islamic shaped crescent. Every particle of this original crescent design remains completely intact in the so-called redesign, which only added a few irrelevant trees. The giant crescent is still there.

2. IT POINTS TO MECCA. The giant crescent points to Mecca. A crescent that Muslims face into to face Mecca is called a \"mihrab,\" and is the central feature around which every mosque is built. The Flight 93 Memorial is on track to become the world\'s largest mosque.

3. THE ISLAMIC SUNDIAL. The minaret-like Tower of Voices is a year-round accurate Islamic prayer-time sundial (one of many typical mosque features that are realized in the crescent design, all on the same epic scale as the half mile wide central crescent).

4. THE 44 BLOCKS. There are 44 glass blocks on the flight path, equaling the number of passengers, crew, AND terrorists.

Intentional or not, these features are entirely unacceptable. This travesty must stop and investigations must begin.
1) We the undersigned call on our state and federal legislators to undertake their own thorough and independent investigations of the Flight 93 Memorial design. The truth must come out.
2) We ask that the crescent design be scrapped entirely and that it be replaced with a new design that is not tainted by Islamic or terrorist memorializing symbolism.
3) We demand a fitting and proper memorial that HONORS the brave men and women of Flight 93.

Call for Congressional investigation of Islamic symbolism in the Flight 93 memorial


Yes Al Qaeda, Osama, the Saudi King and the Hilter of Iran and their dirty devilish minions are having a good laugh at the expense of our security and probably thanking Allah that they have been successful in placing one of their own in the White House.

God help us!

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Watch him Gringe at the mention of her name: ekkkKKKKK: Nancy Pelosi

Here is what a commentator on CNN had to say about Nancy Pelosi. Not Fox, but CNN. You don't want to miss it.

Jon Stewart Rips Obama

You know things are getting bad when a leftist comic like Jon Stewart sneers at Obama for demanding TWO teleprompters, plus a podium with the Presidential Seal, before Obama felt brave enough to face --- SIXTH GRADERS! (Good Lord, Republicans must reduce Obama to wearing Depends.)

Watch Stewart's video and hear him mock Obama. It's hilarious.

Or I should say, it's hilarious until you realize that a video showing our Commander in Chief scared of a roomful of kids is the same video being watched by Al Qaida. (Yeah, that's not so funny.)

Thanks Carolyn :-)

Rush talks to Obama

Rush has a heart to heart with Obama - and Mr. Big Ears is NOT going to like it!


RUSH: I penned a message to Obama that I would like to deliver now. Because Mr. Obama, I think it's time we had a heart to heart talk. Let me be the father that you never had or never really knew, because I think you need some guidance. It's time to man up. It's time to grow up. That speech last night was an embarrassment. You couldn't focus, you lashed out in all directions, you refused to accept responsibility for your own actions, and you were angry.

And he was, folks! He was mad. Being president is a big job. It's a big responsibility. You wanted the position, Barack. You campaigned for it. You told the public to trust you with it, and they elected you -- and you're now president of the greatest country mankind has ever known, and yet you act like this was all coming to you, like you deserve it, that you're better than the people you are supposed to serve and that you have no tolerance for debate or dissent. That's not the way it works as president, Barack. We have a Constitution, we have checks and balances, we have separation of powers, we have states -- and most of all, we have the people. You don't get to impose your programs and policies on the nation and the people without our consent.

This is a representative republic, not a banana republic, and let me remind you: Karl Marx and Saul Alinsky are not our Founding Fathers. This is a nation built on individuality, built on liberty, free markets, and faith. Yet you, Barack, demand fidelity to a different belief system: A system that crushes individual initiative and free will. The president does not berate Supreme Court justices who are guests of the Congress and who have no ability to respond to your attacks. You've made such a mess of things, Barack, and it's time to stop deluding yourself. It's time to stop blaming others. You are delusional. You are delirious. It's time for you to assume the responsibilities of a president rather than pretending to be one.

You've driven the nation's debt over the edge. It is your responsibility to fix it now. Otherwise, our young people will have no future. You were wrong to grant terrorists constitutional rights. Even the libs in New York don't want the trial there now! You, Mr. President, are endangering the security of this nation. Now fix it! Reverse course, and end the terrorists -- all of them -- back to Guantanamo Bay, where they belong. You are wrong to nationalize one industry after another from automobiles to banks. You are destroying competition and jobs. You need to stop what you were doing before million of more families go broke from your misguided policies. It's not too late to stop this. I know you're not going to stop it because last night you said you don't quit, and I know what you mean.

You're gonna keep plugging for the same agenda, which is going to destroy this country even more -- which makes me think, Barack, that's your objective. You know, Barack, unlike most presidents you're dealing with a Congress that has super majorities in both houses, fellow Democrats. It amazes me that with all the talk about your ability to persuade and communicate, that you can't even hold your own party members together anymore. Is that Bush's fault, too? Is it is fault of the banks and the insurance companies and the lobbyists that you can't keep your own Democrat Party unified -- or is it a problem with your leadership, Barack, or lack of leadership? It's the latter, Mr. President. I'll tell you, you are not a leader. You are an agitator and an organizer, and a process guy, but you are not a leader. It is you who are doing something wrong.

The people in Virginia don't like it. The people in New Jersey don't like it. The people in Massachusetts don't like it. The people in Massachusetts and all over the country have the ability to inform themselves outside of your sycophant press corps, and they are doing so. Members of your own governing majority don't like what you are doing. I mean, this calls for some self-reflection and some circumspection. Has it occurred to you, Mr. President, even once that you're not as cool as you think you are? Has it occurred to you that you are screwing up? And if it has, are you happy about that? Has it occurred to you that you have a great deal to learn and that you need to take your own measure, or are you Mr. Perfect? Are you God-sent?

