Friday, May 29, 2009

Muslims Vs Free Speech

Thank you Frank for the latest news on the latest attacks by Muslims on Free Speech!



Dear Friends of Freedom of Speech,

I have an urgent update for you on the radical Islamic groups who are waging a fight to silence a good friend of the Freedom Center, Joe Kaufman.

Briefly, seven Muslim groups claim that Joe is a threat. They convinced a court that Joe "intends to threaten to take unlawful action... cause bodily injury... or threaten Plaintiffs or their members with immediate bodily injury." On those grounds the court imposed a restraining order on him. In addition, the groups are suing Joe for defamation to stop him from writing about Muslims in the future and to close down his web sites.

Joe's never threatened anyone in his life. He's written well-detailed reports, however, about the growing threat radical Muslims represent and he's identified individuals and organizations in the United States that are supporting our enemies.

The seven Muslim groups who've united to attack Joe and strip him of his rights are well financed and savvy to our court system. There has been a flurry of legal activity as these radicals continue to fuel the fire with senseless demands and accusations - and money. They have deep pockets. They truly believe they can silence Joe by financially breaking him and the Freedom Center's legal team

You see, the Freedom Center's legal team - the Individual Rights Foundation - is handling Joe's defense. But we need your help. Legal fees are mounting. And we're turning to you.

If Joe Kaufman loses, radical Muslims will know they can stop anyone from investigating and writing about any Muslim groups and individuals. This is why I am urgently asking you to make an emergency contribution to help the Freedom Center pay for Joe's defense.

You see, this case is nearly two years old. Yet, the court refuses to toss out the lawsuit, so the case continues. Joe is being represented by a team of lawyers who are generously donating their time. But the other legal costs are considerable.

To date, the Freedom Center has paid more than $30,000 in legal fees. Another $25,000 needs to be paid - and the case has just had another round of oral arguments to add to the legal costs. I'm working hard to raise $45,000 as soon as possible. I can't let this case end with the radical Muslims winning. You see, Joe's not the only one on trial here. The Freedom Center's efforts, the work at Jihad Watch, and the work by many others who are exposing a threat the mainstream media won't touch in jeopardy, as well.

Like Joe, many of the journalists, web publications, and internet watchdogs are doing this out of their passion for freedom and their desire to help protect America from the Islamo-Fascist threat. The case these seven radical Muslim groups have brought against Joe Kaufman is simply the first step in silencing every one of us!

The lawsuit against Joe Kaufman is part of a strategy by these Muslim groups to bully us into silence. That's why we cannot let them win.

I am asking you to make a contribution of $25, $50, $100 or more,< /A> to help us raise the $45,000 we need right away to pay for Joe Kaufman's defense. Any amount you can give will help. Please follow this link immediately to give. It's extremely urgent!

Thanks in advance for your support.

Sincerely,

David Horowitz
President & Founder

P.S. We must continue to fight for Joe Kaufman. Radical Muslims have already shown they can bully their enemies in courtrooms in Canada and Europe! We cannot let it happen here! We must raise the money needed to win this case. Please follow this link to chip in whatever you can to help us reach our goal of $45,000.

A song some radio stations are banning

video

Tim WA0PSQ, Vice Commander / Net Control Amateur Radio Post 380, American Legion Still Serving God and Country

THIS IS GREAT - PLEASE LISTEN TO IT AND THEN PASS THIS ON!

The song you are about to listen to is from a Las Vegas Diamond Rio concert. They received an immediate, resounding standing ovation, and continue to do so every time they perform it!

Sadly, major radio stations wouldn't play it because it was considered "politically incorrect." Consequently, the song was never released to the public. So, America , see what you think. If this offering speaks to your heart and you feel you want to share it with friends and loved ones,
please do.



Thank you, Pamela ............for this and for your generosity!

Saying what Millions of Americans are thinking - a Pastor with Guts

Did these same Senators walk out when the Muslims prayed for victory over the Kafirs????

Thought you might enjoy this interesting
prayer given in Kansas at
the opening session of their Senate. It seems
prayer still upsets some
people. When Minister Joe Wright was asked to open
the new session of the Kansas Senate, everyone was expecting the usual generalities, but this is what they heard:

Heavenly Father, we come before you today to ask
your forgiveness and to seek your direction and
guidance. We know Your Word says, 'Woe to those
who call evil good,' but that is exactly what we
have done.

We have lost our spiritual equilibrium and reversed
our values.

We have exploited the poor and called it
the lottery.

We have rewarded laziness and called it
welfare.

We have killed our unborn and called it
choice.

We have shot abortionists and called it
justifiable.

We have neglected to discipline our
children and called it building self esteem..

We have abused power and called it
politics.

We have coveted our neighbor's possessions
and called it ambition

We have polluted the air with profanity and
pornography and called it freedom of expression.

We have ridiculed the time-honored values
of our forefathers and called it enlightenment.

Search us, Oh, God, and know our hearts
today; cleanse us from every sin and set us free.
Amen!

The response was immediate. A number of
legislators walked out during the prayer in
protest. In 6 short weeks, Central Christian
Church, where Rev. Wright is pastor, logged more than
5,000 phone calls with only 47 of those calls
responding negatively. The church is now receiving
international requests for copies of this prayer
from India , Africa and Korea

Commentator Paul Harvey aired this prayer on
his radio program, 'The Rest of the Story,'and
received a larger response to this program than any
other he has ever aired.


With the Lord's help, may this prayer sweep
over our nation and wholeheartedly become our
desire so that we again can be called 'one nation
under God.'


If possible, please pass this prayer on to
your friends. 'If you don't stand for something,
you will fall for everything.'


Thank you Pamela

Obama closing GOP Dealerships

Big Brother is moving faster than I feared.

Nearly 88% of car dealerships terminated by Chrysler - at Obama's direct orders - are GOP owned. Huffingpost thinks it's amusing - but I wonder if those Republicans will be laughing next November? I mean, what's amusing about being forced to pay the debt a government incurred in buying the business that fired you? A firing ordered by the same government?

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Furor-grows-over-partisan-car-dealer-closings-46261447.html

"Evidence appears to be mounting that the Obama administration has systematically targeted for closing Chrysler dealers who contributed to Repubicans. What started earlier this week as mainly a rumbling on the Right side of the Blogosphere has gathered some steam today with revelations that among the dealers being shut down are a GOP congressman and closing of competitors to a dealership chain partly owned by former Clinton White House chief of staff Mack McLarty."

Another note. This may or may not be relevant but...

"...White House car czar Steven Rattner is married to Maureen White, the former national finance chairman of the Democratic National Committee. And let's not forget that before Rattner became a Wall Street mover and shaker, he was a New York Times reporter."


Mike asked a very good question - i.e., is there any more backup for the claim that 88% of car dealerships closed by GM were GOP-owned?

So I did some more investigation. And as far as I can see the claim that GOP owners were mostly targeted for closing holds up. Indeed, one of the links even said that the number was actually 90%, instead of 88%.

One other thing. These cites are from the Net, not the MSM. Yet more proof that the MSM still only gets a tingle for Obama, not the facts.

Carolyn

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/did-chrysler-kill-republican-dealers-or-what/

http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/05/27/dancing-with-the-dealers-3-targeting-gop-districts/

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=99325

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/27/a-look-at-the-protected-chrysler-dealerships/


Thank you for the links, etc. Carolyn and Mike

Folks, this is going to be a long summer

Rachel Maddow Zeroes in on a Lying Hypocrite Named Obama

Rachel Maddow Zeroes In On a Lying Hypocrite Named Obama


Rachel Maddow of MSNBC is about as far to the left as is legal, and way beyond the point that is logical.

Still, despite her liberal bias she was able to see Barack Obama's hypocrisy and lies very clearly.

This YOUTUBE video says it all.

