Wednesday, November 26, 2008

It's ISLAMIC Terrorism in Mumbai, you media whores!


Witnesses: Terrorists looked for Brits, Americans; Muslim fanatics attack innocent Indians, Americans; bloodbath; Terrorists coordinate attacks across Bombay; Mumbai police: 4 suspects killed, 9 arrested; Analysis: a new tactic by Islamist militants; Mumbai's anti-terrorism squad chief killed; Feds warn of terror plot against NYC subways; Al Qaida targets New York's Penn Station

Several regions of India under attack by ISLAMIC TERRORISTS: Hostages taken, Hotels, Train Stations and Hospitals under attack. Stay tuned for continuing ISLAMIC TERRORISM throughout the globe.

What do YOUR news sources tell you about what is happening in India? Do they tell you it is ISLAMISTS doing the killing, bombing and burning?

P.S. For all you liberal college educated saps out there: Mumbai is Bombay - Bombay is Mumbai.

Monday, November 24, 2008

Holy Land Foundation defendants guilty on all counts

OMG! OMG! Where's my minature violin? Crying because they got caught! Isn't your heart just breaking for them? They were only doing what their "religion" DEMANDS of them! OH! You government fear mongers. Guilty of 108 counts and still claiming innocence!

Holy Land Foundation defendants guilty on all counts

Dallas Morning News;

A jury on Monday determined that the Holy Land Foundation and five men who worked with the Muslim charity were guilty of three dozen counts related to the illegal funneling of at least $12 million to the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas.

The unanimous verdicts are a complete victory for the government, which streamlined its case after a mistrial last year, and worked hard to carefully educate jurors on the complex evidence presented in the massive case. Guilty verdicts were read on 108 separate charges.

Zolfa Elaydi (center) is comforted by her son, Jihad Elaydi, as she and her daughter, Fidaa Elaydi, weep outside the Earle Cabell Federal Building on Monday in reaction to the guilty verdicts in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing case.

The prosecution victory is also a major one for the administration of President George Bush, whose efforts at fighting terrorism financing in court have been troubled, even though the flow of funds seems to be effectively shut down.

“Today’s verdicts are important milestones in America’s efforts against financiers of terrorism,” Patrick Rowan, Assistant Attorney General for National Security said in a prepared statement.

“This prosecution demonstrates our resolve to ensure that humanitarian relief efforts are not used as a mechanism to disguise and enable support for terrorist groups,” he said.

Robert Hirschhorn, a nationally known jury consultant based in Lewisville, said “The jury has handed the government a huge victory and a loud and clear message has been sent — if any group funnels money to a terrorist organization, the government will hunt you down and turn off the money spigot.”

Later Monday, the jury determined that Holy Land should forfeit $12.4 million in defendants’ assets because of several convictions on money laundering charges related to the case.

It was the second trial where the government attempted to convict the men and the now defunct Richardson-based Holy Land Foundation itself. It took the jury eight days of deliberations to reach its decisions — less than half the time it took jurors to end up with an almost complete mistrial last year on the first go-around.

“It’s a sad day,” said Mohammed Wafa Yaish, Holy Land’s former accountant and himself a witness of the trial. “It looks like helping the needy Palestinians is a crime these days.”

Before he read the verdict, the judge had ordered all observers to remain civil and respect the proceedings.

“My dad is not a criminal!” sobbed one courtroom observer after the verdicts were read. “He’s a human!”

In the trial’s second, overflow courtroom, reaction to the verdicts was subdued. Family and friends left quietly. Several said they didn’t want to talk.

One supporter of the defendants who identified himself as Adel said, “It’s politicized. I don’t think there is justice. I know these guys. I think everything is lies.”

John Wolf, a friend and member of the Hungry for Justice coalition, said he’d known the defendants for 12 years.

“I’m not surprised,” he said of the verdicts. “I think the government had their do-over and they learned from their mistakes. It’s hard to accept because I don’t believe the gentlemen are guilty. These guys are the sweetest, clean-hearted people.”

Opening statements at the Earle Cabell Federal Building in downtown Dallas began Sept. 22. Over the past two months, prosecutors attempted to prove that five former charity organizers used Holy Land, once the largest Muslim charity in the U.S., to funnel an estimated $60 million to the militant group — most of it before 1995.

Hamas was designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. in 1995, and the trial centered on the $12 million the government said Holy Land and supporters funneled to the group after that date.

Defense attorneys argued that the foundation was a legitimate, non-political charity that helped distressed Palestinians under Israeli occupation. They accused the government of bending to Israeli pressure to prosecute the charity, and of relying on old evidence predating the 1995 designation.

Holy Land was formed in the late 1980s, and was shut down by U.S. government regulators in December 2001. The case was indicted in 2004.

Last year’s trial of the same five defendants ended in a hung jury Oct. 22, 2007. Jurors deliberated for 19 days before they deadlocked. Supporters on both side of the aisle were prepared to claim a victory, at least in the moral sense.

“The government showed in a streamlined case that where special assistance to the families of terrorists is concerned, cash is the moral equivalent of a car bomb,” said Peter Margulies, Roger Williams University law professor who studies terrorism financing cases.

“Going forward, however, the government must be more pro-active about furnishing guidance to Muslim-Americans who merely wish to fulfill their religious obligations,” he said.

Douglas Farah, a former Washington Post foreign correspondent who is now an author and terrorism consultant, said that the “trial provides an invaluable forum for publicly showing the true agenda of the international Muslim Brotherhood and its organizations in the United States — the abolition of the United States government as we know it and support for a designated terrorist organization.”

“Given this complete victory for the government … it is now incumbent on U.S. government agencies to stop dealing with them as if they were engaging in benign efforts to push an agenda of tolerance and civil rights.”

The Justice Department is likely to claim victory not only with the verdicts, but by trumpeting the shutdown of what prosecutors say was a robust and unsettling American network of terrorist funding.

Holy Land, regardless of the verdict, is defunct. And other international terrorism financing pipelines have been interrupted.

But critics of the government case argued that even convictions would carry an asterisk noting that it took untold millions of taxpayer dollars, 15 years of investigation and two long, high-profile trials to finally convince a jury of the defendants’ guilt.

“I think this case proves that, with enough effort, the federal government can convict nearly anyone,” said Tom Melsheimer, a former federal prosecutor in Dallas now in private practice.“Retrials tend to favor the prosecution, in my view, because the government can figure out what worked and what didn’t and streamline their presentation of the evidence. The defense, on the other hand, has already shown their cards and the government can be better prepared to respond.

“I fear that these convictions will convince the government of the justness of their overall cause but I view the convictions as compelling the opposite conclusion,” he said. “To spend millions of dollars in time and expenses to prosecute people who were of no real threat to anyone, under the banner of a terrorism case, is a waste of precious federal resources.

William Moffitt, a Virginia defense attorney who represented two former university professors, Abdelhaleem Ashqar and Sami Al-Arian, said before the Holy Land verdicts that he suspects the convicted defendants will be hailed as heroes by some.

“I suspect that they will be viewed much the same way that Mandela was viewed by the black South African population — as freedom fighters who have dedicated their lives to the liberation of Palestine,” he said. Mr. Ashqar and Mr. Al-Arian were acquitted in trials in Chicago and Florida on similar charges that they steered support to Palestinian terrorists.

Mr. Ashqar was sentenced to 11 years in prison last year for refusing to testify for a grand jury about his Hamas ties. Dr. Al-Arian pleaded guilty in 2006 to a charge of supporting Palestinian Islamic Jihad and is being held on contempt charges for refusing to co-operate in another terrorism support investigation. But both are viewed as folk heroes by some in the Muslim community.

Mr. Moffitt said Holy Land and the other cases are “show trials” where the government attempted to use “events that happened over 10 years ago” as evidence of crimes well before statutes specifically outlawing terrorism support were enacted.

“I think that the purpose of these trials was to further, in the minds of the public, the so-called ‘war on terrorism,’” he said. “There are legitimate terrorist organizations out there. But we’ve tried to make every group that doesn’t agree with us like al-Qaeda.”

