The Pope Visits Alaska - JOKE

The Pope went on vacation for a few days to visit the rugged mountains of Alaska. He was
cruising along the campground in the Pope Mobile when he heard a frantic commotion just at the edge of the woods. He found a helpless liberal wearing shorts, sandals, a Vote for
Obama hat and a Save the Trees shirt. The man was screaming and struggling frantically,
thrashing all about and trying to free himself from the grasp of a 10-foot grizzly bear.

As the Pope watched in horror, a group of conservative loggers wearing Go Sarah shirts
came racing up. One quickly fired a 44 magnum slug right into the bear's chest. The two
other men pulled the semiconscious liberal from the bear's grasp. Then using baseball
bats, the three loggers finished off the bear. Two of the men dragged the dead grizzly
onto the bed of their pickup truck while the other tenderly placed the injured liberal in
the back seat.

As they began to leave, the Pope summoned all of them men over to him. "I give you my
blessing for your brave actions!" he proudly proclaimed. "I have heard there was bitter
hatred between conservative loggers and liberal environmental activists, but now I've seen
with my own eyes that this is not true."

As the Pope drove off, one logger asked his buddies, "Who the heck was that guy?"

"Man, that was the Pope," another replied. "He's in direct contact with Heaven and has
access to all wisdom."

"Well," the logger said, "he may have access to all wisdom, but he doesn't know squat
about bear hunting! By the way, is the bait still alive or do we need to go back to San Francisco and get another one?"

Jihadist whistleblower, Kamal Saleem, exposes whitewashing dangerous Islamism to UCLA audience

The verses of London Suicide Bomber, Shehzad Tanweer

The verses of London Suicide Bomber, Shehzad Tanweer

The Sources

Reference:
Quote

Qur'an 9:111
Verily, Allah has purchased from the believers their lives, and their property, for the price that they shall be in Paradise. They fight in Allah's cause, so they kill and are killed...

Qur'an 4:076
Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve fight in the cause of Satan. So fight you against the friends of Satan. Ever feeble indeed is the plot of Satan.

Qur'an 2:216
Fighting was ordained for you, though you dislike it. It may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you, and you like a thing which is bad for you. And Allah knows, but you do not know.

Qur'an 4:075
What is wrong with you that you fight not in the cause of Allah, and for those weak, ill, cheated, and oppressed, among men, women, and children, whose cry is: 'Our Lord, rescue us from this town whose people are oppressors, and raise for us from among you one who will protect, and raise for us from you one who will help.

Qur'an 9:24
Say, if your fathers, your sons, your brothers, your wives, your kindred, the wealth that you've gained, the commerce in which you fear decline, and the dwellings in which you delight, are dearer to you than Allah, and His messenger, and striving hard in fighting His cause, then wait until Allah brings about His decision, His torment, and Allah guides not those people who are fasiqun (the rebellious, disobedient to Allah).

Qur'an 9:038
Oh you who believe, what is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in His cause, you cling heavily to the earth. Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of this world as compared to the Hereafter.

Qur'an 5:054
Oh you who believe, whoever from amongst you turns back from his religion, Allah will bring a people whom He will love, and they will love Him. Humble towards the believers, stern towards the disbelievers, fighting in the cause of Allah, never fear the blame of the blamers, that is the grace of Allah, which He bestows upon whom He wills, and Allah is All-sufficient for His creatures' needs.


The Theology

“Fight against the disbelievers, for it is but an obligation made on you by Allah,” says Shehzad Tanweer in a film released a year and a day after the atrocities. His attack on Aldgate tube station killed seven people and himself. He quotes the above verses from the Qur'an as religious justification. Al-Zawahiri, the Al-Qaeda second-in-command, features in the film too.

In his statement, Tanweer listed multiple complaints against, and demands of, the UK Government and people, referencing Baghdad to Belmarsh prison (London) and ‘other concentration camps.’ ‘And know that if you fail to comply…this war will never stop, and that we are ready to give our lives, one hundred times over, for the cause of Islam.’ This idea of repeated killing and dying is pure Islam.