Are you The One that you've been waiting for? See, I have a little concern there may be a psychological issue at play here. I don't say this to demean you, Barack. I say it because I'm concerned. I mean, Tom Daschle was always "concerned" and I like the word. I'm concerned. You seem to have a whole lot of enemies, at least in your own mind. A partial list would include Fox News, insurance companies, banks, oil companies, the "special interests," the Supreme Court, Republicans, talk show hosts, executives, anyone or any business that earns over $250,000 a year, mortgage companies, credit card companies -- and the list goes on and on and on. You have the longest enemies list of anybody I've ever known.

These people are not your enemies, though, Barack. They are Americans. They are part of this country. They are part of what makes the nation work. You are not. You have nothing to do, and have had nothing to do, with this nation's greatness. You can't lay claim to greatness on any scale, not even rhetorical. But you have no direct relationship to the greatness of this country. You are damaging the possibility of further greatness. Nevertheless, like a bully, you continue to threaten all of these people. The Supreme Court, Big Oil, Big Pharmaceutical, Big Retail, talk show hosts, Fox News, the list goes on. You threaten anybody who does not agree with you. You try to intimidate them. You smear them. Your sycophantic media goes right along and carries your water. But this is not what presidents do.

You're supposed to lead not by threatening people but by encouraging them, by embracing them, by thanking them, by inspiring them. Most of all you don't seem to appreciate the magnificence of this nation! I know you don't. The way you've been educated about this country it's painfully obvious. You think this country is guilty, period. Guilty and unjust. You seem to think this country needs to be torn down so you can rebuild it. But you were elected to be president, not some kind of dictator. You must operate within the confines of the Constitution. You are not bigger than the law, and you are not bigger than the people. You were elected to serve the people, not dictate to them. Anyway, I'm sure this little lecture will not do you much good, particularly given the spectacle of your speech last night. You really are full of yourself. But I truly hope that this little talk does do you some good down the way, because something is going to have to change in you or we are doomed for at least the next three years.

Thanks Carolyn

Monday, January 25, 2010

GUTLESS AND SHAMEFUL, Ft Hood Jihadist Massacre Report

Ft. Hood Jihadist Massacre Report

"Gutless and Shameful"

Dear Friends,

How bad is the cancer of political correctness in the Defense Department?

So bad that the 86 page report on the Ft. Hood jihadist massacre mentions "Islam" or any of its derivatives only once—in a footnote.

So bad that CNN commentator Jack Cafferty called it a "joke."

Unfortunately, the only ones laughing are the Islamists.

They must be looking at our military and political leadership and thanking Allah for their good fortune. It's easy to envision discussions among Islamists where they tell each other "surely Allah is with us; the infidel leaders are so blind and stupid they won't even acknowledge who is fighting them!"

Ralph Peters' column below is RIGHT ON POINT!

We believe American outrage at this suicidal level of political correctness is only going to grow. Let us resolve together to make 2010 the year that "main street America" shouted back at Washington that we've had enough!!


Hood Massacre Report Gutless and Shameful


January 16, 2010

There are two basic problems with the grotesque non-report on the Islamist- terror massacre at Fort Hood (released by the Defense Department yesterday):

* It's not about what happened at Fort Hood.

* It avoids entirely the issue of why it happened.

Rarely in the course of human events has a report issued by any government agency been so cowardly and delusional. It's so inept, it doesn't even rise to cover-up level.

"Protecting the Force: Lessons From Fort Hood" never mentions Islamist terror. Its 86 mind-numbing pages treat "the alleged perpetrator," Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, as just another workplace shooter (guess they're still looking for the pickup truck with the gun rack).

The report is so politically correct that its authors don't even realize the extent of their political correctness -- they're body-and-soul creatures of the PC culture that murdered 12 soldiers and one Army civilian.

Reading the report, you get the feeling that, jeepers, things actually went pretty darned well down at Fort Hood. Commanders, first responders and everybody but the latest "American Idol" contestants come in for high praise.

The teensy bit of specific criticism is reserved for the "military medical officer supervisors" in Maj. Hasan's chain of command at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. As if the problem started and ended there.

Unquestionably, the officers who let Hasan slide, despite his well-known wackiness and hatred of America, bear plenty of blame. But this disgraceful pretense of a report never asks why they didn't stop Hasan's career in its tracks.

The answer is straightforward: Hasan's superiors feared -- correctly -- that any attempt to call attention to his radicalism or to prevent his promotion would backfire on them, destroying their careers, not his.

Hasan was a protected-species minority. Under the PC tyranny of today's armed services, no non-minority officer was going to take him on.

This is a military that imposes rules of engagement that protect our enemies and kill our own troops and that court-martials heroic SEALs to appease a terrorist. Ain't many colonels willing to hammer the Army's sole Palestinian-American psychiatrist.

Of course, there's no mention of political correctness by the panel. Instead, the report settles for blinding flashes of the obvious, such as "We believe a gap exists in providing information to the right people." Gee, really? Well, that explains everything. Money well spent!

Or "Department of Defense force protection policies are not optimized for countering internal threats." Of course not: You can't stop an internal threat you refuse to recognize.

The panel's recommendations? Wow. "Develop a risk-assessment tool for commanders." Now that's going to stop Islamist terrorists in their tracks.

The Fort Hood massacre didn't reflect an intelligence failure. The intelligence was there, in gigabytes. This was a leadership failure and an ethical failure, at every level. Nobody wanted to know what Hasan was up to. But you won't learn that from this play-pretend report.

The sole interesting finding flashes by quickly: Behind some timid wording on pages 13 and 14, a daring soul managed to insert the observation that we aren't currently able to keep violence-oriented religious extremists from becoming chaplains. (Of course, they're probably referring to those darned Baptists . . .)

