Evidences and Key Points about Baraq Hussein Obama

From a friend who wishes to remain anonymous. (editor's note: Since critizing Baraq Hussein Obama may soon be punishable by death!)

OBAMA: EVIDENCES and KEY POINTS

The following evidences on Obama are based on seven articles, published by established organizations/ writers (non of them are hoax) and by al-Jazeera. We care about the evidences and not about opinions, and we care about the risk that the western countries are taking this year:

KEY POINTS of ALL articles:
* Obama sat on Board that gave money to America Arab Action Network (groups calls founding of Israel a Naqba--catastrophe in Arabic: actually, Naqba originally was about Arab Leaders decision to call ALL Palestinians to LEAVE Israel by themselves in 1948, without Israel involvement. The naqba was a big lie to the Palestinian people (by their leaders) in order to free their land for the Arabs armies and let the Arab countries do what they want with the empty evacuated land- EVIDENCES ARE AVAILABLE upon request).

* Obama as did his running mate Biden opposed Ambassador Bolton, the man who helped to repeal Zionism is Racism at the UN.

* Obama as did his running mate Biden opposed naming Iranian Rev Guard Council a terrorist entity (Biden did too)

* Obama ignored racist and anti-Semitic statements and positions of his Chicago Middle East mentors(Khalidi, Said, Wright, Flegler, Farrakhan -- Obama went to Million Man March)

*Obama 's advisors, some dismissed only after scrutiny- Worldview of hostility to Israel by: (Malley, McPeak, Cirincione --his nuclear
proliferation advisor who castigated Israel over their successful attack onthe Syrian-North Korean reactor--plus Powers, Samantha Rice, Tony Lake)Obama only fired Malley after he actually met with Hamas.

*Obama has repeatedly praised Z Brzezinsky.

* Obama raised funds for a PLO terror camp. He has been endorsed, funded, and campaigned for by Israeli enemies far and wide.
Obama HAD to return substantial amounts of money to donors from Gaza.

* Obama believe no one suffers more than Palestinians

* Obama referred to "my Muslim faith" in a nationally televised interview.

* Barry Rubin, a well-known and respected Mideast expert and academic, said an Obama victory would precipitate “the most dangerous crisis facing the world.”

* Palestinians from Gaza calling Americans to Vote for Obama:

"Amazing video from al-Jazeera (see link below): Palestinians working to elect Obama are calling from Gaza to the US random phone numbers in primary states urging them to get out the vote. Unfortunately for them, Arabs calling from the Middle East soliciting votes for Obama which is going to have the opposite effect they intended.... "

* [Note: The un-balanced video shows the leader of Palestinians who believe that only Obama has the chance to make "peace" in Gaza. The Video doesn't mention that Israelis are trying to make real peace for more than 60 years, with constant rejection from most Arab countries.

* [Note: The un-balanced video shows that the major problem in the conflict are the settlements. Actually, settlements are built legally per international law, on legal purchased land, which belong to the builders, and NOT to any Palestinian person]

* [Note: The video does NOT give one word on all violence initiated by the Palestinians. ]

Link to al-Jazeera Video:

* Obama wrote in his book, p.261: "... I will stand with them [Arab and Pakistani Americans] should the political winds shift in any ugly direction.": [corrected quote]

* A well-known anti-Israel activist, Ali Abunimah, wrote in his report:
- Obama voluntarily initiate and raised the discussion with Abunimah and said:
- Hey, I’m sorry I haven’t said more about Palestine right now, but we are in a tough primary race.
I’m hoping when things calm down I can be more up front.”
* Obama also responded to same anti-Israel activist,who criticizing Israel and US by a column,published in Chicago said Tribune,and : “Keep up the good work ! "

* Per above Abunimah report: ..... in 1999 Obama had a major community fundraiser for Palestinian in Deheisha refugee camp,... Barack Obama used to be verycomfortable speaking up for, and being
associated with Palestinian rights and opposing the Israeli occupation."

* Abunimah's report included a photo of Obama with his wife Michelle seated at table with virulently anti-Israeli Professor Edward Said, in 1998 Arab community event, at which Said gave the keynote speech.

* Abunimah wrote: " he(Obama) used to attend events in the Palestinian community in Chicago all the time."

