Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Paying for our own demise

From a post at ISLAM IN ACTION http://islaminaction08.blogspot.com/2008/04/paying-for-our-own-demise.html

Paying for our own Demise

I was watching the end of Hannity and cowardly Colmes last night. Mr. Hannity was speaking about how just as early as next year that Americans may be paying up to $10 a gallon of gas. Just imagine what the Islamofascists will do with all that extra oil money. They are already picking us apart piece by piece. With the extra money they can open up more Mosques and madrases here and in Europe. No thanks, there are already more then enough of them here already.

More money, means more money to attack the minds of our children in our universities as the Saudis continue to buy influence on our campus grounds. Higher oil prices mean more money to fund Islamic terrorist groups like Hezbollah, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

More terrorist training and more military equipment for them and lastly more cash to lobby our gutless Saudi buttock kissing politicians. Our politicians and country have done NOTHING for decades to help ourselves here at home in regards to the energy issue. They talk and talk about it but take no action. Well action is what we NEED. We need to start drilling for oil here at home. We should be inviting our old but new ally, France who has almost 80% of its electricity coming from nuclear plants over here to give us a helping hand with building them. France and nuke plants. We have gotten nothing but lip service for long enough. We have to FORCE our politicians hand to take action. Before we become slaves to the Middle East.

So are you going to just sit there, read this and then go about your daily business? Or are you going to take action and contact your local representatives today? When you do call or write. Don't be shy. Let them know straight out that you know what the Saudis are all about. Think of it as helping us and the life's of our future generations.

The contact link is here: http://www.senate.gov/ Go ahead make that call or send an email. We have to help ourselves.

Your friend,
Exposing Islam

Monday, April 28, 2008


Debbie Schlussel: Hezbollah U.S.A.: How a U.S. Attorney, the FBI, ICE & a Congressman Helped a Terror


By Debbie Schlussel

America backs Israel in its fight against Hezbollah.
But in the Detroit area--the heart of Islamic America--it's a different story. Hezbollah supporters connected to Iran are feted by top federal officials.

Take Imam Mohammed Ali Elahi, head of the shi'ite Islamic House of Wisdom--one of the largest mosques in North America. He was the spiritual leader of Ayatollah Khomeini's Navy in Iran. Despite that, Elahi--who came here in the 1990s on a visitor visa to speak to a mosque in San Francisco--is now a U.S. citizen. Elahi's ties to Iran are so strong that his former mosque, the Islamic Center of America, fired him--even though that mosque also backs Hezbollah.
Hezbollah Spiritual Leader Sheikh Mohammed Fadlallah& Imam Mohammed Ali ElahiImam Mohammed Ali Elahi & Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini
Elahi's mosque newsletter proudly featured a photo of him meeting in May 2005 with Hezbollah spiritual leader Sheikh Mohammed Fadlallah. Several congregants of Elahi's mosque have been indicted and convicted of crimes involving money laundering to Hezbollah. One, restaurateur Talal Chahine, was indicted for evading federal income taxes and laundering at least $20 million to Hezbollah. His son, Khalil Chahine, was convicted of murdering Paul Hallis--a Maronite Lebanese Christian who was engaged to his Muslim ex-girlfriend. (Islamic Honor killings do happen in America.) After 9/11, Elahi claimed Israel was behind the attacks, repeating the canard about Jews allegedly not coming to work that day.
Convicted Murderer Khalil Chahine (left), Indicted Hezbollah Financier Talal Chahine (second from rt), Hezbollah/Iran Agent Imam Mohammed Ali Elahi@ the Hezbollah MosqueMuslim Khalil Chahine Honor-Murdered Arab Christian Paul Hallis(Photos by Millard Berry/Heritage Newspapers)

Given all this, you'd think Imam Elahi would be an outcast under investigation. Instead, Elahi is a regular columnist for The Detroit News, attacking Jews, Christians, and Israel, and praising Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Detroit News Editorial Page Editor Nolan Finley stands by his decision to run Elahi's incendiary columns.

Then, there are the feds. In September 2005, U.S. Attorney Stephen Murphy III a/k/a "Abu Porno"--incredibly, also now a Bush nominee for the U.S. Court of Appeals--organized a "Town Hall" meeting at Elahi's mosque. At his urging, Michigan FBI Chief Daniel Roberts and Immigration and Customs Enforcement Official Brian Moskowitz a/k/a "Abu Moskowitz" shared the stage with him and far-left U.S. Congressman John Conyers.

(Though Elahi is believed to be an agent of the Government of Iran and did not disclose his ties to Hezbollah in his paperwork for U.S. citizenship, which should, therefore, be stripped. Unfortunately, Murphy and Moskowitz are the only ones who can investigate this and initiate such proceedings, and they refuse to do so, preferring to pander to him, instead. Murphy also deliberately allowed Elahi congregant/Hezbollah $20 million man Chahine, as well as the Hammoud family of Hezbollah operatives to flee the country.)

Hezbollah's Three Stooges: U.S. Attorney Stephen Murphy, FBI SAIC Daniel Roberts, ICE SAIC Brian "Abu" Moskowitz
Elahi gave the introductory speech saying, "No-one can say that I am not against terrorism. But what's going on in the South of Lebanon--that group in the South of Lebanon--is not terrorism. It's legitimate resistance against terrorism." Though it was clear that Elahi was praising Hezbollah, the federal officials clapped enthusiastically, and Murphy responded: "We come with . . . humility and respect . . . . It's a real honor to be here."
During a question and answer period, they were asked why Hezbollah is on the State Department Terrorism list. The FBI and ICE officials said the decision isn't up to them and didn't seem to know why Hezbollah is on the list. U.S. Attorney Murphy laughed and joked about it, saying that he recently had lunch with a good friend who said that Hezbollah is a great group that provides social services for people.

The moderator of the event, Osama Siblani, responded, "That was me. I told you that." Murphy confirmed, "Yes, I think that was you." But Siblani--Editor of the Arab American News--was at a meeting held at Dearborn's "Adonis" restaurant described in June by Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Seyassah as a gathering of Hezbollah's American representatives and supporters of Christian leader Michel Aoun. Aoun and Hezbollah's Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah recently signed an alliance pact.

At the Town Hall meeting, a crying woman asked the federal officials why her husband was in jail because of "credit card problems." She said he was arrested after FBI agents raided her home and found a poster on the wall of "our leader, Hassan Nasrallah." FBI Assistant Special Agent in Charge William Kowalski ran to her side, gave her his business card and patted her on the back.

The woman, Rania Rahal, and her husband, Ali Nemr Rahal--both Elahi congregants--were later indicted for credit card, bank, and mortgage fraud in a scheme to obtain $500,000. When agents raided their home, they found a video of a 2002 Hezbollah rally attended by Rahal, a video entitled, "A Martyr Speaks About Martyrs," and a Hezbollah recruitment video, in addition to a photo of Rahal tearing and burning the American flag. In February, Customs agents at the Detroit U.S.-Canada border found "military-quality" explosives on Rahal's and his sons' passports. The Rahals have since pled guilty. At Mr. Rahal's sentencing, instead of being contrite, he apologized for ruining his credit record.
Both Michigan FBI's Roberts and Michigan ICE's Moskowitz refused to answer questions on camera about Elahi or his mosque when asked to do so by Christian Broadcast Network's Erick Stakelbeck. U.S. Attorney Murphy also delivered a friendly address to Hezbollah supporters at the Bint Jebail Cultural Center in Dearborn, last October, saying the group and the U.S. government had issues of common interest and concern. But the club is the site of many Hezbollah rallies. Bint Jebail, from which most club members emanate, is the Hezbollah-controlled town in Southern Lebanon from which Hezbollah frequently shells Northern Israel. Hezbollah leader Nasrallah is a frequent, honored guest and delivers many anti-Israel speeches there.

Then, there is the Knollenberg family--Republican U.S. Congressmen Joe Knollenberg and his son Marty, a candidate for the Michigan House of Representatives. Both Knollenbergs accepted thousands in campaign contributions from the Nijad Fares family. Until recently, Fares' father, Issam Fares, was the Syrian-installed, Hezbollah-backed Deputy Prime Minister of Lebanon. Why would the Fareses care about the Michigan legislature? Well, they wouldn't. But Mary Knollenberg's Congressman father--as a high-ranking member of the House International Relations Committee--introduced successful legislation in 2000 (along with then-U.S. Senator Spencer Abraham), which sent at least $86 million (Knollenberg sought $268 million) in USAID funds to Hezbollah-controlled Southern Lebanon for the ostensible purpose of rebuilding hospitals and infrastructure allegedly "destroyed" by Israel. The money has never been tracked.
Unfortunately, sometimes the adage that "all politics is local" couldn't be more wrong. In the case of federal officials, sometimes their politics is what's best for America's enemies and their supporters over here, who are anything but loyal Americans.

Posted by Debbie on July 20, 2006 06:54 AM to Debbie Schlussel


Who's Looking Out for America?

By Debbie Schlussel

Who's looking out for America on the international stage?
Not the Bush Administration.

After long taking the right tack and opposing the International Criminal Court in Europe, the U.S. is now surrendering http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120917156494046579.html?mod=googlenews_wsj to it . . . and giving up America's national sovereignty.

Why wait for Barack or Hillary to do it, when the liberal Republican in office can do it now and claim credit, as a boost for Nobel Prize consideration.

And the reason for submitting is absurd, too.

As I've noted over the years, America didn't care about Arab genocide of Black Christians in Sudan. But, now that almost no Black Christians are left and the victims are now Black Muslims, suddenly the world and the State of Greater Celebritia is all atwitter over it. Now, the International Criminal Court is moving on Sudan over what's happening to Black Muslims in Darfur. And, therefore, the Bushies--not ever willing to do what's right on our own--insists we must now be a part of this international tribunal.

We have to give up our national sovereignty because Arab Muslims are murdering Black Muslims on the other side of the world? I don't get it. This will now make our soldiers answerable to this America-hating forum. It will make Americans and America's fight against terrorism weak and emasculated by submitting the fight of those efforts to a body dominated by pan-Islamist sympathizers.