To be fair, there's a separate, classified report on Maj. Hasan himself. But it's too sensitive for the American people to see. Does it even hint he was a self-appointed Islamist terrorist committing jihad? I'll bet it focuses on his "personal problems."

In the end, the report contents itself with pretending that the accountability problem was isolated within the military medical community at Walter Reed. It wasn't, and it isn't. Murderous political correctness is pervasive in our military. The medical staff at Walter Reed is just where the results began to manifest themselves in Hasan's case.

Once again, the higher-ups blame the worker bees who were victims of the policy the higher-ups inflicted on them. This report's spinelessness is itself an indictment of our military's failed moral and ethical leadership.

We agonize over civilian casualties in a war zone but rush to whitewash the slaughter of our own troops on our own soil. Conduct unbecoming.


Dutch Rally in Support of Geert Wilders while Muslims Protest and call for the death of Geert Wilders

Which do YOU support? Liberty or Xenophobia?

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Threats (from Islamists) Increase

A Look Back at 2009
Threats to America Increase;
ACT! for America’s Accomplishments

By Brigitte Gabriel, President
Guy Rodgers, Executive Director

Dear Friends,

On January 1, 2009, few people in the establishment press or politics were predicting that 2009 would be a year where the threat of radical Islam to America would force itself front and center in the public consciousness.

But as the year progressed, and we watched the messages and actions coming from the Obama administration, we began predicting that these messages and actions would embolden our enemies, not placate them.

We warned repeatedly that a message of apology, accommodation and appeasement would not have the effect President Obama hoped for, but would in fact produce the opposite effect of increased Islamist militancy and an increase in the threat.

And that is precisely what has happened.

It is tempting to feel discouraged when we see where things are headed. So here is our exhortation to you—TAKE HEART!! In spite of the fact that during most of 2009 issues like the economy, jobs and health care dominated politics and the news, we in ACT! for America can look back with pride to a year of great growth and accomplishment.

•Our number of members increased by over 60%, to nearly 80,000.

•Our number of chapters increased by 60%, to 350.

•We became the only national security organization committed to combating the threat of radical Islam to have a full-time lobbyist representing us in Washington. This was a major achievement that helped us in many ways, including:

•ACT! for America helped craft H.R. 1343, “First Responders Fighting Terrorism Act,” to protect first responders from defamation lawsuits. The bill was introduced by Rep. Sue Myrick, Co-chair of the House Anti-Terrorism Caucus, who had this to say about ACT! for America:

“ACT! for America is just the kind of ally we need in Congress…Thanks to Brigitte Gabriel and ACT! for America, our country has a greater chance of winning the battle against the rising tide of radical Islamists.”

•A barrage of phone calls and emails from ACT! for America members helped win passage of the Kyl/Lieberman amendment in the Senate, which denies taxpayer funding to any company doing business with Iran’s energy sector.

•We conducted our first legislative briefing in Washington, a highly successful event during which a dozen members of the House and Senate addressed ACT! for America members about issues relating to radical Islam and terrorism. ACT! members then visited their Members of Congress to discuss our concerns and seek their support.

•ACT! for America grassroots pressure on House Armed Services Committee members to stop cuts in missile defense funding resulted in the committee spending an unprecedented amount of time debating the issue—with two members of the committee changing their vote to agreeing with the ACT! for America position.

•ACT! for America’s visibility on Capitol Hill has increased significantly over the past eight months—as has awareness of our legislative agenda and issues of concern. ACT! for America conducted numerous briefings with Members of Congress and staffs on issues ranging from terrorism to shariah finance. These “behind the scenes” briefings will reap great dividends as more and more Members of Congress and staffs come to understand the nature and reality of the threat against us.

We hear repeatedly from Members of Congress that what we are doing and how we are building a grassroots citizen action network is VITAL to ultimately defeating the threat of radical Islam.

•ACT! for America launched the “Stop Shariah Now” project. This included a grassroots lobbying effort and a comprehensive website ( Sample legislation dealing with the threat of shariah finance is now being considered by local elected officials across the country, and we have been assured by some of these officials that such legislation will pass this year.

Should this happen, to our knowledge this will be the first time legislation addressing the threat of shariah finance will have passed a governing body in the U.S.

•We launched a national petition calling for a government investigation of CAIR (the Council on American-Islamic Relations) as a first step in a campaign to draw attention to CAIR’s checkered past and ties to the terrorist organization Hamas. By year’s end the petition had garnered over 38,000 names, more than any petition ever launched by ACT! for America.

•Local chapters reported many successes to us. One chapter hosted a screening of the documentary “The Third Jihad” and drew over 300 people. Several chapters are having monthly meetings drawing 100 or more people. One chapter successfully stopped an effort to have the last day of Ramadan declared that city’s “Humanitarian Day.” Another organized a town hall meeting to protest the transfer of Guantanamo enemy combatants to American soil.

•ACT! for America joined forces with dozens of other organizations in a coalition effort to stop passage of a UN resolution that calls on nations to criminalize the “defamation” of religions, specifically Islam. Although the resolution passed, the vote was much closer than the previous year. In 2008 it passed by a 33 vote margin, 86 to 53, whereas last year the vote was much closer as it passed by only 19 votes, 80 to 61. This is progress!

•We conducted six “Citizen in Action” training conferences, two of which we broadcast on the web. We trained over 700 activists at these conferences.

The tide is turning. Polls show America’s concerns about national security and Islamic terrorism are rising dramatically. This is reflected in the number of candidates for Congress who are aware of and discussing the threat of radical Islam, which is already far greater than we saw in 2008.