Mr. Yaish, the Holy Land accountant, said Monday that he was angry that the prosecution brought up the Taliban and al Qaeda during the trial. He called that a fear tactic.

“What does giving charity to the Palestinians in the refugee camps have to do with this?”

“They scared the jurors,” he said. “Fear is the No. 1 government tactic.”

CAIR Sued for Racketeering, Fraud and More!

Dare we hope that this terrorist Islamist organization is beginning to be taken down by our government?

ALERT: at approximately 7:00 p.m. this evening, Nihad Awad, Executive Director of CAIR, was served a summons at the CAIR 14th Annual Banquet - onstage - by Dave Gaubatz.

The dinner is ongoing and viewers here will be able to see the Youtube video which was edited and uploaded to Youtube immediately after the dessert course.

For more information click here

Gates of Vienna has the whole story:

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Global Resistance to Islamic Jihad

Friends and Lovers of Liberty,

The previous few posts are meant to give you ideas and encouragement to resist the spread of global jihad - the movement by Islamists to create a global caliphate living under Qur'anic, Shariah Law.

If you want to live under Qur'anic law, IMHO and that of millions upon millios of well informed people: YOU ARE BRAIN DEAD OR one of the Islamic THUGS!

Surely by now, anyone with a functioning brain, can no longer ignore the reality of the spread of Islam by any and all means! Afterall, War is Deceit!

Global war has been declared by Islam against ALL non Muslims...........This means YOU, your FAMILY, your COMMUNITY and your COUNTRY.

Much of the Islamic world has been gearing up for DECADES - training and indoctrinating their children to Jihad. Former PLO terrorists, Walid Shoebat, recruited by the Muslim Brotherhood, went on his first jihad mission to the Golan Heights, at the age of 7 years old! In Mohammad's own words "Teach your children how to fight."

And here's a word for you apologists, dupes,dhimmis and other dummies of and for Islam.........The Jihadists training Walid Shoebat used sheppards to do their dirty work. They paid the sheppard to strap bombs onto his sheep, herd them into a community and kaboooomb! A bunch of dead Unbelievers. So now the sheppard has money to replace his blown up sheep and something extra for his troubles. The Sheppard is living large on his efforts having helped the jihadists, because, after all, the sheppard has to feed his family! Time passes, and those same jihadists return to the sheppard, who is probably!....another mission, more money...............but NO, no...the jihadist return to KILL him AND his family.

Entire families live to advance Islam. The Hadith tells Muslims that if they can not fight physically they must fight financially. Ever heard of Shariah Compliant Finance? More on this subject later - basically Shariah Complaint Finance helps to fund terrorism.

For a Muslim to die a shaid (jihadist)is to die as an intercessor for one's family to go to paradise.

Sura 8 is full of "Holy" instructions directly from Mohammad on how to deceive and slay the unbeliever - to become a shaid.

Sura 8:12, 13, 14, 15, 16: "Remember your Lord inspired the angels with the message: I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: you smite above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them. This because they contended against Allah and His Messenger: if any contend against Allah and His Messenger, Allah is strict in punishment. Thus, You taste then of the punishment for those who resist Allah, is the penalty of the Fire. O you who believe! when you meet the Unbelievers in hostile array, never turn your backs to them. If any do turn his back to them on such a day - unless it be in a stratagem of war, or to retreat to a troop, he draws on himself the wrath of Allah and his abode is Hell - an evil refuge."

There is no need for me to give you examples of Islamofascist barbarism of violence across the globe. These incidents have been in the news for years in almost every single country in the world! But what you probably are unaware of is JIHAD BY STEALTH.

WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR??? Join the resistance now!

The jihadists and Islamists are hiding like termites in our communities - many are here for the purpose of jihad and are living in peace - for now. The jihadist and Islamists are in western countries to advance Sharia Law and to recruit more jihadists. Their primary recruiting arm, the Muslim Student Association or MSA,which was founded by the Muslim Brotherhood or Ikhwan,is well established in hundreds of our colleges, universities and even high schools!

The Islamists mission:
1) Kill for Islam 2) Get ride of all opposition.

In almost every country there IS a resistance and it is growing.

What you say? "I had no idea!" Well, now you do!

You can and MUST act now! Join any of the resistance groups in your respective country. There are many, many actions YOU can take to save your future and that of your children.

In the US, please consider joining or starting a local chapter of ACT for America. ACT! for America was founded by Brigitte Gabriel, a Lebanese immigrant who came to the United States after losing her country of birth to militant Muslim fundamentalists during the Lebanese Civil War.

ACT! for America was created to provide American citizens a means to be a collective voice for the democratic values of Western Civilization, such as the celebration of life and liberty, as opposed to the authoritarian values of Islamofascism, such as the celebration of death, terror and tyranny.

This collective, grassroots voice will triumphantly rise above political correctness and intimidation.


Counter Jihad - Germany / Aktionsforum Gegen - Aktionsforum gegen die Islamisierung Europas

La Yijad en Eurabia

La Yijad en Eurabia - Noticias y Reflexiones sobre la transformación de Europa por la Tercera Yijad

ACTION SITA- Join the Resistance

The SITA Motto: You have an envelope, a stamp thererfore you've got the POWER........You have to POWER to say any public person YOUR OPINION.......So, don't hesitate.............get involved with SITA-actions inspired by Amnesty International.

In French SITA means Sensibilisation à l'Islam Tous Azimuts, it could be translated into Stop Islamization and Terrorist Actions.

To all friends fighting Islam (its texts) but not Muslims = main victims of Islam.

The Islamization of Western countries is carried out in several ways and the building of mosques is an essential component as it is the place where children are indoctrinated to hate Western values and become future jihadists.

An important detail, no mosque is without a Madrassa, a term which is misleading for Westerners. Koranic schools or schools for learning Arabic or tutoring school use only one teaching book, the Koran! Imagine the outcry if we learned English-language only from the Bible.

In the forefront on Islamization, the only effective method that we have found and that we use is inspired by Amnesty International, and is the mailed information with an envelope and a stamp.

It stems from the snowflake phenomenon: one snowflake on a roof, two flakes, three flakes nothing happens but a few billion flakes and roof collapses.


Stop the Hate Against Kafirs! Sign the Petition

Enough is Enough! Join the Resistance!



This excellent Petition 2009 UN World Conference Against Racism was drafted by a lawyer.

It is intended to counterbalance and counteract the petition to the United Nations from Islamic countries which seek to make “islamophobia” (the height of common sense) a crime as heinous as racism (the lowest form of stupidity).

It was sent to the Israeli Prime Minister and to every member of the Knesset. Only one replied saying that he didn’t want to get involved in internal European Politics! (he obviously never read it).

Israel is the intended target for isolation in the forthcoming 2009 UN World Conference Against Racism, in Durban, as it was at the same conference a few years ago.

As several Islamic countries have not even signed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but instead signed up to their own sharia version the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam, we think it is a bit of a cheek for Islamists to use the UNDHR against the West, indeed all non-islamic countries, when the Cairo declaration enshrines sharia law.

The petition was also sent to the Serbian Prime Minister and various Serbian Ministries, with no answer. Of course we understand that elections were happening in Serbia, but our correspondence merited a reply, at least.

Hindus and Copts have agreed to sign and fully support our effort to combat islamic persecution of minorities.


Thursday, November 20, 2008

CAIR's plan for "winning the hearts and minds" of Americans

Recently obtained, from confidential sources within CAIR, that organization’s 2007 strategy memo. The memo spells out what CAIR aims to accomplish over the next few years. Quoting from the strategy memo we read:

“By December 31, 2010, we [CAIR} will be supporting a $12,000,000 budget…We will have a presence covering all states, with at least 28 state chapters…

“We will impact local Congressional districts with each chapter influencing at least two legislators…We will focus on Congressmen responsible for policy that directly impacts the American Muslim community. For example, Congressmen on the judiciary, intelligence, and homeland security committees. We will develop national initiatives such as lobby day and placing Muslim interns in Congressional offices.