Mohammed, the founder of Islam, and Tanweer’s mentor and muse, said here and here (1294): "By the One in whose hand my soul is, I would love to be killed in the way of Allah and then be brought to life, and then be killed and then be brought to life, and then be killed and then brought to life, and then be killed again." Of course, the phrase ‘to be killed’ is in the context of killing others ‘in (Holy battles) in Allah's cause.’ [e.g. Q 8:39]

Most Muslims do not sign up to Allah’s “cause” in the same way or to the extent that Tanweer did. But the obligation to support such activity or to actually fight, kill and dominate is part and parcel of Islam. A lazy, ignorant, cowardly, or mendacious media refuses to highlight these verses and the Islamic motivation to murder: The Independent, four years after these attacks: ‘Two hundred school children in Britain, some as young as 13, have been identified as potential terrorists by a police scheme that aims to spot youngsters who are "vulnerable" to Islamic radicalisation,’ (28th March 2009). And so the danger persists and grows.

In 2006, Vicar Julie Nicholson, mother of Jenny, a victim of 7/7, resigned from her parish because she believed her duties required her to forgive the killers of her 24 year old daughter but she could not. In 2008, on a BBC TV programme on the subject of forgiveness Nicholson’s great honesty and integrity was uplifting; however, intertwined with this was her anguish and painful bewilderment, which was heartbreaking to see; she asked: Why was Jenny murdered; how could anyone do this? She deserves an answer.

Thank you, Dan of London

Radical (Islamic) Rhetoric doesn't occur in a vacuum

Dear Friends,

The article below is welcome news. The U.S. must begin looking beyond the acts of Islamic terrorism and examine the real root causes for such terrorism, beginning with the doctrine of jihad and the call to jihad that permeates the holy books of Islam.

The radical rhetoric doesn’t occur in a vacuum. Perhaps analyzing the rhetoric may lead some in the Department of Homeland Security to seriously analyze the Islamist doctrines and ideology behind the rhetoric.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.hstoday.us/content/view/9385/128/

RESEARCHERS EXAMINE RADICAL RHETORIC

by Mickey McCarter
Thursday, 16 July 2009

DHS hopes to correlate language of extremist groups to acts of terrorism

A privacy assessment filed by researchers at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has thrown some light on a project to study "radical rhetoric" and how extreme language relates to violent activities in acts of terrorism.

The research effort, formally titled Comparative Case Studies of Radical Rhetoric, aims to examine whether characteristics of rhetoric used by extremists have a relationship with how likely they are to engage in violence.

The Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division (HFD) of the DHS Directorate of Science and Technology (S&T) undertook the project to see if it could determine whether analyzing rhetoric could distinguish between groups that do and do not engage in violent attacks or could assist in predicting upcoming violent attacks by specific groups, HFD said in a privacy report made public Wednesday.

The HFD division is providing funding to the Oak Ridge National Laboratory to carry out the work to correlate radical rhetoric with acts of violence. Researchers on the project use open source intelligence sources to examine the speeches, statements, and papers of four foreign extremist groups: al Qaeda, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, Hizb ut-Tahir, and the Movement for Islamic Reform in Arabia.

"Central" al Qaeda and al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, led by Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, engage in terrorism against nations and institutions they oppose, the report noted. Hizb ut-Tahrir and the Movement for Islamic Reform in Arabia follow the same ideology and goals but do not engage in terrorism, researchers said.

So the HFD division has broken the four groups into two control groups to examine their rhetorical differences and then to see if any conclusions can be drawn from the differences. By comparing the al Qaeda groups to the other two groups, researchers expressed hope they could determine who would engage in violent acts based on what they have to say.

Researchers plan to search the Open Source Center, provided by the US director of National Intelligence, and Hizb ut-Tahrir's Web sites for documents. From the Open Source Center, researchers will pull documents that reference al Qaeda and al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula or bin Laden and al-Zawahiri. From Hizb ut-Tahrir, researchers will use documents issued only by its central office in Jordan to focus their study on the leadership of the groups, the report said.

The rhetorical analysis undertaken in the study will examine the imagery, tone and context of rhetoric as well as the literal meaning of the words, researchers said.

The HFD division and Oak Ridge National Laboratory also plan to assemble a timeline of violent activities of al Qaeda and al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula through use of other open source intelligence sources, such as the State Department's Country Reports on Global Terrorism, reports developed by the Congressional Research Service, academic databases, newspaper reports, and others.

The privacy impact assessment filed by the S&T Directorate was a routine filing meant to determine if information will be shared and, if so, how it will be protected. The S&T Directorate noted there were no privacy concerns related to the foreign extremists.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ACT for America
P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591
www.actforamerica.org

The Stoning of Soraya M. - Shariah is Action

If you are concerned about:


Radical Islam


Women's Rights


and the survival of Western Civilization...