I (Brigitte) have not seen this level of awareness and concern since the days following 9/11. In 2010, more and more Americans will be seeking information, answers, and action. We are positioned to provide the answers and action they seek—and you helped make that possible.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Rescue and Relief Efforts in Haiti

I, like many of you, have been reading about and looking at photographs of the devastration in Haiti after the large earthquake there on January 12, 2010. I have kept a list of countries and cities involved in the recue and relief efforts. What I find striking is that not a single mention or photograph has been read or seen from a single Islamic country. These countries are mostly very wealthy, so why aren't any relief efforts from, oh say, Saudi Arabia seen anywhere on the net or mentioned on the radio or television?

If you know of any assistance from a Muslim country or Islamic Republic, please post that info with link in your comments. Thank you.

Below is a list I have compiled over the last several days:

January 12, 2010 Haitian earthquake Search and Rescue teams and Disaster Relief from:

American citizens raised $500+ million for Haiti
American Red Cross
Los Angeles Fire Department

NASCAR (American racing)
Basque autonomous region
FEMA, South Florida
U.S. Navy – Floating Hospital Ships and Landing Craft in Operation Unified Response; Multi-purpose amphibious assault ships used for evacuations; Hard-hulled inflatable boats, and other support vehicles, such as helicopters
U.S. Marines – Protection for citizens receiving aid against looting, raping and murdering convicts and thugs who escaped Prison after the earthquake.

Dominican Republic
South Korea
Campus Crusade for Christ, International
Church of Scientology

Missing from reports and pictures of rescue workers: OIL RICH ISLAMIC REPUBLICS/COUNTRIES.

update January 25, 2010:

Finally some aid from a Muslim nation in Haiti.

Oh, wait. No aid for "Infidels".

From AP:

“Princess Haya bint Al Hussein, wife of Sheik Mohammed bin Rashid, the ruler of Dubai , also flew to Port-Au-Prince last week on a "mercy mission" to deliver aid and rescue Arab families in the Haitian capital.”

A Security Expert's Warning to Americans- Listen up you dolts in Congress!

Juval Aviv was the Israeli Agent upon whom the movie 'Munich ' was based. He was Golda Meir's bodyguard, and she appointed him to track down and bring to justice the Palestinian terrorists who took the Israeli athletes hostage and killed them during the Munich Olympic Games. In a lecture in New York City he shared information that EVERY American needs to know -- but that our government has not yet shared with us. He predicted the London subway bombing on the Bill O'Reilly show on Fox News stating publicly that it would happen within a week. At the time, O'Reilly laughed, and mocked him saying that in a week he wanted him back on the show. Unfortunately, within a week the terrorist attack had occurred.

Juval Aviv gave intelligence (via what he had gathered in Israel and the Middle East ) to the Bush Administration about 9/11, a month before it occurred. His report specifically said they would use planes as bombs and target high profile buildings and monuments. Congress has since hired him as a security consultant.

Now for his future predictions. He predicts the next terrorist attack on the U.S. will occur within the next few months.

Forget hijacking airplanes, because he says terrorists will NEVER try and hijack a plane again as they know the people onboard will never go down quietly again. Aviv believes our airport security is a joke -- that we have been reactionary rather than proactive in developing strategies that are truly effective. For example:
1) Our airport technology is outdated. We look for metal, and the new explosives are made of plastic.

2) He talked about how some idiot tried to light his shoe on fire. Because of that, now everyone has to take off their shoes. A group of idiots tried to bring aboard liquid explosives. Now we can't bring liquids on board. He says he's waiting for some suicidal maniac to pour liquid explosive on his underwear; at which point, security will have us all traveling naked! Every strategy we have is reactionary.

3) We only focus on security when people are heading to the gates. Aviv says that if a terrorist attack targets airports in the future, they will target busy times on the front end of the airport when/where people are checking in. It would be easy for someone to take two suitcases of explosives, walk up to a busy check-in line, ask a person next to them to watch their bags for a minute while they run to the restroom or get a drink, and then detonate the bags BEFORE security even gets involved. In Israel, security checks bags BEFORE people can even ENTER the airport.

Aviv says the next terrorist attack here in America is imminent and will involve suicide bombers and non-suicide bombers in places where large groups of people congregate. (i.e., Disneyland, Las Vegas casinos, big cities (New York, San Francisco, Chicago, etc.) and that it will also include shopping malls, subways in rush hour, train stations, etc., as well as, rural America this time. The interlands ( Wyoming , Montana , etc.). The attack will be characterized by simultaneous detonations around the country (terrorists like big impact), involving at least 5-8 cities, including rural areas. Aviv says terrorists won't need to use suicide bombers in many of the larger cities, because at places like the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, they can simply valet park a car loaded with explosives and walk away.

Aviv says all of the above is well known in intelligence circles, but that our U. S. Government does not want to 'alarm American citizens' with the facts. The world is quickly going to become 'a different place', and issues like 'global warming' and political correctness will become totally irrelevant. On an encouraging note, he says that Americans don't have to be concerned about being nuked. Aviv says the terrorists who want to destroy America will not use sophisticated weapons. They like to use suicide as a front-line approach. It's cheap, it's easy, it's effective; and they have an infinite abundance of young militants more than willing to 'meet their destiny'.

He also says the next level of terrorists, over which America should be most concerned, will not be coming from abroad. But will be, instead, 'homegrown', having attended and been educated in our own schools and universities right here in the U.S.. He says to look for 'students' who frequently travel back and forth to the Middle East . These young terrorists will be most dangerous because they will know our language and will fully understand the habits of Americans; but that we Americans won't know/understand a thing about them. Aviv says that, as a people, Americans are unaware and uneducated about the terrorist threats we will inevitably face.America still has only a handful of Arabic and Farsi speaking people in our intelligence networks, and Aviv says it is critical that we change that fact SOON.