In concert with local chapters we will sustain an ongoing media campaign "to change the hearts and minds of Americans…”

CAIR is just one arm of the American Islamic lobby. We should expect every Islamic organization in America to feel emboldened and empowered by the results of the 2008 election.

CAIR's demand for fees from Michael Savage rejected

CONGRATULATIONS Michael Savage! A man who stands by his principles and refuses to give in to Islamic intimidation! CAIR and all you insane liberals and Islamic apologists: Go to Hell!

CAIR's demand for fees from Michael Savage rejected
Clinton-appointed judge denies motion by controversial Islamic lobby group

Posted: November 13, 2008
4:52 pm Eastern

© 2008 WorldNetDaily

Michael Savage (San Francisco Chronicle)

A Clinton-appointed federal judge ruled in favor of Michael Savage today in an attempt by the Council on American-Islamic Relations to extract attorney fees and costs in a case the nationally syndicated talk radio host brought against the Muslim lobby group.

"This is a huge victory for me, personally, but also for the rest of America who is afraid of this lawsuit-happy group of intimidators," Savage said.

Judge Susan Illston of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California previously dismissed Savage's copyright infringement and RICO lawsuit against CAIR. Savage alleged CAIR illegally published singled-out quotes and audio excerpts from his show regarding Islam, misappropriated his words and used the clips for its own fundraising purposes, damaging the value of his copyrighted material.

Savage noted Illston is a "bona fide liberal, yet she followed the law in the fees motion."

"CAIR tried to tell her in their claim that she 'should get' me, because they were all liberals," he said. "You have to read their sloppy claim to believe it. Now, people will not be afraid to file suits if they have a legitimate claim against CAIR or any other Soros-funded group."

CAIR last year waged a public campaign using excerpted Savage remarks to urge advertisers to boycott his top-rated program. CAIR stated its campaign successfully resulted in Savage losing $1 million in advertising.

Part of Savage's lawsuit alleged CAIR received millions in foreign funding and that the Islamic group may have been wrongfully acting as a lobbyist or agent for a foreign government, violating its nonprofit status.

Savage also alleged CAIR was engaged in racketeering, describing the group as a "mouthpiece of international terror" that helped fund the 9/11 attacks, a contention strongly denied by CAIR.

But Illston threw out the case in July, arguing it is legal to use excerpts of a public broadcast for purposes of comment and criticism.

Illston, nominated to her position by President Bill Clinton, wrote in her ruling that Savage could try to rewrite the racketeering portion of his suit to better fit the specifics of his case.

In May 2007, CAIR was identified by the government as an unindicted co-conspirator in a case involving the Holy Land Foundation, a charity allegedly affiliated with Hamas. Federal prosecutors listed CAIR under the category: “Individuals/entities who are and/or were members of the US Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee and/or its organizations.”

The government also listed Omar Ahmad, CAIR's founder and chairman emeritus, under the same category.

CAIR is registered as a nonprofit organization recognized as tax-exempt under IRS codes, which restrict "lobbying on behalf of a foreign government." CAIR's website claims it receives no foreign government support.

But CAIR's headquarters near the U.S. Capitol until recently was owned by the ruler of Dubai, United Arab Emirates, and the ruler's foundation has pledged $50 million to capitalize a long-term CAIR public-relations campaign.

The UAE formally recognized the Taliban, and Dubai reportedly acted as the transit point for cash for the 9/11 hijackers. Two of the hijackers were from the Emirates, and one served in the UAE military.

Until 2005, the Al Maktoum Foundation run by Dubai's ruler Sheik Mohammed bin Rashid held the deed to CAIR's headquarters just three blocks from the Capitol. The same foundation reportedly has held telethons to raise money for families of Palestinian "martyrs" during the intifada – or terrorist war – started in September 2000 against Israel. It recently pledged a $50 million endowment for CAIR.

CAIR argues that any assertions it receives money from foreign governments is "disinformation."LIARS!!!

"This is yet another attempt to invent a controversy," the group said. "CAIR's operational budget is funded by donations from American Muslims."

CAIR, however, has never publicly acknowledged $1 million controlling interest that the ruler of Dubai's foundation took in its national headquarters just one year after 9/11.

The group also received $500,000 from Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, the sheik whose $10 million relief check after 9/11 was rejected by then-New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani after he blamed U.S. policy toward Israel for the attacks.

"There is nothing criminal or immoral about accepting donations from foreign nationals," CAIR asserted. "The U.S. government, corporations and non-profit organizations routinely receive money from foreign nationals."

"Bin Talal is not a member of the Saudi Arabian government," the group added in a statement. "He is a private entrepreneur and international investor."

This may be a distinction without a difference, Savage's lawyers argue, since bin Talal is a member of the Saudi ruling family.

"CAIR is proud to receive support of every individual," CAIR argued, "as long as they are not an official of any foreign government and there are no strings attached to the bequest."

The UAE endowment to CAIR was specifically earmarked for public relations efforts to repair the image of Arabs and Muslims in America after public outrage doomed a Dubai bid to run U.S. ports.

Lawyers for Savage argue that CAIR may have used UAE funds and other foreign support to attack the radio host.

Yet One More Reason Why Islam is NOT Compatible With the West!

Phoenix Imam Tells Muslims To Disregard U.S. Laws by Robert Spencer

“A Muslim must try his best to abide by the rulings of Sharia [Islamic law] whenever possible as much as he can. He should not allow himself to be liable to those western laws that contradict the clear-cut Islamic rulings.” The rulings of Sharia, mind you, include stoning for adultery, amputation of the hand for theft, and institutionalized discrimination against women and non-Muslims. But the speaker was not some fanatic Wahhabi in Saudi Arabia; it was the Phoenix-based imam Omar Shahin, president of the North American Imams Foundation. This is probably one reason why, as The Arizona Republic reported Monday, the FBI has stepped up scrutiny of Shahin and other Muslim leaders in Phoenix.

Omar Shahin has been in the news before. He is the spokesman for a group of six imams who sued US Airways after being removed from a flight in 2006 when passengers and crewmembers reported that they were behaving suspiciously. The imams were handcuffed and later interrogated, then released with no charges, whereupon Shahin led a news conference to condemn prejudice against Muslims. All six imams later sued the airline, airport police and an FBI agent, claiming they had been singled out solely because they were Muslim. “We did nothing,” Shahin maintained in a report on Boston -- and the Council on American Islamic Relations seized on the incident as evidence of American “Islamophobia.” “We are concerned that crew members, passengers and security personnel may have succumbed to fear and prejudice based on stereotyping of Muslims and Islam,” said CAIR’s executive director, Nihad Awad, in the same report.

The imams also initially sued the anonymous passengers who reported them, before House Republicans pushed through a measure protecting whistleblowers in such circumstances. As I discuss in my new book Stealth Jihad, if this initiative had been successful, the only winners would have been Islamic jihadists who wanted to hijack airplanes. Any ruling against the passengers would have essentially placed Muslims beyond the pale of security-related scrutiny, because someone who reported suspicious behavior by a Muslim in an airport or airplane would have faced a real risk of being sued for discrimination.

Shahin’s questionable activities didn’t begin with this lawsuit, either. In the '80s, he was an imam at the Islamic Center of Tucson, which the Republic identified as “a hub for adherents to the radical Wahhabi school of Islam, some of whom later became important aides to Osama bin Laden in the al-Qaida terrorist group.” The report by Sean Holstege and Dennis Wagner also notes that Shahin raised funds for two Islamic charities that were ultimately shut down on accusations that they were funneling contributions to the jihad terrorist group Hamas.

Yet despite all this, “Shahin has served as a Muslim community liaison with the FBI and the Phoenix police,” according to the Republic. How did a man with a record like Shahin’s ever get into the good graces of the FBI? He was able to do so because many officials in positions of influence in the United States are standing by passively as the stealth jihad advances. They are ignorant of what is happening, and those who do know are making sure not to tell them. Willfully blind officials appear dedicated to “multiculturalism” and “diversity” no matter what the cost. They hinder the investigation of and resistance to the stealth jihad.