Monday, May 25, 2009

A wonderful and Fitting YouTube Tribute for Memorial Day

Thanks go out to Richard for passing on the below tribute



Thank God for those veterans who traveled to places like Europe, Asia, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Bosnia, Lebanon, Somalia, Iraq and Afghanistan. Let us remember those who over the years have provided us the opportunity to enjoy the freedom and liberty that is America. Thank a veteran for the ability to enjoy the sunshine with our spouse, our children and grandchildren, and pursue whatever happiness means to us.

No one knows better than a veteran that freedom is not free. We must be eternally vigilant

"Let us solemnly remember the sacrifices of all those who fought so valiantly, on the seas, in the air, and on foreign shores, to preserve our heritage of freedom, and let us re-consecrate ourselves to the task of promoting an enduring peace so that their efforts shall not have been in vain." --Dwight Eisenhower



"Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few." --Sir Winston Churchill



Let us never forget.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6f_FvZpm3g






Make it a point to say 'Thank you' to every person you come across who served in our Armed Forces. Freedom does not come cheap and we should be grateful for all those who have served our country.

It is important to acknowledge the contributions our service people make.




Don't be too busy today...
Share this message with friends and family.


On behalf of those who DO appreciate all that they did for us, thank you to each of you who receive this message who have served or are serving our country in the armed services or any other service.

God Bless America!

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Poll Results from Personal Liberty.com

Government Bailouts...
Good for America?


Here are the results!

The Total Number of people who voted in this poll: 373329

1) Who is most to blame for America’s current economic crisis?
69% voted: Clinton Administration and the Democrats in Congress
11% voted: The Bush Administration
3% voted: Wall Street
13% voted: Banks and sub-prime lenders
2% voted: Real estate and mortgage professionals
0% voted: Investors
1% voted: Home buyers

2) Do you agree government bailouts are the answer to America’s financial crisis?
7% voted: Yes
88% voted: No
5% voted: Undecided

3) Do you believe the American taxpayers should have to foot the bill for our financial systems mistakes?
7% voted: Yes, we have to or we’ll end up in a prolonged recession or worse a depression.
22% voted: No, America is too far in debt already.
69% voted: Absolutely not, the American people should never be responsible for bailing out the private sector.
2% voted: Undecided

4) Do you believe the government bailouts will ultimately rescue our country's financial system?
8% voted: Yes
86% voted: No
6% voted: Undecided

5) Do you believe Barack Obama was the best choice to handle the country's future economic policy?
12% voted: Yes
85% voted: No
3% voted: Undecided

In Dueling Speeches, a National Security Debate - Video

In Dueling Speeches, a National Security Debate
Obama Says Bush Set Aside Principles in Terrorism Fight, Americans with brains says Obama doesn't give a care about Americans or their security.

President Obama and former vice president Richard B. Cheney yesterday gave the country the national security debate it never had during last year's campaign, with the two outlining starkly divergent views of American power and the presidency in the fight against terrorism.

Click here for the video

Obama "We know that al qaeda is planning to attack us again" (this is why Obama must weaken us further, eh???? Listen to Cheney walk all over the imposter, Obama's extremely flawed logic and attempts to put all Americans in danger. Even with his teleprompter, Obama shows what a dufus he is. In order words, Obama refuses to do all he can to protect and defend Americans and America, talking his oath of office as a joke, what else would you expect from the fraud who many say is not even eligible to hold the office. Obama is talking about "time-tested" methods........are these the ones he HOpes to change?

WAKE UP OBAMABOTS!!! he doesn't give a fig about you and your family, unless of course you are black and/or Muslim, which is an outcome of the utterly destructive "multiculturalism" that is seperating us all into special groups and then piting each of us against the other group (Tribalism! we see how great that works when the administration "reaches out to the Muslim Community")....further, giving special group, special privileges and protections. If this isn't Jim Crow and discrimination that so many of us fought against for so long, I don't know if we can survive this kind of 1984, big brother thinking!!!

Thursday, May 21, 2009

An open Letter to Barack Hussein Obama

Your campaign for the presidency was waged in large measure on the premise that President George W. Bush pushed America into an unjustifiable and immoral invasion of Iraq, followed by years of agonizing mismanagement of the war.

In particular, you constantly chided the Bush administration for failing to develop and implement a coherent "exit strategy," for leaving the Iraq theater of the war on terror.

You and your leftist colleagues in Congress constantly pounded President Bush on the issue until discrediting the president nearly became more important than the primary military objective: To fight the war on terror in Baghdad and Fallujah, rather than New York City and Los Angeles.

However, your headstrong obsession with an "exit strategy" seems to have gone missing recently, at least with respect to closing Guantanamo Bay.

Although one of your first official acts as president was to sign an executive order to shut down the controversial Guantanamo Bay detention center "as soon as practicable," neither you nor your staff, devoted much thought to the logistics, probable ramifications, or alternatives.

Pacifying moon bats on the far left seems to have been a greater priority to you than the safety and well being of American citizens.

Republicans were not amused by your grandstanding to liberal nut balls. As reported, in part, by ABC on January 22, 2009, Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio had strong words of doubt about closing GITMO:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/LawPolitics/story?id=6707095&page=1


"I think the first thing we have to remember is that we're talking about terrorists here," Boehner said at a press conference this afternoon. "Do we bring them into our borders? Do we release them back into the battlefield, like some 61 detainees that have been released we know are back on the battlefield? And do we release them to get back and rejoin this fight? ... I'm concerned that some will be let go too soon, could end up back on the battlefield."

In the four months since you issued your tragically flawed executive order and Rep. Boehner shared his sage warnings, Team Obama still has not come forth with intelligent plans for dealing with 248 of the most vicious and deadly terrorists on the face of the planet.

Your complete and utter incompetence regarding GITMO has cost you the needed support from Democrats in Congress. Indeed, Congress has refused to authorize the funds needed to implement your unwise decision.


As it turns out, no politician, regardless of how liberally insane, wants to go before his or her constituency and explain why it is necessary to transfer deadly terrorists from an isolated military base in Cuba to their own home communities!

You continue to say, "None of these terrorists will be released on American soil." If you bring them to America in any way whatsoever, you will be giving them the same rights as American citizens when they are brought to trial!!! How incompetent is that?

It simply makes no sense! And since you have no intelligent alternative, your mindless pandering to the far left is officially on hold.

Imagine how ironic it will be if you, who fought tooth and nail against a war, intended to keep the war of terror from being fought on American soil, may actually be instrumental in bringing terrorists to American cities and towns.

A word of advice: Next time, have your "exit strategy" in place before acting, Mr. President!

Pamela
Spokan, WA


"All it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing"

WHAT DOES OBAMA HAVE TO HIDE?

While I've little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question: What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York, Jakarta, and Karachi?

So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later? And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York, Jakarta, and Karachi, what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration? The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers.
It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.

Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A: Yes, by his own admission.
Q: What passport did he travel under?
A: There are only three possibilities. 1. He traveled with a U.S. passport, 2) He traveled with a British passport, or 3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.
Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. passport in 1981?
A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.

Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport.

If he was traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he was traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.

Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008.

Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better.

Count me in as one of those inquiring minds who'd at least like to know the answers to these easily answered (by Obama) questions.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Obama Administration MAY RELEASE TWO TERRORISTS FROM GITMO EVEN THOUGH THE SENATE SAYS DON'T DO IT!!!!

Breaking News: Obama Administration May
Release Two Terrorists From Gitmo Even though the Senate says don't do it!!!!



Dear Friends,

According to the breaking news, the Obama administration is considering releasing two Chinese Muslim Uighur militants into the United States.These are radicals that have been trained by al Qaeda. This is NOT a transfer to another prison, but a release on to American soil.

The Fox News reporter stated that this report of an imminent release had not yet been confirmed by the Obama administration, so by the time you see this post there will likely be updated news on this.

Regardless of how this particular story ultimately plays out, it is clear to us that Washington needs to hear our voice – your voice – to ensure that no Guantanamo terrorist is released or transferred into the United States.