Predictably, the far-left is joyous, and the only person talking any sense here is the ever-reliable, ever-visionary John Bolton. So, remind me again, why was Bush better than John Kerry? This was a point of contention between them in the 2004 election. Guess what? Bush lied:

A senior Bush administration official said Friday that the U.S. now accepts the "reality" of the International Criminal Court, and that Washington would consider aiding the Hague tribunal in its investigation of atrocities in Sudan's Darfur region.

"The U.S. must acknowledge that the ICC enjoys a large body of international support, and that many countries will look to the ICC as the preferred mechanism" for punishing war crimes that individual countries can't or won't address, John Bellinger, the State Department's chief lawyer, told a conference in Chicago marking the 10th anniversary of the tribunal's founding treaty, the Rome Statute. More than 100 countries have ratified the treaty. . . .

Mr. Bellinger's speech represented a rhetorical turnabout for an administration that came to power determined to hobble the movement for a permanent war crimes tribunal.

"This is a meaty piece of work," said Richard Dicker, international justice director for Human Rights Watch. "It's impossible to imagine such a statement four years ago." Shortly before the court opened in 2002, the Bush administration "unsigned" the Rome Statute, which President Clinton had approved before leaving office. President Bush subsequently signed legislation authorizing military action, should the court arrest an American, and limiting U.S. dealings with the tribunal.

An architect of the White House's earlier policies dismissed Mr. Bellinger's remarks as "pabulum" from a State Department that is too solicitous of international institutions. "It would be a great speech in the first Clinton administration, and probably a great speech in the second Clinton administration," said John Bolton, the former ambassador to the United Nations who, as undersecretary of state, signed the letter repudiating Rome Statute.

"It reflects the yearning the Rice State Department has for acceptance" by academics and foreign intellectuals, Mr. Bolton said. "The fight resumes after Jan. 20," when a new administration takes office, he added.

All three senators running for president -- Republican John McCain and Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama -- have voiced reservations about the court, but said they would consider closer cooperation with it.

In 2002, both Arizona Sen. McCain and New York Sen. Clinton voted for the anti-court legislation. But Sen. McCain said in 2005 that "I want us in the ICC, but I'm not satisfied that there are enough safeguards," Reuters reported. . . .
The Darfur investigation "is likely to do more than any other factor...to shape U.S. perceptions of the role and impact of the ICC," Mr. Bellinger said Friday. "We want to see the ICC's Darfur work succeed," and are "prepared to consider" providing assistance, he said.

The thaw between the Bush White House and the court began in 2005, when the U.S. refrained from vetoing a U.N. Security Council resolution referring Darfur atrocities to the court.
Mr. Bellinger said the U.S. wanted the court to "complement" the U.N. Security Council's agenda. That would ensure the court remains aligned with American interests, because the council can take no action without assent from its permanent members -- the U.S., Britain, China, France and Russia.

Mr. Bellinger said the U.S. would look to a diplomatic conference slated for 2010, which is expected to discuss definitions for the international crime of "aggression." . . .
The U.S. has worried that a vague definition could be used as a pretext to prosecute American officials for military operations.
The International Criminal Court is intended as a court of last resort for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, when national justice systems can't or won't take action.

This is madness. When an American soldier shoots a terrorist in Iraq who was trying to murder him, he may soon have to answer to China, France, Russia, and the other international America-haters on the ICC.

Thanks, George Bush. T minus 8 months

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Free Speech in an age of Jihad: Libel Tourism

If you think the only weapons of jihadis are guns and bombs, you're wrong. They're already using lawsuits to push Sharia law and silence free speech. Last Thursday, PJM's Roger Kimball hosted a conference on “Free Speech in An Age of Jihad: Libel Tourism, “Hate Speech,” and Political Freedom” at the Princeton Club in New York.

Video: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/libel-tourism-the-soft-jihad-video/

Geert Wilder Should be Awarded a Prize

IF the Nobel Peace Prize had any true meaning, Mr. Wilder should be a receipient. However, since the likes of Jimma Carter and Yassar Assafat have won, I'd say the Nobel Peace Prize should be flushed down the toilet along side of political correctness!

This is a very important speech to the Dutch parliament. It should be read by every American, and I can only hope it will receive wide distribution and publicity. You may have already read this, but is is worth another read. IF ONLY OUR US POLITICANS HAD THE BRAINS AND INTEGRITY TO MAKE A SIMILIAR SPEECH.

If only our media wasn't in large part whores for our enemies, owned and paid for by even bigger prostitutes and shills for their puppet masters, someone might have the courage to speak the same truth as Mr. Wilder.

If only one of our presidential candidates would say the same thing, but as we all know, two of them are cowards and the third is a racist, lying Muslim himself!

Geert Wilder’s speech to Holland’s Parliament ***
**11 MARCH 2008 *

*”Madam Speaker, first, allow me to express my sincere thanks to you personally for having planned a debate on Islam, on the very day of my birthday. I could not have wished for a nicer present! Madam Speaker, approximately 1400 years ago war was declared on us by an ideology of hate and violence which arose at the time and was proclaimed by a barbarian who called himself the Prophet Mohammed.
I am referring to Islam.

Madam Speaker, let me start with the foundation of the Islamic faith, the Koran. The Koran’s core theme is about the duty of all Muslims to fight non-Muslims; an Islamic Mein Kampf, in which fight means war, jihad. The Koran is above all, a book of war, a call to butcher non-Muslims (2:191, 3:141, 4:91, 5:3), to roast them (4:56, 69:30-69:32), and to cause bloodbaths amongst them (47:4). Jews are compared to monkeys and pigs (2:65, 5:60, 7:166), while people who believe in Jesus Christ as the Son of God must according to the Koran be fought (9:30).

Madam Speaker, the West has no problems with Jews or Christians, but it does have problems with Islam. It is still possible, even today, for Muslims to view the Koran, which they regard as valid for all time, as a licence to kill. And that is exactly what happens. The Koran is worded in such a way that its instructions are addressed to Muslims for eternity, which includes today’s Muslims. This in contrast to texts in the Bible, which is formulated as a number of historical narratives, placing events in a distant past. Let us remind ourselves that it was Muslims, not Jews or Christians, who committed the catastrophic terrorist attacks in New York, Madrid and London; and that it was no coincidence that Theo van Gogh was brutally murdered by a Muslim, Mohammed Bouyeri.

Madam Speaker, I acknowledge that there are people who call themselves Muslims and who respect our laws. My party, the Freedom Party, has nothing against such people, of course. However, the Koran does have something against them. For it is stated in the Koran in Sura 2, verse 85, that those believers who do not believe in everything the Koran states will be humiliated and receive the severest punishment; which means that they will roast in Hell. In other words, people who call themselves Muslims but who do not believe, for example, in Sura 9, verse 30, which states that Jews and Christians must be fought, or, for example, in Sura 5, verse 38, which states that the hand of a thief must be cut off, such people will be humiliated and roast in Hell. Note that it is not me who is making this up. All this can be found in the Koran. The Koran also states that Muslims who believe in only part of the Koran are in fact apostates, and we know what has to happen to apostates. They have to be killed.

Madam Speaker, the Koran is a book that incites to violence. I remind the House that the distribution of such texts is unlawful according to Article 132 of our Penal Code. In addition, the Koran incites to hatred and calls for murder and mayhem. The distribution of such texts is made punishable by Article 137(e). The Koran is therefore a highly dangerous book; a book which is completely against our legal order and our democratic institutions. In this light, it is an absolute necessity that the Koran be banned for the defence and reinforcement of our civilisation and our constitutional state. I shall propose a second-reading motion to that effect.

Madam Speaker, there is no such thing as “moderate Islam”.... As Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan said the other day, and I quote, “There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it”.... Islam is in pursuit of dominance. It wishes to exact its imperialist agenda by force on a worldwide scale (8:39). This is clear from European history. Fortunately, the first Islamic invasion of Europe was stopped at Poitiers in 732; the second in Vienna in 1683. Madam Speaker, let us ensure that the third Islamic invasion, which is currently in full spate, will be stopped too in spite of its insidious nature and notwithstanding the fact that, in contrast to the 8th and 17th centuries, it has no need for an Islamic army because the scared “dhimmis” in the West, also those in Dutch politics, have left their doors wide open to Islam and Muslims.

Apart from conquest, Madam Speaker, Islam is also bent on installing a totally different form of law and order, namely Sharia law. This makes Islam, apart from a religion for hundreds of millions of Muslims also, and in particular, a political ideology (with political/constitutional/Islamic basic values, etc). Islam is an ideology without any respect for others; not for Christians, not for Jews, not for non-believers and not for apostates. Islam aims to dominate, subject, kill and wage war.

Madam Speaker, the Islamic incursion must be stopped. Islam is the Trojan Horse in Europe. If we do not stop Islamification now, Eurabia and Netherabia will just be a matter of time. One century ago, there were approximately 50 Muslims in the Netherlands. Today, there are about 1 million Muslims in this country. Where will it end? We are heading for the end of European and Dutch civilisation as we know it. Where is our Prime Minister in all this? In reply to my questions in the House he said, without batting an eyelid, that there is no question of our country being Islamified. Now, this reply constituted a historical error as soon as it was uttered. Very many Dutch citizens, Madam Speaker, experience the presence of Islam around them. And I can report that they have had enough of burkas, headscarves, the ritual slaughter of animals, so-called honour revenge, blaring minarets, female circumcision, hymen restoration operations, abuse of homosexuals, Turkish and Arabic on the buses and trains as well as on town hall leaflets, halal meat at grocery shops and department stores, Sharia exams, the Finance Minister’s Sharia mortgages, and the enormous over representation of Muslims in the area of crime, including Moroccan street terrorists.

In spite of all this, Madam Speaker, there is hope. Fortunately. The majority of Dutch citizens have become fully aware of the danger, and regard Islam as a threat to our culture. My party, the Freedom Party, takes those citizens seriously and comes to their defence.