There is no gauging the extent of stealth jihadist infiltration into American intelligence and law enforcement agencies. But there is no question that the chief enabler of that infiltration has been political correctness among American officials. In this great war against the global jihad network, no one wants to appear anti-Arab or anti-Muslim -- and this has led more or less directly to some serious lapses in national security.

If America is to survive, it is eventually going to have to choose national security over political correctness -- and call upon Islamic leaders like Omar Shahin to stop teaching Muslims in the U.S. to disregard American laws when they conflict with Islamic norms. The spectacle of the FBI increasing scrutiny of a man whom they have worked with in the past is ludicrous beyond belief. How many more imams in America will teach Muslims that when Islamic law and U.S. law contradict each other, it is U.S. law that must give way, before those sworn to uphold and defend U.S. law wake up to what is happening?

Mr. Spencer is director of Jihad Watch and author of "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)", "The Truth About Muhammad" and the forthcoming"Stealth Jihad" (all from Regnery -- a HUMAN EVENTS sister company).

UK-based Palestinian charity, is facing closure after Lloyds TSB instructed the Islamic Bank of Britain to shut its bank account.

Interpal, the controversial UK-based Palestinian charity, is facing closure after Lloyds TSB instructed the Islamic Bank of Britain to shut its bank account.

Interpal (pictured), which is on a list of banned organisations in the US because of suspected links with terrorists, is also under investigation by the UK Charity Commission for the third time.

The first two investigations by the Commission, which concluded in 1996 and 2003, found no evidence of any wrongdoing by the charity. The latest one, which opened in December 2006, is examining fresh concerns about the potential for inappropriate links between the charity and terrorist supporters of Hamas, the government of Gaza.

Yet the suspicions of US intelligence services appear to have proved enough of a warning bell for Lloyds, which has told the Islamic Bank of Britain (IBB) to close Interpal's account on 8 December. Lloyds has the power to do this because it is a clearing bank and clears all the IBB's cheques.

In light of the news, Interpal's chair Ibrahim Hewitt issued a statement to supporters warning that the situation "has the potential to force us to cease operations early next month". Early December is also the start of the Muslim festival Eid, traditionally a time of prolific charitable giving.

Potential to damage community cohesion
"This has the potential to not only damage Interpal but also to affect community relations and cohesion in Britain," he said.

"It is, at the very least, an example of the utter lack of respect faced by the Muslim community from some hostile quarters in this country."

Hewitt added that IBB had offered its total support but is "apparently powerless, throwing into question the autonomy of Britan's burgeoing Islamic finance sector".

In a further statement on the charity's website this week, Interpal said the Islamic Bank "remains threatened by Lloyds' demands and thus faces closure itself".

It accused Lloyds TSB of treating IBB in a discriminatory fashion and called it "an Islamophobic attack on the rights of all British Muslims".

‘Dangerous precedent'
"Other Muslim charities now face the same discrimination and their accounts can be closed down without adequate warning or explanation. At a time when ties amongst communities need to be strengthened, this sets a dangerous precedent for discrimination on all British citizens and account-holders."

Interpal blamed "pressures from foreign groups" for Lloyds TSB's action. It has asked its supporters to write to Lloyds and the IBB demanding they rescind the "outrageous, unfair and arbitrary" decision.

If the account is closed, it will be the second time Interpal has had to find a new bank - NatWest "reluctantly" closed its account in April 2007 after a group of families of Israeli suicide bomb victims launched a claim against the bank in the US.

Supporters of the charity say it is only prudent for Interpal to have some dealings with Hamas. One supporter wrote on the Muslimmatters website: "How is a charity meant to avoid interacting with members of a country's democratically-elected government? Especially in a place as chaotic as Palestine, where one needs to have good contacts at every level in order to get anything done."

Lloyds TSB and the Islamic Bank of Britain both refused to comment.

Tania Mason
19 November 2008

Pat Condell on Saudi Arabia

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Shariah Law, Shariah Compliant Finance

Frontpage Article about how Shariah punishes women who are raped.

This is Shariah and part of the unspoken issues of Shariah Compliant Finance, Posted by allysonrt on November 18th, 2008

How Sharia Law Punishes Raped Women

By Hasan Mahmud | Monday, November 17, 2008

On October 30, 2008, the United Nations condemned the stoning to death of Aisha Duhulowa, a 13-year-old girl who had been gang-raped and then sentenced to death by a Sharia court for fornication (Zina). She was screaming and begging for mercy, but when some family members attempted to intervene, shots were fired by the Islamic militia and a baby was killed.
Local Sharia courts in Bangladesh regularly punish raped minor girls and women by flogging and beating them with shoes.[1] Similar cases of punishing raped women are Mina v. the State, Bibi v. the State and Bahadur v. the State.[2] Sharia courts in Pakistan have punished thousands of raped women by long term imprisonment.[3]
You might think that such horrific barbarity cannot be the real Sharia law; that it is a misapplication of the law by ignorant clergy. Sadly, neither is true.

There is a traceable dynamic in Sharia Law that is bound to lead to this barbarity. And unless we abandon these laws we will never be able to emerge from this barbarity. It was a blunder that Muslim jurists included rape in the Hudood section of Sharia Law that deals with murder, bodily harm, apostasy, drinking, defamation, theft, adultery and highway robbery. But anyone who tried to change these laws ended up banging their heads against the wall. Mawdudi, the founding father of modern Political Islam, claims that even if all the world’s Muslims together wanted to make the slightest change in these laws, they would not be allowed to do so.[4]

But change is necessary.

Top 11 Islamic Quotes

Top 11 Islamic Quotes - Put these quotes in your mobile phone & memorise them each time you travel.

1. On Abrogation
Qur'an 2:106
'Such of Our revelations as We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, we bring (in place) one better or the like thereof.'

2. On Jews
Bukhari (004.052.177):
'Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say, "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."

3. On Relations with Non-Muslims
Qur'an 3.28:
Let not the believers take the unbelievers for friends rather than believers; and whoever does this, he shall have nothing of (the guardianship of) Allah, but you should guard yourselves against them, guarding carefully; and Allah makes you cautious of (retribution from) Himself; and to Allah is the eventual coming.

4. On War
Bukhari (004.052.268): Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle called: "War is deceit".

5. On Lying
Sira 367 Then he (Kab bin al-Ashraf) composed amatory verses of an insulting nature about the Muslim women. The Apostle said…'Who will rid me of Ibnul-Ashraf?' Muhammad bin Maslama, brother of the Bani Addu'l-Ashhal, said, 'I will deal with him for you, O Apostle of God, I will kill him.' 'Do so if you can.'… 'All that is incumbent on you is that you should try… ' He (Muhammad bin Maslama) said, 'O Apostle of God, we shall have to tell lies.' He (Mohammed, the founder of Islam) answered, 'Say what you like, for you are free in the matter.'

6. On killing non-muslims
8:12-15 Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them."

7. On Marriage to Children
Bukhari (007.062.64) Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64:
Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

8. On Mohammed as the Perfect Example to Follow
Certainly you have in the Messenger of Allah an excellent exemplar for him who hopes in Allah and the latter day and remembers Allah much.

9. On the Destiny of Non-Muslims
Koran 98:1-8
The unbelievers among the People of the Book and the pagans shall burn for ever in the fire of Hell. They are the vilest of all creatures.

10. On Women's Intelligence and DepravityVolume 1, Book 6, Number 301:
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:
Once Allah's Apostle went out to the Musalla (to offer the prayer) o 'Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, "O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women)." They asked, "Why is it so, O Allah's Apostle ?" He replied, "You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you." The women asked, "O Allah's Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?" He said, "Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?" They replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn't it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?" The women replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her religion."

11. On Jihad till all the world is Islamic
Hadith 1:13:
"I have been ordered by Allah to fight with people till they bear testimony to the fact that there is no God but Allah."

Muslim Contributions to British Culture and Life

TEST: How many of these Muslims Contributions are the same in YOUR country and/orcommunity?

Politicians from the main parties are always referring to the 'enormous contribution to Britain of the Muslim community...' Here's a list of the most obvious contributions. Please add to it if you can think of more!