So please make your voice heard! Click here to sign our petition opposing the release or transfer of any Gitmo terrorist.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ACT for America
P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591
www.actforamerica.org



ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

Good News: Senate Rebukes Obama's Plan re: releasing Gitmo Terrorists

By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press Writer Andrew Taylor, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON – In a rare, bipartisan defeat for President Barack Obama, the Senate voted overwhelmingly Wednesday to keep the prison at Guantanamo Bay open for the foreseeable future and forbid the transfer of any detainees to facilities in the United States.

Democrats lined up with Republicans in the 90-6 vote that came on the heels of a similar move a week ago in the House, underscoring widespread apprehension among Obama's congressional allies over voters' strong feelings about bringing detainees to the U.S. The president readied a speech for Thursday on the U.S. fight against terrorism.

Obama has vowed to close the prison by January 2010, and the Senate's vote was not the final word on the matter. It will be next month at the earliest before Congress completes work on the legislation, giving the White House time pursue a compromise that would allow the president to fulfill his pledge.


click the link at the top of the story for the rest of this news item.

My question: Did the Senate come to their senses on their own OR did the groundswell from Americans against the insane release of terrorists have something to do with their decision??? You still have time to contact your legislators to tell them to finalize their rebuke of Obama's insane plan. Do YOU want a jihadist as YOUR neighbor???

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

“highly professional jihadist” in your neighborhood? Thank you Obama

!!! ACTION ALERT – STOP THE RELEASE OF
GUANTANAMO “ENEMY COMBATANTS” !!!




Would you like to have any of these men living in your community? Near your family? Ramzi Bin al-Shibh, who al Qaeda’s military commander called a “highly professional jihadist”


Walid Bin Attash, who survived a suicide bombing attack against a U.S. embassy in Africa


Gouled Hassan Dourad, leader of the al Qaeda terrorist cell in Djibouti

With President Obama’s Executive Order closing the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, the very real possibility exists that ruthless, cold-blooded terrorists like these will be moved to facilities in the continental United States. Why? Because they are so dangerous no other countries want them!!

There is also discussion in Washington about releasing some of the detainees on American soil – and then providing them tax-paid public assistance benefits!!

WE’RE SURE YOU AGREE – THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!!

Opposition is building to these proposals, both in Congress and at the grassroots. We need you to take action TODAY to let our elected officials know that we OPPOSE transferring or releasing any of the Guantanamo detainees into America.

ACTION ITEM #1

Click here to sign our petition to Congress entitled:

“We Oppose the Release of ANY Guantanamo Facility Detainee into the United States and Providing Any Tax-Paid Public Benefits to Any Detainee”

Please sign this petition right away, and then follow the directions at the bottom of the petition to forward it to everyone you know! We need to get as many people as possible to sign this petition right away!

It only takes a few moments to add your name to our petition and then forward it on to your friends and family. They need to know there are plans being discussed in Washington to transfer and even release many of these dangerous enemy combatants on to American soil. Give them the chance to add their voices to yours by forwarding our petition on to them as soon as you have signed it.

Lisa Piraneo, our Director of Government Relations, will then deliver this petition to the appropriate congressional leaders.

ACTION ITEM #2

Contact your U.S. Representative and urge him or her to support both of these bills:
H.R. 2294, the “Keep Terrorists Out of America Act.” This bill would require that no detainee could be released or transferred to a state without the approval of that state’s governor or legislature.


H.R. 2338, the “No Welfare for Terrorists Act.” This bill would prohibit any Guantanamo detainee released into the United States from receiving any federal, state or local public benefits.
You can contact your U.S. Representative by phone, fax or email. Please click here to get contact information for your Representative.


Together we can protect our communities from these enemies of America and put a stop to the absurdity of rewarding terrorism with the doling out of tax-paid public benefits. A petition with tens of thousands of names, and thousands of calls, faxes and emails, will send an unmistakably loud and clear message to Congress. So please ACT today!!



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ACT for America
P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591
www.actforamerica.org


ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

Dhimmi Dummy of the Day - STATE Category


Welcome to the Dhimmi Dummy of the Day group - HAWAII

Maybe they should have a NAZI DAY or COMMUNIST MURDER DAY Too ! Why leave any mass murder ideologies out?

Hawaiian lawmakers pass bill to celebrate "Islam Day" despite objections. Hawaii goes dhimmi although they are clueless to the sucidal path they have begun.


The Hawaii state Legislature passed a resolution that marks Sept. 24 (WHY NOT MAKE IT SEPTEMBER 11! AS LONG AS YOU ARE CELEBRATING THE ACCOMPLLISHMENTS OF MURDER)as Islam Day to recognize the "rich religious, scientific, cultural and artistic contributions" of Islam and the Islamic world. This is a deception and a fantasy. It is a deception because it fails to mention the violence and persecution and over 200 million deaths, that Islam has meted out to non-Muslims it in its 1400 year history and still does now, in so many parts of the world. It is a fantasy because most of the so called achievements of
Islam were previously produced by other (non-Islamic) cultures, or were the
product of non-muslims living in Dhimmitude under Islam.


This is part of the stealth Jihad strategy of Islamists, that whilst terrorising you, you should accept them as legitimate replacements for your culture. Next time you submissively shuffle through another undignified airport security Screening, ask yourself "Why do I have to do this?"

Islam once again demands special privileges because it is in their minds, the superior, supremacist ideology. Hawaii will not be having a Buddhist day, a Sikh day, a Jewish day etc. There is not a a day to celebrate Hawaii's indigenous
polytheistic religion. This is blatant discrimination, of the type we are
getting so used to.

Vote against Islam Day (in Hawaii) in a poll being taken by a Hawaiin paper -the results of the poll will be published to let Hawaii politicians know how
people feel about their adopting the resolution. You do not need to be a
Hawaii resident to vote.


Vote NO to disapprove of this resolution:
http://poll.starbulletin.com/index.php

The above post contains quotes from individuals who have emailed me regarding this issue, many of them more articulate than I. Thank you friends.

Friday, May 15, 2009

The Hubble Telescope - NASA: America at it's Best - Are you proud yet, Michelle???

Were any of those associated with this grand scientific endeavor some of the great Muslim contributors to our society that Fauxbama talks about? When will a Muslim make an outragous claim that he invented the hubble Space Telescope or was the first space walking astronaut???? After all Muslims are claiming one of their own discovered America and that Adam, Eve, Abraham and Jesus were all Muslims.....that's their claim and that's what they are teaching your children in 7th grade. WAKE Up America!!!