Many Dutch citizens are fed up to the back teeth and yearn for action. However, their representatives in The Hague are doing precisely nothing. They are held back by fear, political correctness or simply electoral motives. This is particularly clear in the case of PvdA, the Dutch Labour Party, which is afraid of losing Muslim voters. The Prime Minister said in Indonesia the other day that Islam does not pose any danger. Minister Donner believes that Sharia law should be capable of being introduced in the Netherlands if the majority want it. Minister Vogelaar babbles about the future Netherlands as a country with a Judeo-Christian-Islamic tradition, and that she aims to help Islam take root in Dutch society. In saying this, the Minister shows that she has obviously gone stark raving mad. She is betraying Dutch culture and insulting Dutch citizens.

Madam Speaker, my party, the Freedom Party, demands that Minister Vogelaar retract her statement. If the Minister fails to do so, the Freedom Party parliamentary group will withdraw its support for her. No Islamic tradition must ever be established in the Netherlands: not now and also not in a few centuries’ time.
Madam Speaker, let me briefly touch on the government’s response to the WRR [Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy] report. On page 12 of its response, the government states that Islam is not contrary to democracy or human rights. All I can say to that is that things can’t get much more idiotic than this.
Madam Speaker, it is a few minutes to twelve. If we go on like this, Islam will herald the end of our Western civilisation as well as Dutch culture.

I would like to round off my first-reading contribution with a personal appeal to the Prime Minister on behalf of a great many Dutch citizens: stop the Islamification of the Netherlands!
Mr Balkenende, a historic task rests on your shoulders. Be courageous. Do what many Dutch citizens are screaming out for. Do what the country needs. Stop all immigration from Muslim countries, ban all building of new mosques, close all Islamic schools, ban burkas and the Koran. Expel all criminal Muslims from the country, including those Moroccan street terrorists that drive people mad. Accept your responsibility! Stop Islamification!
Enough is enough, Mr Balkenende. Enough is enough.”


An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam

An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam.
Newsletter #1/18
Know the Enemy—Sun Tsu, The Art of War
________________________________________Before we start, we need the right words if we are to have the right thoughts.

Islam claims that all who do not submit are kafirs (unbelievers). A kafir is hated by Allah and Allah plots against the kafir. Over 60% of the Koran is devoted to the kafir. A kafir may be killed, robbed, raped, enslaved, tortured and mocked. Every mention of the kafir is negative, demeaning, insulting and hurtful. Unbeliever is a neutral word. Kafir is the worst word in the human language.

The second word we need is dhimmi. The original dhimmis were Christians and Jews who got to keep their religion, but lived in a totally Islamic culture. Today a dhimmi is a kafir who apologizes for Islam.
The story of Islam starts with the Jews since Islam is a Jewish heresy. The Koran endlessly adapts Jewish stories such as those of Moses and Noah to show that Mohammed is the prophet of Allah. The Ten Commandments is a good place to start looking at Islam.

Ten Commandments—Religious
Do not have any other gods before Me.
Do not make an image or any likeness of Me
Do not swear falsely by the name of the Lord.
Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy

Ten Commandments—Ethical
Honor your father and your mother
Do not murder
Do not commit adultery.
Do not steal.
Do not bear false witness against your neighbor
Do not covet your neighbor’s property.

They fall into two categories—religious and ethical. The only religion that follows all the religious commandments is that of the Jews. Christians do not follow the Sabbath commandment and some would argue that the Catholics and Orthodox sects use images and violate the image commandment. Hindus, Buddhists and atheists don’t follow any of the religious commandments. There are no two religions that agree on the Ten Commandments.

Humanity can not agree on religion.
But let’s look at the ethical commandments. Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, and most atheists agree that lying, theft, murder, sanctity of family, and lusting after other people’s property is bad behavior.

Upon reflection, all of these prohibitions prevent harm to others. We don’t harm others and we don’t want to be harmed. We all want to be treated well and this is the best way to treat others, hence the Golden


Do unto others, as you would have them do unto you.
The Golden Rule is an ethic of unity. Everyone is treated the same. One ethical system for all people. This has been said in many ways in many cultures. But there is one doctrine that does not agree with these ethics—Islam.

Islamic Ethics
What are Islamic ethics and where do we find them? Everything in Islam is based upon the Koran (what Mohammed said that his god, Allah, said) and the words and deeds of Mohammed (called the Sunna). A Muslim repeats endlessly, “There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is his prophet.” The Koran repeats again and again that Mohammed is the model or pattern for the ideal Muslim. A Muslim is not someone who worships Allah. A Muslim is someone who worships Allah exactly like Mohammed worshipped Allah. So every Muslim is a Mohammedan. There are absolutely no exceptions.

And where do we find Mohammed’s words and deeds?

1. The Traditions (or Hadith) are collections of everything Mohammed did and said. The best and most honored Hadith is by Al Bukhari.
2. The Sira is the biography of Mohammed and is written by Ibn Ishaq. The Sira is to Mohammed as the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are to Jesus.

There was not enough information in the Koran to create Islam. The Sunna (Hadith and Sira) define almost all of the doctrine of Islam.

The collection of Koran, Sira, and Hadith is called the Islamic Trilogy. The Trilogy contains the complete political doctrine of Islam. Christians have two sacred texts—Old and New Testament. Muslims have three sacred texts. For 1400 years, all three of these texts have only been read by Islamic religious and political leaders, but today these texts are easily understood.

The Trilogy overflows with ethical statements. (These are all from the Bukhari’s Hadith)

Bukhari 9,85,83 Mohammed: “A Muslim is a brother to other Muslims. He should never oppress them nor should he facilitate their oppression.”

Bukhari 8,73,70 Mohammed: “Harming a Muslim is an evil act; killing a Muslim means rejecting Allah.”

Bukhari 5,59,369 Mohammed asked, “Who will kill Ka’b (a Jewish poet), the enemy of Allah and Mohammed?”
Bin Maslama rose and responded, “O Mohammed! Would it please you if I killed him?”
Mohammed answered, “Yes.”
Bin Maslama then said, “Give me permission to deceive him with lies so that my plot will succeed.”
Mohammed replied, “You may speak falsely to him.”

A Muslim should be a brother to other Muslims (not the rest of humanity). A Muslim should not kill another Muslim. A Muslim may lie to kafirs to advance Islam.

So for Islam the ethical statements are:

Do not kill another Muslim
Do not steal from another Muslim
Do not deceive another Muslim

Islam states that a kafir can be killed, robbed, raped and deceived if it will advance Islam. A Muslim does not have to lie, cheat or kill a kafir, it is an ethical option.

Islam divides the entire world into Islam and kafirs and has two sets of ethics, one for Islam and another for the rest. The Golden Rule has the equality of all humanity as its basis. It is not: Do unto some people, as you would have them do unto you, but do unto all people as you would have them do unto you.

Islam denies the universality of the Golden Rule because Islam starts with the division of the entire world, all humanity, into two different groups—Islamic and non-Islamic. Every aspect of Islamic ethics is based upon this separation. Having two distinct groups leads to two different ethical codes. Said another way, Islam has dualistic ethics.

Deceit, violence and force are optional actions against the kafirs. Believers are to be treated as brothers and sisters. Islam’s ethics are based upon:

Good is whatever advances Islam.
Evil is whatever resists Islam.

Of Interest:
What happens to kafirs in a 'moderate' Islamic country?
A Muslim on moderate Muslims
Mosque in Rome, largest in Europe, calls for jihad
Moderate Sheik Qaradawi flays Pope's "hostile act"
Memri clip of Saudi imam on 'freedom of religion'

An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam: Part 2

This newsletter is one of a series on the subject-Newsletter #2/18

The Origin of the Politics of Islam

Mohammed preached for 13 years in Mecca and only acquired about 150 followers. Following the death of his protector and uncle, the wealthy class of Mecca ran him out of town. He left with his followers and went to Medina, a town located less than a hundred miles from Mecca in what is now Saudi Arabia. There he preached for another year and obtained a hundred or so more followers.
In order to support himself and his followers, he sent men out to rob caravans from Mecca and generously distributed among them the wealth they brought back, keeping a portion for himself. Part of the wealth obtained from these raids were captives which Mohammed also distributed among his men as slaves and in some cases as wives. Slaves who agreed to convert to Islam were freed. Mohammed was never motivated by money as much as by power. He considered money a tool that could be used to fund jihad and to support his followers.

At the same time, Mohammed moved from the strictly religious or spiritual practice of Islam into a profoundly political mode. Suddenly the new Islam became popular. It was not simply a religion that would assure the poorest of the poor a place of honor in a gilded paradise, but a political system that could provide them with wealth, sex and power, all to be had for the taking from the kafir.
The word of Allah, as received and reported by Mohammed, is divided into two records. The Koran of Mecca was based on religious precepts. The Koran of Medina, however, became clearly political in scope and direction.

The belief that only Muslims are protected by Allah meant that kafirs were not afforded the usual considerations of morality, such as equality, honesty and compassion. Examples we see from Mohammed's life show that kafirs can be mocked, raped, cursed, threatened, tortured, killed, robbed or enslaved to advance the cause of Islam.

This dual system of ethics paved the way to jihad: a holy war undertaken as a Muslim duty and are reflected in the Islamic world view:

dar al Islam, land of submission
dar al harb, land of war

In contrast, the prevailing kafir world view is that all people at some fundamental level are equal, although they are not necessarily the same. Not all people are of the same ability, although all deserve to be treated fairly, compassionately and honestly. The ultimate ethical statement is referred to as The Golden Rule: "Treat others as you wish to be treated." In this view "others" and "self" are equal and all of humanity is to be accorded the same consideration. This is the ideal. We frequently fail to live up to the ideal, but is the ideal nevertheless.

The dual ethics of Islam are not as simple as separate set of ethics for the kafir. What makes political Islam so effective is that it has two stages of ethics for the kafir. It has the ethics of the Meccan Koran (written early and religious), and the ethics of the Medinan Koran (written later and political). Islam can treat the kafir well, but as an inferior (Koran of Mecca), or treat him as an enemy of Allah (Koran of Medina). Both actions are sanctioned as sacred in the Koran. Islamic apologists always refer to the Meccan ethics.