Go see this life changing movie!

ACT now to help stop the so-called Fairness Doctrine

FREE SPEECH PLAN BOOTED BY HOUSE COMMITTEE

Tell Congress immediately drop all legislative efforts to re-impose the so-called "Fairness Doctrine". Stop attacks on freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

FaxDC.com wants to send this urgent and personalized Blast Fax message to all 535 members of the House and Senate for YOU.

Alert: An amendment proposed to the Financial Services Appropriation Bill that would have protected free speech by preventing the Federal Communications Commission from restoring the so-called Fairness Doctrine regulations to U.S. airwaves has been rejected by members of a U.S. House committee.

"Unfortunately, Democrats on the Rules Committee decided that the freedom of speech, though enshrined in the Constitution, is not a right they were willing to afford their colleagues in the House," said Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., who along with Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., sponsored the plan.
"I am profoundly disappointed," Pence said.

The Rules Committee voted 8-4 along party lines to reject the amendment that would have halted any proposals by the FCC that would restore the Fairness Doctrine, which was abandoned in 1987 under President Reagan.

Pence explained in a website statement that the First Amendment "is not a partisan issue; the preservation of constitutional freedoms should be the paramount duty of every elected representative and should take precedence over partisan gamesmanship or heavy-handedness."

He said what made the decision by majority Democrats both disappointing and baffling was that more than 300 members of the House already have expressed support for broadcast freedom.

"Today, the interests of the American people and the interests of this august institution were not served," Pence said. "Every time a vote concerning the freedom of a people, abroad or here at home, has come to the floor of the People's House, freedom has always won; yet tonight freedom was blocked from getting even a chance to be voted on."

The amendment, the sponsors explained, was intended to block regulations that would result in government censorship of political and religious talk radio.

"Congressman Pence and I are continuing our longstanding fight against the government takeover of free speech on the airwaves," Walden said.

"The federal government is intruding on various sectors of American life. The last thing we want is a government takeover of the airwaves," he declared.

It's time to put up or shut up, America. Literally. Get the book that shows how to fight the assault on your freedom of speech!

A number of prominent Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, have indicated a desire to see the FCC restore the speech restrictions. While the program under the Fairness Doctrine name is unlikely, the FCC has recently floated new rules that would add layers of restrictive oversight to radio programming.

"As a radio station operator of over 21 years, I can say from experience that there's only one group qualified to judge a station's performance: the listeners," Walden said. "If they're tuning in, you're doing something right. If they're not, it's time to reconsider. Sounds simple enough, but some here in the nation's capital want the government to intrude on that basic principle."

In encouraging a "yes" vote on the issue, Pence said, "The American people cherish freedom, especially freedom of speech and of the press. That was why President Reagan repealed the so-called Fairness Doctrine back in 1987.

"For more than four decades, the federal government regulated the content of American talk radio and some of the most powerful Democrats in the House and Senate would like to see it restored. Bringing back the Fairness Doctrine today would amount to government control over political views expressed on the public airways," he said.

WND reported recently on the alarm over the nomination of President Obama's longtime pal Julius Genachowski to head the FCC.

Syndicated talk radio host Roger Hedgecock of San Diego, who was picked by members of the American Radio Free Speech Foundation to be the chief of its Don't Touch My Dial campaign, has said censorship, racial quotas for radio stations and other new demands from the government are inevitable if Genachowski is confirmed.

Hedgecock said there are several reasons he's worried:

1. "Genachowski will CENSOR talk radio hosts.

"Genachowski's top priority will be to establish strict 'localism' requirements on broadcasters," Hedgecock said. "Part of this plan is for the FCC to establish local community advisory boards (better named 'commissar committees') in towns and cities across the United States. These boards would be packed with left-leaning activists and ACORN-type groups, and they would monitor the airwaves and report back to the FCC as to whether or not radio stations and broadcasts were serving the local public interest. Any radio station or broadcast that doesn't fit the bill could be subject to fines, or even having their broadcast license revoked.

"This, of course, isn't about serving the local community this is about empowering left-wing activist to shut down conservative talk radio."

2. "Genachowski will CENSOR and REGULATE Internet speech."

"Genachowski is an unabashed proponent of so-called 'Net neutrality' regulations. These regulations would give the FCC the power to tell Internet operators what online communications they must provide. In essence, this massive expansion of FCC power would amount to a 'Fairness Doctrine' for the Internet. It would trample the First Amendment rights of private companies and make the FCC 'Editor in Chief' when it comes to online communications," he said.