So, what can America do to protect itself? From an intelligence perspective, Aviv says the U.S. needs to stop relying on satellites and technology for intelligence. We need to, instead, follow Israel 's, Ireland 's and England 's hands-on examples of human intelligence, both from an infiltration perspective as well as to pay attention to, and trust 'aware' citizens to help.. We need to engage and educate ourselves as citizens; however, our U. S. government continues to treat us, its citizens, 'like babies'. Our government thinks we 'can't handle the truth' and are concerned that we'll panic if we understand the realities of terrorism. Aviv says this is a deadly mistake.

Aviv recently created/executed a security test for our Congress, by placing an empty briefcase in five well-traveled spots in five major cities. The results? Not one person called 911 or sought a policeman to check it out. In fact, in Chicago , someone tried to steal the briefcase! In comparison, Aviv says that citizens of Israel are so well 'trained' that an unattended bag or package would be reported in seconds by citizen(s) who know to publicly shout, 'Unattended Bag!' The area would be quickly & calmly cleared by the citizens themselves.

Unfortunately, America hasn't been yet 'hurt enough' by terrorism for their government to fully understand the need to educate its citizens or for the government to understand that it's their citizens who are, inevitably, the best first-line of defense against terrorism. Aviv also was concerned about the high number of children here in America who were in preschool and kindergarten after 9/11, who were 'lost' without parents being able to pick them up, and about our schools that had no plan in place to best care for the students until parents could get there. (In New York City , this was days, in some cases!) He stresses the importance of having a plan, that's agreed upon within your family, of how to respond in the event of a terrorist emergency. He urges parents to contact their children's schools and demand that the schools too, develop plans of actions, just as they do in Israel. Does your family know what to do if you can't contact one another by phone? Where would you gather in an emergency? He says we should all have a plan that is easy enough for even our youngest children to remember and follow. Aviv says that the U. S. government has in force a plan, that in the event of another terrorist attack, EVERYONE's ability to use cell phones, blackberries, etc., will immediately be cut-off, as this is the preferred communication source used by terrorists and is often the way that their bombs are detonated.

How will you communicate with your loved ones in the event you cannot speak to each other? You need to have a plan. If you understand, and believe what you have just read, then you must feel compelled to send this to every concerned parent, guardian, grandparents, uncles, aunts, whomever. Don't stop there. In addition to sharing this via e-mail, contact and discuss this information with whomever it makes sense to. Make contingency plans with those you care about. Better that you have plans in place, and never have to use them, then to have no plans in place, and find you needed them.

If you choose not to share this, or not to have a plan in place, and nothing ever occurs -- good for you! However, in the event something does happen, and even moreso, if it directly affects your loved ones, then this message will haunt you forever. Telling yourself after the fact, "I should have sent this to so and so, but deleted it as so much trash, plus, I just didn't believe it", will not change anything.

You were alerted, had the chance to do something, and instead of erring on the side of caution, you chose to disregard, if nothing else, a sensible, valuable warning.

In support of Globalized Free Speech


Rep. Myrick Releases Video on Trying Terrorists in Civilian Court

US Representative Sue Myrick (NC-09) today released a video explaining the dangers of trying Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and other suspected terrorists in US civilian court.

The video can be viewed by clicking the image above, or by visiting Rep. Myrick's official YouTube page.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Lt. Col Allen West on Islamic Jihad and our Government's Ignorance

Once at the site, scroll down for the videos on Islamic Jihad

Taqiyya and Political Islam’s Rules of War

From an ACT for bulletin:

Taqiyya and Political Islam’s Rules of War

A Definite “Must-Read” Commentary

Dear Friends,

Every so often a research document, commentary, article or video comes along that is so important and so essential to understanding what we are up against, that we use the words “must read” or “must see.”

Recently, just such a research document came across our desks, which you can download and print out by clicking here.

This MUST-READ document outlines the essentials of the perpetual warfare worldview that is inherent in the ideology of political Islam, extensively citing the Qur’an and the hadith, as well as Islamic scholars and works from the four schools of Islamic jurisprudence. Those essentials are:

1.Islam is superior to all other religions.

2.Islam is in a perpetual state of war with all non-Muslims.

3.Jihad is central to the prosecution of this war.

4.Taqiyya (dissimilitude or deceit) is not only permitted but sanctioned as a means of practicing this warfare.

5.Subjugating and even killing non-Muslims is actually a benefit to those non-Muslims, because Islam is such a superior way of life.

6.War between Islam and all non-Muslims will only cease when Islam reigns worldwide.

Remarkably, the writer of this commentary, Raymond Ibrahim, carefully, logically and with documentation expounds upon these essentials in fewer than ten pages!

We highly recommend that you:

•Print out the commentary, carefully read it, and file it somewhere for easy future reference.

•Forward it to others you know and encourage them to read it.

•Especially forward it to anyone you know who is in the military, law enforcement, or politics.

Islamists are counting on the West remaining ignorant of the material laid out in this attached commentary. We can and will defeat the radical Islamists bent on destroying and/or subjugating us IF enough Americans come to understand the basic essentials of the ideology that is driving the Islamists.