The Two Civilizations

Ethics are of primary importance. Ethics determine how you treat someone else. The ethic of unity is the basis of democracy, the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution.

It was the Golden Rule that lead to the end of slavery. All civil rights was based upon the Golden Rule. Notice this is about politics, not religion. The Golden Rule goes beyond religion.

There are only two types of ethics-unity and dualistic. And so there are two civilizations-those based upon ethics of unity and those based upon dualistic ethics.

This is the crux of the matter. Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and most atheists subscribe to the Golden Rule. A Hindu has the same ethics as a Christian. Both are workers, hold family in high regard and don't lie, cheat or steal. Of course, some do, but they can be judged, shamed and condemned on the basis of the Golden Rule ethical system.

A Muslim is not subject to the Golden Rule, and so does not feel shame at the suffering of the kafirs. Take slavery, for instance. Christians can be shamed over slavery. Islam has a 1400-year history of slavery, including running the slave trade that sold the Africans to the Christians. There are no Islamic books that recall the slave trade in any detail and express any regret.

There has never been a book written where a Muslim recalls the historic suffering of jihad and has remorse or shame. Every history of jihad is glorious. Mohammed killed and enslaved the kafirs and established the ideal pattern for all Muslims. Mohammed never felt remorse or shame, so a Muslim feels no remorse or shame over any suffering caused by jihad.

This lack of regret or sorrow is what should be expected of a dualistic ethical civilization.

The kafirs cannot unite on the basis of religion, but we are already united on the basis of an ethics of unity. We just need to understand our common ethical ground. If we understand that we are all members of a unitary ethical civilization, we can also unite to defend ourselves against the attack by the dualistic ethical system of Islam.
Bill Warner

Of Interest:
Most Westerners think of the Islamic mosque as a church, primarily a place of worship. A mosque is much more than this. These articles give a clear picture of its functions.
Part One
Part Two

An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam: Part 3

This newsletter is one of a series on the subject
Islam and Political Islam
Throughout the world, Islam is perceived as a religion, but it moved quickly from strictly religious teachings into one of the world's most successful political systems. Political Islam has an unbroken 1400-year history and continues to spread rapidly today through immigration and population growth as well as military conquest. The most recent of these wars of conquest is that of the Islamic regime of Khartoum, which is actively engaged in a genocidal war against Sudanese Christians and Animists.
In its early years, the spread of Islam both as a religion and as a political and military force was explosive. Within ten years after Mohammed established an Islamic city-state in Medina he had absorbed the divided tribes of Arabia into one nation.

Religious vs. Political islam

Religious Islam is focused on Five Pillars:

Repeating the creed, "There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is his final prophet."
Praying five times a day facing in the direction of Mecca.
Contributing to charity to benefit other Muslims.
Fasting during the month of Ramadan.
Going on pilgrimage to Mecca.

None of the Five Pillars includes the non-Islamic world. Jihad, which is incumbent on all Muslims, is sometimes called the Sixth Pillar, but the first five pillars are religious and jihad is political.
Religious Islam strictly deals with Muslims. Political Islam is the doctrine that drives all Islamic policy about the kafirs.

Political Duality

In the Sunna, the part of the Trilogy that records Mohammed's actions, jihad, slavery, killing and oppression are clearly considered ethical when used to advance Islam. It is this "us" and "them" mentality that results in an ethical inequality, the duality, that is inherent in Islam. And, according to Muslims, the laws of Islam are eternal and cannot be changed, reformed or altered. It is ordained by Allah. It was not created by Man. It is permanent and it is universal and no on has the right to amend or reform it.

The Koran, the Hadith and the Sira all emphasize that the only politics recognized by Allah are the politics of Islam. From that viewpoint, all governments must become Islamic in order to preserve peace, because Muslims can use the violence of jihad on any Free who do not submit.

Mohammed was a master of this dualistic thinking. He used the tribal jealousies and conflicts to convert, conquer and unite on a global scale. Populations quickly recognized that they would fare better as Muslims under Islam, than as "others," or kafirs. While the kafirs are unimpressed by Islam's threats of Hell as the only hereafter available to kafirs, they do care about how they are treated ethically and legally in this plane of existence. However, Islam declares that all kafirs are second-class citizens.

In the Islamic Trilogy, the kafirs can be treated well only if they submit to the demands of Islam. The sacred texts of Islam are adamant that domination is the only way to treat the kafirs.

Stages of Duality

Islam has two modes of Koranic behavior-the Koran of Mecca and the Koran of Medina. In Mecca, Mohammed was weak and Islam was beginning and the Koran of Mecca is religious. In Medina, Mohammed became political and strong. So the Koran of Medina is political, violent, judgment and demanding.

Bear patiently with what the kafirs say, and leave their company without recrimination. Leave to Me those that deny the Truth, those that enjoy the comforts of this life; bear with them yet a little while. Koran of Mecca 73:10

Mohammed is the perfect Muslim. At first he was nice, then demanding, then violent. Demanding as in: if you don't do what Islam dictates, first come the threats and then come the violence.
So the "good" Muslim is a Meccan Muslim.

In Medina Mohammed transformed the religion of Islam into a political system. Killing, theft, and rape became sacralized. He became powerful and the Koranic message changed. A terrorist follows the Koran from Medina.

Prophet, make war on the kafirs and the hypocrites, and deal sternly with them. Hell shall be their home, evil their fate.
Koran of Medina 66:9

These Koranic verses contradict each other. How do you tell which one to follow? Simple. According to the Koran, the later verse replaces the earlier verse. And where ever there is contradiction, the Koran of Medina abrogates the Koran of Mecca.

But knowing which verses to follow is much more complicated than that. The "nice" Koran of Mecca is still to be used if Islam is weak in political power. When Islam has the strength-force is the answer; use the Koran of Medina. All verses can be used as needed. The Koran is duality.

The Koran also establishes a different form of logic. Since the Koran is both true and contradictory it violates the normal rules of logic. In unitary logic if something is contradictory it is false. But the Koran is contradictory and true. This is dualistic logic. So Islam operates under a different form of reasoning than the rest of the world.

The Practice of Islamic Politics

The practical outcome of this dualistic thinking in government by Islam is the following:

Force, pressure, demands, and violence are always options.
Sharia (Islamic) law must replace all other forms of law and government
Jihad must be practiced

Jihad must be everywhere, in all aspects of private and public life in the dar al harb (land of war)
The jihadists must imitate history's model of the perfect political Muslim: Mohammed.

Islam is not just the faith of another immigrant group. No, political Islam is here to Islamicize us. Our culture must submit to the culture of Islam. That has been Islam's mandate towards every other culture for 1400 years, and here and now it's no different. Islam is devoted to an unchanging doctrine, to follow Mohammed's plan until all the earth is Islamic. This goal is repeated stated in the Koran, the Sira and the Hadith. In short, all Muslims agree with the goal; they just differ on which method of the duality ethics-peaceful tactics or violent ones-is the most efficient way to reach the goal of dominance.

The political nature of Islam is to control 100% of the public sphere: the media, books, poetry, music, art, the law, constitutions, dress, food, the courts. If something is in the public domain, then Islam must control it. That means this book or anything that stakes out fundamental rights of the kafirs is forbidden by Islam.

Political Islam has another feature. It never acknowledges and never apologizes. In the last 1400 years jihad has killed more than 270 million of the kafirs, yet political Islam denies having killed a single soul. Islam denies its role in slavery, even though every black slave sold to a white man was wholesaled by a Muslim. Islam has even carried on the slave trade in the 20th and 21st centuries and has never made a single acknowledgment or apology; there is no guilt. Muslims feel shame if they fail but never guilt about their successes. After all, their ethical doctrine supports all of their positions.

Bill Warner
copyright 2008, CBSX, Inc. dba politicalislam.com
Use this as you will, just do not edit and give us credit.

"Wake Up America" Plan by Congresswoman Myrick

Lisa Zagaroly, McClatchy Newspapers


Rep. Sue Myrick wants America to "wake up" and stop allowing terrorism to proliferate ... The Charlotte Republican on Friday released a list of 10 items she hopes will help peel back the layers on how radical elements of Islam might be infiltrating the military, school rooms and other elements of society. She also wants to stop the government from supporting terrorist organizations through financial investments and military sales. ... The co-founder of the House anti-terrorism caucus has spent an increasing amount of time trying to tackle what she views as threats posed at home by extremists, an issue that fuels her commitment to deporting illegal immigrants.

Myrick's 10-point plan

Investigate all military chaplains endorsed by Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was imprisoned for funding a terrorist organization.

Investigate all prison chaplains endorsed by Alamoudi.

Investigate the selection process of Arabic translators working for the Pentagon and FBI.

Examine the nonprofit status of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

Make it an act of sedition or solicitation of treason to preach or publish materials that call for the deaths of Americans.

Audit sovereign wealth funds in the United States.

Cancel scholarship student visa program with Saudi Arabia until they reform their text books, which she claims preach hatred and violence against non-Muslims.

Restrict religious visas for imams who come from countries that don't allow reciprocal visits by non-Muslim clergy.

Cancel contracts to train Saudi police and security in U.S. counterterrorism tactics.

Block the sale of sensitive military munitions to Saudi Arabia.

U.S. Representative Sue Myrick, co-founder of the House anti-terrorism caucus, has done America a great service with her call for a 10 point plan to tackle the threat of Islamic terrorism here in America.

Her 10 point plan is listed in the article below. Her press release laying out her plan can be viewed by clicking http://www.house.gov/list/press/nc09_myrick/wakeupamerica41808.html.

She will certainly get criticism from Muslims and the politically correct crowd. We need to show Rep. Myrick that there are Americans who are 100% behind her and applaud her courage and leadership.

Before Monday, please send an email to Rep. Myrick letting her know we’re behind her. Click on this link to send her an email: http://myrick.house.gov/zipauth.shtml

And if you are so inclined, call her Washington, D.C. office, 202/225-1976, and leave a message there letting Rep. Myrick know we’re supporting her efforts.