3. "Genachowski will force RACIAL QUOTAS on broadcast companies."

"One of the reasons President Obama picked Genachowski to head the FCC is to complete the president's mission to bring 'diversity' to the broadcast industry. On May 7 of this year, Obama's interim FCC Chairman Michael Copps went so far as to say that the current racial and gender makeup of broadcast corporations was responsible for minorities being 'stereotyped and caricatured' in today's society," Hedgecock said.

"That same day, Diversity Committee Chairman (and Fairness Doctrine supporter) Henry Rivera stated that the FCC would 'move into a race-based rulemaking procedure' should his committee determine that there are not enough women or minorities in high-level positions within broadcast corporations. Just what is a 'race-based rulemaking procedure?' … If Rivera and Genachowski think there aren't enough minorities occupying top-level positions in broadcast companies they'll force those companies to hire and fire until they get the right 'racial and gender mix.'"

"America is at a crucial crossroads," Hedgecock said. "Our First Amendment rights are under attack on every front from the Fairness Doctrine, to Net neutrality, to diversity and localism mandates for radio broadcasters. Our actions on these critical issues over the coming months will seal our fate for a long, long time to come."

Other members of the Don't Touch My Dial coalition include Lars Larson, Rusty Humphries, Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, Steve Gill, Joyce Kaufman and Steve Malzberg.

The so-called Fairness Doctrine at issue now in the U.S. was established in 1949 by the FCC to require broadcasters to provide "fair" programming, essentially demanding the broadcast of opposing views.

But the Supreme Court in 1969 ruled that while the policy did not violate a broadcaster's First Amendment rights, if the doctrine ever began to restrain free speech, its constitutionality should be reviewed. In 1974, the court said the doctrine "dampens the vigor and limits the variety of public debate."

Ten years later, the court found the rationale that opposing viewpoints should be required was flawed, and in 1987 the plan was abolished. (WND)


DO NOT BE SILENCED BY ANYONE STAND UP! MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!

TAKE ACTION: Send YOUR blast FAX to ALL 535 Congressman NOW!

To visit FaxDC.com, click here: http://faxdc.com/

To view Your Fax Message, click here: http://faxdc.com/freedom.htm

To Fax Blast Capitol Hill, click here: http://faxdc.com/freedom_order.htm

Be part of the FaxDC.com Army and subscribe to the Auto-Fax Program
$ 25.00 per month at: http://www.faxdc.com/friends.htm

Thank You Patriot! Your friends at FaxDC.com

NOTE: Be sure to send this Alert to EVERYONE you know who supports saving America and Protecting our Middle Class. Thank you!

UPDATE:

No wonder the libs were so hot to pass the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" - they knew that the American public would finally wake up (Health Care Reform)at some point and oppose them. No wonder the libs are resorting to name calling and attributing their very own dispicable tactics to those of the opposition. Now we are on a roll, baby, they can't shut us up now. Go Ahead, Nancy Peloser, call those that dissent, Domestic Terrorists, it will only serve to make them work via the system to kick your sorry self out of office, along with all the other viagra addeled braine dead congress critters! Your vile and hate is backfiring and you may have realized that the American people are no longer swallowing your lies and mockery of them. YOU WORK FOR US!!! AND YOU ARE ABOUT TO BE OUT OF A JOB!

What Arab Leaders say in English is different than what they mean in Arabic

The below message is from the Walid Shoebat Foundation. Mr. Shoebat is a former Islamic Terrorist who is now a Christian and is trying to open the eyes of Islamist supporters, appeasers and dhimmis. He knows what he is talking about - please take heed and follow the suggestions to pass the info on and to notify your congressional rep. Thank you.


Dear Friends

Below is a very important link sent to me by a supporter which shows one of the main leaders touted by George Bush as "a young leader we can deal with," Muhammad Dahlan who publicly stated that Arafat conned the world and what Arafat said during the day is different what he really meant when he spoke at night. Walid has been saying this for years, that what Arab leaders say in English is different what they mean in Arabic.

Below is the proof, now lets get to work and get it to our leaders so they know too and persuade them to act so as to pressure our leaders to publicly condemn Islamic hatred of Israel and Jews and to start imposing the right pressure on the real aggressors. Pressuring Israel and Jews not to build houses and villages in their own ancient land is just a smoke screen of at best misguided people who cannot see good from evil.

http://www.palwatch.org/main.aspx?fi=157&doc_id=1133

please send this link with a similar note to your Congress person and Senators as well as the State Department.