************************************************************************



Astronauts work through repair trouble at Hubble Space Telescope


By MARCIA DUNN
AP Aerospace Writer
Published: May 15, 2009

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) - Spacewalking astronauts had to put a refurbished pair of gyroscopes into the Hubble Space Telescope after a brand new set refused to go in Friday, but scientists were satisfied nonetheless and confident the observatory would point precisely to ever more distant objects in the cosmos.
Replacing the gyroscopes was the top priority of the repair mission, and the struggle had NASA on edge for two hours.
Thanks to the spacewalkers’ effort, Hubble ended up with four brand new gyroscopes and two refurbished ones that were original 19-year-old telescope parts, said to be almost as good as the new ones. The telescope also got fresh batteries.
It was the second spacewalk in as many days for the Atlantis astronauts, who once again were bedeviled by problems. On Thursday, another two-man team installed a powerful new camera and a computer data unit, after struggling with a stubborn bolt. NASA had hoped for an easier, less stressful spacewalk, but instead had to endure more drama.
As on Thursday, the astronauts got their work done, but it was harder and took longer than expected. Friday’s spacewalk was one of the longest ever, lasting nearly 8 hours, and Mission Control told the weary crew members that they could sleep in and start Saturday’s spacewalk a little late.
Michael Massimino, who was working from inside Hubble, and his partner, Michael Good, had no problem removing all six of Hubble’s 10-year-old gyroscopes. But the last set of new gyroscopes wouldn’t fit properly.
Mission Control instructed the men to go get a spare box of gyroscopes from the shuttle, and put that one in. This spare set originally was launched aboard Hubble in 1990 and returned in 1999.
The astronauts successfully installed the refurbished set. By then, however, five hours of the spacewalk had passed and they had yet to start on the other major chore of the day, the battery swap.
The gyroscopes were the No. 1 task, though. Three of the old gyroscopes no longer worked, and two others had been acting up. The other had seen a lot of use.
“My friend Leonidas has a couple of words for you guys that are appropriate right now,“ shuttle commander Scott Altman told the spacewalkers, referring to the ancient Spartan king. “Remember this day, men, for it will be yours for all time.“ Then Altman laughed. Leonidas died in battle in 480 B.C.
“We’ve got a little more work to do, but thanks,“ replied Massimino.
Hubble’s deputy senior project scientist, Mal Niedner, said he was not concerned the astronauts had to resort to refurbished gyroscopes. They lack the latest anticorrosive wiring, but it’s “the difference between an A and an A-plus.“
In all, five spacewalks are planned so that the observatory - beloved by astronomers and many others for its breathtaking views of the universe - is at its apex while living out its remaining years. Scientists expect the upgraded Hubble to look back even further in time, to within 500 million to 600 million years of creation.
Good drove in the bolts for the gyroscope boxes as Massimino, a returning Hubble mechanic who is over 6-feet tall, worked from inside the telescope, where he had wedged himself in head first. “Trained my whole life for this,“ he said.
Massimino had a brief scare when his communication system fouled up at the start of the spacewalk. For a minute or two, no one could hear him.
That wasn’t the only unnerving thing about this mission.
Space is particularly littered in this 350-mile-high orbit, and Atlantis and its crew face a greater risk of being slammed by a piece of junk. As a precaution, NASA has a rescue shuttle on standby, ready to launch in just three days if necessary.
Even though the spacewalk was running behind, the astronauts pressed on and replaced some batteries.
The hefty, nickel hydrogen batteries that came out were built before the telescope was launched in 1990. They come three to a pack, about the size of a big TV set with a mass of nearly 500 pounds. The final three batteries will be replaced early next week.
The unused new gyroscopes, meanwhile, will be analyzed once they’re returned to Earth.
NASA hopes to get another five to 10 years of use out of Hubble, once the Atlantis astronauts plug in all the new equipment. They also will take a crack at fixing two broken science instruments this weekend.
The mission cost NASA more than $1 billion, one-tenth of what has been spent on Hubble over the decades.
—-
AP Science Writer Seth Borenstein in Houston contributed to this report.
—-
On the Net:
NASA: http://www.nasa.gov/mission-pages/hubble/main/index.html

Obama says he is reviving tribunals for Gitmo detainees, BUT will he be able to find them since they have been released into American Communities?

Blog Owner Comments: I highly doubt he will find the released accused Islamic terrorists released from Gitmo. Our Government can not even find the millions of illegal aliens in this country who are collecting welfare, social security and various governmental aide. Meanwhile nearly every American knows all you have to do is to go to your local HOME DEPOT parking lot where dozens of illegals now euphemistically labeled "Day Workers" station themselves daily. I also doubt that our President will do a single thing to rile his buddy and mentor, the King of Saudi Arabia or the Muslim community he has been so eager to "reach out to" since day one of his faux Presidency!

Blog Owner Comments: What a gigantic snow job on a populace that was stupid enough to vote for this fake,
this Socialist, this America-Hater and destroyer. Once he was able to fool the masses, he has not stopped fooling them. What I really want to know is when he is going to cure the common cold or cure cancer! He and all of his America-hating socialist buddies can surely either discover the cures or at least CLAIM they have! BTW: YOUR MORTGAGE IS NOT MY PROBLEM!!! EITHER IS YOUR HEALTH CARE.


AP Story Below

Obama revives tribunals for Gitmo detainees
by Associated Press........I wonder who they are associated with??? Many Americans and others associate the press with jackasses and Democrats...ooops, that's redundant isn't it?

By LARA JAKES, Associated Press Writer Lara Jakes, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama on Friday restarted a Bush-era military trial system for a small number of Guantanamo detainees, reviving a method of prosecution he once assailed as flawed but with new legal protections for terror suspects.

In a three-paragraph White House statement, Obama announced the decision that already has drawn criticism from liberal groups, arguing that it will ensure a legitimate forum to prosecute alleged terrorists being held at the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. (Blog Owner Comments: OMG!!! a legitimate forum to prosecute criminals! WTF is this world coming to?????)

"This is the best way to protect our country, while upholding our deeply held values," the president said in a statement. (Blog Owner comments: As far as I can see, the only deeply helf value of Barack Hussein Obama is a culture of death and apology to those who want to kill us! - *looking for my whoopie bag now*)

Obama had criticized the system established by President George W. Bush, and in his statement, he said it had only succeeded in prosecuting three suspected terrorist in more than seven years.

Answering liberal complaints, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters: "First and foremost, the president does what is in the best security interest of the United States." (BOComments: *choking back the bile arising from this ourtrageous statement!*)

For now, the military trials will remain on hold, as they have been since the beginning of his administration, as Obama changes the legal system that is expected to try fewer than 20 of the 241 detainees now being held at Guantanamo.

The president said that immediate rule changes governing the trials will begin to bring them in line with the rule of law , most significantly by altering some rules of allowable evidence. Obama also is asking Congress to change the 2006 law creating the current, on-hold tribunal system to enact more sweeping reforms.

"Military commissions have a long tradition in the United States. They are appropriate for trying enemies who violate the laws of war, provided that they are properly structured and administered," Obama said.

Thirteen Guantanamo detainees — including five charged with helping orchestrate the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks — are already in the tribunal system.

Pentagon lawyers were filing a continuance request with the military commissions judge seeking a 120-day delay in trials to give it time to enact at least the initial rule changes.

The tribunal system was established after the military began taking detainees from the battlefields of Afghanistan in late 2001. But it immediately came under repeated challenges from human rights and legal organizations, because it denied defendants most of the rights they would be granted in a civilian courtroom or even in a traditional military court martial.

Obama voted for one version of the tribunal law that gave detainees additional rights, but then voted against the more limited 2006 legislation that ultimately became law.

Liberal groups, already stung by Obama's decision on Wednesday to try to block the court-ordered release of photos showing U.S. troops abusing prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan, were angered again.

"It's disappointing that Obama is seeking to revive rather than end this failed experiment," said Jonathan Hafetz, a national security attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union. "There's no detainee at Guantanamo who cannot be tried and shouldn't be tried in the regular federal courts system. Even with the proposed modifications, this will not cure the commissions or provide them with legitimacy. This is perpetuating the Bush administration's misguided detention policy."

However, the changes Obama ordered are consistent with his past criticism of the Bush system.

They include:

_Restrictions on hearsay evidence that can be used in court against the detainees.

_A ban on all evidence obtained through cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. This would include statements given from detainees who were subjected to waterboarding, a form of simulated drowning.

_Giving detainees greater leeway in choosing their own military counsel.

_Protecting detainees who refuse to testify from legal sanctions or other court prejudices.

When Obama opposed the system that Congress ultimately approved, he called it "sloppy."

"We have rushed through a bill that stands a good chance of being challenged once again in the Supreme Court," Obama said in a Sept. 28, 2006, speech on the Senate floor. "This is not how a serious administration would approach the problem of terrorism."

Later, on the presidential campaign trail in February 2008, Obama described the Guantanamo trials as "a flawed military commission system that has failed to convict anyone of a terrorist act since the 9/11 attacks and that has been embroiled in legal challenges."