Monday, January 18, 2010

Pat Condell on Freedom of Speech and Islam

for video, click here

Help save Freedom of Speech in Finland -

Take action now. write to the Helsinki Court of Appeal in support of FREE SPEECH, THANKS, SITA INTERNATIONAL AND THE INTERNATIONAL FREE PRESS SOCIETY


Helsinki Court of Appeal
Radanrakentajantie 5
00521 Helsinki
Honorable Helsinki Court of Appeal!
In his blog (3.6.2008) Jussi Halla-aho, a member of the Helsinki city council, criticized the
incoherent interpretation of the law concerning defamation of religion. He also criticized the actions
of the state prosecutor, Mika Illmann, who specializes in the legislation of freedom of speech. Jussi
Halla-aho said: “The Prophet Muhammad was a pedophile and Islam sanctifies pedophilia as a
religion. Islam is a religion of pedophilia. Pedophilia is Allah’s will.” Halla-aho was subsequently
charged with defamation of religion. The judge of the Helsinki district court, Jussi Sippola, ruled
that Halla-aho acted with the intention to blaspheme and imposed a fine on him.
Islam allows child marriages and thus child molestation
Islam’s holy texts tell how the fifty-three-year-old prophet Muhammad “consummated the marriage”
- in other words, had sexual intercourse - with his bride Aisha when she was nine years old and still
played with dolls (Bukhari 7:62;88, Bukhari 7:62:64, Bukhari 7:62:65, Muslim 8:3310).1 The
researcher of Islam, Jaakko Hämeen-Anttila, writes in his handbook of Islam (Islamin käsikirja,
Otava, 2004, p.37, which received a meritorious award by the Finnish state): “The prophet had
never in his life acted solely according to the prevailing situation but at the same time he had
looked out for the future. The details of the prophet’s life were meant to be eternally imitated by the
Islamic community.” In addition Hämeen-Anttila emphasizes that the prophet Muhammad was
“insured against faults (ma sum), so in his behavior he did nothing wrong, nor ́ anything that would
not have been God’s (Allah’s) intention.” (Islam – taskusanakirja, Basam Books, 2001, p.28). Allah
proclaims in the Quran: “Certainly you have in the Messenger of Allah an excellent example”
According to present-day standards Muhammad was a pedophile in the neutral and medical sense
of the word (see Duodecim: The tradition of Muhammad’s exemplary
way of living, also known as sunna, serves as one of the central sources for Islamic law; sharia.
Hämeen-Anttila (2001, p.26) states: “Because the sharia is a religious, holy law, it can not be
changed by people’s decision.” Furthermore, Hämeen-Anttila (2001, p.28) stresses: “The Sunna is
a conclusive example to the Muslims, and it is the responsibility of every devout Muslim to obey the
example of Muhammad”. Islamic law does not legislate a minimum age for matrimony. Hence it is
obvious that Islam truly sanctifies child molestation, so far as it happens inside matrimony or in its
shadow. According to the written pleading of the Helsinki district court, this should not be
concluded, because within religions “truth is relative” and “due to this, logic or rational reasoning do
not have true sense in discussion about religious matters.” If the district court’s pronounced
sentence on Halla-aho is to be the final judgment, it implies that criticizing Islam is illegal, even
when it is based on obvious facts which Muslims themselves hold to be true.
Because the prophet Muhammad’s exemplary
way of living “was meant to be eternally imitated
by the Islamic community”, the molestation of
baby girls sanctified by Allah is in many Muslim
countries nowadays a common phenomenon and
an institution that human and women’s rights
activists such as Ghada Jamshir have criticized in
the Arab media (
v=2t3vfDhPTlk, 1:54-2:45, Al-Arabiya TV, Dubai/
Saudi-Arabia, 21.12.2005).

1 The information about the sunnas originates from the so-called hadith, which function as one of the sources of law of the sharia.
The essential collections of hadith is found here:

LONG LIVE THE QURAN! After reading this you will be able to answer the following questions

Islam is a religious, political and judicial system initiated in the VIIth century by
Muhammad, who claims to be the last prophet, and therefore THE prophet to whom
Allah transmitted his precepts through the angel Gabriel. These precepts are compiled
in the Quran. The Quran, fixed, unchangeable, that cannot be interpreted, comprises
of 114 chapters called suras, and each sura is composed of phrases called verses. The
suras and verses have been numbered in a standard way since 1923. For instance, [4:34] means verse 34 in sura 4. It should be noted that Muhammad heard the words of the angel Gabriel during mystical episodes! “Witnesses say that he (Muhammad) had seizures during which he drooled and roared like a young camel” (Mizanu’l Haqq, p. 345 can be checked at In addition to their
holy book, muslims also hold Muhammad as an example, drawing inspiration from
his words and deeds, recounted between the VIIIth and Xth centuries by the traditionists including Bukhari, Muslim, Daoud and others, in the hadiths (the sayings), which compose the Sunna (tradition). Our purpose is to prove, based on the hadiths and a Quran widely accepted by English-speaking-muslims, the Abdullah Yusuf Ali's quran,that islam was violent from its origin, that it is inegalitarian and discriminatory towards women, non muslims, homosexuals, etc., and that in fact, islam rejects and fights everything outside itself. In fact, when we look for a “reference” Quran, we are always offered a trio : Abdullah Yusuf Ali, Marmaduke Mohammad Pickthall, a British convert, and M. H. Shakir. But there is a controversy about Shakir, so we will only consider the two others you can read on this site Clicking a verse displays all three translations simultaneously. It’s an ideology that exploits religion with the aim to subdue all the world’s non-muslims, either through persuasion or by the sword. Indeed, in Arabic, islam means submission, and muslim means submissive. Obviously, muslims don’t share this analysis, hence this document that aims to counter them using their own Quran, thus demonstrating that islam is incompatible with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (article 3 : right to life, article 4 :
prohibition of slavery, article 18 : right to change one's religion. To verify these allegations go to, which forms part of the constitutions of occidental countries.