United America Committee exposes classroom Jihad

Recently the United American Committee's Central Florida chapter exposed cultural Jihad in a Central Florida school. What would you do if your child was forced to attend a class on Islam without your consent in a Public School? This is the same public school system who says your child can not be exposed to prayer in schools. It is also the same public school system that your tax dollars fund to be able to give YOUR children a quality unbiased education. The public school system that says you can not force a child to participate in any religion. Well it happened this week in Central Florida. The Central Florida chapter of the United American Committee uncovered this plot to educate your children with the religion of Islam and exposed it.

The Central Florida Chapter of the United American Committee then contacted WFTV Channel 9 news in Orlando to expose a cultural Jihad at a local school. This class was called family dynamics and was supposed to have nothing to do with religion, but ISLAM turned it into a religious discussion and these students had no choice to stay or go.

Watch the video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-875161054537808915&hl=en

Should Jimma Carter's Passport be Revoked?

Jimmy Carter met with Mahmoud Zahar, a top Hamas gang leader... he hugged and kissed Nasser Shaer, an unscrupulous apostle of slaughter... then he laid a wreath on Yasser Arafat's grave, calling the late terrorist "a peace fighter" and "a dear friend."

But that wasn't enough. Carter's most outrageous act was his meeting with Hamas's exiled leader, Khaled Meshal, whom our government has officially designated "a terrorist," responsible for the deaths of at least 26 Americans.

And yet, only a few lone voices on Capitol Hill seem willing to do something about Carter's treacherous antics.

Representative Sue Myrick has asked Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to pull Carter's passport.

Here's what she said:

"Former President Carter has acted in contradiction of international agreements to isolate Hamas. He has acted in defiance of both United States policy and international policy."

In 1981 Congress granted this power to the Secretary of State and the Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of the statute.

And then there's Representative Joe Knollenberg, who has introduced legislation in the House that would stop the federal government from spending our tax dollars -- $19 million so far -- to fund the Carter Center.

"America must speak with one voice against our terrorist enemies. It sends a fundamentally troubling message when an American dignitary is engaged in dialogue with terrorists. My legislation will make sure that taxpayer dollars are not being used to support discussions or negotiations with terrorist groups."

There are still a few Members of Congress who are not afraid to be conservatives and patriots.

We have an obligation NOT to let them stand alone.

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent and personalized Blast Fax messages to President George W. Bush and each and every one of the Republican Members of the leadership in the House and Senate.

Tell them this time Jimmy Carter has gone too far. Urge them to support Rep. Sue Myrick's efforts to urge Secretary Rice to pull Carter's passport. And, demand they immediately vote on Representative Knollenberg's legislation to stop the federal government from doling out our hard-earned tax dollars to the Georgia-based Carter Center. Our hard-earned tax dollars should not be used to support activity that runs contrary to U.S. interests, including meetings with terrorists.


Carter Thumbed His Nose At Congress

When Carter announced his little trip, some members of his own party joined with Republicans in signing a letter begging him NOT to meet with Hamas -- an anti-Semitic, hate-America gang of terrorists.

Representative Bill Shuster introduced a "sense of Congress" resolution which reads in part that Congress "disapproves of former President Jimmy Carter's freelance diplomatic efforts in the Middle East, which contradict the stated foreign policy position of the current Administration."

Two other Democrats, Representatives Howard Berman, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and Gary Ackerman, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Mideast subcommittee, wrote Carter imploring him NOT to meet with Hamas.

"This visit will undermine the Middle East peace process... the legitimacy and prestige that Hamas will derive from your visit will be seen in the region as a clear demonstration that violence pays.

More than 50 House Members -- in all -- wrote Carter urging him NOT to meet with Meshal, calling him the man behind the deaths of 26 Americans.

Yet there was Carter: striking poses for TV cameras, mouthing far-left platitudes, playing the role of the benevolent peacemaker, flashing his nauseating grin.

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent and personalized Blast Fax messages to President George W. Bush and each and every one of the Republican Members of the leadership in the House and Senate.

Tell them this time Jimmy Carter has gone too far. Urge them to support Rep. Sue Myrick's efforts to urge Secretary Rice to pull Carter's passport. And, demand they immediately vote on Representative Knollenberg's legislation to stop the federal government from doling out our hard-earned tax dollars to the Georgia-based Carter Center. Our hard-earned tax dollars should not be used to support activity that runs contrary to U.S. interests, including meetings with terrorists.


Any Friend of Hamas Is No Friend Of Mine

Former President Carter's behavior is nothing new.

Using the prestige of his presidency and millions and millions of YOUR tax dollars, Carter has traveled the world, and REPEATEDLY met with America's most dangerous enemies against our nation's interest.

Hamas is no social club! It's a terrorist organization whose hands drip with the blood of innocent Israelis and Americans.

Hamas launches suicide bombers and murders innocent women and children with wild-eyed glee -- particularly if their targets are Jewish or Christian.

After Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian parliamentary elections and took control of the Palestinian "nation," the United States -- along with the United Nations, the European Union, and Russia -- called on Hamas to recognize Israel and honor previous agreements to coexist peacefully.

The leaders of Hamas were defiant. They made it clear that they intended to keep on killing Jews, Americans, and everyone else that got in the way of their fanatic agenda.

Jimmy Carter is critical of President Bush -- a man who has made the defeat of terrorism his legacy -- but Carter never misses an opportunity to meet and greet international terrorists.

Join us in sending a message to Carter... Stop him from feeding from the government trough. TODAY!

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent and personalized Blast Fax messages to President George W. Bush and each and every one of the Republican Members of the leadership in the House and Senate.

Tell them this time Jimmy Carter has gone too far. Urge them to support Rep. Sue Myrick's efforts to urge Secretary Rice to pull Carter's passport. And, demand they immediately vote on Representative Knollenberg's legislation to stop the federal government from doling out our hard-earned tax dollars to the Georgia-based Carter Center. Our hard-earned tax dollars should not be used to support activity that runs contrary to U.S. interests, including meetings with terrorists.


FOR THE REST OF THE STORY AND MORE CARTER TREACHERY: http://www.cfiflistmanager.org/defundthecartercenter1be.html

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Why Hamas endorses Barack Hussein Obama

Islamic Terrorist Hamas leadership in the USA publicly endorsed Barak Hussein Obama.

The candidate, accused of being an apostate from Islam, denies he asked for such
endorsements. So WHY did Hamas feel that this ultra-Liberal candidate would be the most advantageous leader of the free world for terrorists dedicated to the destruction of Israel and the United States?

Perhaps they merely read what Obama himself has stated in his own words:

From Dreams of my Father: I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.

From Dreams of my Father: I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race.
In other words, Barack Obama openly confesses and bluntly admits in this statement that he is antagonistic towards Anglo-Americans and that he basically just hates white people.

From Dreams of my Father: There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.
Barack Obama is an out and out stone cold racist! Just like his hate-filled pastor for 20 years Jeremiah Wright
and just like his angry wife.

From Dreams of my Father: It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.

From Dreams of my Father: I never emulate white men, and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa, that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.

From Audacity of Hope: I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.
The potential Commander in Chief proclaims he will be on the side of our enemies when Islam attacks us again!

The Islamic terror organization, HAMAS, understands what many Americans refuse to accept.

Barak Hussein Obama is their silent ally.

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Call to Jihad has nothing to do with Islam


Terrorist who has nothing to do with Islam calls on Muslims to turn mosques, schools, factories, universities into "centers of support for jihad"

Now that the EU has strongly denounced those venomous people who insist on linking Islam with terrorism and have made it European dogma that terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, I wonder if they will issue a condemnation of Al-Zawahri as an...Islamophobe.
Meanwhile, his call to do this will be heeded insofar as Muslims accept his claim to represent the truth of Islam. But that is the one element of the jihadist appeal that analysts almost uniformly ignore.

"Al-Zawahiri Calls On Muslims To Turn Mosques, Schools, Factories, Universities into 'Centers of Support for Jihad,'" from MEMRI (thanks to LGF):

On April 18, 2008, Al-Ikhlas and other Islamist websites posted an audio message by Al-Zawahiri, produced by Al-Sahab, titled "Five Years after the Invasion of Iraq; Decades of Oppression by the Tyrant." Al-Zawahiri states that the Democrats in the U.S. are deceiving their voters when they promise to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq by forming an understanding with Iran. This understanding, he says, is meant to allow the Americans to focus on fighting Al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Pakistan and Afghanistan, but will in fact only "only serve Iran's interests in the region and add fuel to the fire."

Al-Zawahiri also discusses what he calls the Muslims' longstanding economic crisis and political oppression at the hands of the Arab regimes, particularly the Egyptian government. He calls upon the Muslims to take matters into their own hands, saying: "Rights are not granted, but are claimed by force."

He concludes by urging Muslims to take to the streets, and to turn their mosques, schools, factories and universities into centers of support for jihad and resistance.

Saturday, April 19, 2008

Sharia-Compliant Finance Funds Jihad

Sharia-Compliant Finance Funds Jihad


The below is from MJ Wilson - One of our busiest and best Anti-Jihad members. If you haven't read his blog lately, please do so. He is one heckofva researcher. Many of my posts here are thanks to MJ.

by Deroy Murdock Posted 04/04/2008 ET

Turn your clock back 70 years. Imagine that Wall Street banks and brokerages sold Nuremberg-compliant bonds and stock funds in 1938. American Nazi sympathizers bought financial instruments certified by Berlin-based advisors as free of “Jewish profits” from, say, Salomon Brothers and Bloomingdale’s. In turn, a percentage of such funds’ gains underwrote pro-Nazi charities, like the German-American Bund, and similar organizations in the Fatherland, like the Hitler Youth.

Seventy years hence, an analogous outrage grows on Wall Street, only this time for real. Sharia-compliant finance (SCF) is expanding among banks and securities houses eager to absorb the hundreds of billions of petrodollars cascading into the Middle East, thanks to $100-per-barrel oil. To lure this cash, financial companies increasingly offer vehicles that neither pay interest nor benefit from gambling, entertainment, alcohol, pork, or anything considered “haram” or “un-kosher” in Islam. Bahrain’s International Islamic Financial Market (IIFM) counts $97 billion in Islamic bonds in circulation with another $66 billion forecast through 2008 -- and SCF is not limited to the bond market.