The restrictions on evidence almost certainly will result in only a fraction of detainees who ever will go to trial. The rest of the detainees would either be released, transferred to other nations or tried by civilian prosecutors in U.S. federal courts, an official said.

It's also possible that some could continue to be held indefinitely as prisoners of war with full Geneva Conventions protections, according to another senior U.S. official.

The decision to restart the process puts the administration in a race against the clock to conclude commission trials before the Navy prison is closed, by January 2010. If the trials are still going on, the detainees might have to be brought to the United States, where they would receive even greater legal rights.

Since Obama's executive order to close the prison, Republicans have focused on the issue of where the detainees would go — and the new Democratic administration's lack of a plan to deal with them.

And another BTW, isn't the writer, Lara Jakes, of this AP Story now considered a "Right-Wing Extremist" right up there with the likes of Sheik Kalid and Osama Bin Ladin for writing the words "Islamic terrorists"?????

The ACLJ: In Defense of Constitutional Liberties Secured by Law

FROM THE CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, THE ACLJ, Jay Seklow

Dear Friends,

I am pleased to report some very encouraging news:

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has confirmed that it has pulled the troubling report that said ''rightwing extremism'' may include groups of veterans and those opposed to abortion.

As you recall, this report labeled these groups as ''extremists'' - prompting the ACLJ to demand a retraction. I also sent a letter directly to Secretary Janet Napolitano demanding that the report be pulled.

This morning, a Washington Times article reported that DHS Sec. Napolitano told lawmakers that the offensive report has been pulled from the DHS website, is no longer available, and is in the process of being ''replaced or redone in a much more useful and much more precise fashion.''

''The wheels came off the wagon because the vetting process was not followed,'' Napolitano told the House Homeland Security Committee. ''The report is no longer out there ... An employee sent it out without authorization.''

In addition, ''Some things in my initial days have gone very well at the department, some things have not,'' Napolitano told Members of Congress. ''And that was probably the worst thing. It was not authorized to be distributed. It had not even completed its vetting process within the department. It has been taken off of the intel websites and the lexicon that went along with it was similarly withdrawn. Neither were authorized products, and we have now put in place processes. And it turned out there were really no procedures to govern what went out and what didn't before, and now there are.''

In the words of Napolitano: ''I do not want to see a replication of that.''

Neither does the ACLJ.

We are seeing great results in this situation, thanks to the support and participation of members like you! God bless you.


American Center for Law and Justice
P.O. Box 90555, Washington, D.C. 20090-0555
Phone: (800) 296-4529


The ACLJ is an organization dedicated to the defense of constitutional liberties secured by law.

American Center for Law and Justice is a d/b/a for Christian Advocates Serving Evangelism, Inc., a tax-exempt, not-for-profit, religious corporation as defined under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, specifically dedicated to the ideal that religious freedom and freedom of speech are inalienable, God-given rights. The Center's purpose is to educate, promulgate, conciliate, and where necessary, litigate, to ensure that those rights are protected under the law. The organization has participated in numerous cases before the Supreme Court, Federal Court of Appeals, Federal District Courts, and various state courts regarding freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Your gift is very much appreciated and fully deductible as a charitable contribution. A copy of our latest financial report may be obtained b y writing to us at P.O. Box 450349, Atlanta, GA 31145-0349.

As always, let us know of threats to freedom in your area by calling (757) 226-2489. And tune in to our daily radio program, "Jay Sekulow Live!"
.

WHAT IS BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA HIDING? and WHY?

Another WORLDNETDAILY.COM news story by way of The Western Center for Journalism

Barack Hussein Obama obviously has something to hide. He obviously knows how to keep a secret when it comes to releasing his Birth Certificate; the one document that could bolster the argument that he is, in fact, eligible under Article 2, Section 1, of the United States Constitution to hold the office of President of the United States.

And yet, Barack Hussein Obama has no problem sharing information that SHOULD remain secret to the entire world and to our enemies.

Case in point! The Obama Administration just released secret memos and photographs that detail the interrogations of terrorists that were being held in American custody.

Obama authorized the release of these photographs and memos in spite of the undeniable fact that releasing these memos and photographs places the lives of our intelligence operatives and their families in imminent danger.

Obama authorized the release of these photographs and memos in spite of the undeniable fact that releasing these memos severely compromises our national security, and endangers each and every one of us.

It's becoming more and more clear, with each passing day, that the issue surrounding Obama's refusal to release his Birth Certificate and prove his eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States goes much deeper than initially thought.

The fact that Obama has something to hide when it comes to his Birth Certificate (and some of his college records for that matter) is now more than apparent.

And Obama, through his own obstruction in this matter, has established that contention as valid. It can no longer be reasonably questioned.

But what is now becoming apparent is that Obama's refusal to release his Birth Certificate hints at an arrogance and disdain of the American people that is unprecedented... an arrogance and disdain that places all of us, our children, our grandchildren and our way of life in extreme jeopardy.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use the button below to send your personalized faxes to Barack Hussein Obama and the editors of USA Today, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, the New York Post, and Long Island Newsday - the top ten newspapers in the United States with a combined circulation of approximately 10 million. Also send my personalized faxes to the producers at ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX News, MSNBC and CNN.

Tell them that Barack Hussein Obama has NOT produced an actual birth certificate and therefore has not verified that he is Constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President of the United States. Tell them to purse this very real story. Tell them to stop distorting and start reporting.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



What I Do Is None Of Your Business.

Consider the following incident. It clearly speaks to Obama's character and the character of those in his Administration.

Team Obama recently dispatched a Boeing-747 and an F-16 fighter jet to buzz New York City. The residents of New York City were not informed, and, with the tragedy of 9-11 still fresh in their minds, understandably went into a panic.

Not to worry, said the Obama Administration, it wasn't an attack or even a drill. It was just a photo-op. We needed updated photographs of Air Force One flying by the Statue of Liberty.

But when asked to release the photographs, the Obama Administration stonewalled.

Why? Were those really cool photographs, that sent the people of New York into a panic and cost the American taxpayer hundreds of million of dollars to shoot, a secret?

Do you see a connection here?

When it comes to sharing legitimate secrets with America's enemies and endangering the lives of Americans, Obama is an open book.

But, when it comes to releasing information about himself or those close to him... even information that is not of a highly personal nature, that the American people SHOULD know (Hey folks, don't panic, the planes flying perilously close to the New York Skyline are ours, or, here's my Birth Certificate which proves I am eligible to hold the office of President of the United States) Obama takes an it's-none-of-your-business attitude.

Who knows, perhaps this combination of courtesy for those that hate the United States and disdain for average Americans explains why Obama has gone to extraordinary lengths to keep his Birth Certificate under lock-and-key.

Perhaps this combination of courtesy for those that hate the United States and disdain for average Americans explains why teams of lawyers have been tasked to thwart the efforts of Americans who simply seek to compel Obama to produce his Birth Certificate.

Perhaps this combination of courtesy for those that hate the United States and disdain for average Americans explains why Team Obama has gone to extraordinary lengths to confound, confuse, distort and spin the issue surrounding his citizenship and eligibility, under the Constitution, to hold the office of President of the United States.

But one thing is becoming painfully obvious, Barack Hussein Obama is not an American, at least not in the truest sense of the word; he does not respect or admire or love the United States as you or I love and respect and admire the United States.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use the Link below to send your personalized faxes to Barack Hussein Obama and the editors of USA Today, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, the New York Post, and Long Island Newsday - the top ten newspapers in the United States with a combined circulation of approximately 10 million. Also send my personalized faxes to the producers at ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX News, MSNBC and CNN.

please use this hyperlink.

Tell them that Barack Hussein Obama has NOT produced an actual birth certificate and therefore has not verified that he is Constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President of the United States. Tell them to purse this very real story. Tell them to stop distorting and start reporting.




The Birth Certificate Controversy And The Obstruction... Just The Facts.