a) A fundamental point. Never be baffled if a muslim lies, actively or by omission,
or conceals or falsifies, because this is prescribed by the Quran. Anything goes when
the goal is to spread islam. Taqya (dissimulation) is a duty for believers in an inferiority (= minority) situation. By contrast, as soon as the balance of power has shifted, the muslim can consider aggression :
[Quran 47:35 ] Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be
uppermost: for Allah is with you, and will never put you in loss for your (good)
b) When confronting a muslim who suggests that islam is a religion of tolerance,
peace and love, by quoting a few violent, misogynist, anti-christian or anti-jewish
suras, when he runs out of arguments he will eventually say that “in order to understand the Quran, one has to read it in Arabic”. The answer is simple: if that was the case, then an English-speaking convert, unless he read Arabic, which has to be extremely rare, would be a person who converts to a religion while being unable to grasp a single word from its holy book! This is not tenable, therefore the muslim has to implicitly admit that some translations into English that are acceptable to a
Mahometan do exist, if only the one from Abdullah Yusuf Ali, which can be checked
at All that is left then is to contradict him using the suras from “his” Quran.
c) It is also necessary to refute the recurring argument, used by muslims who, in
many cases, have not read the Quran, as well as by English ignoramuses who don’t
know anything about islamology, that islam is a religion like any other, and that muslims therefore have the same rights as the followers of other religions. This assertion must be countered by stating that the Quran features numerous verses that incite murder (see paragraph 4 for examples), or by reading the hadiths where the messenger of Allah, Muhammad himself, instigates numerous murders. Islam cannot, therefore,be considered as being like any other religion.
d) With regards to the long list of quranic verses that clearly call for the murder of unbelievers, muslims always claim that they were only reacting, defending themselves against attacks from “nasty” polytheists. One can already recognize, back in those times, the muslims’ “victim posturing”. So we should believe that the
arab/muslim people conquered immense territories, in the name of Allah, only by
defending themselves, because other peoples were attacking them. It’s enough to
read the letters the warlord Muhammad sent to various leaders or kings, to “invite”
them to embrace islam, to become convinced of his arrogance and aggressivity: to
the Arab tribal leaders, the kings of Byzantium, of Persia, of Abyssinia, etc. Here is the “invitation” letter to the people of Oman: “Peace be upon him who follows the
straight path! I call you to islam. Accept my call, and you will be safe. I am the
messenger from Allah sent to humanity, and the annoucement will be made to the
unbelievers. If, then, you identify with islam, I shall grant power upon you. But if
you refuse to accept islam, your power shall disappear, my horses will camp out on
the extent of your territory and we shall reign in your kingdom. Signed:
“Muhammad, messenger of Allah”.
e) It should also be noted that while 2 verses may contradict each other, Allah, all
knowing and infallible as he is, has planned for everything. For such cases, he has
developed the doctrine of abrogator verses (nasikh) and abrogated verses (mansukh),
which states that the most recent verse cancels the oldest one, and therefore that a
Medina, or post-Hegira verse, can, in case of a contradiction, cancel a Mecca or pre-
Hegira verse. The Hegira is the period when Muhammad was chased from Mecca
and took refuge in Medina. To demonstrate the aforementioned, one can quote the
two verses:
[Quran 2:106] None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but
We substitute something better or similar: Knowest thou not that AllahHath power
over all things?
[Quran 16:101] When We substitute one revelation for another,- and Allah knows best what He reveals (in stages),- they say, "Thou art but a forger": but most of them understand not.
To know if a verse is pre-Hegira or post-Hegira go to
Every sura is indicated as revealed at Mecca or Medina.
Therefore, do not be baffled when a follower of Allah quotes a tolerant verse,
because it is probably abrogated and rendered obsolete by a Medina verse.
Otherwise you could always counter it with numerous violent verses. If islam was
peaceful there would not be a single violent verse un the Quran… yet it contains
dozens of instances of words such as “kill”, “fight” or “slay”.
f) When the apologists of islam struggle to conceal the warlike and intolerant nature
of the Quran, they often try to “dilute” reality, pretending that islam is open to numerous “interpretations”. The violence of islamic societies and muslim terrorists would stem from a “mistaken interpretation”. By saying this, they conceal the fact that the Quran itself, (seconded by some hadiths), condemns interpretation (it should be noted that many Western politicians also take part in this pathetic farce).
[Quran 3 :7] He it is Who has sent down to thee the Book: In it are verses basic or
fundamental (of established meaning); they are the foundation of the Book: others
are allegorical. But those in whose hearts is perversity follow the part thereof that is allegorical, seeking discord, and searching for its hidden meanings, but no one knows its hidden meanings except Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in
knowledge say: "We believe in the Book; the whole of it is from our Lord:" and none
will grasp the Message except men of understanding.


We have already highlighted the benefit, to us, of choosing an English language Quran
approved by muslims themselves. It is, therefore, the Abdullah Yusuf Ali 's Quran, to the exclusion of any other, that will serve as a reference from here on. Important notice about the Quran: the Quran (“recitation” in Arabic) is not so much a text as it is the Arabic recitation of that text. For non Arabic-speakers, it is therefore a long succession of sounds, learned by rote in “quranic schools” (madrassa, where muslims are taught to hate the West). It therefore is a genuine example of brainwashing, that a muslim is often subjected to from as young as the age of 4!


