Friday, May 28, 2010

How long will America take this?

Here’s a candidate that gets it! Check it out! He’s obviously angry, but rightfully so. Don’t tick off a Marine!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwCa-1MQ9V4


The proposed mosque at grand zero........further insult "scheduled to open on September 11, 2011"!!!!!

Friday, May 21, 2010

STOP THE MOSQUE AT GROUND ZERO, A Huge Insult BY Islam

Pamela Geller is hitting on all cylinders.


And the graphics are a blood curdling reminder.


Go to http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/05/pamela-geller-debates-the-911-mosque-on-hannity-radio-show.html


Sign Our Petition Today!

Stop the plans to build the Mosque at ground zero.

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

A Message to the Muslim World (and to it's apologists and quislings)

A Message to the Muslim World by Tawfik Hamid
www.tawfikhamid.com

Many in the Muslim world repeatedly express anger when Islam and its founder are
criticized. This anger could be fully understandable, especially when we take into
consideration the sensitivity of talking about religious issues. However, it is vital that the Muslim world realize that most-if not all- the criticism of Islam and of the prophet is based on what traditional and mainstream Islamic books teach. In other words, it is unfair to say that criticism of Islam was merely based on or motivated by bias against the religion, especially when we see thousands of Mosques and Islamic schools built in and sometimes supported by Western countries. We have actually seen much more limitations placed on the rights of minorities to build their religious temples or topractice their religion freely in Muslim countries than in the West. For example, Christians are not permitted to have their bibles with them in Saudi Arabia while Muslims have complete freedom to have the Quran in the US and European countries.

Muslims MUST ask themselves who actually discriminates against the other, is it the
West who is discriminating against Islam or is it that the Muslim world is discriminating against people of other faiths? Who needs to change and show more tolerance for religious minorities, the West or the Muslim world?
In addition, when the Taliban destroyed the historical Buddha statues the Muslim
world was virtually silent, which may indicate a form of acceptance for this barbaric act.

The Muslims MUST ask themselves, what would they have felt if the Buddhists- for
example- destroyed the Muslim Holy mosque in Mecca?

Furthermore, Muslims enjoy full freedom in the West to preach to non-Muslims and to convert them to Islam. On the contrary, Muslims-in general- become very furious if they discover that non-Muslims are proselytizing to Muslims to convert them to other faiths.

In fact, proselytizing to Muslims is illegal in many Islamic countries. The Muslim world needs to question itself. Again, is it the West discriminating against them, or is it the Muslims discriminating against the others.

The Muslim world needs to realize that the negative image of Islam in the West has been created by the Muslims themselves.

When mainstream Islamic books of Sira (Biography of Prophet Mohamed that was
essentially written by Muslims) teach that prophet Mohamed took a woman as booty in
the war after forcing her to see her father and brother decapitated
(1)....Do Muslims expect the world to tell them that.... Wow, this is a wonderful model for tolerance!

When we teach in several Islamic books including Sahih (accurate) Hadith that prophet
Mohamed said that he was ordered by Allah to fight the entire world until they
subjugate to Islam (2) and when we teach in current approved Sharia books that
Muslims have to wage wars against Non-Muslims and offer them to choose one of the
following options: to convert to Islam, to pay humiliating tax (Jizzia), or to be
killed........Do we expect others to tell us that Islam is the religion of peace? I wonder if non -Muslims declared war against Muslims to spread their religion and offered Muslims to convert out of Islam (to the new religion), to pay a humiliating tax to the invaders, or to be killed.......Will Muslims consider this to be a peaceful act?

When our traditional Islamic books mention that prophet Mohamed ordered his
followers to torture other human beings (3).....Does the Muslim world expect that the
world will tell us that the prophet of Islam was sent as a mercy for mankind?
When we teach in Al-Buchary [mainstream Hadith book for Sunni Muslims] that
prophet Mohamed married and had sex with a 9 year old child (4) and used to bring
dolls for her so that she can play with them (5) or that the prophet used to have sex with his 9 wives in one night (6), Do we expect the world to tell us that the prophet was a role model for mankind? If mentioning these stories is considered an insult to Islam then Al-Buchary -not the West-should take responsibility for insulting the religion.

When non-Muslims realize that Muslims who convert away from Islam must be killed
by Redda Law (killing the apostates) and that this law is approved by ALL schools of Islamic jurisprudence based on Hadith of prophet Mohamed (7)....Shall we expect them after this to sing praises for how Islam respects the value of religious freedom?

When non-Muslims read in our mainstream books that stoning of adulterous women is
acceptable in our modern times (8), and that it is permissible for a man to beat his wife to discipline her (9), and that polygamy is permissible for men up to four wives ........Do we expect that the world will tell us that Islam is the religion that gave women their rights?