Keith Davies
Director Shoebat Foundation

When Governments sanction peaceable conservatives because Muslims might get upset

When governments start sanctioning peaceable conservatives because Muslims might get upset, it's time to worry. When the government picks targets in order to appease radical potentially violent Muslims, it becomes a matter of national security ...


July 27, 2009 American Thinker

********************************************************
Michael Savage targeted 'to balance least wanted list

*************************************************

Michael Savage targeted for\being non-Muslim

**************************************************

BANNED FOR SPEAKING HIS MIND

House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.), questioned the point of lawmakers reading the health care bill

Sue Myrick on Health Care Reform

And I might add: Health Insurance is NOT a right and I don't want the government deciding what health care I am entitled to. I will continue to pay for my own health insurance, thank you very much. I will continue to see the doctor I wish to see and I do not want to pay for abortions or end of life counseling (how to end my life, which in the current incarnation of the Obama Health Care is mandatory!!!

Kill the unborn and kill the elderly is this what you really want? Do you want your life to be worthless unless you refuse to work, are a foreign national, a foreign invader, a jailbird or a drug addict??? Give ME your money - this will help Obama redistribute the wealth and give ME hope for the future. Do the fraud a favor and continue his Marxist spitting on the constitution and hard working, taxpaying American CITIZENS.

Help Stop Sotomayor and Help SAVE the 2nd Amendment

U.S. SENATE IS PREPARING TO VOTE FOR A RADICAL ANTI-GUN-RIGHTS EXTREMIST FOR SUPREME COURT JUSTICE: TELL THEM TO VOTE NO ON SOTOMAYOR!

WORLDNETDAILY

Dear Gun Owners and Supporters of the Second Amendment:

America is getting closer and closer to seeing a radically anti-gun-rights extremist confirmed to sit on the U.S. Supreme Court... and the U.S. Senate is going to make sure it happens THIS COMING WEEK... unless YOU AND I stop them!

TELL THE SENATE TO REJECT THE
ANTI-GUN SOTOMAYOR NOMINATION:
SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!

You and I know that it is extremely important that a Supreme Court justice understand and appreciate the origin and meaning of the Second Amendment, a constitutional guarantee permanently enshrined in the Bill of Rights. The record of Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, on the Second Amendment should causes cause every patriotic American grave concern over her treatment of this enumerated constitutional right.

Last year, the Supreme Court decided the landmark case District of Columbia v. Heller, holding that the Second Amendment guarantees to all law-abiding, responsible citizens the individual right to keep and bear arms, particularly for self-defense. Following Heller, the Supreme Court is almost certain to decide next year whether the Second Amendment applies to states and local governments, as it does to the federal government (see NRA v. Chicago and McDonald v. Chicago.)

While sitting as a federal judge on the Second Circuit Appeals Court, Judge Sotomayor revealed her views on the right to keep and bear arms in Maloney v. Cuomo, a case decided after Heller, yet holding that the Second Amendment is NOT a fundamental right, that it does NOT apply to the states, and that if an object is "designed primarily as a weapon" then that is a sufficient basis for total prohibition -- even within the home!

Earlier, in a 2004 case, United States v. Sanchez-Villar, Sotomayor and two colleagues perfunctorily dismissed a Second Amendment claim, holding that "the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right." Imagine if such a view were expressed about other fundamental rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, such as the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments!

TELL THE SENATE TO REJECT THE
ANTI-GUN SOTOMAYOR NOMINATION:
SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!

Surprisingly, Heller was a 5-4 decision, with some justices arguing that the Second Amendment does not apply to private citizens or that if it does, even a total gun ban could be upheld if a "legitimate governmental interest" could be found. The dissenting justices also found D.C.'s absolute ban on handguns within the home to be a "reasonable" restriction. If this had been the majority view, then ANY gun ban could be upheld, and the Second Amendment would be meaningless!

The Second Amendment survives today by a single vote in the Supreme Court. Both its application to the states AND whether there will be a meaningfully strict standard of review remain to be decided by the High Court. Judge Sotomayor has already revealed her views on these issues -- and they are obviously contrary to the intent and purposes of the Second Amendment and Bill of Rights. As supporters of the Second Amendment who are deeply concerned about preserving all fundamental rights for current and future generations of Americans, we need to strongly oppose this nominee, and URGE the Senate NOT to confirm Judge Sonia Sotomayor -- NOW. Please, CLICK HERE NOW to send Blast Faxes to EVERY SINGLE MEMBER OF THE U.S. SENATE, telling them to REJECT Sonia Sotomayor when the vote on her nomination comes up!