SCF goes far beyond marketing to Muslims and Middle Easterners. IIFM lists “wider sharia acceptance” among its goals. Selling sharia-compliant investments legitimizes a barbaric theocratic orthodoxy that should be defeated, not promoted.

Turn your clock back 1,300 years. According to the Koran, sharia means that, with disobedient women, men should “admonish them, and send them to their beds and beat them” (Koran 4:34). For those having sex outside marriage: “The fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them with a hundred stripes” (24:2). “Cut off the hands of thieves, whether they are male or female, as punishment for what they have done” (5:38). Instead of celebrating gay sex with parades and rainbow flags, “kill the one who does it, and the one to whom it is done” (“Reliance of the Traveler” -- Abu Dawud 4447). How do you handle an adulteress? “Khalid Walid came forward with a stone which he threw at her head, and when the blood spurted on his face, he cursed her” (“Reliance” -- Muslim 4206).

Western financiers have no business complying with this. Nevertheless, SCF advisors help these funds remain sharia-compliant. Unfortunately, these authorities often are Muslim extremists who appear mainstream by consulting for such powerhouses as Deutsche Bank and Standard & Poor’s. *In 2002, Caribou Coffee had to explain the ties between its Atlanta-based sharia-compliant owner, Arcapita, Inc., and Arcapita’s sharia advisor, Yusuf Al-Qaradawi. He had defended “our brothers and children in Al-Aqsa and the blessed land of Palestine generously sacrificing their blood, giving their souls willingly in the way of Allah.” Qaradawi eventually resigned from Arcapita.

*Sheik Muhammad Taqi Usmani advises the Dow Jones Islamic Index. He has written: “The purpose of Jihad…aims at breaking the grandeur of unbelievers and establish[ing] that of Muslims.” * The North American Islamic Trust owns 69.8 percent of the Dow Jones Islamic Fund. The Justice Department identified NAIT last June as an unindicted co-conspirator in supporting Hamas’ murderous anti-Israeli terrorism. NAIT also owns Albany, New York’s Masjid As-Salam mosque. In April 2007, its founder, Mohammed Mosharref Hossain, and imam, Yassin Muhiddin Aref, received 15-year prison sentences for assisting an FBI sting operation to assassinate a Pakistani diplomat in Manhattan with a shoulder-fired missile.

Sharia-compliant funds usually donate 2.5 percent of profits as “zakat.” While such money assists peaceful Muslim causes, some of it has gone ka-boom.

*The Holy Land Foundation, Benevolence International Foundation, and Global Relief Foundation, all major Muslim charities, were shuttered in December 2001 for allegedly supporting Islamic terrorism.

*According to “The Tax Lawyer,” Yasin al-Qadi -- an investor in one Hamas-connected, sharia-compliant company called BMI (not the perfectly legitimate Broadcast Music, Inc.) -- transmitted $820,000 to Chicago’s Quranic Literacy Institute in 1991. QLI employee Mohammad Salah confessed in 1995 that he trained recruits to handle assorted toxins and “basic chemical materials for the preparation of bombs and explosives.”

“This is bad for America, bad for capitalism, and good for jihad,” says Frank Gaffney, president of the Center for Security Policy, which is sounding the anti-SCF claxons. CSP’S legal analysis by David Yerushalmi richly details SCF’s dangers.

The last thing America needs is jihad with tailored suits and Excel spreadsheets. It’s time to stop the clock on this deadly idea.


Anti-Jihad Resistance Movement - JOIN TODAY

PROUD MEMBER of the Anti-Jihad Resistance http://www.antijihadresistance.com/

The anti-jihad resistance is not an organization, it is any and every organization who is against the Jihadist threat which faces the West. A member of the anti-jihad resistance is anyone and everyone who is against Islamic militancy. It is the growing movement of thousands of organizations and individuals against the threats we face from radical Islam. Are you part of the resistance?

DISCLAIMER: The anti-jihad resistance is a non-entity, has no charter, and is NOT an organization or group, but is comprised of any and all organizations and groups who are against Jihad. Therefore it is made up of countless organizations who may not share the same views or tactics, yet share the common belief of protecting the West from Islamofascism. The actions of one group in no way reflect the actions or beliefs of any other group, and all groups remain entirely separate entities, although they may team up from time to time on various campaigns. The resistance is a powerful guiding force that will constantly remind us that we are all working for the same goal. It is the cohesive uniting belief that all groups who share the same view that we must confront the Jihadist threats should set aside all differences and unite in one movement.

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Sharia Financing funds ISLAMIC TERRORISM!

Sharia-Compliant Financing: One More Tentacle of Cultural Jihad

Any financial institution that agrees to participate in Sharia financing is facing the prospect of having to divert 2.5% to as much as 6% of its profits to Muslim charities. So what's wrong with such "philanthropy? "

Over the past several years, three major Muslim charities in America have been shut down after investigations revealed they were funneling charitable contributions to terrorist organizations. How many more around the world are doing the same thing?

In other words, with sharia-compliant financing we might as well be taking a portion of our interest, dividends, and capital gains, and handing that money directly to terrorists.

Click on this link, http://www.terrapin n.com/2008/ ifwna/, to visit a website advertising a sharia-compliant conference. Take special note of the sponsors, which include the Dow Jones and Standard and Poor's.

Vladimir Lenin once noted that "the capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them." Sharia-compliant financing goes one better than that – we simply give them the money to hang us.
How to stop it? Education is necessary – but not sufficient. It will take substantial, organized, grassroots pressure.

A few years ago, Bank of America let it be known it was going to actively market its products to illegal immigrants, which the bank saw as an untapped market. A fierce grassroots outcry followed, and to its credit Bank of America listened and scrapped its plan.

Organizations such as the ACT! for America membership and chapter will be able to exert the level of informed, organized opposition to sharia-compliant financing that will send a clear message to financial institutions looking to cash in on the oil wealth of the Middle East: Not with our investment dollars.


See the link at in the right column to find a chapter near you.

International Sharia for Dhimmis

Here is an answer to a query of FTSE. FTSE Group calculates over 100,000 indices covering more than 48 countries and all major asset classes. They have just created a Shariah compliant Index Series. Take a look at the pdf and see what you think.

From: Kenneth Sebuganda [mailto:Kenneth. Sebuganda@ ftse.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 3:45 PM
Subject: RE: Shariah compliant Index Series


Please find attached a presentation outline the rules of what it mean to be Shariah compliant and the construction of the FTSE Shariah Global Equity Index Series <>

Please note that dealing directly with your query, the term Shariah can be defined as below, which is extracted from the FTSE Glossary of Terms for the FTSE Shariah Global Equity Index Series:
Shariah / Sharia / Shari'a

Islamic canon law derived from 3 Primary sources: the Quran; the Hadith (sayings of the Prophet Muhammad); and the Sunnah (practice and traditions of the Prophet Muhammad), and three Secondary sources Qiyas (Analogical deductions and reasoning), Ijma (Consensus of Islamic Scholars) and Ijtihad (Legal reasoning).
http://www.ftse. com/Indices/ FTSE_Shariah_ Global_Equity_ Index_Series/ Downloads/ Yasaar_Glossary_ of_Terms. pdf
In addition, please find below the factsheet for the FTSE Shariah Global Equity Index Series provide additional relevant information:
http://www.ftse. com/Indices/ FTSE_Shariah_ Global_Equity_ Index_Series/ Downloads/ FTSE_Shariah_ Global_Equity_ Index_Series_ Factsheet. pdf

If you require further information please contact us.

Kenneth Sebuganda
Client Services Executive - FTSE Group
1330 Avenue of The Americas,
10th Floor, New York 10019, USA
New York: (Domestic) + 1 888 747 FTSE (3873)
(International) : +;1 212 641 6124
Direct Tel: + 1 212 641 6124
Fax: + 1 212 641 6190

FTSE Shariah Index Series Induction.pdf
473K View as HTML : http://mail. google.com/ mail/?ui= 2&ik=69e5d510d8&attid=0.1&disp=vah&view=att&th=1193427fb48bfad9

You can download the document from the above url

Shariah Risk Due Diligence Newsletter, Articles

A Project of The Center For Security Policy
April 01 -07, 2008



1. Saudi Father 'killed daughter who met man on Facebook'
2. Iran: Parliament to discuss death penalty for converts who leave Islam
3. Homosexuals Rounded Up In Esfahan, Iran - HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
4. No more mosques' says Synod member - UK General Synod calls for a Ban
5. Austria: Woman Politician indicted for calling Mohammed a child molester
6. Pakistan: Couple stoned to death for adultery
7. Shariah Alert: Another Honor Murder in Britain-Tortured & Murdered by her father
8. Sharia lawyers say extend cuddle ban to non-Muslims
9. Muslims to get floor sinks at Indianapolis airport by fall
10. Muslim is spared a speeding ban so he can drive between his two wives
11. American Idol Sharia Style
12. Canadian teen sentenced to 200 lashes
13. Afghan bill may ban dancing, other un-Islamic TV scenes


1. Saudi Father 'killed daughter who met man on Facebook'
April 1, 2008 The Scotsman MICHAEL THEODOULOU
http://news. scotsman. com/world/ Father-39killed- daughter- -who.3932435. jp
A YOUNG woman was beaten and shot dead by her father for talking online with a man she met on the Facebook website, according to a Saudi-owned news website. The case was reported on Al-Arabiya.net as an example of the "strife" the social networking site is causing in the ultra- conservative desert kingdom, where a prominent cleric is calling for Facebook to be blocked. It was reported the man shot his daughter in Riyadh last August. "Security sources assured Al-Arabiya.net the father beat his daughter and then shot her dead," the website said. A leading Saudi preacher told Al-Arabiya.net that Facebook was a "door to lust" for women and called for it to be blocked to prevent social "strife". Syria is the only Arab country to have blocked Facebook so far.