In the following text, when the words “the” (plural) or “they” are not qualified they
are used to designate all those who are not submissive to Allah: Jews, Christians,
heretics, infidels, associators, polytheists and unbelievers.
a) Calls for murder in the Quran
[Quran 2:191] And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from
where they have Turned you out; for tumult and oppression are slaughter; but fight
them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight
you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith.
[Quran 4:89] They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on
the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in
the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them
and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers
from their ranks.
[Quran 5:33] The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His
Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution,
or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides,
or exile from the land : that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment
is theirs in the Hereafter.
[Quran 8:12] Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am
with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the
Unbelievers. Smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.
[Quran 8:17] It is not ye who slew them; it was Allah: when thou threwest (a
handful of dust), it was not thy act, but Allah's: in order that He might test the
Believers by a gracious trial from Himself: for Allah is He Who heareth and knoweth
(all things). In other words it's a pre-emptive absolution for a murderer of an
infidel in the name of Allah.
[Quran 9:5] But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the
Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for
them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers
and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving,
Most Merciful.
[Quran 17:33] Nor take life - which Allah has made sacred - except for just cause.
And if anyone is slain wrongfully, we have given his heir authority (to demand
qisas or to forgive): but let him not exceed bounds in the matter of taking life; for
he is helped (by the Law). Therefore, according to the Quran, there are perfectly
valid, legally sound reasons to kill.
[Quran 33:61] They shall have a curse on them: whenever they are found, they
shall be seized and slain (without mercy).
[Quran 47:4] Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their
necks; At length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on
them): thereafter (is the time for) either generosity or ransom: Until the war lays
down its burdens. Thus (are ye commanded): but if it had been Allah's Will, He
could certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets you
fight) in order to test you, some with others. But those who are slain in the Way of
Allah,- He will never let their deeds be lost.
b) Hate against the Jews, Christians and Infidels
[Quran 5:51] O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your
friends and protectors :They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he
amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not
a people unjust.
[Quran 9:30] The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the
son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the
unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them : how they are deluded
away from the Truth!
[Quran 5:14] From those, too, who call themselves Christians, We did take a covenant,
but they forgot a good part of the message that was sent them: so we estranged
them, with enmity and hatred between the one and the other, to the day of
judgment. And soon will Allah show them what it is they have done.
Among the hadiths, one can easily find a collection of anti-jewish and anti-christian
statements, sometimes extremely violent, such as :
The Prophet said, "A group of Israelites were lost. Nobody knows what they did.
But I do not see them except that they were cursed and changed into rats"
(Narrated Abu Huraira, Muslim XLII 7135 et Bukhari LIV 524).
c) Three fundamental inequalities in islam
The muslim is superior to the non-muslim
[Quran 3:110] Ye are the best of peoples, evolved for mankind, enjoining what is
right, forbidding what is wrong, and believing in Allah. If only the People of the
Book had faith, it were best for them: among them are some who have faith, but
most of them are perverted transgressors.
Men are superior to women
[Quran 4:34] Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah
has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them
from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and
guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those
women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first),
(Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return
to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most
High, great (above you all). In the [Quran 4:34] there is no arabic word for
"lightly" it's a personal add from the author Yusuf Ali and an example of taqya.
The master is superior to the slave
Islam has not yet abolished slavery, which is still practised in Saudi Arabia and Sudan, where the black slave trade is still current, as per the heart wrenching testimony of a black christian Sudanese man, Simon Deng, reduced to slavery by the Arabic islamist regime in Khartoum : ( If islam has not abolished slavery (can it?), it’s quite simply because its goal is to establish a world califate where non-muslims would have to choose between conversion, death or, at best,dhimmitude (
d) Death penalty for whoever leaves islam Ali burnt some people and this news reached Ibn 'Abbas, who said, "Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophet said, 'Don't punish (anybody) with Allah's Punishment.' No doubt, I would have killed them, for the Prophet said, 'If somebody
(a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.' (Narrated Ikrima, Bukhari LII 260).
Do you know many religions that call for the death of whoever wants to leave them?

5. MUHAMMAD, THE « BEAUTIFUL MODEL »We cannot conclude without mentioning this odd “prophet” for an odd “religion”. A few personality traits of the man every good muslim is supposed to emulate, found in the hadiths or Quran
Muhammad was a torturer When the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) cut off (the hands and feet of)those who had stolen his camels and he had their eyes put out by fire (heated nails),Allah reprimanded him on that (action), and Allah, the Exalted, revealed: "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Apostle and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is execution or crucifixion. (Narrated Abu Zinad, Dawud XXXVIII 4357).
Muhammad was a murderer Jabir b. 'Abdullah reported that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) stoned (to death) a
person from Banu Aslam, and a Jew and his wife.(Narrated Jabir Abdullah, Muslim XVII 4216).
Muhammad was a pedophile
Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for
two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age,
and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old. (Narrated
Hisham's father, Bukhari LVIII 236).
Muhammad was a looter
Whenever Allah's Apostle intended to lead a Ghazwa, he would use an equivocation
from which one would understand that he was going to a different destination.
(Narrated Ka’b ibn Malik, Bukhari LII 197). In arabic "ghazwa" means looting :
[Quran 8:1] They ask thee concerning (things taken as) spoils of war. Say: "(such)
spoils are at the disposal of Allah and the Messenger: So fear Allah, and keep straight the relations between yourselves: Obey Allah and His Messenger, if ye do believe." Thus has islam been for fourteen centuries! It’s an ideology that exploits a religion and aims to submit humanity in the same way as naziism or communism did. Islam was violent from its origin, it is inegalitarian and discriminatory towards women, non muslims, homosexuals, etc., and in fact, islam rejects and fights everything outside itself. Islam is therefore incompatible with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (article
3 : right to life, article 4 : prohibition of slavery, article 18 : right to change one's religion.
To verify these allegations go to,
which forms part of the constitutions of occidental countries. Hadiths (in English)
can be found at:, the
website of the Muslim Students Association of South Carolina University (MSAUSC).
Download this document at :
or or

Please distribute widely, a lot of people ignore everything about islam.
Help them open their eyes! — — — —


Please take a look at what Andrew Breitbart has to say about the race for deceased Senator Ted Kennedy's Senate seat. Hear Miss Martha's dangerous ignorance, in her own words, about Islamic terrorism. HOW MANY MORE NINCOMPOOPS CAN WE WITHSTAND IN OUR GOVERNMENT?????