* Ali Abunimah claimed to know Obama well and to have met him on numerous occasions at pro-Palestinian events in Chicago.

* Israeli security officials express "concern" about Robert Malley, an adviser to Obama, who has advocated negotiations with Hamas and providing international assistance to the terrorist group. Malley also blamed Israel for the collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations at Camp David in 2000when Arafat turned down a Palestinian state in the West Bank,Gaza & East Jerusalem.

* Although Senator Obama has presented himself as the candidate of new things -- using the mantra of'change' endlessly -- the cold fact is that virtually
- Everything Obama says about domestic policy is straight out of the 1960s and
- Everything he says about foreign policy is straight out of the 1930s.
- That approach, in the name of peace, is what led to the most catastrophic war in human history [WW2]. [Writen by a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute, Thomas Sowell, a black essayist]

* Obama gave $22,500 in2006 to a church run by Jeremiah Wright.

* Jeremiah Wright knows of the Malcolm X (Nation of Islam leader) statement and, forty-five years later,chose to echo, repeat, and confirm it.

* The question is: why didn't Obama left that church before the primary, before 2008?

* Obama associate with people like Wright who believes that the government created HIVto commit a genocide; His replacement believes that the CIA created crack cocaine to destroy African-American communities; and his military adviser, Tony McPeak believes that Jews and Christian Zionists manipulated American foreign policy in Iraq.

* ACORN has been involved in voter fraud in the United States for years and served as the venue for the Obama's work as a "community organizer" . This report comes from today's Wall Street Journal. Tad Taube

*************************
Obama and Israel:
As a summary of the long message below:

Jesse Jackson: Expects Obama to stop "putting Israel's interests first" in making Mideast policy.

"The most important change would occur in the Middle East, where "decades of putting Israel's interests first" would end.
Jackson believes that, although "Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades" remain strong, they'll lose a great deal of their clout when Barack Obamaenters the White House.
"Obama is about change," Jackson told me in a wide-ranging conversation. "And the change that Obama promises is not limited to what we do in America itself. It is a change of the way America looks at the world and its place in it."

Obama Policy in the middle east:
"People are concern that Obama would alterate the disastrous course of US policy in the Middle East forthe growing campaign of boycott, divestment and sanctions needed to hold Israelaccountable for its escalating violence and solidifying apartheid."

Obama states you do not have to be pro Likud to be pro Israel.

Obama told Electronic Intifada Ali Abunimeh....hey, I am running for office now,I have to cool it on the Palestinian stuff, but keep up your good work !

Obama wants to sit down with Ahmadninejad without pre-conditions.

Obama believes in a global poverty tax and more money for the UN.

Obama lied to AIPAC (7500 people in the room) about Jerusalem. He recanted the very next day.

Yet,we have heard repeatedly how AIPAC gives Obama a perfect record.This cover prevented the community from being politically educated, and now Obama has his advocates telling Jewsnot to worry about him, and that any criticism is just smears.

The hiding of information about Obama all this time invited inJ Steet and Rabbis for Obama and all the game playing about how Obama is just as good for Israel as McCain. J Steet wants to destroy AIPACand RJC. They have called out the hate Israel dogs to try to censor AIPAC 7 RJC ads, send us hate emails. The anti War and anti Israel left now has both in its sights. AIPAC and Israel will pay the price. So will American Jewry.

Joe Biden, who once threatened to cut off aid to Israel (spoken directly toan Israeli Prime Minister, with fists pounding the table, during wartime (1982) and isthe Mullahs favorite Senator (1998, one of only 4 Senators not to vote forIranian Missile Proliferation Sanctions Act, etc.) has also been given a free ride. Not to mention Biden meanness to AIPAC a few weeks ago.

Jews are capable of incredible self deception and foolishness.
Ask the ones who continue to consider Dennis Ross a wise man.

Don't forget, more Jews voted for Jimmy Carter over Ronald Reagan.
go figure.