2. Iran: Parliament to discuss death penalty for converts who leave Islam
March 20, 2008 Adnkronos
http://www.adnkrono s.com/AKI/ English/Religion /?id=1.0. 1988866222
Tehran, (AKI) - In its first session since last week's general elections, the new Iranian parliament is expected to discuss a law that will condemn to death anyone who decides to leave the Muslim faith and convert to other religions. The parliament, also known as the Majlis, will debate the new law which has been presented by the government of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Under the proposed law, anyone who is born to Muslim parents and decides to convert to another faith, will face the death penalty. Since the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran, at least eight Christians have been killed for their faith. Seven of them were found stabbed to death after they were kidnapped.

3. Homosexuals Rounded Up In Esfahan, Iran - HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
March 28, 2008 Iran Press
http://www.iranpres snews.com/ english/source/ 038197.html
New York - The arrest of more than 30 men attending a party in a private home in the city of Esfahan signals renewed efforts by Iranian authorities to enforce morality codes, and highlights the fragility of basic rights in a country where police powers routinely undermine privacy, Human Rights Watch said today. It urged Iranian authorities to release the men reportedly arrested in late February, and to drop charges against people accused of consensual homosexual conduct, drinking alcohol, and other related moral offenses. When police routinely break down doors to enforce a brand of morality, it means a line has been crossed to invade people's privacy at any time, said Joe Stork, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. In extensive interviews with men and women inside and outside Iran, Human Rights Watch has documented widespread patterns of arbitrary arrest and torture based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

4. 'No more mosques' says Synod member - UK General Synod calls for Ban
April 1, 2008 Times Online UK Ruth Gledhill
http://www.timesonl ine.co.uk/ tol/comment/ faith/article366 2450.ece
Alison Ruoff claims that building mega-mosques could help turn Britian into an Islamic state. A prominent evangelical member of the Church of England's General Synod has called for a ban on the building of any more mosques in Britain. Alison Ruoff also claimed that Sharia law is inevitable in this country if mosques continue to be built here. Mrs Ruoff, a former magistrate, said in an interview with London's Premier Christian Radio that no more mosques should be built in Britain until all persecution of Christians in Muslim nations had ceased. She said: "No more mosques in the UK. We are constantly building new mosques, which are paid for by the money that comes from oil states. "We have only in this country as far as we know, 3.5 to four million Muslims. There are enough mosques for Muslims in this country, they don't need anymore. "We don't need to have Sharia law which would come with more mosques imposed upon our nation, if we don't watch out, that would happen. If we want to become an Islamic state, this is the way to go.

5. Austria: Woman Politician indicted for calling Mohammed a child molester
April 1, 2008 The Brussels Journal Thomas Landen
http://www.brussels journal.com/ node/3145
The Austrian authorities have indicted politician Susanne Winter on charges of incitement and degradation of religious symbols and religious agitation. This offence carries a maximum sentence of two years. Last January, Ms. Winter said that the prophet Muhammad was "a child molester" because he had married a six-year-old girl. She also said he was "a warlord" who had written the Koran during "epileptic fits." The politician, a member of the Austrian Freedom Party FPÖ, an anti-immigration party which is in opposition, added that Islam is "a totalitarian system of domination that should be cast back to its birthplace on the other side of the Mediterranean. " She also warned for "a Muslim immigration tsunami," saying that "in 20 or 30 years, half the population of Austria will be Muslim" if the present immigration policies continue. Following her remarks, Muslim extremists threatened to kill Susanne Winter and she was placed under police protection. Today, the Justice Department in Vienna announced that Ms. Winter will be charged with "incitement and degradation of religious symbols." If convicted she may have to serve up to two years in jail for her opinions. Today in neighbouring Belgium the government's anti-discrimination body CEOOR warned bloggers and websites to remove their links to Wilders's movie.

6. Pakistan: Couple stoned to death for adultery
April 2, 2008 Adnkronos International- Pakistan
http://www.adnkrono s.com/AKI/ English/Religion /?id=1.0. 2031812946
Ghalanai - A man and a woman have been stoned to death by militants in Pakistan's north-west border region after an Islamic 'qazi' court found them guilty of adultery. According to the Pakistani daily, Dawn, this is the first incident of stoning carried out in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas on the border of Afghanistan. In the past, couples found guilty of adultery by militants or tribesmen were executed by firing squads. The woman, identified as Shano, had allegedly eloped with Daulat Khan Malikdeenkhel on 15 March. Quoting Dr. Asad, a spokesman for the militants, Dawn said that Shano was a married woman living in Peshawar's Deen Bahar colony. He said a complaint had been received from her family that she had been abducted by Daulat Khan. But later it was reported that she had ran away with him. He said that some members of the Taliban captured them when they were returning from Karachi. He said the qazi court found the couple guilty of adultery and sentenced them to death by stoning and the sentence was carried out on Monday in Khwaezai-Baezai.

7. Shariah Alert: Another Honor Murder in Britain-Tortured & Murdered by her father
April 3, 2008 Sydney Morning Herald
http://www.smh. com.au/news/ world/tortured- and-murdered- -by-her-father/ 2008/04/03/ 1206851041835. html
Two British police forces failed a young Kurdish woman who was tortured, raped and murdered in an honour killing plotted by her family, the police watchdog concluded. Investigations by the police in England's West Midlands and Scotland Yard in London let down Banaz Mahmod after not taking seriously death threats against her. The 20-year-old was raped and garrotted during an ordeal lasting more than two-and-a-half hours at her family home in south London last year after falling in love with a man her family thought was unsuitable. Her body was later found in a suitcase beneath a house in Birmingham, central England. Members of her family and several family friends had plotted her murder. Her father Mahmod Mahmod, 52, and her uncle Ari Mahmod, 51, were jailed for life last July after being found guilty of murder. Banaz had told police four times she feared for her life after falling in love with a man of whom her family disapproved, but her claims were not taken seriously.

8. Sharia lawyers say extend cuddle ban to non-Muslims
April 2, 2008 Reuters
http://www.reuters. com/article/ worldNews/ idUSKLR741732008 0403?feedType= RSS&feedName=worldNews
KUALA LUMPUR - Islamic lawyers meeting in Malaysia want an existing ban on unwed Muslim couples from cuddling or holding hands to be extended to non-Muslims caught flirting with the faithful. Experts in sharia law, which currently applies only to Malaysia's majority Muslims, proposed at a seminar that there should be a civil law to deal with non-Muslims found committing the Islamic crime of khalwat, or close proximity, with a Muslim. "The Muslims can be sentenced in sharia courts and the non-Muslim partners can probably be sentenced in the civil courts, to be fair to both parties." Malaysia runs parallel sharia and civil legal systems, with sharia courts dealing only with Muslims and mainly in family disputes or in matters such as khalwat or apostasy. It employs religious police to ensure Muslim compliance with Koranic laws. They sometimes patrol parks looking for young unwed couples holding hands, raid nightclubs to catch Muslims drinking alcohol and ensure Muslims observe the fasting month of Ramadan.

9. Muslims to get floor sinks at Indianapolis airport by fall
April 4, 2008 INDYSTAR.COM By Erin Dostal
http://www.indystar .com/apps/ pbcs.dll/ article?AID= /20080404/ LOCAL1804/ 804040462/ 1195/LOCAL18
Floor sinks to accommodate prayer requirements for Muslim taxi drivers will be installed at Indianapolis International Airport by fall. David Dawson, a spokesman for the airport project, said that two bathrooms, one for men and one for women, will have the sinks. Both will be in a 900-square-foot building where taxi drivers gather before picking up passengers at the terminal. Many of the taxi drivers are Muslims who pray five times a day. The prayer involves many rituals, including washing the feet. Drivers now use hand sinks at the existing terminal, which has caused safety hazards. Osmand Djama, 44, a taxi driver who uses the facility, said about 180 taxi drivers, most of whom are men, use the bathroom, making it unsanitary. Shariq A. Siddiqui, executive director of the Muslim Alliance of Indiana, said he's glad the board made its decision based on sanitation, not religion. The Rev. Jerry Hillenburg of Hope Baptist Church in Indianapolis, whose son was killed in Iraq in 2004, called the sinks unconstitutional and said they showed a dangerous concession to Islam. Marc Monte, pastor at Faith Baptist Church in Avon, said he is not sure whether his or Hillenburg's community will take further action against the installation but thinks it shows that "in the name of multiculturalism, people will sell America down the river." "I don't think the Airport Authority is going to let me install a baptismal font to baptize people in."

10. Muslim is spared a speeding ban so he can drive between his two wives
April 6, 2008 Women Against Shariah
http://womenagainst shariah.blogspot .com
Mohammed Anwar said a ban would make it difficult to commute between his two wives and fulfill his matrimonial duties. His lawyer told a Scottish court the Muslim restaurant owner has one wife in Motherwell and another in Glasgow - he is allowed up to four under his religion - and sleeps with them on alternate nights. Airdrie Sheriff Court had heard that Anwar was caught driving at 64mph in a 30mph zone in Glasgow, fast enough to qualify for instant disqualification. Anwar admitted the offence, but Sheriff John C. Morris accepted his plea not to be banned and allowed him to keep his licence. Lorna Jackson, from the road safety charity Brake, called the decision "astonishing" . She said: "Regardless of the number of wives or businesses this man drives to, he broke a law which is there to protect everyone.