1. The return of tuberculosis to Britain where it had previously been erradicated.

2. The return of polio.

3. The increased threat of MRSA in hospitals because Muslim staff won't use handwash they claim has alcohol in it.

4. Increased cost to the NHS of unhealthy infants as a result of 'cousin marriage'.

5. So-called 'Honour Killings' of daughters, wives and even mothers.

6. Increase in incidence of rapes.

7. Increase in child molestation and abuse.

8. Increase in domestic violence towards women.

9. Increase in racial, religious and cultural tensions.

10. Cost in lives and treasure of our military presence in Afghanistan.

11. Cost in lives and treasure of our military presence in Iraq.

12. Cost in lives, injury and damage of 7/7 atrocities.

13. Cost of damage and increased policing of Muslim riots in various areas.

14. Cost of policing almost weekly Muslim demonstrations in our cities.

15. Increased social security bill as a result of Muslims' unwillingness to work.

16. Bloc voting by Muslim communities.

17. Unprecedented voting irregularities in some areas.

18. Increased bribery & corruption in public and political life (Mohammad al-Fayad scandals etc.)

19. Widespread insecurity about travelling on trains, buses and the underground.

20. Insecurity about air travel post 9/11.

21. Attacks on the public by the 'Muslim Boys', ‘Asian Invasion’, and similar gangs.

22. Attacks on police including the shooting of policewomen.

23. Increased attacks on Jewish people, Christians, Sikhs and Hindus.

24. Torture murders of non-Muslims like 15-year-old Kriss Donald.

25. Huge cost of increased security in all aspects of life post 9/11 and 7/7.

26. Erosion of traditional aspects of British life - i.e. downplaying Christmas, banning crucifixes etc.

27. Demanding the removal of images of pigs (eg 'Piglet', china pigs, pig money boxes.)

28. Censorship of theatre plays.

29. Censorship of art galleries - e.g. Tate Modern and Whitechapel Gallery.

30. Self-censorship by artists and writers.

31. The presence of extremist mosques.

32. The presence of extremist and threatening imams.

33. The proliferation of Saudi-financed Islamic schools and academies teaching hatred of the 'sons of pigs and monkeys' - ie: Christians and Jews.

34. The uncontrolled dissemination of Islamic propaganda fuelled by foreign oil money.

35. 'Lawfare' or 'Tourist litigation': the use of British courts by wealthy Arabs to intimidate and silence critics of Islam even if they live outside the UK.

37. The development of 'no-go' areas where non-Muslims no longer feel secure.

38. The use of hijabs and burkas as tools of political intimidation.

39. Intimidation of unveiled non-Muslim women in areas dominated by muslims.

40. Desecration of Jewish cemeteries.

41. Burial plots for non-Muslims facing Mecca.

42. Tolerance of halal slaughter methods repugnant to many Britons.

43. The foisting of halal meat on non-Muslims in schools and prisons etc.

44. Segregated swimming sessions for Muslims only.

45. Cost of translating documents for Muslim immigrants who resist learning English.

46. Increased cost of imprisoning the disproportionate number of Muslim criminals.

47. 'Faeces Jihad': deliberate contamination of food served to non-Muslims.

48. Increased cost of child benefit(3.5 per family as opposed to 1.4)

49. Violence and intimidation towards elderly non-Muslims.

50. The rape/murder/cannibalisation of 14 year-old Charlene Downes.

51. Exploitation of British women for bogus marriages.

52. The burning of bookshops (e.g. in Charing Cross Rd following fatwa on Salman Rushdie,)

53. Attempted bombing of Glasgow Airport.

54. Attempted bombing of nightclubs and discos.

55. Dissemination of food poisoning from kebab restaurants and takeaways.

56. Effect of heroin smuggled in from Pakistan.

57. Introduction of polygamy into Britain where bigamy is illegal.

58. Refusing to serve customers buying contraceptives in chemists.

59. Refusing to serve customers buying pork/alcohol in supermarkets.

60. Attacking Christian converts from Islam (apostates) on British soil.

61. Threatening the life of Salman Rushdie, requiring taxpayers to pay for his 24/7 protection.

62. Propagandising against Jews and Israel, thus stimulating anti-Semitism in Britain

63. Destroying free speech through the political system (eg religious hatred laws.)

64. Distorting the facts of the Crusades, making Britons feel guilty about their own history.

65. Defaming politicians and journalists as "Islamophobic", whenever they make any justified criticisms of Islam.

66. Multiple plots to destroy passenger planes from Britain in mid-air.

67. Attempting to make Europeans feel ashamed about "Colonialism", when Islam is colonising Europe at a rapid rate today.

68. Attempting to make Europeans feel ashamed about past Imperialism, when Islam is itself a vehicle for Arab Imperialism.

69. Ensuring that the second most common name for new-born boys in Britain is Muhammad.

70. Refusing blind people access to taxis and buses if they have a guide dog with them.

71. Supporting Sharia Law, a cruel and undemocratic system of totalitarian control.

72. Setting up Sharia courts in Britain.

73. Causing an increase in anti-Americanism in Britain through propagandising.

74. Faking attacks on mosques to gain sympathy for their perceived persecution.

75. The destruction of a passenger plane over Locherbie, Scotland.

76. Actively conducting Da'wa (prosyletising) in prisons to gain more recruits for Jihad.

77. Targeting the uneducated, marginalised and mentally afflicted for conversion to Islam.

78. Indoctrinating our children in schools through 'multi faith' teaching initiatives.

79. Infiltrating political parties and local councils to further their own Islamic agenda.

80. Perverting the course of Justice by intimidating police forces terrified of being labelled 'racist' (eg: West Yorkshire Police.)

81. Attacks on Jewish schools and synagogues.

82. Cynical attempts to deceive the public about the true nature of Islam with 'Muslim outreach' events in mosques which downplay Jihad.

83. Public displays of ritual self-flagellation and blood-letting in our streets.

84. British Muslims travelling to Iraq/Afghanistan with the intention of killing British and Allied soldiers.

85. Threatening British troops after their return home from duty in Iraq/Afghanistan.

86. Continually blaming "Western Foreign Policy" for violent Islamic Jihad.

87. Convincing a man with a mental age of ten to bomb a restaurant in Exeter.

88. The re-introduction of 'forced marriages' into Britain centuries after they died out.

89. Inflicting the 'call to prayer' on non-Muslims via mosque loudspeakers.

90. Increase in corruption and bribery in British business practice.

91. Marching every year through London in support of the Iranian regime (Al Quds March.)

92. Telling British politicians they are not welcome in "Muslim areas" of Britain.

93. Propagating the lie that any criticism of Muslims is "racist" when Muslims are not a race.

94. Conducting bloody animal sacrifices in public (especially at the end of Ramadan.)

95. Increasing the number of instances of female genital mutilation (FMG) in Britain.

96. The 'grooming' of young non-Muslim girls as sex slaves and prostitutes for Muslim men.

97. Desecration of Christian churches and graveyards.
98. Violent assaults on vicars.

99. Claiming that Shakespeare's plays were written by a Muslim.

100. Ensuring that widespread civil unrest/war will erupt in Britain in the near future.


15. AHA (Hirsi Ali) says that Islam has a culture of looking down on and deprecating work, as opposed to Western culture's pride in a career, respect from professional status in society, and glad to deliver service to society, e.g. doctor or fireman (I put policeman there first but realised thats now a 'political' appointment :-) ). The aim in Islamic society is to just have money and do nothing, like a Saudi prince, or a Malaysian business partner. In Malaysia, every Chinese has to have a sleeping muslim partner. The chinese person works, the muslim just takes 50%. Whereas over here, if you are just a playboy and can deliver nothing, you would be embarrassed about it, in muslim societies, apparently, that's the ideal that everyone aspires to!



Tags: british, contributions, culture, muslim

Sunday, November 16, 2008

We DEMAND the following of Muslims!