It's been stated before but, as there is so much erroneous information published on this issue (from both sides of the ideological aisle), it's beneficial to state the facts whenever possible.

Barack Obama Senior (Obama's Father) was a subject of the British Commonwealth (Kenya was not an independent nation when Obama was born. It was under the control of the British Crown).

As an aside, since many have asked... yes, even under the best case scenario, Obama was born with dual citizenship and there are legal arguments as to whether his status as a dual citizen would also disqualify him under Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.

However, we don't address those arguments at this point so as not to confound matters. Essentially, one cannot even progress to that question until Obama proves that he was born in Hawaii.

His mother, while an American citizen, was not of sufficient age, under the laws of the United States, to bestow citizenship onto any of her offspring that were not born on American soil.

Amazingly, the liberal media initially treated the matter of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution with a degree of seriousness. In fact, the liberal media probably started the ball rolling by aggressively questioning Senator McCain's eligibility.

McCain's father was stationed in Panama at the time of McCain's birth. McCain was NOT born on American soil.

Is McCain eligible to be President of the United States? ... The media aggressively pursued that question.

And McCain's campaign promptly answered the question and put it to rest. Although McCain was NOT born on U.S. soil, McCain's parents were both natural born citizens of the United States and of sufficient age to pass that status onto McCain... case closed.

The McCain incident was all but forgotten. Then Obama's paternal grandmother reportedly made a statement that Obama was born in what is now Kenya and that she witnessed the birth.

Admittedly, at the time, the statement was unverified and even if Obama's grandmother had, in fact, made the statement, it could be dismissed as a little white-lie told by a proud grandmother.

The story might have died were it not for the actions of Team Obama. In a rush to respond to the situation, Team Obama published a Hawaii CERTIFICATION of Live Birth on Obama's Fight the Smears (or as we call it, Obama's Fight the Truth) website... an action that raised more questions than it answered.

The Certification of Live Birth, while an official document is NOT an ACTUAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE (a CERTIFICATE of Live Birth).

Why not produce an actual birth certificate? That was - and still is - the legitimate question that keeps this all too important controversy alive.

Except when it came to the media; what was initially a valid question, when it came to McCain, was apparently no longer of any importance.

When it came to McCain, they pursued the issue with diligence. When it came to Obama, to even ask the question was a conspiracy theory.

But, as shall become apparent, the ONLY conspiracy going on here is the conspiracy on the part of Team Obama, to keep his Birth Certificate vaulted.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use the link below to send your personalized faxes to Barack Hussein Obama and the editors of USA Today, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, the New York Post, and Long Island Newsday - the top ten newspapers in the United States with a combined circulation of approximately 10 million. Also send my personalized faxes to the producers at ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX News, MSNBC and CNN.

Tell them that Barack Hussein Obama has NOT produced an actual birth certificate and therefore has not verified that he is Constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President of the United States. Tell them to purse this very real story. Tell them to stop distorting and start reporting.

please use this hyperlinkCLICK HERE.

The Real Obstruction Begins.

Again, the Certification of Live Birth is a legal document, but it is TOTALLY INADEQUATE when it comes to proving an individual was born in Hawaii.

The State of Hawaii DOES NOT EVEN ACCEPT the Certification of Live Birth as valid proof that an individual was born in Hawaii.

The Hawaii Department of Homelands, which administers programs to encourage property ownership for native Hawaiians states the following on its website.

"In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found ONLY on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL." [Emphasis Mine].

The bottom line is that the Certification of Live Birth can be erroneous. It has been reported that it was not uncommon for foreigners residing in Hawaii to bring their infant children to the Clerk of the Court, swear they were born in Hawaii and have actual Certificates of Live Birth issued to their children.

It has even been reported that foreigners residing in Hawaii, in some cases, produced birth certificates from foreign countries and the State of Hawaii still issued Hawaiian Certificates of Live Birth to the infants in question.

Could either of those two things have happened in Obama's case?

The question remains unanswered because Team Obama started moving heaven and earth to keep Obama's Certificate of Live Birth (the ACTUAL Birth Certificate which lists information such as the hospital, attending physician etc. that would verify Obama's physical place of birth) under wraps.

The only person who may have seen it is the head of Hawaii's Department of Health, Dr. Chiyome Fukino. Fukino issued the following statement to the media.

"Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawaii, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."

When pressed for details... who was the physician... what hospital is listed... does the certificate say "unknown" ... does it indicate Obama was delivered by a Mid-Wife ... does it actually acknowledge he was born outside the United States... Fukino went silent.

And the hospital where Obama was born appears to be a hard question to answer because Obama won't even answer it.

Obama's own sister was once willing to answer the question but seems confused. She named two different hospitals on two different occasions and then, she too, went silent.

And the question remains unanswered.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use the button below to send your personalized faxes to Barack Hussein Obama and the editors of USA Today, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, the New York Post, and Long Island Newsday - the top ten newspapers in the United States with a combined circulation of approximately 10 million. Also send my personalized faxes to the producers at ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX News, MSNBC and CNN.

Tell them that Barack Hussein Obama has NOT produced an actual birth certificate and therefore has not verified that he is Constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President of the United States. Tell them to purse this very real story. Tell them to stop distorting and start reporting.

please use this hyperlinkCLICK HERE.

What Is Obama Hiding?

Obama could easily answer the question by releasing his actual Birth Certificate. But not only has Obama refused to do so, teams of attorneys are thwarting efforts to compel Obama to produce it.

Obama is actively obstructing efforts to un-vault his actual Birth Certificate and this active obstruction, in and of itself, should arouse a tremendous amount of suspicion. Without a doubt, there is something on his actual Birth Certificate that he does not want known.

And for those maintaining some hope that the courts will resolve this issue... don't hold your breath.

Court actions have been unsuccessful. Team Obama actually has the audacity to claim that the courts have settled the issue but THAT'S NOT A FACTUAL ASSERTION. In all cases, the courts have dismissed these suits WITHOUT ever considering the claims or even the MERITS of the actual claims.

In most cases, the courts have simply ruled that the petitioners "lacked standing" to bring the suits. In layman's terms, the courts have basically stated, we're not even going to look at this because you have NO RIGHT to even ask Mr. Obama to produce a Birth Certificate.

Generally, rulings on "standing" are valid. Simply put, you don't have the right to un-vault your next-door neighbor's Birth Certificate simply out of curiosity.

But in this particular case, there is a nagging issue of the Constitution that simply won't go away. In our humble opinion, approximate 300 million people have standing to compel Barack Hussein Obama to un-vault his ACTUAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE.

So what's happening with the courts? Simply put, they're punting the ball. No judge wants to be the person who opens this Pandora's Box.

But the American public thinks otherwise. While some in the political and media establishment are trying to convince everyone that this matter is some kind of conspiracy theory, a recent AOL poll (while non-scientific) indicates that 52 percent of the respondents believe this matter has validity.

It's YOUR country. It's YOUR Constitution. No one is going to honor or preserve it but YOU! You have to stand up for your rights and you can do that by keeping up the pressure.

The liberal media wants this story to go away. The liberal media wants YOU to go away.

Don't let that happen. Don't give them the satisfaction. Demand they cover this story.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use the link below to send your personalized faxes to Barack Hussein Obama and the editors of USA Today, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, the New York Post, and Long Island Newsday - the top ten newspapers in the United States with a combined circulation of approximately 10 million. Also send my personalized faxes to the producers at ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX News, MSNBC and CNN.

Tell them that Barack Hussein Obama has NOT produced an actual birth certificate and therefore has not verified that he is Constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President of the United States. Tell them to purse this very real story. Tell them to stop distorting and start reporting.


please use this hyperlinkCLICK HERE.

The Constitution Is NOT Just A Piece Of Paper.

Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution states; "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President..."

Now... Obama supporters have written us hate-filled letters and told us that Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, as it pertains to Obama, is nothing more than a "legal technicality."

Can you believe that?