Sincerely,

Alan Gottlieb, Chairman
Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms


P.S. As tens of thousands of faxes are already pouring in to the Senate offices on Capitol Hill, the CCRKBA is already LOBBYING HARD to make sure that our Congressmen follow through on ALL of our demands to protect and support the Second Amendment. But lobbying costs money -- so we need YOUR help to keep pounding away on these legislators to do the right thing!

Cop Tells Obama: I Didn't Vote for You and Won't Apologize

Cop Tells Obama: I Didn't Vote for You and Won't Apologize

Thursday, July 23, 2009 8:44 PM

By: Newsmax Staff



The police officer at the center of a national racial firestorm triggered by President Barack Obama told an interviewer Thursday that he had nothing to apologize for in the arrest of a black Harvard scholar, and that the president he didn’t vote for should have considered his words more carefully.

“The apology won’t come from me,” Sgt. James Crowley told Carl Stevens of WBZ News Radio in Boston. "I’ve done nothing wrong."

A well-regarded officer who is an expert on racial profiling, Crowley responded to a call at the Cambridge home of Henry Louis Gates Jr. last week to investigate a report of a burglary. Confronting Gates and another man who appeared to have forced open the door of the home, Crowley asked Gates to show him identification.

Gates initially refused and accused Crowley of racism. The professor, a close friend of Harvard alumnus Barack Obama, was charged with disorderly conduct. The charge was dropped Tuesday, and Gates has since demanded an apology from Crowley.

In a four-minute interview outside his home, Crowley revealed that:


Gates escalated the situation by yelling and refusing to calm down, calling Crowley a racist, and referring to his mother.


He was the police officer who tried to save the life of former Boston Celtics player Reggie Lewis, a black man, who collapsed and died during an off-season workout at Brandeis University. Crowley said he still is very shaken because of that event.


Crowley said he didn’t vote for Obama but supports the president 110 percent. He also suggested that the president was siding with his friend Gates, and he probably would have done the same in a similar situation.


Though he said he would do everything exactly the same way again, Crowley did express regret at the media attention and pressure the event has brought on his friends and family.

“I acted appropriately. Mr. Gates was given plenty of opportunity to stop what he was doing,” Crowley said. “He didn’t. He acted very irrational, and he controlled the outcome of that event.”


“There was a lot of yelling. There was references to my mother,” Crowley said. “Something you wouldn’t expect from anybody who should be grateful you’re there investigating the report of a crime in progress, let alone a Harvard University professor.”


The reporter then referred to the death of Lewis, explaining that he worked the scene that night when Crowley tried to save the player’s life.


“I was a police officer at Brandeis University at the time and I was responding to a medical call and had the unfortunate experience of trying to revive somebody who was probably already gone,” Crowley said. “It was very tough emotionally dealing with that as well.”


The reporter than asked him to respond to those who allege that he is a racist.


“It almost doesn’t warrant a comment. My friends, my family my colleagues — those people whose opinions mean the most to me — they know who I am, they know what I am and what I am not. It’s an unfortunate thing that the professor and other people even mentioned that.”


Asked what he thought of the president’s comments, Crowley immediately replied, “I didn’t vote for him,” and then smiled.


“When he said the Cambridge police acted stupidly, he was talking about you,” the interviewer said. “What was your reaction to that?


“My only reaction, somebody had told me what he said. I didn’t hear the press conference but I did listen afterwards and I support the president of the United States 110 percent. I think he’s way off base wading into a local issue without knowing all the facts as he himself stated before making that comment so again, I don’t know what to say about that. I guess a friend of mine would support my position too.”


Asked whether he is able to do his job, Crowley responded: “Sure. I absolutely will. This will not distract me from doing what it is I do. And if a similar call came in tomorrow, I wouldn’t shy away from responding and I’d do what I have to do.”


Asked whether he should have done anything differently, Crowley responded bluntly: “No.”

Senator DeMint Speaks Out Against Obama's Take Over of Health Care

News Max on Chris Matthews and the Obama Birth Certificate

Chris Matthews Wrong on Obama Birth Certificate

Wednesday, July 22, 2009 6:33 PM

By: Jim Meyers Article
News Max.com on the eligibility issue



MSNBC's Chris Matthews got into a heated exchange with a congressman on his show Tuesday as he revisited the question of President Barack Obama's birth certificate — or lack of one.