ACORN has been involved in voter fraud in the United States for years and served as the venue for the Obama's work as a "community organizer" . This report comes from today's Wall Street Journal. Tad Taube

Obama supported by J Street (Jewish org):
" The hiding of information about Obama all this time invited in J Steet and Rabbis for Obama and all the game playing about how Obama is just as good for Israel as McCain. J Steet wants to destroy AIPACand RJC. They have called out the hate Israel dogs to try to censor AIPAC 7 RJC ads, send us hate emails. The anti War and anti Israel left now has both in its sights. AIPAC and Israel will pay the price. So will American Jewry."


* Per the above info we can conclude that Israel and Obama issue will be solved in an aggressive way, by Obama, Leftist and with some Jewish supporters:

"Palestinian ‘Right of Return' Is Not ‘Inalienable' "
by Michael Sharnoff
Pajamas Media
October 13, 2008
www.jewishpolicycenter.org/article/345

"On September 14, Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas lamented the lack of recent progress in Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, stating, "I cannot say that there has been an agreement on a single issue. The gap between the sides is very large. We presented our ideas and demands regarding the six issues, and have yet to receive any answer from the Israeli side."

Abbas accuses the Israelis of stalling on the issue of the so-called "right of return." He believes that some 800,000 Palestinians displaced during aggressive Arab wars against Israel have a "right" to return to their homes...."


I will send out rebuttals. If they exist.


Jesse Jackson: Expects Obama to stop "putting Israel's interests first" in making Mideast policy.

"The most important change would occur in the Middle East, where "decades of putting Israel's interests first" would end.
Jackson believes that, although "Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades" remain strong, they'll lose a great deal of their clout when Barack Obamaenters the White House.
"Obama is about change," Jackson told me in a wide-ranging conversation. "And the change that Obama promises is not limited to what we do in America itself. It is a change of the way America looks at the world and its place in it."

Jackson warns that he isn't an Obama confidant or adviser, "just a supporter." But he adds that Obama has been "a neighbor or, better still, a member of the family." Jackson's son has been a close friend of Obama for years, and Jackson's daughter went to school with Obama's wife Michelle.

"We helped him start his career," says Jackson. "And then we were always there to help him move ahead. He is the continuation of our struggle for justice not only for the black people but also for all those who have been wronged."

Will Obama's election close the chapter of black grievances linked to memories of slavery? The reverend takes a deep breath and waits a long time before responding.

"No, that chapter won't be closed," he says. "However, Obama's victory will be a huge step in the direction we have wanted America to take for decades."


THE O JESSE KNOWS - JACKSON ON OBAMA'S AMERICA
Obama to stop "putting Israel's interests first" in making Mideast policy."

Jackson: Expects Obama to stop "putting Israel's interests first" in making Mideast policy.
AMIR TAHERI"

October 14, 2008
EVIAN, FRANCE
PREPARE for a new America: That's the message that the Rev. Jesse Jackson conveyed to participants in the first World Policy Forum, held at this French lakeside resort last week.

He promised "fundamental changes" in US foreign policy - saying America must "heal wounds" it has caused to other nations, revive its alliances and apologize for the "arrogance of the Bush administration."

The most important change would occur in the Middle East, where "decades of putting Israel's interests first" would end.
Jackson believes that, although "Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades" remain strong, they'll lose a great deal of their clout when Barack Obama enters the White House.
"Obama is about change," Jackson told me in a wide-ranging conversation. "And the change that Obama promises is not limited to what we do in America itself. It is a change of the way America looks at the world and its place in it."

Jackson warns that he isn't an Obama confidant or adviser, "just a supporter." But he adds that Obama has been "a neighbor or, better still, a member of the family." Jackson's son has been a close friend of Obama for years, and Jackson's daughter went to school with Obama's wife Michelle.

"We helped him start his career," says Jackson. "And then we were always there to help him move ahead. He is the continuation of our struggle for justice not only for the black people but also for all those who have been wronged."

Will Obama's election close the chapter of black grievances linked to memories of slavery? The reverend takes a deep breath and waits a long time before responding.

"No, that chapter won't be closed," he says. "However, Obama's victory will be a huge step in the direction we have wanted America to take for decades."
Jackson rejects any suggestion that Obama was influenced by Marxist ideas in his youth. "I see no evidence of that," he says. "Obama's thirst for justice and equality is rooted in his black culture."
But is Obama - who's not a descendant of slaves - truly a typical American black?