An extract from this interesting article with a set of demands to muslims by Austrian academics, which could serve as a blueprint for other nations:

The Vienna Association of Academics demands the following from Muslims in Austria:

(Note: This is the first time these demands have been made public)

We demand the following:

1. Full disclosure of religious foundations, as required in the law on religion. A certified translation of the Qur’an and the Ahadith are to be deposited (in the Ministry of Interior).

2. All fatwas from imams preaching in Austria are to be translated into German and deposited in the Ministry of Interior.

3. Public Service: All Muslims entering public service must dissociate — in writing — from Koranic verses prohibiting subordination to the instructions of “infidel” officials and judgments from “infidel” judges.

4. School: Teachers, including Islamic religious instructors, must dissociate from those Koranic verses that propagate the disadvantage of women, corporal punishment and violence against members of other religions (and atheists and non-theists).

5. Friday prayers and Quran as well as in schools must be held in German.

6. Ban on covering faces: Total ban of burqa and chador in public.

7. Mosques I: Adjustments to the building regulations so that the preservation of the Austrian Cultural heritage is guaranteed (no dome and minarets).

8. Mosques II: Prayer houses and rooms are often misused and thus viewed as conducive to setting up cells of Islamic parallel society. Mosque-affiliated businesses, restaurants, commercial areas are — unless correctly legally established — to close immediately.

9. Criteria for the awarding of citizenship: Knowledge about the Christian-humanist foundations of our social order is to be tested authoritatively.

10. Asylum applications: There must be a demand for the applicant’s commitment to our Christian-humanist values.

11. Forcing the headscarf for children is to considered an act of violence on the part of the legal guardian and must be treated as child abuse.

12. Animal Cruelty: Ban on trade in and the sale of meat slaughtered according to Islamic rites.

13. Polygamy: As prescribed by law to religious groups in Austria, a ban on marriages in mosques without prior civil wedding must be enforced.

14. Immediate cessation of all public measures designed to encourage refusal of integration (separate cemeteries, special treatments in hospitals, offer of social services in the languages of the countries of origin of migrants, etc.).

15. Call on the Islamic Faith Community to focus efforts on enforcing building permits for Christian Church in Islamic states.

We, here in the US need to DEMAND the same type of things! PASS IT ON PEOPLE.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Bio of Mohammad by Ali Sina

Since September 11, 2001, there have been over 11,000 terrorist attacks, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians and a lot more injuries, throughout the world.

The perpetrators of these attacks were not monsters; they were Muslims. They were pious people who believed and acted in accordance with their faith. There are millions more who think like them and are ready to do the same.

If you think Islamic terrorism is a new phenomenon, think again. Islam owes its success to terrorism. The prophet of Islam boasted, “I have been made victorious with terror". [Bukhari: 4.52. 220] Since the day Muhammad set foot in Medina, he started his campaign of terror. His followers have been doing the same ever since.

Muslims are intolerant, supremacist, bullies, and violent. They are highly inflammable and can explode if they are not treated preferentially and with respect. At the same time, they abuse others and violate the rights of people of other faiths. This is psychopathology.

To understand Muslims, one must understand their prophet. Muslims worship and emulate Muhammad. Islam is Muhammadanism. Only by understanding him can one know what makes them tick.

Understanding Muhammad is a psychobiography of Allah’s Prophet. It seeks to unveil the mystery of that man. Historians tell us Muhammad used to withdraw to a cave, spending days wrapped in his thoughts. He heard bells ringing and had ghostly visions. He thought he was demon possessed, until his wife reassured him he had become a prophet. Convinced of his status, he was intolerant of those who rejected him, assassinated those who criticized him, raided, looted, and massacred entire populations. He reduced thousands to slavery, raped, and allowed his men to rape female captives. All of this, he did with a clear conscience and a sense of entitlement.

He was magnanimous toward those who admired him, but vengeful toward those who did not. He believed he was the most perfect human creation and the universe's raison d'être. Muhammad was no ordinary man. He was a narcissist.

Understanding Muhammad, ventures beyond the stories. Focusing on the "why" rather than the "what," it unravels the mystique of one of the most enigmatic and influential men in history.

Muhammad believed in his own cause. He was so certain of the reality of his hallucinations that he expected everyone to believe too. He would make his Allah indignantly ask “What! Do you then dispute with him [Muhammad] as to what he saw?” (Q.53:12) This is psychopathology. Why should others believe in what he saw? Wasn't it up to him to prove what he saw was real? Only a narcissist expects others to believe in his claims without asking for evidence.

Muhammad was an orphan. Spurned by his mother in his infancy and left in the care of a Bedouin couple, he had a loveless childhood. He then passed to the care of his grandfather and uncle who took pity on him and spoiled him. Not receiving love at a time he needed unconditional love and not receiving discipline when he needed to learn about boundaries, he developed narcissistic personality disorder, a trait that made him a megalomaniac bereft of conscience. He fantasized about unlimited power, expected praise and admiration, believed he was special, and expected others to believe him and go along with his ideas and plans. He took advantage of others, was jealous, yet believed others were jealous of him, and was extremely hurt when rejected, even killing those who deserted him. He lied and deceived, feeling entitled and justified in doing so. All these are traits of narcissistic personality disorder.

Thanks to another mental illness, temporal lobe epilepsy, the prophet of Islam had vivid hallucinations he interpreted as mystical and divine intimations. When he claimed he heard voices, saw angels and other ghostly entities, he was not lying. His problem was that he could not distinguish reality from fantasy.

He also suffered from obsessive compulsive disorder, causing his fixations on numbers, rituals and stringent rules. This explains why he lived such an austere life and why his religion is filled with so many absurd rules.

Normal Footprint Muhammad had fleshy and swelled hands and feet. His footprint shows he had acromegaly.

In the later years of his life Muhammad was affected by acromegaly, a disease caused by excessive production of a growth hormone, resulting in large bones, cold and fleshy hands and feet and coarse facial features such as enlarged lips, nose and tongue. Acromegaly occurs after the age of 40 and usually kills the patient in his early 60s. It causes impotence, while it increases libido. This explains Muhammad's sexual vagaries in his old age and why in the later years of his life he had such an insatiable craving for sex. He would visit all his 9 wives in one night to touch and fondle them, without being satisfied. His impotence explains his insecurity, paranoia, and intense jealousy of his young wives. He ordered them to cover themselves, lest other men would cast a lusting eye on them. Today, half a billion Muslim women veil themselves, because Muhammad was impotent. Muhammad's illnesses explain a lot of mysteries of Islam.

The combination of all these psychological disorders and his unusual physiognomy made Muhammad a phenomenon that set him apart from ordinary people. His uneducated followers interpreted his differences as signs of his prophethood. Like devotees of all cults, they rose to champion his cause with dedication. By defying death and butchering others they made Islam the world's second largest religion, now the biggest threat to world peace and the survival of human civilization.

Why is it important to know Muhammad? Because over a billion people try to be like him and do as he did. Consequently, the insanity of one man is bequeathed to all his followers. It is by understanding him that we can see through them, and be able to predict these unpredictable people.

We live in a dangerous time. When a fifth of humanity worships a psychopath, eulogizes suicide bombing and thinks killing and martyrdom are ultimate acts of piety, the world becomes a dangerous place. When these people acquire the atomic bomb, the earth becomes a powder keg.

Islam is a cult. It is time for mankind to wake up and realize that this cult is a threat to mankind and there can be no co-existence with Muslims. As long as Muslims believe in Muhammad, they are a threat to others and to themselves. Muslims must either leave Islam, leave their culture of hate and join the rest of mankind as fellow humans, or non-Muslims must separate themselves from them, ban Islam, end the immigration of Muslims and send home those who plot against democracy and refuse to integrate.

Islam is incompatible with democracy. It is a warring creed that uses democracy to destroy it and to establish itself as a world wide dictatorship. The only way to avert the clash between this barbarity and civilization, a world disaster, is to expose the fallacy of Islam and demystify it. Muslims must be weaned from Islam for humanity to live in peace.

Understanding Muhammad is imperative for both Muslims and non-Muslims. This book makes that task easy.