Others have gone so far as to take the "living-breathing argument" to its unfortunate and dangerous conclusion and told us that Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution is outmoded, outdated and no longer relevant.

Sadly, even some conservatives have advanced that erroneous argument.

Erroneous because Obama's own actions PROVE exactly WHY our Founding Fathers ratified Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution and why Article 2, Section 1 is STILL relevant today.

In under 100 days, Barack Hussein Obama:

Supplicated himself by bowing before the King of Saudi Arabia. But Obama did not simply supplicate himself. As the elected leader of the United States, he obsequiously and subserviently supplicated you... supplicated me... supplicated the entire United States before a man who is arguable, as the protector of Mecca and Medina, the most important man in the Muslim world.

Contrast Obama's subservient bow to the actions of then-New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani in October of 2001. Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, came to the United States after the 9-11 attacks and, during a high-profile ceremony, gave Giuliani a $10 million disaster relief check.

After the ceremony, the Prince released a statement to the media saying the policies of the United States partially led to, and by implication, were a justification for, the 9-11 attack. Giuliani, gave the check back!

Obama, on the other hand, traveled to Europe and profusely apologized for America's arrogance. He's snuggled up to Hugo Chavez and the Castro regime in Cuba and is even reaching out to Iran's Mahmoud "the-Holocaust-never-happened" Ahmadinejad.

Radio talk-show host, Tom Roeser comments on yet another incident:

"When Nicaragua's president Daniel C. Ortega spent 55 minutes ripping the U. S. as a fascist, anti-humane power he smilingly said, 'I'm grateful President Ortega didn't blame me for things that happened when I was three months old'-referring to the climactic test with USSR-sponsored Cuba, supposedly a shining hour of the Kennedy years. Shove off JFK: your travail has nothing to do with me. You see, I was only a baby! To our enemies he says hate the U. S. but love me!"

Mark Rhodes, writing for the Internet news blog, Illinois Review, offered additional insights on Roeser's point:

"Does Barack Obama... view himself as a citizen of the world who only happens to be the custodian of the American executive branch? This is a question that Tom Roeser hints at and it is an entirely legitimate one that in an unguarded and honest moment, President Obama himself might have a tough time answering. ... Roeser's point is that Obama can happily shake hands with enemies of America because he does not see their rants against our country as anything he needs take personally since he is detached from the history of the nation and is not emotionally bound up in its identity as most Americans are."

Taking into account Obama's past associations with the Reverend Jeremiah "God D___ America" Wright and Nation of Islam leader, Louis Farrakhan; it's almost as if hating America is a major prerequisite for those who wish to make it into Obama's cozy little circle.

Our Founding Fathers ratified Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution for just such a reason. It should be obvious that the President of the United States should have sole allegiance to the United States.

When it comes to Barack Hussein Obama, many rational people will always have doubts when it comes to issues of his loyalty and allegiance.

Hiding his Birth Certificate from the American public will only compound those doubts. That issue must be resolved.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use the link below to send your personalized faxes to Barack Hussein Obama and the editors of USA Today, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, the New York Post, and Long Island Newsday - the top ten newspapers in the United States with a combined circulation of approximately 10 million. Also send my personalized faxes to the producers at ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX News, MSNBC and CNN.

Tell them that Barack Hussein Obama has NOT produced an actual birth certificate and therefore has not verified that he is Constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President of the United States. Tell them to purse this very real story. Tell them to stop distorting and start reporting.


please use this hyperlinkCLICK HERE.


And While We're On The Subject Of Allegiance And Loyalty, A Few More Points... .

It should come as no shock that Obama is reaching out to Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Obama, after all, expressed a willingness to meet Ahmadinejad without preconditions during the campaign.

Unfortunately, Ahmadinejad appears to have some preconditions of his own.

According to MSNBC; "Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has said Iran would welcome talks with the U.S. - but only if there was mutual respect. Iranian officials have said that means the U.S. needs to stop accusing Iran of seeking to build nuclear weapons and supporting terrorism... ."

Of course, there's just two small problem with Ahmadinejad's demands. Iran IS seeking to secretly build nuclear weapons and IT DOES support terrorism.

And on another front, Obama's still moving forward with plans to close Guantanamo Bay.

Last week, Attorney General Eric Holder told the media that at least 30 of these terrorists had already been cleared for release. Allusions were initially made that these 30 terrorists could actually be released on U.S. soil and that most of the remaining terrorists could be tried on U.S. soil (Essentially meaning that after retaining slick ACLU lawyers, who would make a mockery of our legal system, many of these remaining terrorists would also be released onto U.S. soil).

Holder quickly contained the situation and issued a "clarification" on Thursday, saying that no terrorists will be released in the United States. However, as things stand now, we have no place to put these terrorists... no other country will take them. So WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO GO!

Frankly, coming from an Administration that distributed a secret report to law enforcement officials contending that patriotic Americans are the real terrorists, such statements are far from reassuring.

Senator Kit Bond of Missouri said: "While President Obama has no plan for what to do with these killers, he has pledged to close the terrorist detention facility in January, to fulfill a campaign promise. This is a dangerous case of putting symbolism over security."

And things are even worse on the domestic front.

Under the guise of "bailing-out" the auto industry, Obama essentially took control of General Motors and Chrysler. Not being a selfish man, he then turned around and effectively gave away pieces of the former to Big Labor and Fiat (a foreign automobile manufacturer).

But Obama's not done yet. In a time of severe economic hardship, Obama has proposed to triple the national debt and he is laying the groundwork for an effective nationalization of the health-care industry.

As for the banks, they're ripe for takeover as well. Economist Stuart Varney, in an editorial published by The Wall Street Journal, alerted us to the Obama Administration's reluctance to accept money from banks that are attempting to repay TARP bailout money:

"My answer: The government wants to control the banks, just as it now controls GM and Chrysler, and will surely control the health industry in the not-too-distant future. Keeping them TARP-stuffed is the key to control. And for this intensely political president, mere influence is not enough. The White House wants to tell 'em what to do. Control. Direct. Command."

Varney goes on a talks about what is happening to a large well-known bank that was FORCED to accept TARP money and is NOT being allowed to pay the money back to the American taxpayer:

"The chairman offers to write a check, now, with interest. He's been sitting on the cash for months and has felt the dead hand of government threatening to run his business and dictate pay scales. He sees the writing on the wall and he wants out. But the Obama team says no, since unlike the smaller banks that gave their TARP money back, this bank is far more prominent. The bank has also been threatened with 'adverse' consequences if its chairman persists. That's politics talking, not economics."

Are Obama's actions, the actions of a man that loves the United States?

Many patriotic Americans will say no; but, at the very least, we should compel the man occupying the office of President of the United States to prove that he is eligible, under the highest law in the land, to occupy that office.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Use the Link below to send your personalized faxes to Barack Hussein Obama and the editors of USA Today, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, the New York Post, and Long Island Newsday - the top ten newspapers in the United States with a combined circulation of approximately 10 million. Also send my personalized faxes to the producers at ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX News, MSNBC and CNN.

Tell them that Barack Hussein Obama has NOT produced an actual birth certificate and therefore has not verified that he is Constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President of the United States. Tell them to purse this very real story. Tell them to stop distorting and start reporting.





P.S. Even if you can not join us in this effort right now, you can still help us expose Barack Hussein Obama by sending this e-mail to at least 10 of your friends.




please use this hyperlinkCLICK HERE.

Thursday, May 14, 2009

INSANITY IN LOUISIANA - A GOVERNMENT GONE NUTS!


This type of behavior by our government must be stopped. This, and hate crime legislation must be stopped. It's called mind control. Being good citizens, law abiding citizens, we have to stop, or change laws that are taking away our freedoms. Our present socialist government will stop at nothing to take away our freedom of speech and thought.