When non-Muslims read in some Hadith books (sayings of prophet Mohamed) that
prophet have said that if the wife licked a wound pouring pus from her husband she
would (still) not have fulfilled his right (as a husband) (10) and when they hear Fatwas from some of our leading scholars that drinking the urine of the prophet was a blessing for the disciples of Mohamed (11)..........What do we expect their reaction to this form of teaching? Shall we expect words of admiration or criticism?
When we teach in our approved Islamic books that early Muslims army invaded many
countries to spread Islam and that the agreement between the second Caliphate and non
Muslim minorities in these countries (Al-Uhda Al-Umareia) did not allow non-Muslims
to sit while Muslims were standing and did not allow non-Muslims to raise their voices while crying when following their dead, do we expect that others to be speaking loudly about the 'tolerance' of Islam?

It is important that the Muslim world realize that that they need to stop discrimination against its non-Muslim minorities and that the negative image of Islam was not created by the West but by Muslims themselves. Denying that the above teachings exist just makes things worse as such teachings do exist in our Islamic books. The best way to stop criticism of Islam is to admit that violent teachings exist and that Islamic scholars must work on providing modern ways for interpreting and understanding their religion instead of accusing those who expose the problem and raise valid questions of being Islamophobes.

1-Tabari IX:137 "Allah granted Rayhanah of the [Jewish] Qurayza to His Messenger as
booty [but only after she had been forced to watch him decapitate her father and
brother, seen her mother hauled off to be raped, and her sisters sold into slavery]."

2-Bukhari:V4B52N196
3-Tabari VIII:122
Ishaq:515"The Prophet gave orders concerning Kinanah to Zubayr, saying, 'Torture him
until you root out and extract what he has. So Zubayr kindled a fire on Kinanah's chest, twirling it with his firestick until Kinanah was near death. Then the Messenger gave him to Maslamah, who beheaded him."

4- Sahih Al-Buchary Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64:
Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he
consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with
him for nine years (Note: according to Islamic books, Mohammed was above 50 years
old when he married this young child).

5- #Sahih Al-Buchary Volume 8, Book 73, Number 151:
Narrated 'Aisha:
I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah's Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for 'Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-Bari page 143,
Vol.13)

6- Narrated Anas: The Prophet used to go round (have sexual relations with) all his
wives in one night, and he had nine wives. (Hadith Sahih; Sahih Albuchary Volume 7,
Book 62, Number 14: Chapter of Marriage or Allnikah).

7 - Sahih Al-Bukhari (52:260) - "...The Prophet said, 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.' "

8- See Minhaj Al-Muslim by Al Jaja'iry (Lecture at the Nobel prophetic Masjid) Part 2
Page 505 -Published by Darussalam Publications First Edition May 2001

9- Quran {4:34}: Men are superior to women because Allah has given them more
preference to women, and because they financially support them. Therefore the
righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what
Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part you fear that they do
not obey you, admonish them, avoid making sex with them (as a form of punishment),
and beat them; but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of
annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all).

10- Reported by Ahmad (3/159) and others. It's of narration is declared to be good by
al-Mundhiree in at-Targheeb wat-Tarheeb (3/75): The Messanger of Allaah (S.A.W.)
said, "It is not right that any human being should prostrate to another human being I
would have ordered the woman to prostrate to her husband due to the greatness of his
rights upon her. By Him in whose Hand is my soul, if from his foot to the crown of his head there was a wound pouring forth pus, and she (the wife) came and licked that, then she would (still) not have fulfilled his right."

11- http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uproar-over-fatwa-on-drinking-prophets-urine

Monday, April 12, 2010

VETERAN DEFENDERS OF AMERICA

Are you a veteran? Is a family member a veteran? Or a friend?

Then this message is for you.


We are delighted and pleased beyond words to announce that we re joining hands with Major General Paul Vallely (US Army, Ret), in the launch of a new grassroots movement for veterans and their families, “Veteran Defenders of America,” www.veterandefenders.org.



Over a year ago some veterans approached ACT! for America and told us there are veterans everywhere who are concerned about increased threats to our national security, especially the threat of radical Islam.

They are concerned about the smothering “political correctness” that is sabotaging our nation’s ability to effectively combat the threat of radical Islam.


They still take seriously their oath to defend their nation, they want to continue to contribute their talents and experience, and they’re asking “what can we do?”

Veteran Defenders of America (VDA) is the answer.