Corruption or Just Plain Stupid

Corruption, cheating, lying, racists, affirmative action, PC suicide, Islamic terrorist support, Marxist 50 year plan, media whores! Thank you all for putting an enemy of freedom in charge of the White House. Your mothers must be very proud!

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Black Panther Thugs for Obama

More video of Black Panther Thugs for Obama.

Obama's Civilian Army in Action on Election Day

Apparently, Marxist pigs and Black Panther wanna bes donning night sticks and blocking the doors to some polls in Philly believe they can intimidate some Philly voters, perhaps McCain/Palin voters? I don’t think so! Read what else Tracy at No Compromise has to say about the Obamanutz, Obamabots and Obama's new SS troops!

Monday, November 3, 2008



The BASTARD Baraq Hussein Mohammad Sottero Obama not only wants to change the constitution, redistribute the wealth, but now he wants a citizen army! If this bastard is elected President, you may as well start practing right now, bending over and kissing your ass goodbye! WFT is wrong with you people??? This bastard is a naked Marxist!!! WAKE UP YOU STUPID OBAMABOTS, YOU ARE TOOLS.

watch the video Obama Civilian Security

A Prebuttal to Obama's Infomercial

A Prebuttal to Obama's Infomercial

RUSH: Tonight, Barack Obama with his preinaugural address, a 30-minute television buy on some networks. I thought, ladies and gentlemen, I would precede this with a prebuttal to Obama, my own version of an inaugural address, if you will, or a campaign ad. It would go like this.

My fellow Americans, I come to you tonight a few days before an election only six days from now. These are monumental times. We face the worst economy since the Great Depression. People are losing their homes, their jobs, their businesses. Students cannot afford their college loans. Single mothers cannot afford day care; our schools are underfunded; families are growing broke paying for health care. And nobody seems to care,

ladies and gentlemen. Nobody seems to represent the middle class. The question is whether we want another eight years of failed policies. I have traveled this nation. From the big cities to our small towns, I have talked to the assembly line worker in Detroit. I have talked to the farmer in Missouri, and working people of this country have had to bear the brunt of eight years of neglect, of policies that have favored the well off and the wealthy. It is time to change the course of the nation, to work together to bring an end to the division that exists in our nation. That's what this election is about: hope, change, the future.

And so it is, my fellow Americans, that I urge you to reject Barack Obama and his cynical campaign for president. I urge you to reject the policies and the wording of the charismatic demagogue. Barack Obama condemns the United States Constitution, our highest law, because it does not empower him to redistribute the income of the middle class and give it to people who do not work. Obama condemns our judicial system not because it's too liberal and too activist, but because it will not impose his left-wing policies by judicial fiat. Obama believes that the tax code should be used not to fund the legitimate purposes of government, but to massively expand the size and power of the federal government. It's time for change. It is time for the kind of change that has made this country great and the change we seek, the change that matters is change that expands our liberty, expands opportunities, expands wealth creation, and expands our horizons. It is time to celebrate capitalism, not demonize it. It's time to celebrate success, not punish it. It is time to ignite our economy, not smother it.

Barack Obama speaks the language of the socialist. Barack Obama peddles class warfare. He peddles human envy. This is not what American leaders do. This is not what would-be American presidents should do. This is the tactic of the authoritarian, to create animosity, to create anger, to create fear, all for the purpose of undermining the strength and the unity of our society. Barack Obama comes from a long line of ideologues who puts the interests of big government above the interests of the individual and the interests of the family. He seeks to replace the American entrepreneurial spirit with government regulations and mandates. James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Ronald Reagan, all embraced the principle that America was a different place because of its respect for the individual. They did not talk about the government redistributing wealth. They did not talk about the government punishing success. They did not talk about the government reregulating the economy. They did not say that paying more taxes was patriotic.

They believed, as our leaders have always believed, that government had limits, so that the American dream would have no limits. They believe that each human being is unique, that he or she has the ability to do great things if left alone to pursue their own interests. They believed that ordinary people could accomplish extraordinary things. They rejected outright the authoritarianism that Barack Obama represents. They each swore to uphold the Constitution because they loved it, not because they saw it as a way to take power and subvert it. Throughout our history, our leaders have understood that private property rights are key to the survival of the individual. If you take his property, you take his livelihood. If you take his property, you attack his spirit. From the day our nation was born, the preservation of private property has been considered a priority of law. Barack Obama wants to use the law to destroy private property. This is what he means, when he attacks businesses large and small, when he insists that there must be limits on what you can earn and keep and pass on to your family when you pass away. He wants the government to control your private property, your income, your assets.

In other words, my fellow Americans, Barack Obama believes that when you go to work each day, when you save some of your money, when you write your will, the federal government can and must be involved in all of those decisions. What would Jefferson, Madison, Lincoln, and Reagan say about that? Jefferson and Madison would call it the abuses of monarchy. Lincoln would call it the abuses of despotism. Ronald Reagan would call it the tyranny of socialism. Our nation is built on the premise that the federal government has specific limited powers. It has important powers, yes, but they are restricted to certain activities. And the purpose of those powers is not to expand the authority of politicians and bureaucrats in Washington, but to organize society around the concept of individual liberty. The individual is not to be a slave to government, he is not to be an employee of the politician or the bureaucrat. He is to be respected and protected from government. That is why we have a Bill of Rights. It is why we have separation of powers.

For several decades, the left has attempted to destroy these protections. The left does not want to be hemmed in by the Constitution. They have sought ways to avert the legal limits the Founders placed on them and their ambitions, and, sadly, they have made much progress in this regard and they have placed all hope that Barack Obama will finally deliver them the victory over the American people they have craved. And make no mistake, my fellow Americans, a Barack Obama victory is a victory over the American people. And that is, in the end, what this election is really about. Will the American people remain free, or will they once and for all become servants of government? Will the politicians and bureaucrats in Washington be empowered to confiscate the hopes, the dreams, the finances, the property of the people as they see fit, any time they see fit, or will the people still be in charge of their own government and their own destiny? That is what this election is all about.

When Barack Obama says that he will make sure you do not lose your home, that you will go to college, that you will receive free health care, that you will have child care, that you will be free from want, free from desire, free from need, he repeats the lies of past authoritarians who have made the same claims and the same promises and who have delivered nothing but poverty, misery, and hopelessness. Obama represents an ideology for which there are no limits on power. He wants to lead a different kind of government, one in which there are no limits to how much it can confiscate from the people, he wants to lead a movement in which the individual is crushed under the weight of the many. And Obama, like others in the past, speaks of democracy as he pursues anti-democratic goals. As his mentor Saul Alinsky taught, you must use the language of the middle class in order to destroy it.

So I come to you, my fellow Americans, with a simple message. If you believe in the principles and the institutions that have made this nation great, that have given more liberty and prosperity to more people than any other system on the face of the either, that have created the most tolerant and giving and successful society in human history, then I urge you to reject the candidate who rejects these and our principles. If you want to leave your children and grandchildren and generations yet to come a country that is as free and hopeful and magnificent as the country you live in today and that your parents and grandparents left you, you will reject the candidate who rejects individual liberty, private property rights, and the Constitution. Do not allow a charismatic demagogue to change our great nation in ways that will diminish it. You have your destiny and America's destiny in your own hands, you, not the media, not the pollsters, not the pundits, you will decide this election. You will decide if you want to live in America or someplace that you won't recognize in a few years. You will decide if the principles that have served this nation so well will remain our governing principles.

This election, only six days away, is the most important election in our lifetime. Everything is at stake. We know this because Obama has said so. He has thrown down the gauntlet. He is running against our history. He is running against the system. He is running against our liberty, and so it is that I ask you on November 4th, next Tuesday, vote for liberty, your own and the nations. Vote for opportunity, your own and your children's. Vote for America. Vote for McCain-Palin. You will hear Obama tonight say that we have been talking about the same problems for decades and nothing has ever been done to solve them. This may be the most accurate statement Barack Obama has made, or will make, in the campaign. We have been talking about the same problems for decades. The problem is that for most of these decades, the people who have been fixing them have made them worse. It's not that we have done nothing to solve these problems.