11. American Idol Sharia Style
April 4, 2008
http://girlinshorts horts.blogspot. com/2008/ 04/american- idol-sharia- syle.html
On Monday Afghanistan' s lower house of Parliament passed a resolution banning television programs which feature dancing and other practices deemed un-Islamic. This all came on the heels of a controversy that ensued after Tolo TV aired a piece showing women and men dancing together. The Information and Culture Ministry condemned the scene, saying "dancing by men and women together is completely against the culture of the Afghan, Muslim society." Its all part of the re-Talibanization of Afghanistan, which is made possible because Sharia Law is, like in Iraq, embedded in their new spiffy democratic constitution. But, Afghanistan is suppose to at least pretend they are going democratic, and really do not want to be the world's premier heroin pusher. Last year gunmen entered the home of Zakia Zaki, the female owner of a radio station, and shot her to death in front of her 8-year-old son. Miss Zaki had apparently ignored the clerics who warned her to change the station's programming: Shaima Rezayee, a popular veejay on an MTV-style music show, was shot dead in 2005 after clerics criticized her show as "anti-Islamic. "

12. Canadian teen sentenced to 200 lashes-
Older brother still faces death for role in schoolyard fight
Sunday, April 06, 2008 Ottawa Citizen.com
http://www.canada. com/ottawacitize n/news/story. html?id=ef13d546 -1a99-44b8- 8752-40f7a3379c3 4&k=92725
MONTREAL - A Montreal teen charged in Saudi Arabia for his involvement in a schoolyard brawl that killed a fellow student has been sentenced to 200 lashes and one year in prison. However, yesterday's sentencing of 17-year-old Sultan Kohail may also contain a glimmer of hope for his brother Mohamed, 22, currently on death row for his role in the same brawl. Unless that sentence, handed down on March 3, is overturned on appeal, Mohamed Kohail could be beheaded by sword within three months. The Kohails immigrated to Canada in 2000, settling in a Montreal suburb. Their visit to Saudi Arabia for a wedding in 2006 has turned into a nightmare, Mr. Kohail said.

13. Afghan bill may ban dancing, other un-Islamic TV scenes
April 1, 2008 Boston Herald
http://www.bostonhe rald.com/ news/internation al/middle_ east/view. bg?articleid= 1084232&srvc=rss
KABUL - TV programs that show dancing and other un-Islamic practices would be banned under a resolution passed by Afghanistan' s lower house of Parliament. The decision came after the Tolo TV channel showed a dance routine on an Afghan film awards program. The Information and Culture Ministry condemned the scene: "Dancing by men and women together was completely against the culture of the Afghan, Muslim society." The parliamentary resolution said dancers should not be shown on TV, and un-Islamic scenes should be cut from Indian TV series broadcast in Afghanistan, said lawmaker Din Mohammad Azimi. Afghanistan' s media boomed after the fall of the Taliban in 2001. But officials and warlords have pressured broadcasters over programming. Last year gunmen shot radio station owner Zakia Zaki to death in front of her 8-year-old son, in a dispute with warlords over programming.

A Shariah (Qur'anic Law) Assault on the US Constitution

A Project of The Center For Security Policy
April 01 -07, 2008

http://shariahfinan cewatch.wordpres s.com/

The Shariah Risk Due Diligence Campaign - A Project of the Center for Security Policy - Established to defend the U.S. Constitution and to protect our political and religious liberties, which are all under assault by those seeking to legitimize Shariah law (i.e., Islamic law) and its economic tool, Shariah-compliant finance. Shariah law is neither religion nor personal faith, but a theo-political doctrine seeking to dominate and to subvert Western liberties and representative government.

This newsletter is not targeting Muslims or the religion of Islam; but rather, the political Islamists who seek to establish Islamic Law as defined by Shariah "scholarly consensus". This newsletter is not referring to the pietistic individual Shariah practiced by patriotic American Muslims.


Understanding Shariah law is integral to understanding the dangers of Shariah-compliant finance. Shariah law is Islamic law dating back to the 9th century and is today the law of the land in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sudan and the law under which the Taliban operates. Recent polls reveal that only 10-15% of Muslims worldwide want to live under this all-encompassing system of Islamic jurisprudence that covers all aspects of a Muslim's life including religious, social, political, and military obligations. However, with a current population of 1.5 billion Muslims, this translates to a huge pool of Jihadist recruits and supporters - a base of approximately 150 - 225 million Muslims.

Shariah law authorities, some of whom are now being paid handsomely by Barclays, Dow Jones, Standard & Poors, HSBC, Citibank, Merrill Lynch, Deutschebank, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, UBS, Credit Suisse and others have the power to dictate Shariah compliance as deemed by "scholarly consensus" on matters of finance, family, penal law, apostasy, and war. Examples of authoritarian Shariah law include: requirement of women to obtain permission from husbands for daily freedoms; beating of disobedient woman and girls; execution of homosexuals; engagement of polygamy and forced child marriages; the testimony of four male witnesses to prove rape; honor killings of those, principally women, who have dishonored the family; death to apostate Muslims who chose to leave Islam; inferior status of non-Muslims, and capital punishment for those "slander Islam."


National Security and Financial Risks: Islamists are attempting to impose Shariah Compliant Finance (SCF) on Western institutions to use our own financial strengths against us. The most serious problem with SCF is that it legitimates and institutionalizes Shariah law (i.e., Islamic law), a theo-political- legal doctrine violently opposed to Western values. With $1 -$2 trillion petrodollars annually looking for an investment home, blind exuberance is driving financial institutions to adopt SCF, without even a minimal baseline for legal compliance. This willful blindness, and lack of both transparency and due diligence may cause SCF to be the next sub-prime crisis, but this time with deadly consequences.

Legal Risks: Western financial institutions which adopt SCF may have criminal and civil exposure to claims of aiding and abetting sedition and the material support of terrorism, securities fraud, consumer fraud, racketeering, and antitrust violations, as well as exposure to tort claims for sedition and terrorism, and for the violation of internationally recognized norms of the law of nations.

Terror Financing Mechanism: SCF as monitored by paid Shariah law advisors to U.S. banking institutions must "purify" certain return on investment (ROI) dollars that do not meet Shariah law standards. This money must be donated to Islamic charities - including some that promote Jihad and support suicide bombing. Investment disclosures state that these profits can be as high as 6% of profits of investments. With $800 billion already in SCF assets, the potential for billions of dollars to be siphoned off for terrorism is real. This would be a serious criminal violation of U.S. law.

Consider this example: Shariah Mutual Funds promote themselves as "ethical funds." To be Shariah-compliant, they donate "tainted" revenues to Shariah-compliant "charities." A post 9-11 U.S. investor in a Shariah-compliant "ethical investment" is not told that Shariah law also requires imposing Shariah as U.S. law, execution of gays and female apartheid. Is he a victim of consumer fraud? Is this same post 9-11 investor unwittingly funding terror? The government has shut down the three largest Shariah-compliant charities in the U.S. - the Holy Land Foundation, Benevolence International Foundation, and the Global Relief Foundation - after proving they funded terrorist organizations.

The American taxpayer deserves answers to these questions. The Center for Security Policy (CSP) is meeting directly with members of Congress, U.S. regulatory agencies and Wall Street financial institutions in order to ensure the enforcement of existing U.S. laws on sedition, disclosure, material support of terrorism, and money-laundering. CSP is committed to revealing the civil liability and criminal exposure of Shariah law and Shariah-compliant finance.

*These Frequently Asked Questions about SCF are updated monthly by the research team at the Shariah Risk Due Diligence Program. FAQ sources, detailed research papers and legal briefs are available on request.

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

Sharia-Compliant Financing:

Sharia-Compliant Financing:
One More Tentacle of Cultural Jihad

“Jihad Comes to Wall Street.”

How serious is this?

The answer is very, very serious.

Consider just one problem with sharia-compliant financing: the likelihood that some of YOUR investment and banking dollars will end up in the coffers of terrorist organizations.

How? Because any financial institution that agrees to participate in such financing is facing the prospect of having to divert 2.5% to as much as 6% of its profits to Muslim charities. So what’s wrong with such “philanthropy?”

Over the past several years, three major Muslim charities in America have been shut down after investigations revealed they were funneling charitable contributions to terrorist organizations. How many more around the world are doing the same thing?

In other words, with sharia-compliant financing we might as well be taking a portion of our interest, dividends, and capital gains, and handing that money directly to terrorists.

Click on this link, http://www.terrapinn.com/2008/ifwna/, to visit a website advertising a sharia-compliant conference. Take special note of the sponsors, which include the Dow Jones and Standard and Poor’s.

Vladimir Lenin once noted that “the capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them.” Sharia-compliant financing goes one better than that – we simply give them the money to hang us.

How to stop it? Education is necessary – but not sufficient. It will take substantial, organized, grassroots pressure.

A few years ago, Bank of America let it be known it was going to actively market its products to illegal immigrants, which the bank saw as an untapped market. A fierce grassroots outcry followed, and to its credit Bank of America listened and scrapped its plan.

JOIN ACT! FOR AMERICA TODAY to help stop this tenacle of cultural jihad!

Taqiyya Barack Hussein Obama

This head's up from our NY City friends.

Via Little Green Footballs April 9, 2008

A reader of Free Republic dug up an old article from The New Republic, where it stated explicitly that Obama's pastor was a Muslim. http://infidelsarecool.com/2008/04/07/jeremiah-wright-former-muslim/

From Wright and others, Obama learned that part of his problem as an organizer was that he was trying to build a confederation of churches but wasn't showing up in the pews on Sunday. When pastors asked him the inevitable questions about his own spiritual life, Obama would duck them uncomfortably. A Reverend Philips put the problem to him squarely when he learned that Obama didn't attend services. "It might help your mission if you had a church home," he told Obama. "It doesn't matter where, really. What you're asking from pastors requires us to set aside some of our more priestly concerns in favor of prophesy. That requires a good deal of faith on our part. It makes us want to know just where you're getting yours from."

After many lectures like this, Obama decided to take a second look at Wright's church. Older pastors warned him that Trinity was for "Buppies"–black urban professionals–and didn't have enough street cred. But Wright was a former Muslim and black nationalist who had studied at Howard and Chicago, and Trinity's guiding principles–what the church calls the "Black Value System"–included a "Disavowal of the Pursuit of Middleclassness.'"

Former Muslim, my foot! I think current practicing Muslim is more accurate. Why else would the man travel to Libya to meet with Gaddafi, then criticize the U.S for bombing that country? Why else would Wright blame America for the 9/11 attacks?

And now I understand why his "church" published that Hamas screed, and why Wright believes that Israel is a dirty word.