Jackson emphatically answers yes: "You don't need to be a descendant of slaves to experience the oppression, the suffocating injustice and the ugly racism that exists in our society," he says. "Obama experienced the same environment as all American blacks did. It was nonsense to suggest that he was somehow not black enough to feel the pain."

Is Jackson worried about the "Bradley effect" - that people may be telling pollsters they favor the black candidate, but won't end up voting for him?

"I don't think this is how things will turn out," he says. "We have a collapsing economy and a war that we have lost in Iraq. In Afghanistan, we face a resurgent Taliban. New threats are looming in Pakistan. Our liberties have been trampled under feet . . . Today, most Americans want change, and know that only Barack can deliver what they want. Young Americans are especially determined to make sure that Obama wins."

He sees a broad public loss of confidence in the nation's institutions: "We have lost confidence in our president, our Congress, our banking system, our Wall Street and our legal system to protect our individual freedoms. . . I don't see how we could regain confidence in all those institutions without a radical change of direction."

Jackson declines to be more concrete about possible policy changes. After all, he insists, he isn't part of Obama's policy team. Yet he clearly hopes that his views, reflecting the position of many Democrats, would be reflected in the policies of an Obama administration.

On the economic front, he hopes for "major changes in our trading policy."

"We cannot continue with the open-door policy," he says. "We need to protect our manufacturing industry against unfair competition that destroys American jobs and creates ill-paid jobs abroad."
Would that mean an abrogation of the NAFTA treaty with Canada and Mexico?

Jackson dismisses the question as "premature": "We could do a great deal without such dramatic action."

His most surprising position concerns Iraq. He passionately denounces the toppling of Saddam Hussein as "an illegal and unjust act." But he's now sure that the United States "will have to remain in Iraq for a very long time."

What of Obama's promise to withdraw by 2010? Jackson believes that position will have to evolve, reflecting "realities on the ground."
"We should work with our allies in Iraq to consolidate democratic institutions there," he says. "We must help the people of Iraq decide and shape their future in accordance with their own culture and faith."

On Iran, he strongly supports Obama's idea of opening a direct dialogue with the leadership in Tehran. "We've got to talk to tell them what we want and hear what they want," Jackson says. "Nothing is gained by not talking to others."

Would that mean ignoring the four UN Security Council resolutions that demand an end to Iran's uranium-enrichment program? Jackson says direct talks wouldn't start without preparations.
"Barack wants an aggressive and dynamic diplomacy," he says. "He also wants adequate preparatory work. We must enter the talks after the ground has been prepared," he says.

Jackson is especially critical of President Bush's approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict.

"Bush was so afraid of a snafu and of upsetting Israel that he gave the whole thing a miss," Jackson says. "Barack will change that," because, as long as the Palestinians haven't seen justice, the Middle East will "remain a source of danger to us all."
"Barack is determined to repair our relations with the world of Islam and Muslims," Jackson says. "Thanks to his background and ecumenical approach, he knows how Muslims feel while remaining committed to his own faith." Amir Taheri's next book, "The Persian Night: Iran Under the Khomeinist Revolution," is due out next month.

Obama's 95% Illusion
It depends on what the meaning of 'tax cut' is.

* One of Barack Obama's most potent campaign claims is that he'll cut taxes for no less than 95% of "working families." He's even promising to cut taxes enough that the government's tax share of GDP will be no more than 18.2% -- which is lower than it is today.

AP
It's a clever pitch, because it lets him pose as a middle-class tax cutter while disguising that he's also proposing one of the largest tax increases ever on the other 5%. But how does he conjure this miracle, especially since more than a third of all Americans already pay no income taxes at all? There are several sleights of hand, but the most creative is to redefine the meaning of "tax cut."
For the Obama Democrats, a tax cut is no longer letting you keep more of what you earn. In their lexicon, a tax cut includes tens of billions of dollars in government handouts that are disguised by the phrase "tax credit." Mr. Obama is proposing to create or expand no fewer than seven such credits for individuals:
- A $500 tax credit ($1,000 a couple) to "make work pay" that phases out at income of $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 per couple.

- A $4,000 tax credit for college tuition.

- A 10% mortgage interest tax credit (on top of the existing mortgage interest deduction and other housing subsidies).