General Vallely is a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and Vietnam veteran who served 32 distinguished years in the Army. He is a graduate of the Infantry School, Ranger and Airborne Schools, Jumpmaster School, the Command and General Staff School, The Industrial College of the Armed Forces and the Army War College. He has over fifteen years experience in Special Operations, Psychological and Civil Military Operations.

General Vallely is also the co-author of three books: Endgame – Blueprint for Victory for Winning the War on Terror, Warfooting and Baghdad Ablaze.

In short, General Vallely understands the seriousness of the threat of radical Islam and global jihad.

America’s veterans like General Vallely are our heroes. Your sacrifice has helped make possible a country where an immigrant like Brigitte Gabriel can come and live in peace and liberty, and be all that she can be.

Now your country needs you again. Your family and your community need you.

Please log on to www.veterandefenders.org today to find out how veterans and their family members can take their rightful place on the front lines of freedom.

The motto of Veteran Defenders of America is “the eyes and ears of freedom, because we know that freedom isn’t free.” For the sake of the country and family that you love, we hope to hear from you today!

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Interview with the son of Hamas leader

Mosab Hassan Yousef the former Muslim, member of Hamas now a Christian takes on Arabic BBC in a stunning TV interview that slams "the God of the Koran" as the core of the problem.

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

A Doctor's open letter about the newest proposed Health Care/Obama Government takeover of YOUR health care

An Indianapolis doctor's letter to Sen. Bayh about the Bill (Note: Dr. Stephen E. Fraser, MD practices as an anesthesiologist in Indianapolis, IN ) Here is a letter I sent to Senator Bayh.. Feel free to copy it and send it around to all other representatives. -- Stephen Fraser



Senator Bayh,

As a practicing physician I have major concerns with the health care bill before Congress. I actually have read the bill and am shocked by the brazenness of the government's proposed involvement in the patient-physician relationship. The very idea that the government will dictate and ration patient care is dangerous and certainly not helpful in designing a health care system that works for all. Every physician I work with agrees that we need to fix our health care system, but the proposed bills currently making their way through congress will be a disaster if passed.

I ask you respectfully and as a patriotic American to look at the following troubling lines that I have read in the bill. You cannot possibly believe that these proposals are in the best interests of the country and our fellow citizens.

Page 22 of the HC Bill: Mandates that the Govt will audit books of all employers that self-insure!!

Page 30 Sec 123 of HC bill: THERE WILL BE A GOVT COMMITTEE that decides what treatments/benefits you get.

Page 29 lines 4-16 in the HC bill: YOUR HEALTH CARE IS RATIONED!!!

Page 42 of HC Bill: The Health Choices Commissioner will choose your HC benefits for you. You have no choice!

Page 50 Section 152 in HC bill: HC will be provided to ALL non-US citizens, illegal or otherwise.

Page 58 HC Bill: Govt will have real-time access to individuals' finances & a 'National ID Health card' will be issued! (Papers please!)

Page 59 HC Bill lines 21-24: Govt will have direct access to your bank accounts for elective funds transfer. (Time for more cash and carry)

Page 65 Sec 164: Is a payoff subsidized plan for retirees and their families in unions & community organizations: (ACORN).

Page 84 Sec 203 HC bill: Govt mandates ALL benefit packages for private HC plans in the 'Exchange.'

Page 85 Line 7 HC Bill: Specifications of Benefit Levels for Plans -- The Govt will ration your health care!

Page 91 Lines 4-7 HC Bill: Govt mandates linguistic appropriate services. (Translation: illegal aliens.)

Page 95 HC Bill Lines 8-18: The Govt will use groups (i.e. ACORN & Americorps to sign up individuals for Govt HC plan.

Page 85 Line 7 HC Bill: Specifications of Benefit Levels for Plans. (AARP members - your health care WILL be rationed!)
Page 102 Lines 12-18 HC Bill: Medicaid eligible individuals will be automatically enrolled in Medicaid. (No choice.)

Page 12 4 lines 24-25 HC: No company can sue GOVT on price fixing. No "judicial review" against Govt monopoly.

Page 127 Lines 1-16 HC Bill: Doctors/ American Medical Association - The Govt will tell YOU what salary you can make.

Page 145 Line 15-17: An Employer MUST auto-enroll employees into public option plan. (NO choice!)

Page 126 Lines 22-25: Employers MUST pay for HC for part-time employees ANDtheir families. (Employees shouldn't get excited about this as employers will be forced to reduce its work force, benefits, and wages/salaries to cover such a huge expense.)

Page 149 Lines 16-24: ANY Employer with payroll 401k & above who does not provide public option will pay 8% tax on all payroll! (See the last comment in parenthesis.)
Page 150 Lines 9-13: A business with payroll between $251K & $401K who doesn't provide public option will pay 2-6% tax on all payroll.