We have done everything the left promised would solve these problems, and not one of the problems is solved, unless Republicans achieve a majority and govern as such, and then we get welfare reform. And then we get balanced budgets, and then we get tax cuts, and then we get prosperity, and we get good national security, and we get safety. But at those times where Democrats are strong enough in Congress to blunt a Republican president, or run the whole show themselves, they look back over 50 years and they see the same problems, and we have addressed those problems and we have fixed those problems per se, and yet the beneficiaries of the solutions are still as angry and unhappy and miserable as they were 50 years ago when the liberal Democrats began the fix. It makes no sense to let them keep fixing things when all they do is break them.

Obama's Leaky Plumbing

Obama's Leaky Plumbing © 2008 Barack Obama discovers a leak under his sink, so he calls Joe the Plumber to come and fix it.

Joe drives to Obama's house, which is located in a very nice neighborhood and where it's clear that all the residents make more than $250,000 per year.

Joe arrives and takes his tools into the house. Joe is led to the room that contains the leaky pipe under a sink. Joe assesses the problem and tells Obama, who is standing near the door, that it's an easy repair that will take less than 10 minutes.

Obama asks Joe how much it will cost. Joe immediately says, "$9,500."

"$9,500?" Obama asks, stunned. "But you said it's an easy repair!"

"Yes, but what I do is charge a lot more to my clients who make more than $250,000 per year so I can fix the plumbing of everybody who makes less than that for free," explains Joe. "It's always been my philosophy. As a matter of fact, I lobbied government to pass this philosophy as law, and it did pass earlier this year, so now all plumbers have to do business this way. It's known as 'Joe's Fair Plumbing Act of 2008.' Surprised you haven't heard of it, senator."

In spite of that, Obama tells Joe there's no way he's paying that much for a small plumbing repair, so Joe leaves.

Obama spends the next hour flipping through the phone book looking for another plumber, but he finds that all other plumbing businesses listed have gone out of business. Not wanting to pay Joe's price, Obama does nothing.

The leak under Obama's sink goes unrepaired for the next several days.

A week later the leak is so bad that Obama has had to put a bucket under the sink. The bucket fills up quickly and has to be emptied every hour, and there's a risk that the room will flood, so Obama calls Joe and pleads with him to return.

Joe goes back to Obama's house, looks at the leaky pipe, and says "Let's see – this will cost you about $21,000."

"A few days ago you told me it would cost $9,500!" Obama quickly fires back.

Joe explains the reason for the dramatic increase. "Well, because of the 'Joe's Fair Plumbing Act,' a lot of rich people are learning how to fix their own plumbing, so there are fewer of you paying for all the free plumbing I'm doing for the people who make less than $250,000. As a result, the rate I have to charge my wealthy paying customers rises every day.

"Not only that, but for some reason the demand for plumbing work from the group of people who get it for free has skyrocketed, and there's a long waiting list of those who need repairs. This has put a lot of my fellow plumbers out of business, and they're not being replaced – nobody is going into the plumbing business because they know they won't make any money. I'm hurting now too – all thanks to greedy rich people like you who won't pay their fair share."

Obama tries to straighten out the plumber: "Of course you're hurting, Joe! Don't you get it? If all the rich people learn how to fix their own plumbing and you refuse to charge the poorer people for your services, you'll be broke, and then what will you do?"

Joe immediately replies, "Run for president, apparently."

The above was emailed to me without a source. If you are the source, please let me know and I will immediately credit you.

Tito the Builder Intimidates Alan Colmes

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Incriminating Khalidi Obama Tape - OBAMA and his TERRORIST FRIENDS

The LA Times is Hiding an Incriminating Video of Barack Obama at a Party with Radical Palestinian Activists and Bill Ayers.

That's right - in a closely contested election, the Los Angeles Times is concealing a video showing Barack Obama at a going-away party for former PLO spokesman Rashid Khalidi, attended by radical Palestinian activists and former Weather Underground terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

Contact the LA Times and demand that they release the video.

LA Times holding on to incriminating tapeListen to PJTV Daily's interview about the Khalidi Obama Tape AND part of the tape itself.

Presidential Poll Results

In a recent poll of voters, 78% said they believe that Barack Hussein Obama is

1) Untrustworthy
2) A Fraud and a Liar
3) A Marxist
4) A buddy of Bill Ayers
5) A buddy of Kahlidi
6) An affirmative action receiptient of the education system
7) A Corrupt Politician
8) Gave $820,000.00 to ACORN
9) Is a lousy lawyer
10) Too stupid to serve as an intern to any judge after law school
11) A racist and a race-baiter
12) An America-Hater
13) A grifter

16 pirates died after handling substance on captured Iranian ship

This is a repost for all you Obamabot IDIOTS out there who MAY be able to add 2 + 2 to come up with the truth about what Iran is up to and how they are laughing at Barry for believing that dialoging with them will keep them from trying to destroy us.

16 pirates died after handling substance on captured Iranian ship

— An Iranian ship captured by Somali pirates carried sealed containers of a powdery substance believed to be nuclear or chemical weapons agents.

Western intelligence agencies have been monitoring the capture of the Iran Deyanat, seized by Somali pirates on Aug. 21. The cargo ship, owned and operated by the state-owned Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines, or IRISL, contains sealed cargo thought to be linked to the death of 16 pirates.

In September 2008, IRISL came under U.S. sanctions as a company that helps Iran's nuclear and other strategic programs, Middle East Newsline reported.

Industry sources said the ship's crew of 29, about half of them Iranians and reported to have left China on July 28, would neither disclose the exact contents of the cargo nor provide the code to open the sealed containers.

In the Somali port village of Eyl, pirates blasted open one of the seven cargo units, said to contain an unidentified powdery substance.

About 40 pirates, armed with rocket-propelled grenades and assault rifles, boarded the Iranian ship, owned by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, in the Horn of Africa, about 130 kilometers southeast of Yemen. Iran Deyanat was registered to carry a sealed cargo of 42,500 tons minerals and industrial products to the Netherlands via Egypt's Suez Canal.

"That ship is unusual," Somali Regional Energy Minister Hassan Allore Osman, who has been investigating the Iranian ship, said. "It is not carrying a normal shipment."

"We cannot inspect the cargo yet," Osman said. "But we are sure that it is weapons."

"Our sources say it contains chemicals, dangerous chemicals," Andrew Mwangura, the director of the East African Seafarers' Assistance Programme, said.

Within days, the pirates sustained skin burns, lost hair and became critically ill. Soon after, at least 16 pirates died.
"We don't know exactly how many, but the information that I am getting is that some of them had died," Mwangura told the Sunday Times on Sept. 28. "There is something very wrong about that ship."
The U.S. Treasury Department said IRISL regularly falsifies shipping documents to hide the identity of end users, uses generic terms to describe shipments and operates under various covers to circumvent United Nations sanctions.

"IRISL's actions are part of a broader pattern of deception and fabrication that Iran uses to advance its nuclear and missile programs," Treasury Undersecretary Stuart Levey said. "That conduct should give pause to any financial institution or business still choosing to deal with Iran."

Industry sources said IRISL relayed $200,000 to a Somali broker for the release of the ship. But the ship was not released as IRGC refused to send a delegation to return the ship to Iran. Reports from Somalia said the U.S. Navy has offered $7 million to examine Iran Deyanat.

"They [Iranians] told the pirates that they could not come because of the presence of the U.S. Navy," Osman said.

Both Israel and the United States have intensified efforts to identify the contents of Iran Deyanat. An industry source said the two countries were concerned that the shipment was meant for Hizbullah, which could then use the chemical weapons agents for its huge missile and rocket arsenal.

Somali officials have assessed that Iran Deyanat was meant for the Al Qaida network in Somalia. They the destination of the ship was thought to be Eritrea.

"It was heading to Eritrea to deliver small arms and chemical weapons to Somalia's Islamist insurgents," two U.S. analysts, Nick Grace and Abdiweli Ali, wrote in an analysis.