Rep. John Campbell, R-Calif., is a co-sponsor of the so-called "birther bill," which would require future presidential candidates to provide a copy of their original birth certificates.

“Birthers” are those who believe Obama is not qualified to be president, based on a belief that he was not born in the United States.

Campbell is not a “birther” and never has claimed that Obama was born outside the United States or should be disqualified from being president.


On the show, Matthews seemingly undermined claims by some that Obama never has released his birth certificate, producing what Matthews said was a true copy of it.


But Matthews made a false claim. Obama never has released his actual birth certificate. He has released another document, which state authorities often provide in lieu of a birth certificate, called a certification of live birth.

Matthews on Tuesday said Campbell was "playing to the crazies" by supporting the "crazy" bill, and the congressman shot back that it was all about "putting the matter to rest."

Matthews also accused Campbell of "feeding the wacko wing of your party," and held up what he called a copy of the supposed Obama birth certificate.

Case closed?

The indisputable fact is that Obama has not released his birth certificate, which the state of Hawaii issues for all citizens born there.

Instead, his campaign has released only his certification of live birth from the state of Hawaii, which is a document that offers a summarized version of the birth certificate.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, GOP nominee Sen. John McCain quickly released his birth certificate when liberal bloggers raised questions about his eligibility to be president. McCain was born at a military hospital in Panama.

Obama likewise could put the matter to rest by releasing his actual birth certificate, which would show, among other things, the place of his birth and the doctor who performed the birth procedure. This information is not provided on the certification of live birth.

As it stands, Obama is the only president in history whose birthplace is unknown to the public – a fact that would be stated on the actual birth certificate. Interestingly, his family has mentioned two different hospitals in Hawaii as the place of birth.

The fact that Obama has refused to release his actual birth certificate does not mean conspiracy theorists are right when they claim he was born in Kenya and therefore not eligible to be president. Investigators who have reviewed the claims have found no evidence Obama was born outside of Hawaii.

But Obama’s refusal to release his birth certificate does mean that Obama remains one of America’s most mysterious and opaque presidents ever.

Obama, for example, has not released many other documents regarding his public and private life.

Many of these documents were sought by reporters, who easily acquiesced when Obama said he would not release them – though most presidential candidates release them as a perfunctory matter.

Among the key documents that Obama continues to shield from the public:


Obama released just one brief document detailing his personal health. McCain, on the other hand, released what he said was his complete medical file, totaling more than 1,500 pages.


Obama refused to offer his official papers as a state legislator in Illinois. Nor did he produce correspondence, such as his schedules of appointments or letters from lobbyists, from his days in the Illinois state Senate.


Obama did not release his client list as an attorney or his billing records. He maintained that he performed only a few hours of legal work for a nonprofit organization with ties to Tony Rezko, the Chicago businessman convicted of fraud in June 2008 but did not release billing records that would prove this assertion.


Obama ignored requests for his records from Occidental College, where he studied for two years before transferring to Columbia University.


Obama’s campaign refused to give Columbia, where he earned an undergraduate degree in political science, permission to release his transcripts. Former President George W. Bush and presidential contenders Al Gore and John Kerry all released their college transcripts.


Obama did not agree to the release of his application to the Illinois State Bar, which would have cleared up intermittent allegations that his application may have been inaccurate.


Obama did not release records from his time at Harvard Law School.


During the presidential campaign, McCain’s campaign released a full list of all online donors. Obama’s campaign still has not released the names of those who donated at least one-third of the $750 million he raised.

Ironically, Obama accused the Bush White House of being "one of the most secretive administrations in our history," and chided then-Sen. Hillary Clinton for not releasing her White House schedules.

Chris Matthews, get your facts straight and demand full disclosure — that’s the best way to keep an honest government.









© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

TELL ALL 50 STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL TO INVESTIGATE OBAMA FRAUD!!!

Tell All 50 State Attorneys General To Investigate Obama's Fraud!!!
What does he have to hide? Why has everyother President and Presidential candidate had their entire life placed under a microscope? Why should Obama be exempted from proving he is eligible to be president? Because he is black? SO WHAT???? If you believe this OR if you voted for Obama BECAUSE he is black (and BTW, he is also white), then YOU are a racist, almost the worst thing in the world, certainly far worse, in many people's minds, than sexually mutiliating and murdering a pregnant woman in the name of Allah (Mumbai Islamist terrorist attack - the whores in the media being too stupid to report for the most part!)

PLEASE click the link below - WE the People have the constitutional right to know IF Obama is eligible to hold the office of President of the United States of America. His Black Grandmother says she was present at his birth in Kenya and if you don't believe her you must be a racist......this according to Obamalogic.

*************************************************************************

UNITED STATES JUSTICE FOUNDATION

Click to FAX All 50 State Attorneys General To Investigate Obama's Birthday FRAUD

FROM THE DESK OF Gary G. Kreep

According to published reports, Barack Obama's legal team has been paid over one million dollars, so far, to STOP anyone from seeing ANY of his actual identification documents, or many other documents:
Actual long-form birth certificate (NOT an easily-forged electronic copy of a short-form document that is not even officially accepted in Hawaii)
Passport files
University of Chicago Law School scholarly articles
Harvard Law Review articles
Harvard Law School records
Columbia University records
Columbia University senior thesis, "Soviet Nuclear Disarmament"
Occidental College records, including financial aid that he may have received
Punahou School records, where Mr. Obama attended from the fifth grade until he finished high school
Noelani Elementary School records, where Barack Obama attended kindergarten (according to the Hawaii Department of Education, students must submit a birth certificate to register -- but parents may bring a passport or student visa if the child is from a foreign country)
Complete files and schedules of his years as an Illinois state senator from 1997 to 2004
Obama's client list from during his time in private practice with the Chicago law firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill and Gallard
Illinois State Bar Association records
Baptism records
Obama/Dunham marriage license
Obama/Dunham divorce documents
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license
Soetero/Dunham Adoption records
By the way, the issue of the Occidental College records is especially pertinent. The United States Justice Foundation (USJF) served officials at Occidental College with a subpoena to produce records concerning Barack Obama's attendance there during the 1980's, because those records could document whether he was attending as a foreign national. You see, Mr. Obama attended the school on a scholarship -- and there are questions as to whether the financial aid he received was reserved for foreign students. The Obama attorneys have bent over backward to block us. He doesn't want anyone to see those records. He's STILL trying to hide them; those financial records STILL have not been released.

WHAT is Barack Obama trying to hide? WHAT is he afraid of? WHY doesn't he just release these documents to prove that he is a natural-born citizen and, therefore, qualified to serve as President -- especially his actual birth certificate?

Isn't it time we FORCED him to come clean? His "birthday" is the PERFECT time to do it!


**********************************************************************************

Have I offended you by this post? My goal is to offend liberal idiots and Obama Supporters, which are one and the same in my not so humble opinion.

A Question of Eligibility

Yes, this IS a blog about Resistance to Islamic Supremacism, BUT......I am so offended by the liar fraud in the whitehouse that I MUST include posts about him.



CLICK HERETO READ ALL ABOUT WORLD NET DAILY'S RESEARCH AND REPORTING ON THE ISSUE OF OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY.

For more reports on the racist Obama and his work to destroy this country, embrace foreign nationals and spit on the U.S. Constitution and American Citizen CLICK HERE

Obama: The Respect he deserves (NONE)

ObamaHandshakeSnubbed.wmv (3377KB)

SEND IN THE CLOWNS

Send in the Clowns

Not a word spoken but absolutely PERFECT!!!!!! Download and (Enjoy the
music!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=3CAX3aJCoDg



Thanks, Pamela

FREEDOM ISN'T FREE

Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence ?

Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died. Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned. Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army; another had two sons captured.

Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War.

They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.

What kind of men were they?

Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners; men of means, well educated, but they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well that the penalty would be death if they were captured.

Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships swept from the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to pay his debts, and died in rags.

Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in
hiding. His possessions were taken from him, and poverty was his reward.

Vandals or soldiers looted the properties of Dillery, Hall, Clymer, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge, and Middleton.

At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson, Jr., noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the Nelson home for his headquarters. He quietly urged General George Washington to open fire. The home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt.

Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months.

John Hart was driven from his wife's bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves, returning home to find his wife dead and his children vanished.

So, take a few minutes while enjoying your 4th of July holiday and silently thank these patriots. It's not much to ask for the price they paid.

Remember: freedom is never free!


Thank you, Carolyn

About our unrepresenting representatives: THROW THE BUMS OUT!

WE THE PEOPLE -VIDEO - WAKE UP AMERICA!