- A "savings" tax credit of 50% up to $1,000.

- An expansion of the earned-income tax credit that would allow single workers to receive as much as $555 a year, up from $175 now, and give these workers up to $1,110 if they are paying child support.

- A child care credit of 50% up to $6,000 of expenses a year.

- A "clean car" tax credit of up to $7,000 on the purchase of certain vehicles.

Here's the political catch. All but the clean car credit would be "refundable," which is Washington-speak for the fact that you can receive these checks even if you have no income-tax liability. In other words, they are an income transfer -- a federal check -- from taxpayers to nontaxpayers. Once upon a time we called this "welfare," or in George McGovern's 1972 campaign a "Demogrant." Mr. Obama's genius is to call it a tax cut.
The Tax Foundation estimates that under the Obama plan 63 million Americans, or 44% of all tax filers, would have no income tax liability and most of those would get a check from the IRS each year.

The Heritage Foundation's Center for Data Analysis estimates that by 2011, under the Obama plan, an additional 10 million filers would pay zero taxes while cashing checks from the IRS.
The total annual expenditures on refundable "tax credits" would rise over the next 10 years by $647 billion to $1.054 trillion, according to the Tax Policy Center. This means that the tax-credit welfare state would soon cost four times actual cash welfare. By redefining such income payments as "tax credits," the Obama campaign also redefines them away as a tax share of GDP. Presto, the federal tax burden looks much smaller than it really is.
The political left defends "refundability" on grounds that these payments help to offset the payroll tax. And that was at least plausible when the only major refundable credit was the earned-income tax credit. Taken together, however, these tax credit payments would exceed payroll levies for most low-income workers.
It is also true that John McCain proposes a refundable tax credit -- his $5,000 to help individuals buy health insurance. We've written before that we prefer a tax deduction for individual health care, rather than a credit. But the big difference with Mr. Obama is that Mr. McCain's proposal replaces the tax subsidy for employer-sponsored health insurance that individuals don't now receive if they buy on their own. It merely changes the nature of the tax subsidy; it doesn't create a new one.

There's another catch: Because Mr. Obama's tax credits are phased out as incomes rise, they impose a huge "marginal" tax rate increase on low-income workers. The marginal tax rate refers to the rate on the next dollar of income earned. As the nearby chart illustrates, the marginal rate for millions of low- and middle-income workers would spike as they earn more income.

Some families with an income of $40,000 could lose up to 40 cents in vanishing credits for every additional dollar earned from working overtime or taking a new job. As public policy, this is contradictory. The tax credits are sold in the name of "making work pay," but in practice they can be a disincentive to working harder, especially if you're a lower-income couple getting raises of $1,000 or $2,000 a year. One mystery -- among many -- of the McCain campaign is why it has allowed Mr. Obama's 95% illusion to go unanswered.


All of the concerns about Obama have been ignored by mainstream Jewry and Jewish media, or they just don't care.

Obama opposed Security Fence, calling it a "Wall between the Peoples"

Obama as did his running mate Biden opposed Ambassador Bolton, the man who helped to repeal Zionism is Racism at the UN Obama as did his running mate Biden opposed naming Iranian Rev Guard Council a terrorist entity (Biden did too)Obama ignored racist and anti-Semitic statements and positions of his Chicago Middle East
mentors(Khalidi, Said, Wright, Flegler, Farrakhan -- Obama went to Million Man March)

Obama 's advisors, some dismissed only after scrutiny- Worldview of hostility to Israel by: (Malley, McPeak, Cirincione --his nuclear
proliferation advisor who castigated Israel over their successful attack onthe Syrian-North Korean reactor--plus Powers, Samantha Rice, Tony Lake)Obama only fired Malley after
he actually met with Hamas.


Obama has repeatedly praised Z Brzezinsky.
Obama raised funds for a PLO terror camp.He has been endorsed, funded, and campaigned for by Israeli enemies far and
wide.

Obama had to return substantial amounts of money to donors from Gaza.

Obama sat on Board that gave money to Am Arab Action Network (groups callsfounding ofIsrael a Naqba--catastrophe).

Obama believe no one suffers more than Palestinians
THE ELECTRONIC INTIFADA ON SENATOR OBAMA