Subject: Suspect detained over 'extremist' bumper sticker


HOMELAND INSECURITY
Suspect detained over 'extremist' bumper sticker
'Don't Tread on Me' puts driver in 'watch' category in DHS report

Posted: May 07, 2009
By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily


A Louisiana driver was stopped and detained for having a "Don't Tread on Me" bumper sticker on his vehicle and warned by a police officer about the "subversive" message it sent, according to the driver's relative.

The situation developed in the small town of Ball, La., where a receptionist at the police department told WND she knew nothing about the traffic stop, during which the "suspect" was investigated for "extremist" activities, the relative said.

A man identifying himself as a police officer from Ball called WND later to report that the town's records of traffic stops did not include this situation. He suggested it might have involved one of several other agencies that work in the area.

to read the rest of this WORLDNETDAILY story click here

Thanks go out to Lois for passing on this item.

Tonight on Blog Talk Radio

Thursday, May 14th

6 pm, west coast time, PDT

on Thursday, Click here to listen


Thursday, No Compromise Radio is hosting two great guests:

Our first guest is Dr. Alan Keyes who is a former US Ambassador under Reagan, ran for the U.S. Senate in 2004 against Barack Obama, has announced plans to come to Notre Dame University in Indiana to be arrested for protesting Obama’s address and honorary doctorate at Notre Dame’s graduation.

Our second guest is Dr. Paul Williams who is an American author, journalist, and consultant. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree in English from Wilkes University, a Master of Divinity degree from Drew University, and a Doctor of Philosophy degree also from Drew. He is the author of six books, the most recent being The Day of Islam: The Annihilation of America and the Western World, in which he expands on the American Hiroshima scenario he believes to be imminent, in which simultaneous nuclear attacks on 7 to 10 American cities would create havoc in American society. Prior to this, he served for seven years as a consultant to the FBI about terrorist and mafia criminal organizations. Currently, Williams is being sued by McMaster University for investigating terrorist activity at McMaster. You can read more about that lawsuit here. http://www.paulwilliamsdefensefund.com/index.html





No Compromise When it Comes to Being Right!

Friday, May 8, 2009

The Fall of Ahmadinejad Video Game

The official launch date is May 22nd. You can now get an early copy of the highly anticipated, politically charged video game “Durka 3d: The Fall of Ahmadinejad”.

Get it at http://www.Durka3d.com

Thank you Jesse Petrilla

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Dhimmi Dummy of The Day Award - Individual/Press



Jonathan Steel









The Guardian's columnist Jonathon Steele has a history of downplaying Palestinian terror. When Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian election, Steele called it the “best news from the Middle East in a long time,” and noted that ”Europe should not get hung up on the wrong issues, like armed resistance.”

In a new article published this week, Steele offers advice to the President Barack Obama ahead of his first meeting with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. While urging Obama to take a hard line with Israel on issues such as settlements and even on Israel’s alleged nuclear arsenal, Steele is less concerned about the threat of violence against Israel.

In fact, Steele not only justifies Palestinian violence, he also offers tacit support for foreign leaders who give it their backing:


Until Israel pulls back to the 1967 borders, give or take some land swaps, under international agreement, Palestinian resistance will continue – and other states will be entitled to support it.

Of course, Steele could just as reasonably have concluded that there can be no Israeli withdrawal to the 1967 border as long as “resistance” – a Palestinian term for terrorism – continues. But that would mean acknowledging that terrorism exists. Instead, Steele whitewashes Hamas’s record as a terrorist organization. “Now that Hamas is independent, strong and popular,” he writes, “Israel sees it as the new target.”

In other words, Israel acts against Hamas because it is popular, not because it fires rockets at Israeli civilians, smuggles weapons into the Gaza Strip, or threatens to destroy the Jewish state. He also fails to mention that Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 – a pullback to the 1967 border in that area – resulted in more violence against Israel, undermining his implicit claim that violence would stop if only Israel would withdraw.

Even more puzzling than Steele’s justification of terror is his reluctance to press Iran for violating the terms of the international Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). In a strange inversion of logic, Steele asserts that the international community should place equal pressure on countries such as Israel, who have not signed the NPT, as it does on countries that have signed the agreement and violate its terms:

If Iran, a signatory of the NPT, is rightly pressed to adhere to the requirement for transparency, it is hypocrisy not to press the non-signatories to be as honest. To argue that countries which have not signed up are exempt from the rules may be legally right, but is politically absurd.


Absurd is right. Someone who public agrees to abide by a set of rules has a greater responsibility to adhere to those rules than someone who enter an agreement. Otherwise, what is the difference between signing and not signing the agreement? Steele is welcome to call on Israel to sign the treaty. But to suggest that Israel should be subject to the terms of the agreement regardless of whether it has signed or not is ridiculous.

Does Steele's justification of terror violate any moral imperative to end violence? Please send your considered comments to the Guardian at letters@guardian.co.uk.





Source:
HonestReporting. com

The 9-12 Project

This group does not represent ACT for America nor is it a coalition member:

The 9-12 Projectis designed to bring us all back to the place we were on September 12, 2001. The day after America was attacked (by Islamists) we were not obsessed with Red Sttes, Blue States or political parties. We were united as Americans, standing together to protect the values and principles of the greatest natin ever created.

Mission Statement
Posted by the912project on March 24, 2009 · Comments (2163)

This website is a place for you and other like-minded Americans looking for direction in taking back the control of our country. It is also a place to find information that will assist you in navigating the rough waters we face in the days, weeks and months ahead.

We suggest that you start in your own homes. Talk to your family about the Values and Principles. Discuss the importance of what the Founders designed for America.

Hold or attend a weekly meeting in your neighborhood or town. Communication with your neighbors is vital to the process of protecting our country. Gather in living rooms, coffee houses or restaurants. Share your thoughts and ideas.

Visit this website often. Make use of the resources that are linked here. Share the ideas and resources that have worked in your home or town.

This is a non-political movement. The 9-12 Project is designed to bring us all back to the place we were on September 12, 2001. The day after America was attacked we were not obsessed with Red States, Blue States or political parties. We were united as Americans, standing together to protect the greatest nation ever created.

That same feeling – that commitment to country is what we are hoping to foster with this idea. We want to get everyone thinking like it is September 12th, 2001 again.

Ask yourself these questions:

Do you watch the direction that America is being taken in and feel powerless to stop it?

Do you believe that your voice isn’t loud enough to be heard above the noise anymore?

Do you read the headlines everyday and feel an empty pit in your stomach…as if you’re completely alone?

If you’ve answered YES, then you’ve fallen for the Wizard of Oz lie. While the voices you hear in the distance may sound intimidating, as if they surround us from all sides—the reality is very different. Once you pull back the curtain, you realize that there are only a few people pressing the buttons, and their voices are weak. The truth is that they don’t surround us at all.

We surround them.

At the origin of America, our Founding Fathers built this country on 28 powerful principles. These principles were culled from all over the world and from centuries of great thinkers. We have distilled the original 28 down to the 9 basic principles.

So, how do we show America what’s really behind the curtain? Read the nine simple principles. If you believe in at least seven of them, then we have something in common.

Welcome.

Spread The Word - Join or state a chapter in your community.

Democrats vote for Pedophilia

Are they on drugs or what? Aren't you ashamed of having voted for these obviously insane idiots??? Hate Crime Protection for Pedophiles!!



Read these comments from Pamela Geller's blog

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

The Mexican Flu

Previous flu epidemics were known as The Spanish Flu and the Hong Kong Flu. This is NOT the swine flu. It IS the Mexican Flu. And Mexicans are INVADING the U.S.A.

Stating FACTS does not make hate speech nor make the person stating FACTS a racist!

Wake up America! Stop committing suicide. Believe your own ears and eyes. 2+2 really does equal 4, not 18 as the media whores and nitwits from Arizona and Illinois would have you believe.

Stand up for your rights or lose them. Stand up for Free Speech and against thought crimes.

BE ANTISOCIAList