Page 167 Lines 18-23: ANY individual who doesn't have acceptable HC according to Govt will be taxed 2.5% of income.

Page 170 Lines 1-3 HC Bill: Any NONRESIDENT Alien is exempt from individual taxes. (Americans will pay.) (Like always)

Page 195 HC Bill: Officers & employees of the GOVT HC Admin.. will have access to ALL Americans' finances and personal records. (I guess so they can 'deduct' their fees)

Page 203 Line 14-15 HC: "The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax." (Yes, it really says that!) ( a 'fee' instead)
Page 239 Line 14-24 HC Bill: Govt will reduce physician services for Medicaid Seniors. (Low-income and the poor are affected.)

Page 241 Line 6-8 HC Bill: Doctors: It doesn't matter what specialty you have trained yourself in -- you will all be paid the same! (Just TRY to tell me that's not Socialism!)

Page 253 Line 10-18: The Govt sets the value of a doctor's time, profession, judgment, etc. (Literally-- the value of humans.)

Page 265 Sec 1131: The Govt mandates and controls productivity for "private" HC industries.

Page 268 Sec 1141: The federal Govt regulates the rental and purchase of power driven wheelchairs.

Page 272 SEC. 1145: TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CANCER HOSPITALS - Cancer patients - welcome to rationing!

Page 280 Sec 1151: The Govt will penalize hospitals for whatever the Govt deems preventable (i.e...re-admissions).

Page 298 Lines 9-11: Doctors: If you treat a patient during initial admission that results in a re-admission -- the Govt will penalize you.

Page 317 L 13-20: PROHIBITION on ownership/investment. (The Govt tells doctors what and how much they can own!)

Page 317-318 lines 21-25, 1-3: PROHIBITION on expansion. (The Govt is mandating that hospitals cannot expand.)
Page 321 2-13: Hospitals have the opportunity to apply for exception BUT community input is required. (Can you say ACORN?)

Page 335 L 16-25 Pg 336-339: The Govt mandates establishment of=2 outcome-based measures. (HC the way they want -- rationing.)
Page 341 Lines 3-9: The Govt has authority to disqualify Medicare Advance Plans, HMOs, etc. (Forcing people into the Govt plan)

Page 354 Sec 1177: The Govt will RESTRICT enrollment of 'special needs people!' Unbelievable!

Page 379 Sec 1191: The Govt creates more bureaucracy via a "Tele-Health Advisory Committee." (Can you say HC by phone?)

Page 425 Lines 4-12: The Govt mandates "Advance-Care Planning Consult." (Think senior citizens end-of-life patients.)

Page 425 Lines 17-19: The Govt will instruct and consult regarding living wills, durable powers of attorney, etc. (And it's mandatory!)
Page 425 Lines 22-25, 426 Lines 1-3: The Govt provides an "approved" list of end-of-life resources; guiding you in death. (Also called 'assisted suicide.')(Sounds like Soylent Green to me.)

Page 427 Lines 15-24: The Govt mandates a program for orders on "end-of-life." (The Govt has a say in how your life ends!)

Page 429 Lines 1-9: An "advanced-care planning consultant" will be used frequently as a patient's health deteriorates.

Page 429 Lines 10-12: An "advanced care consultation" may include an ORDER for end-of-life plans.. (AN ORDER TO DIE FROM THE GOVERNMENT?!?)

Page 429 Lines 13-25: The GOVT will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.. (I wouldn't want to stand before God after getting paid for THAT job!)

Page 430 Lines 11-15: The Govt will decide what level of treatment you will have at end-of-life! (Again -- no choice!)

Page 469: Community-Based Home Medical Services = Non-Profit Organizations. (Hello? ACORN Medical Services here!?!)

Page 489 Sec 1308: The Govt will cover marriage and family therapy. (Which means Govt will insert itself into your marriage even.)

Page 494-498: Govt will cover Mental Health Services including defining, creating, and rationing those services.


Senator, I guarantee that I personally will do everything possible to inform patients and my fellow physicians about the dangers of the proposed bills you and your colleagues are debating.

Furthermore, if you vote for a bill that enforces socialized medicine on the country and destroys the doctor-patient relationship, I will do everything in my power to make sure you lose your job in the next election.

Respectfully,

Stephen E. Fraser, MD

Dear Reader,

I urge you to use the power that you were born with (and the power that may soon be taken away) and circulate this email to as many people as you can reach. The Power of the People can stop this from happening to us, our parents, our grandparents, our children, and to following generations

What Islam wants for the World

Have you seen this video describing what Islam wants for the world?: