Friday, October 31, 2008

Give um hell!

Radio Host tears into Offended Muslim



From Kafir at the Sunni Triangle

Monday, October 27, 2008

And now for the LYING POMPOUS ASS, Biden

WFTV-Channel 9's Barbara West conducted a satellite interview with Sen. Joe Biden on Thursday. ......

She quoted Karl Marx and asked how Obama isn't being a Marxist with the "spreading the wealth" comment.

"Are you joking?" said Biden.
"No," West said.

"I don't know who's writing your questions," Biden shot back.
Biden so disliked West's line of questioning that the Obama campaign canceled a WFTV interview with Jill Biden, the candidate's wife.


Click here for the interview

In Obama's own words: His Marxist Goal of Redistributing the Wealth

My Fellow Americans:

I urge you to write to news outlets to DEMAND that this video be shown and discussed on their television and radio shows, their newspapers, news alerts, and blogs. Anywhere and everywhere that people will read and hear this latest of Baraq Hussein Mohammad Sottero Obama's outrages!

As if this fraud Obama's associations with domestic and international terrorists, Khalidi and Ayers, the corrupt and cheating ACORN via his community organizing, his representing them as their lawyer, his campaign giving them $820,000.00, his association with "Reverend Wright", his refusal to release his school records, his lying about his Muslim faith, his Global Poverty Tax, his ties to radical Islam in Kenya, his hate for America, his messiah complex, his arrogance, his lying, his acceptance of foreign campaing contributions isn't enough, think about what his Marxist redistribution of wealth and wanting to change the constitution of the United States, because he says it is flawed, will mean to YOU.

The suggested email or text to send to the media is below:

*************************************************

Dear Sir or Madam:

The attached link is to a radio interview that Senator Barack Obama gave in 2001 that I hope you will listen to with an open mind.

I found this interview chilling.

In the 20 months that Senator Obama has been running for president, I cannot see why the message he shares in this audio has not received significant national coverage. Senator Obama very openly and candidly discusses "redistribution of wealth."

Even if you do not find this interview troubling, given Senator Obama quite likely will be our next president, his advocacy of "redistribution of wealth" certainly is newsworthy.

Thank you for your willingness to listen to this tape. Perhaps it could be something to discuss on one of your panel shows.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck

*********************************************************

Here's the video in Obama's own Marxist words - hold on to your wallets people because Obama wants to redistribute the wealth! Try to sift through his legal double talk! Disgusting!






from Keith Davies
Director of Walid Shoebat Fdn

Friends

Obama has admited publicly in a 2001 on Chicago PBR that he belives the US constitution only deals with negatives when it comes to freedoms and does not deal with what the governemt needs to "DO FOR YOU." A code for socialist marxiist ideals. He was talking about the civil rights movement but it is in perfect context of what this man belives. So if he is president and swears to uphold the US constitution he is actually lieing under oath at his possible swearing in ceremony.

In the same interview he talks about redistribution of wealth.

Obama as a member of Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty years, which espouses Black Liberation Theology which is a marxist revolutionary interpretation of the bible. If you do not believe us please research it yourselves. Obama wrote a book inspired by Jeremiah Wright, wrote a positive blurb for William Ayers book. What other evidence do we need as to prove Obama is not what he is saying as a "centrist" democratic candidate.

For those interested in hearing the truth right from Obama's own mouth (see the above video).

Our freedoms are in danger, our country is in danger from within, Israel is in mortal danger, make your vote count on Nov 4th even if Obama's ACORN is trying to undermine it.

Keith Davies
Director of Walid Shoebat Fdn

Obama, the homegrown and international terrorists and Maxists friend

Ayers wrote 'Dreams of My Father' for Obama.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/who_wrote_dreams_from_my_fathe_1.html


Jack Cashill, a former editor and author, proves this by revealing a linguistic test I'd never heard of - Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES). Simply put, FRES mathematically calculates the similarity between two separate pieces of writing. If the pieces are written by two different authors, the mathematical comparisons are wildly different. However, if the SAME author wrote both pieces, the FRES scores are almost identical.


The FRES scores for Ayers' 'Fugitive Days' and Obama's 'Dreams of My Father' are practically mirror images of one another.


Obama didn’t write ‘Dreams’ – Ayers did. And frankly, I don’t need a FRES score to tell me that. From day on, I’ve smelled a rat about this ridiculous claim that Obama is a writer. Bull! Except for his two memoirs, Obama has written nothing. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. And that’s impossible given that Obama is a lawyer. Folks, as a legal secretary of a quarter century, I assure you that a man can not become a lawyer without being able to write. Of all the professions – save journalism – no profession demands the skill of writing more than the legal field. Again, you can not become a lawyer unless you know how to write. (For God’s sake, what do you think pleadings are made of? Colored pictures?) Writing is so vital to becoming a lawyer that you can’t even get IN to law school, let alone graduate from it, without writing. But if then on top of that, you also belong to the elite law school in America – Harvard – but even more incredible, you are the f**king President of its Law Review – then the fact that you did-not-write-a-single-thing is too ludicrous for words.


Yet, that is precisely what Obama has done. He did not write in law school. He did not write as President of its Review. He did not write in his law firm. He didn’t even write despite being a professor of law for nearly a decade. No writing. None. Zilch. And even the two writings Obama supposedly DID write - his memoirs – explode his mythical ‘literary’ ability to pieces. Obama was a flop at writing ‘Dreams’. In 1990, Simon & Schuster gave him a $125,000 advance to write that memoir. But Obama couldn’t. I’m not saying he produced bad drafts – I’m saying he produced nothing at all. Not a single sheet of paper. Things got so desperate he and Michelle fled to Bali to get inspired – but Obama flopped there as well. Finally, after two years, Simon & Schuster dumped him. But Obama’s agent then got him a $40,000 contract with Times book. Except that flopped as well. Two years later, Obama still hadn’t produced a single page of his memoir - until suddenly a strange thing happened.


Obama met a ‘guy in the neighborhood’. Bill Ayers. Unlike Obama, Ayers was having no trouble writing HIS own memoirs – ‘Fugitive Days’ which debuted to wild acclaim and huge book sales. (And make no mistake about it, Ayers wrote ‘Fugitive’ – every word of it.)



Now, remember - Obama insists Ayers was ‘just a guy in the neighborhood’. In fact, the two were such total strangers that Ayers appointed Obama to be chairman of Ayer’s CAC committee, giving Obama control of $110,000,000 to distribute. Yeah, never met the guy.



But guess what happened at the same time this ‘total stranger’ didn’t meet Obama? Somebody wrote “Dreams of My Father”. And FRES scores prove that whoever wrote ‘Dreams’ was the same guy who wrote ‘Fugitive Days’. Ahuh. Yeah, coincidence.



Remember – folks - you read it on this site.



(What? You were expecting to read it in the Times?)

Listen Up you Fools!

Baraq Barry Mohammad Hussein Sottero Obama on redistribution of wealth.

Don't freaking tell me associations don't matter, you idiots!

Ayers' Weathermen planned "re-education", genocide

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Clintoon ApointeeJudge basically tells Americans to go to Hell!

Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court as Obama is "NOT" qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court
For Immediate Release: - 10/25/08 - Contact Info at end.
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Berg said, "I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick's decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.

This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?

So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.

According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.

What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.

We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.

Our website obamacrimes.com now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.

Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.

* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

More on Obama's Terrorist's Buddies

Please see the posting at Gateway Pundit
Where Hope Finally Made a Comeback.
Friday, October 24, 2008

Confirmed: MSM Holds Video Of Barack Obama Attending Jew-Bash & Toasting a Former PLO Operative... Refuse to Release the Video!

Introduction: The LA Times is holding a video that shows Barack Obama celebrating with a group of Palestinians who are openly hostile towards Israel. Barack Obama even gives a toast to a former PLO operative at this celebration. If the American public saw this side of Barack Obama he would never be elected president.
But, the media refuses to release this video.

LA Times writer Peter Wallsten wrote about Barack Obama's close association with former Palestinian operative Rashid Khalidi back in April.

Wallsten discussed a dinner held back in 2003 in honor of Khalidi, a critic of Israel and advocate for Palestinian rights.
Barack Obama has denied his close association with Khalidi, too.

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Call in to Talk to Phil Berg, Tues. Oct. 28

Gary Baumgarten said...(commenting on this blog in regard to Phil Berg)

Philip Berg will be my guest on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com Tuesday October 28 at 5 PM New York time.

Please go to www.garybaumgarten.com and click on the Join The Show link to talk to him.

Thanks.

October 24, 2008 8:12 PM

Saturday Night Videos - Obama













Video: Barack Obama - Still Holds Muslim Beliefs

Friday, October 24, 2008

Hear Phil Berg Interviewed

Hear Savage interview Democrat attorney Philip J. Berg, former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania, about his lawsuit demanding Barack Obama present his original birth certificate to prove he was born in the United States and qualified to serve as president.

McCain and Obama: Their Stand on Islamic Jihad and Terrorism

FROM ACT FOR AMERICA

The research we did on the positions of John McCain and Barack Obama regarding the causes of Islamic terrorism and how we should deal with alleged terrorists uncovered significant differences between the two candidates. These differences have either been ignored by most in the media or have been lost in the understandable wall-to-wall coverage of the economic calamity facing us.

For this reason we want to make sure that every ACT! for America member has had a chance to read and forward this research to everyone you know. What you will find below is posted on the ACT! for America voter guide section of our website, which you can access by clicking here.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

The Views and Positions of John McCain and Barack Obama

http://www.actforamerica.org/index.php/learn/voter-guide/350

Both the John McCain and Barack Obama campaigns refused to respond to the ACT! for America candidate questionnaire. In lieu of that, ACT! for America has conducted extensive research that has enabled us to determine the views and positions of both candidates on the broad issue of “terrorism.”

The ACT! for America research on the broad issue of terrorism focused on the two candidates’ positions on the causes of terrorism and how to define the threat. This is very important because how one views and defines the threat is fundamental to how one will handle and respond to the threat. The ACT! for America research uncovered some striking differences between Senator Obama and Senator McCain on this.

The research for each candidate is comprised of quotes sourced from various published reports and ACT! for America comments.

John McCain

New York Post column 9/11/2008

“The divide starts with the question: Why was America attacked?

McCain's answer is simple (or, as Obama might suggest, simplistic): The United States was attacked because a resurgent Islam has produced a radicalism that dreams of world conquest and sees America as the enemy. [Emphasis added]

McCain doesn't hesitate to acknowledge that his country is engaged in a Global War on Terror. He doesn't believe that 9/11 might've been prompted by some wrong America did to others. To him, the nation was an innocent victim of "Islamic terrorism."

McCain asserts, "America faces a dedicated, focused and intelligent foe in the War on Terrorism. This enemy will probe to find America's weaknesses and strike against them. The United States cannot afford to be complacent about the threat, naive about terrorist intentions, unrealistic about their capabilities, or ignorant to our national vulnerabilities."

ACT! for America Comment

While John McCain has at times expressed his concern for America’s national image due to allegations of torture of suspected terrorist detainees, the column above is consistent with McCain’s stated position on the root cause of terrorism. For instance, McCain labels the principal terrorist threat to the world as “radical Islamic terrorism.” See the following article.

Washington Times, April 21, 2008

“A coalition of American Muslim groups is demanding that Sen. John McCain stop using the adjective "Islamic" to describe terrorists and extremist enemies of the United States.

Muneer Fareed, who heads the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), told The Washington Times that his group is beginning a campaign to persuade Mr. McCain to rephrase his descriptions of the enemy.

"We've tried to contact his office, contact his spokesperson to have them rethink word usage that is more acceptable to the Muslim community," Mr. Fareed said. "If it's not our intent to paint everyone with the same brush, then certainly we should think seriously about just characterizing them as criminals, because that is what they are."

An aide to Mr. McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee who is counting on his pro-Iraq war stance to attract conservative voters, said the senator from Arizona will not drop the word.

Steve Schmidt, a former Bush White House aide who is now a McCain media strategist, told The Times that the use of the word is appropriate and that the candidate will continue to define the enemy that way…

… Mr. McCain, an ex-Navy fighter pilot and leading hawk on the Iraq war, regularly uses the term "Islamic" in major foreign-policy speeches and in news conferences.

In a speech last month to the Los Angeles World Affairs Council, Mr. McCain said the formation of an international coalition "will strengthen us to confront the transcendent challenge of our time: the threat of radical Islamic terrorism." [Emphasis added]

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Call the media and DEMAND they cover this story

ABC News 212-456-4040 212-456-2795 http://abcnews.go.com


CBS News 212-975-3691 212-975-1893 http://www.cbsnews.com


NBC News 212-664-4971 212-664-5705 http://www.nbc.com/News_&_Sports


CNN 404-827-1511 404-681-3578 http://www.cnn.com


Fox News 212-301-3300 212-301-8274 http://www.foxnews.com


MSNBC 201-583-5222 201-583-5453 http://www.msnbc.msn.com


PBS 703-998-2150 703-998-4154 http://www.pbs.org


NPR 202-414-2200 202-414-3329 http://www.npr.org


NY Times 212-556-1234 212-556-3690 http://www.nytimes.com


USA Today 703-276-3400 703-247-3100 http://www.usatoday.com


WS Journal 212-416-2000 212-416-2658 http://www.wsj.com


Washington Post 202-334-6000 202-496-3936 http://www.washingtonpost.com


Newsweek 212-445-4000 212-445-4450 http://www.newsweek.com


Time 212-522-1212 212-522-0323 http://www.time.com/time


U.S. News 202-955-2000 202-955-2049 http://www.usnews.com


AP 212-621-1600 212-621-7520 http://www.ap.org


Congress 202-224-3121 http://www.house.gov | http://www.senate.gov


White House 202-456-1414 202-456-2461 http://www.whitehouse.gov





Contact Good Morning America - http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3271346&cat=Good%20Morning%20America





· Contact World News with Charles Gibson http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3271346&cat=World%20News%20with%20Charles%20Gibson





· Contact Primetime - http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3271346&cat=Primetime





· Contact 20/20 - http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3271346&cat=20/20





· Contact Nightline - http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3428117





· Contact This Week - http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3428174


· ABC News Programming Specials - http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3271346&cat=ABC%20News%20Specials





· ABC News Programming Other - http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3271346&cat=ABC%20News%20Other





· Comments and Suggestions About ABCNews.com Content -http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3052660





· ABC News Other - http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3052660


Is it possible at this late date that Barack Obama could be declared ineligible to serve as President? Yes, indeed. And 250 conservatives in the Bay Area (those to whom I am sending this email) can make a difference. Really! I am suggesting a four-step process in which you can participate that might very well change this election. These four steps can be taken while sitting right there on your computer; they are as follows: 1. Read the article that follows my cover note which was posted on the "Yid with Lid" blogsite. You can read it in less than 5 minutes. 2. Write to everyone you know asking them to forward this article to everyone they know; and then send a brief email to each of the following newspapers asking them why they are not reporting this story on Page 1 of their newspapers: The Associated Press, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the USA Today, the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune, the San Franciso Chronicle, the San Jose Mercury, and the San Francisco Chronicle. Anyone who has the email address to the news department (not letters to the editor) of any or all of these newspapers, please send them to me, and I will share them with everyone. 3. Do the same with the following television and radio stations, asking them why this story does not lead their news hour: NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, NPR, and Public Television. Carbon copy the appropriate news reporters like Brian Williams, Katie Couric, Charles Gibson, Wolf Blitzer, David Gergen, Brit Hume, Chris Matthews, and Jim Lehrer. Once again, if anyone has the contact information for any or all of these people, please provide them to me. 4. Send this article to the following individuals, and ask them to not only talk about it, but also to use their influence to encourage the aforementioned newspapers, television and radio outlets and AP to cover this story: Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Neal Boortz, Mark Levin, Lou Dobbs, Bill O'Reilly, Michael Reagan, Hugh Hewitt, Dennis Prager, Michael Medved, Rusty Humphries, Michelle Malkin, Larry Elder, Ann Coulter, Laurie Dhue, Laura Ingraham, Karl Rove, Dick Morris, and anyone else you can think of. If anyone has contact information on any or all of the people on this list, please provide them to me. I do not know where Barack Obama was born; but this should be a news story. I do not know if Obama is a citizen of Kenya or Indonesia; but this should be a news story. Let's start an avalanche encouraging the news media to cover this breaking story. This election is too important not to make the effort. Please get involved. Thank you. Richard Depending on who you ask Senator Barack Obama is going to Hawaii to visit his ailing grandma or to work the Hawaiian courts to prevent the release of his birth certificate. Purveyors of the second theory point to the fact that when Obama was in Hawaii two months ago he spent so little time with the woman he threw under the bus during his race speech. They also mention that granny just isn't that sick.

Andy Martin recently filed suit in Hawaii demanding that the State turn over Obama's Birth Certificate, His claim is that Obama is really in Hawaii to fight the suit. More Below


"Barack H. Obama II has suspended his involvement in his campaign for at least two days to go to Hawaii, purportedly to visit his ailing grandmother.

But the sudden trip to the 50th state coincides with an aggressive campaign by Obama nemesis Andy Martin to legally compel Hawaiian authorities to release birth records that Obama has refused to make public.

And, in a separate Federal Circuit Court case filed by Philip Berg in Pennsylvania to force Obama and the Democratic National Committee to prove that the candidate is in fact a "natural born citizen," Obama and the DNC have failed to respond within a federally-mandated 30 day period, opening the door to a procedural argument that failure to respond represents an admission of the plaintiff's claims that the Democratic nominee is a Kenyan and/or Indonesian citizen, but not a "natural born" citizen of the United States.

The sudden Obama decision to visit Hawaii has triggered broad skepticism, coming as it does in the critical last two week of the close election campaign. Obama's 85-year-old maternal grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, was first brought into the campaign when he sought to show that she, as a "typical white woman", held what the candidate claimed were racist fears of aggressive black men. He brought her up in the context of saying that he could not disown her -- despite her alleged racism -- any more than he could disown his pastor of twenty years, Jeremiah Wright. Obama visited her only very briefly during his summer vacation in Hawaii, and he didn't visit her when she was in a Honolulu hospital last week. There is no indication that her condition is life-threatening.

But Andy Martin, an anti-Obama columnist, says the real reason for Obama's emergency trip is to stop his own pursuit of birth records, including an emergency writ to the Hawaii Supreme Court to request expedited handling after a previous filing to demand that the State's Department of Health release the records. "Obama did not pay any attention to his grandmother until I showed up in Honolulu," he wrote in an email. "Suddenly she is the center of his attention. She is so central to his campaign that he has suspended it! But when Obama was here last summer he only visited his grandmother for an hour. One hour! Now he suspends his campaign for her?"

The Berg-initiated legal action is also pressing the Obama campaign. On September 15, as part of his federal lawsuit contending that the Illinois senator is ineligible, pursuant to the U.S. Constitution, to serve as president of the United States, Philadelphia attorney Philip Berg served Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee with a request for admission, which, on October 6, Barack Obama and the DNC acknowledged getting but then attempted to persuade the court to stay discovery and to dismiss the suit. However, Federal Rules require that a response to a request for admissions be served within the 30-day time limit, and Barack Obama and the DNC have not done so.


Therefore, this morning, Berg is filing two motions in district court in Philadelphia: a motion requesting an immediate order deeming his request for admissions served upon Barack Obama and the DNC on September 15 admitted by default, and a motion requesting an expedited ruling and/or hearing on Berg's motion deeming the request for admissions served upon Obama and the DNC admitted. Berg contends that the failure to respond and serve the response within the time limit is "damning."

"They did not file answers or objections or anything else to the request for admissions we served upon them on September 15," Berg said. "They knew the admissions were due. They knew they must object or answer specifically in 30 days. Here, they did nothing."

The admissions that Berg asserts Barack Obama and the DNC have, at least procedurally, admitted to, include the following:

-Admit you were born in Kenya.
-Admit you are a Kenya "natural born" citizen.
-Admit your foreign birth was registered in the State of Hawaii.
-Admit your father, Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr., admitted Paternity of you.
-Admit your mother gave birth to you in Mombasa, Kenya.
-Admit your mother's maiden name is Stanley Ann Dunham a/k/a Ann Dunham.
-Admit the COLB [Certification of Live Birth] posted on the website "Fightthesmears.com" is a forgery.
-Admit you were adopted by a Foreign Citizen.
-Admit you were adopted by Lolo Soetoro, M.A. a citizen of Indonesia.
-Admit you were not born in Hawaii.
-Admit you are a citizen of Indonesia.
-Admit you never took the "Oath of Allegiance" to regain your U.S. Citizenship status.
-Admit you are not a "natural born" United States citizen.
-Admit your senior campaign staff is aware you are not a "natural born" United States Citizen.
-Admit the United States Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the office of President of the United States unless that person is a "natural born" United States citizen.
-Admit you are ineligible pursuant to the United States Constitution to serve as President and/or Vice President of the United States.


It is not at all clear that the actions by Berg in Federal court and Martin in Hawaii will be ruled on before the election, but both men have vowed to pursue their cases even after the election if necessary. Berg has said that he would drop his case if Obama simply provides documentary proof of his birth, but to date the candidate has not done so, instead releasing only images of a purported "certification of live birth" to the partisan Daily Kos blog and the sympathetic FactCheck web site.

This political ad is chilling and true

This political ad is chilling. Not because it's true - but because the MSM is refusing to let us see it.

OBAMA NOT QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT- He should immediately wihdraw his candidacy

For Immediate Release: - 10/21/08

For Further Information Contact:

Philip J. Berg, Esquire - Berg v. Obama

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

Cell (610) 662-3005 No. 08-cv-04083

(610) 825-3134

(800) 993-PHIL [7445]

Fax (610) 834-7659 philjberg@obamacrimes.com

Obama & DNC Admit All Allegations of Federal Court Lawsuit -

Obama’s “Not” Qualified to be President

Obama Should Immediately Withdraw his Candidacy for President

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/21/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that Obama and tbe DNC “ADMITTED”, by way of failure to timely respond to Requests for

Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit. Obama is “NOT QUALIFIED” to be President and therefore Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President and the DNC shall substitute a qualified candidate. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Berg stated that he filed Requests for Admissions on September 15, 2008 with a response by way of answer or objection had to be served within thirty [30] days. No response to the Requests for Admissions was served by way of response or objection.

Thus, all of the Admissions directed to Obama and the DNC are deemed “ADMITTED.” Therefore, Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President.

The admissions include: OBAMA - Admitted:

1. I was born in Kenya.

2. I am a Kenya “natural born” citizen.

3. My foreign birth was registered in the State of Hawaii.

4. My father, Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr. admitted Paternity of me.

5. My mother gave birth to me in Mombosa, Kenya.

6. My mother’s maiden name is Stanley Ann Dunham a/k/a Ann Dunham.

7. The COLB [Certification of Live Birth] posted on the website
“Fightthesmears.com” is a forgery.

8. I was adopted by a Foreign Citizen.

9. I was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, M.A. a citizen of Indonesia.

10. I was not born in Hawaii.

11. I was not born at the Queens Medical Center in Hawaii.

12. I was not born at Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Hawaii.

13. I was not born in a Hospital in Hawaii.

14. I am a citizen of Indonesia.

15. I never took the “Oath of Allegiance” to regain my U.S. Citizenship status.

16. I am not a “natural born” United States citizen.

17. My date of birth is August 4, 1961.

18. I traveled to Pakistan in 1981 with my Pakistan friends.

19. In 1981, I went to Indonesia on my way to Pakistan.

20. Pakistan was a no travel zone in 1981 for American Citizens.

21. In 1981, Pakistan was not allowing American Citizens to enter
their country.

22. I traveled on my Indonesian Passport to Pakistan.

23. I renewed my Indonesian Passport on my way to Pakistan.

24. My senior campaign staff is aware I am not a “natural born”
United States Citizen.

25. I am proud of my Kenya Heritage.

26. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth
certificate that identifies my first name.

27. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth
certificate that identifies my last name.

28. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth
certificate that identifies my place of birth.

29. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate
that identifies my first name.

30. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate
that identifies my last name.

31. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate
that identifies my place of birth.

32. The document identified as my Indonesian School record from
Fransiskus Assisi School in Jakarta, Indonesia is genuine.

33. I went to a Judge in Hawaii to have my name changed.

34. I went to a Senator and/or Congressman or other public official

in Hawaii to have my name changed.

35. I had a passport issued to me from the Government of Indonesia.

36. The United States Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the office of President of the United States unless that person
is a “natural born” United States citizen.

37. I am ineligible pursuant to the United States Constitution to serve as President and/or Vice President of the United States.

38. I never renounced my citizenship as it relates to my citizenship
to the country of Indonesia.

39. I never renounced my citizenship as it relates to my citizenship
to the country of Kenya.

40. I am an Attorney who specializes in Constitutional Law.

41. Kenya was a part of the British Colonies at the time of my birth.

42. Kenya did not become its own Republic until 1963.

43. I am not a “Naturalized” United States Citizen.

44. I obtained $200 Million dollars in campaign funds by fraudulent means.

45. I cannot produce a “vault” (original) long version of a birth certificate showing my birth in Hawaii.

46. My “vault” (original) long version birth certificate shows my birth in Kenya.

47. The only times I was to a Hospital in Hawaii was for check-ups

or medical treatments for illnesses.

48. Queens Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii does not have any record of my mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) giving birth to me.

49. Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu, Hawaii does not have any record of my mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama)giving birth to me

50. I was born in the Coast Province Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.

51. I represented on my State Bar application in Illinois that I never used any other name other than Barack Hussein Obama.

52. I went by the name Barry Soetoro in Indonesia.

53. My Indonesian school records are under the name of Barry Soetoro.

54. I took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution when admitted to the State Bar of Illinois to practice Law.

55. I took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution when I was Sworn into my United States Senate Office.

56. I hold dual citizenship with at least one other Country besides the United States of America.

DNC - Admitted:

1. The DNC nominated Barrack Hussein Obama as the Democratic
Nominee for President.

2. The DNC has not vetted Barrack Hussein Obama.

3. The DNC did not have a background check performed on Barrack Hussein Obama.

4. The DNC did not verify Barrack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States.

5. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya.

6. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born” United States citizen.

7. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama was not born in Hawaii.

8. The DNC admits they have not inquired into Barrack Hussein
Obama’s citizenship status.

9. The DNC admits they have a duty to properly vette the Democratic
Nominee for President.

10. The DNC admits Lolo Soetoro, M.A., an Indonesian citizen adopted
Barrack Hussein Obama.

11. The DNC admits the Credentials Committee has been aware of this
lawsuit since August 22, 2008 as the lawsuit was faxed to our Washington D.C. Office on August 22, 2008.

12. The DNC admits their Credentials Committee failed to verify and/or inquire into the credentials of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as the President of the United States.


13. The DNC admits their Credential Committee’s Report failed to address the issues of Barack Hussein Obama’s ineligibility to serve as President of the United States.

14. The DNC admits Howard Dean, Chair Person has and had knowledge
Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya and ineligible to serve as
the President of the United States.

15. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all Democratic citizens of the United States have been personally injured as a result of not having a qualified Democratic Presidential Nominee to cast their votes upon.

16. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all citizens of the United States have a Constitutional Right to vote for the President of the United States and to have two (2) qualified candidates of which to choose from.

17. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all citizens of the United States have a Constitutional right to have a properly vetted Democratic Presidential Nominee of which to cast their vote.

18. The DNC admits an FBI background check is not performed on the
Presidential or Vice Presidential Candidates.

19. The DNC admits the United States Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the office of President of the United States unless thatperson is a “natural born” United States citizen.

20. The DNC admits they collected donations on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama for his Presidential campaign.

21. The DNC admits Plaintiff and Democratic citizens donated money based on false representations that Barack Hussein Obama was qualified to serve as the President of the United States.

22. The DNC admits if Barack Hussein Obama is elected as President and allowed to serve as President of the United States in violation of our Constitution, it will create a Constitutional crisis.

23. The DNC admits Barack Hussein Obama took an Oath to uphold the
United States Constitution.

24. The DNC admits allowing a person who is not a “natural born” citizen to serve as President of the United States violates Plaintiff’s rights to due process of law in violation of the United States Constitution.

25. The DNC admits allowing a person who is not a “natural born” citizen to serve as President of the United States violates Plaintiff’s rights to Equal Protection of the laws in violation of the United States Constitution.

26. The DNC admits the function of the DNC is to secure a Democratic
Presidential Candidate who will protect Democratic citizen’s interests,fight for their equal opportunities and fight for justice for all Americans.

27. The DNC admits the Democratic National Committee has been promoting Barack Hussein Obama’s Presidential election knowing he was ineligible to serve as President of the United States.

Our website obamacrimes.com now has 50.7 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers, radio and TV stations. Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Dhimmi Dummy of the Day - Individual





And the Award goes to..........COLIN POWELL



It wasn't enough to dis his Commander and Chief during war time as President George W. Bush's Secretary of State, but now his racist ignorant rants about Baraq Hussein Obama never being a Muslim, while completly ignorning FACTS, makes him my pick for DHIMMI DUMMY OF THE DAY AWARD.

Proudly declaring that Baraq Hussein Obama was never a Muslim and what in the heck is wrong with having a Muslim President shows such utter ignorance that it is astounding. Or like, IMHO, is it the same disease as Nancy Pelosi suffers from, that being a combination of ignorance, alzheimers, corrpution, drug addeled brain, and of course just plain dhimmitude.

How could a man so full of promise have fallen into such absence of sanity by repeating the lie that Barack Obama has “always been a Christian,” despite new information further confirming Obama’s Muslim childhood.

Proof abounds that Barry Mohammad Sottero attended an Indonesian school whose registration listed him as Muslim (only natural born Indonesian citizens, btw, were allowed to attend school in Indonesia at the time).

See the post at No Compromise for more information and research...because why should I spend time on rewriting what Tracey has already spent so much time on:

Instead, then, let us review a related subject – Obama’s connections and even indebtedness, throughout his career, to extremist Islam. Specifically, he has longstanding, if indirect ties to two institutions, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), listed by the U.S. government in 2007 as an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas-funding trial; and the Nation of Islam (NoI), condemned by the Anti-Defamation League for its “consistent record of racism and anti-Semitism.”



Colin Powell, is he another Affirmative Action man who still holds his racist views and doesn't have a clue how to think for himself or how to judge a person on Facts?


Colin Powell Dhimmi Dummy of the Day.

Monday, October 20, 2008

2nd lawsuit challenges Obama's citizenship

ELECTION 2008
2nd lawsuit challenges Obama's citizenship

Man demands state verify birth records or remove senator from ballots


Posted: October 16, 2008
By Chelsea Schilling
© 2008 WorldNetDaily


In a second lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's "natural born" citizenship, a Washington resident is demanding officials review original or certified birth documents for the Democratic Party presidential candidate.

Steven Marquis of Fall City, Wash., filed suit Oct. 9 in Washington State Superior Court, calling for Secretary of State Sam Reed to determine whether Obama is a citizen before Election Day. Marquis released a statement saying the state has the authority to "prevent the wholesale disenfranchisement of voters" who might have otherwise had the opportunity to choose a qualified candidate should records show Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen.

"At this point, Mr. Obama has not allowed independent or official access to his birth records nor supporting hospital records," Marquis wrote. "The Hawaii Health Department has violated Federal law by ignoring formal Freedom of Information requests for the same."

Marquis referenced prominent Pennsylvania Democrat and attorney Philip J. Berg's lawsuit in U.S. District Court against Sen. Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee for proof of Obama's American citizenship.

Story continues here

Barack Obama isn't just inexperienced

Friends

Anne Bayefsky sums up what we have been saying at the Walid Shoebat Foundation

Keith Davies, Walid Shoebat Foundation

Focus, People
A life-or-death election.


Since the time of Hitler, civilization has never been so close to the brink of total catastrophe. This American election will decide whether civilization as we know it will survive. As much as economic questions are currently front and center, with blame to go all round, this is not an election primarily about corporate greed, or individuals living beyond their means, or government neglect of economic oversight. Nor is it about whether we should have gone into Iraq where, like it or not, American boots on the ground have begun to create an emerging democracy. This election is about
whether there will be a nuclear holocaust.

Alarmist? I sure hope so. Isn't it about time that we got to the point about the stakes in this election? How many more pundits do we have to watch talking about the minutae - a candidate's look, an accent, a stumble, a slogan? We have four weeks to talk about the thing that matters most: a nuclear-armed Iran, and which candidate will prevent it.

The question that must be put point-blank to both presidential and
vice-presidential candidates is: "Will you authorize the use of force in time to stop Iran from acquiring the capacity to make nuclear weapons - yes or no?"

Wouldn't your beliefs for and against abortion fade if you thought nobody would be born into a world fit for living things? Wouldn't your worries about health care pale if you thought the mutilation, cancer, and death of millions upon millions, sure to follow nuclear war, would occur in your lifetime? Wouldn't your concerns about affording a college education fade if you thought your children will have the grim task of fighting a war of horrifying devastation instead of going to school?

Wake up. There is a genocidal maniac on the verge of reaching the point of no return in his ability to make a nuclear weapon. A fanatic with the stated ambition to murder five million Jews living in Israel - to start. A villain who has already funded and armed a terrorist war against the Jewish state that in 2006 forced one-third of Israel's population to live underground for almost a month. In other words, an individual who is ready, willing, and
able to give the nuclear trigger to a terrorist group - to terrorists who cannot be bargained with because they prefer their death to your freedom. As for the suggestion that the Mullahs are more powerful and nicer guys, the millions brutalized and subjugated in Iran tell a different story.

I don't know why it is possible after the Holocaust, to have such widespread denial of man's capacity for evil. Nor do I understand why Ahmadinejad's virulent anti-semitism and call for the destruction of Israel are dismissed as irrelevant factoids when calculating the Iranian threat. Time has a story about "experts" who believe that Iran seeks an atomic bomb not because they have ny interest in using it or passing it to others who will, but to deter, to ensure its security. According to Thomas Fringar, chairman of the U.S. National Intelligence Council: "Iran's biggest strategic concern is obtaining security assurances and accords," and it is the United States "which the Iranians consider a mortal threat." These "experts" have it
exactly backwards. If Iran were really driven by such security concerns, these concerns could be alleviated without spending a nickel - by stopping its nuclear-weapons campaign and its funding of terrorists.

No amount of ignorance, stupidity, or wishful thinking will change the reality that there are people who are prepared to kill you and your family for no good reason at all. Not because of poverty, or envy, or discrimination or because of anything you've done. But because they hate you - whether you live in Jerusalem, Washington, London, or Paris. They hate everything you stand for - liberty, tolerance, equality. And their minds are made up. Closed - period - to the entreaties of naïve foreign diplomats or would-be presidents and vice presidents.

During the vice-presidential debate, Joe Biden denied the undeniable fact that Senator Obama said he would sit down with the Iranian President without preconditions: "Barack Obama, he did not say 'sit down with Ahmadinejad.'" Perhaps he should read Barack's website: "The Obama-Biden Plan: Obama supports tough, direct presidential diplomacy with Iran without preconditions."

So let's look at the differences between the presidential tickets on what to do about the nuclear weapons ambitions of a would-be mass murderer.


On the one side:

Vice-Presidential Debate

DEBATE MODERATOR: "Let's move to Iran and Pakistan..Senator Biden. What's the greater threat, a nuclear Iran or an unstable Afghanistan?"

SENATOR BIDEN: ".I always am focused.I have been focusing on for a long time, along with Barack, on Pakistan..Iran getting a nuclear weapon would be very, very destabilizing.[T]hey are not close to getting a nuclear weapon that's able to be deployed.".

SENATOR BIDEN: [on Iran] "Our friends and allies have been saying, Gwen, "Sit down. Talk. Talk. Talk.".And if we don't.what makes you think the allies are going to sit with us?"


Ask yourself: does preventing a nuclear holocaust involve winning a
popularity contest?

First Presidential Debate

Senator Obama [on preventing a nuclear Iran]: "Now here's what we need to do. We do need tougher sanctions. I do not agree.that we're going to be able to execute the kind of sanctions we need without some cooperation with.Russia and China.[W]e are also going to have to.engage in tough direct diplomacy with Iran and this is a major difference I have with Senator McCain."

News flash: Russia and China have told us to take a hike on tough sanctions, Barack. Any other ideas?

Obama Website:

If Iran continues its troubling behavior, we will step up our economic pressure and political isolation. "If" it continues? Anybody in Iran trembling?

And on the other side:


Vice-Presidential Debate


DEBATE MODERATOR: "Governor, nuclear Pakistan, unstable Pakistan, nuclear Iran? Which is the greater threat?"

GOVERNOR PALIN: "An armed, nuclear armed especially Iran is so extremely dangerous to consider. They cannot be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons period."


First Presidential Debate

Senator McCain: "If Iran acquires nuclear weapons, it is an existential threat to the State of Israel and to other countries in the region.[W]e cannot [allow] a second Holocaust. .Have no doubt about the ultimate result of them acquiring nuclear weapons.What Senator Obama doesn't seem to understand that if without preconditions you sit down across the table from someone who has called Israel a "stinking corpse," and wants to destroy that
country and wipe it off the map, you legitimize those comments. This is dangerous. It isn't just naive; it's dangerous. And so we just have a fundamental difference of opinion."


Barack Obama isn't just inexperienced. It isn't naiveté that drives him. I take him at his word. He and his vice-presidential candidate believe in "talk, talk, talk" regardless of the hourglass or the stakes or the intentions of the person across the table. No amount of learning on the job is going to change their way of thinking. Approving the use of force to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons is a Rubicon they will not cross - before civilization as we know it comes to an end.

So when you cast your ballot this election, make no mistake: you are voting for or against a nuclear holocaust. Not because Barack Obama wants such a horror, but because he will not prevent it. He will still be talking when the point of no return in Iran's nuclear program is reached. And the balance of power in the world will - with terrible consequences - have changed forever.

- Anne Bayefsky is a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute
and at Touro College. She is also editor of
www.EyeontheUN.org




Friends

Many of you have requested we sell the 4 Dvd series on our web site and you can now purchase on line .

We plan to set up a web download where you can down load Walid's teachings and speeches.

Obama was born, raised and is still a Muslim

From another friend:

Absolute Proof Obama Was Born, Was Raised, or Still Is a Muslim


1. Barrack Hussein Obama was born to Generations of Muslims

2. Barrack Hussein Obama was raised for years in Muslim Nations

3. Barrack Hussein Obama attended Muslim schools, where he was registered as a Muslim

4. Barrack Hussein Obama wants you to believe that his opportunistic conversion to Christianity after being born to generations of Muslims who raised him for years in Muslim nations where he attended Muslim schools has completely eliminated his Islamic Roots and changed his Muslim sympathies.

5. Barrack Hussein Obama’s church of 20 years gave many awards to the radical, anti-white, pro-Islamic, Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan.

6. Barrack Hussein Obama has been praised and endorsed by the Islamic terrorist group Hamas

7. Barrack Hussein Obama has been praised and endorsed by Palestinian Rashid Khalidi, who also has held a fundraiser for Obama. Khalidi is a harsh critic of Israel, has made statements supportive of Palestinian terror and reportedly has worked on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was involved in anti-Western terrorism and was labeled by the State Department as a terror group.

8. Barrack Hussein Obama has praised and endorsed, in his autobiography, the founder first President of Nation of Islam President Malcom X

9. Brother: Muslim ”Barack Obama’s brother Roy opted for Islam over Christianity, as the Senator recounted in his book when describing his 1992 wedding. “The person who made me proudest of all,” Obama wrote, “was Roy. Actually, now we call him Abongo, his Luo name, for two years ago he decided to reassert his African heritage. He converted to Islam, and has sworn off pork and tobacco and alcohol.”Abongo “argues that the black man must “liberate himself from the poisoning influences of European culture.” He urged his younger brother to embrace his African heritage.

10. Sister: Muslim In an interview with the New York Times, Maya Soetoro-Ng, Obama’s younger half sister, told the Times, “I don’t want to deny Islam. I think it’s obviously very important that we have an understanding of Islam ... my brother has been a Christian for (only) 20 years.

11. Father: Muslim Barack Hussein Obama Sr. (Senior) was born in Nyangoma-Kogelo, Siaya District, Kenya.

12. Step Father: Muslim Lolo Soetoro Mangunharjo ws a devout Muslim and Obama went to Mosque on Fridays with him.

13. Mother: Muslim The evidence seems to quite clearly show that both Ann Dunham and her husband Lolo Soetoro Mangunharjo were in fact devout Muslims themselves and they raised their son as such.”

14. Grandfather: lived for a time in Zanzibar, where he converted from Christianity to Islam. He was one of the first Muslim converts in his village.
Grandfather, for whom Obama was given the middle name, Hussein, was "fiercely devoted to Islam." He had at least 3 wives: Helima, who had no children, Akuma who gave birth to Sarah Obama, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. and Auma Obama.

15. Obama’s teachers and the principal from the 1970's: Obama actively took part in the Islamic religious lessons during his years at his school in Muslim Indonesia. “I remembered that he had studied “mengaji” (recitation of the Quran)” “The actual usage of the word ‘mengaji’ in Indonesian and Malaysian societies means the study of learning to recite the Quran in the Arabic language rather than the native tongue. “Mengagi” is a word and a term that is accorded the highest value and status in the mindset of fundamentalist societies here in Southeast Asia. To put it quite simply, ‘mengaji classes’ are not something that a non practicing or so-called moderate Muslim family would ever send their child to. To put this in a Christian context, this is something above and beyond simply enrolling your child in Sunday school classes.”

16.The Obama Campaign: told the LA Times he wasn’t a “practicing Muslim.” (3/14/2007). Why didn't Obama's campaign just say he wasn't a "Muslim"?

17. Lebanese Raplph Nader Called Obama Pro-"Palestinian" Washington, D.C. (February 25, 2008) -- In remarks made by Ralph Nader on "Meet the Press," Nader added to the debate on Senator Obama's views on Israel and the Middle East and raised serious doubts and questions about the true leanings of Senator Obama on these important issues.

During his interview on "Meet the Press," Nader said that Sen. Obama had reversed his positions on Israel. Nader said Sen. Obama's "instincts and his knowledge have been censored by himself" and that Sen. Obama was "pro-Palestinian when he was in Illinois before he ran for the state Senate" and "during the state Senate."

Sen. Obama has caught criticism for pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel statements and sentiments before. In March 2007, Sen. Obama was criticized for saying that "Nobody is suffering more than the Palestinians." Obama has also been criticized for stocking his campaign with several controversial advisors including Zbigniew Brzezinski, Robert Malley, Samantha Power and Susan Rice.

"People should be very skeptical of Barack Obama's shaky Middle East policies. When a long-time political activist like Ralph Nader, with a well-documented, anti-Israel bias, claims that Senator Obama shares this anti-Israel bias, that is alarming," said RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks. "If Senator Obama supports Ralph Nader's policies, which consistently condemn Israel's right to defend itself against terrorism, and if Sen. Obama has only reversed his positions to run for president, it once again raises serious questions about his grasp of the geo-political realities of the Middle East and puts into doubt his commitment to the safety and security of Israel. These are important questions we in the Jewish community will be asking."

18.Obama admits "My Muslim Faith".Obama acknowledged his Islamic Heritage Sunday, Septaember 7, 2008 during an exchange with ABC's George Stephanopoulos on "This Week", speaking of "My Muslim Faith".

This is one of the first times the candidate demonstrated he is torn between two religions, implying divided loyalties in the Global War Against Islamic Terror.

Evidences and Key Points about Baraq Hussein Obama

From a friend who wishes to remain anonymous. (editor's note: Since critizing Baraq Hussein Obama may soon be punishable by death!)

OBAMA: EVIDENCES and KEY POINTS

The following evidences on Obama are based on seven articles, published by established organizations/ writers (non of them are hoax) and by al-Jazeera. We care about the evidences and not about opinions, and we care about the risk that the western countries are taking this year:

KEY POINTS of ALL articles:
* Obama sat on Board that gave money to America Arab Action Network (groups calls founding of Israel a Naqba--catastrophe in Arabic: actually, Naqba originally was about Arab Leaders decision to call ALL Palestinians to LEAVE Israel by themselves in 1948, without Israel involvement. The naqba was a big lie to the Palestinian people (by their leaders) in order to free their land for the Arabs armies and let the Arab countries do what they want with the empty evacuated land- EVIDENCES ARE AVAILABLE upon request).

* Obama as did his running mate Biden opposed Ambassador Bolton, the man who helped to repeal Zionism is Racism at the UN.

* Obama as did his running mate Biden opposed naming Iranian Rev Guard Council a terrorist entity (Biden did too)

* Obama ignored racist and anti-Semitic statements and positions of his Chicago Middle East mentors(Khalidi, Said, Wright, Flegler, Farrakhan -- Obama went to Million Man March)

*Obama 's advisors, some dismissed only after scrutiny- Worldview of hostility to Israel by: (Malley, McPeak, Cirincione --his nuclear
proliferation advisor who castigated Israel over their successful attack onthe Syrian-North Korean reactor--plus Powers, Samantha Rice, Tony Lake)Obama only fired Malley after he actually met with Hamas.

*Obama has repeatedly praised Z Brzezinsky.

* Obama raised funds for a PLO terror camp. He has been endorsed, funded, and campaigned for by Israeli enemies far and wide.
Obama HAD to return substantial amounts of money to donors from Gaza.


* Obama believe no one suffers more than Palestinians

* Obama referred to "my Muslim faith" in a nationally televised interview.

* Barry Rubin, a well-known and respected Mideast expert and academic, said an Obama victory would precipitate “the most dangerous crisis facing the world.”

* Palestinians from Gaza calling Americans to Vote for Obama:

"Amazing video from al-Jazeera (see link below): Palestinians working to elect Obama are calling from Gaza to the US random phone numbers in primary states urging them to get out the vote. Unfortunately for them, Arabs calling from the Middle East soliciting votes for Obama which is going to have the opposite effect they intended.... "

* [Note: The un-balanced video shows the leader of Palestinians who believe that only Obama has the chance to make "peace" in Gaza. The Video doesn't mention that Israelis are trying to make real peace for more than 60 years, with constant rejection from most Arab countries.

* [Note: The un-balanced video shows that the major problem in the conflict are the settlements. Actually, settlements are built legally per international law, on legal purchased land, which belong to the builders, and NOT to any Palestinian person]

* [Note: The video does NOT give one word on all violence initiated by the Palestinians. ]

Link to al-Jazeera Video:

* Obama wrote in his book, p.261: "... I will stand with them [Arab and Pakistani Americans] should the political winds shift in any ugly direction.": [corrected quote]

* A well-known anti-Israel activist, Ali Abunimah, wrote in his report:
- Obama voluntarily initiate and raised the discussion with Abunimah and said:
- Hey, I’m sorry I haven’t said more about Palestine right now, but we are in a tough primary race.
I’m hoping when things calm down I can be more up front.”
* Obama also responded to same anti-Israel activist,who criticizing Israel and US by a column,published in Chicago said Tribune,and : “Keep up the good work ! "

* Per above Abunimah report: ..... in 1999 Obama had a major community fundraiser for Palestinian in Deheisha refugee camp,... Barack Obama used to be verycomfortable speaking up for, and being
associated with Palestinian rights and opposing the Israeli occupation."

* Abunimah's report included a photo of Obama with his wife Michelle seated at table with virulently anti-Israeli Professor Edward Said, in 1998 Arab community event, at which Said gave the keynote speech.

* Abunimah wrote: " he(Obama) used to attend events in the Palestinian community in Chicago all the time."

* Ali Abunimah claimed to know Obama well and to have met him on numerous occasions at pro-Palestinian events in Chicago.

* Israeli security officials express "concern" about Robert Malley, an adviser to Obama, who has advocated negotiations with Hamas and providing international assistance to the terrorist group. Malley also blamed Israel for the collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations at Camp David in 2000when Arafat turned down a Palestinian state in the West Bank,Gaza & East Jerusalem.

* Although Senator Obama has presented himself as the candidate of new things -- using the mantra of'change' endlessly -- the cold fact is that virtually
- Everything Obama says about domestic policy is straight out of the 1960s and
- Everything he says about foreign policy is straight out of the 1930s.
- That approach, in the name of peace, is what led to the most catastrophic war in human history [WW2]. [Writen by a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute, Thomas Sowell, a black essayist]

* Obama gave $22,500 in2006 to a church run by Jeremiah Wright.

* Jeremiah Wright knows of the Malcolm X (Nation of Islam leader) statement and, forty-five years later,chose to echo, repeat, and confirm it.

* The question is: why didn't Obama left that church before the primary, before 2008?

* Obama associate with people like Wright who believes that the government created HIVto commit a genocide; His replacement believes that the CIA created crack cocaine to destroy African-American communities; and his military adviser, Tony McPeak believes that Jews and Christian Zionists manipulated American foreign policy in Iraq.

* ACORN has been involved in voter fraud in the United States for years and served as the venue for the Obama's work as a "community organizer" . This report comes from today's Wall Street Journal. Tad Taube

*************************
Obama and Israel:
As a summary of the long message below:

Jesse Jackson: Expects Obama to stop "putting Israel's interests first" in making Mideast policy.

"The most important change would occur in the Middle East, where "decades of putting Israel's interests first" would end.
Jackson believes that, although "Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades" remain strong, they'll lose a great deal of their clout when Barack Obamaenters the White House.
"Obama is about change," Jackson told me in a wide-ranging conversation. "And the change that Obama promises is not limited to what we do in America itself. It is a change of the way America looks at the world and its place in it."

Obama Policy in the middle east:
"People are concern that Obama would alterate the disastrous course of US policy in the Middle East forthe growing campaign of boycott, divestment and sanctions needed to hold Israelaccountable for its escalating violence and solidifying apartheid."

Obama states you do not have to be pro Likud to be pro Israel.

Obama told Electronic Intifada Ali Abunimeh....hey, I am running for office now,I have to cool it on the Palestinian stuff, but keep up your good work !

Obama wants to sit down with Ahmadninejad without pre-conditions.

Obama believes in a global poverty tax and more money for the UN.

Obama lied to AIPAC (7500 people in the room) about Jerusalem. He recanted the very next day.

Yet,we have heard repeatedly how AIPAC gives Obama a perfect record.This cover prevented the community from being politically educated, and now Obama has his advocates telling Jewsnot to worry about him, and that any criticism is just smears.

The hiding of information about Obama all this time invited inJ Steet and Rabbis for Obama and all the game playing about how Obama is just as good for Israel as McCain. J Steet wants to destroy AIPACand RJC. They have called out the hate Israel dogs to try to censor AIPAC 7 RJC ads, send us hate emails. The anti War and anti Israel left now has both in its sights. AIPAC and Israel will pay the price. So will American Jewry.

Joe Biden, who once threatened to cut off aid to Israel (spoken directly toan Israeli Prime Minister, with fists pounding the table, during wartime (1982) and isthe Mullahs favorite Senator (1998, one of only 4 Senators not to vote forIranian Missile Proliferation Sanctions Act, etc.) has also been given a free ride. Not to mention Biden meanness to AIPAC a few weeks ago.

Jews are capable of incredible self deception and foolishness.
Ask the ones who continue to consider Dennis Ross a wise man.

Don't forget, more Jews voted for Jimmy Carter over Ronald Reagan.
go figure.


ACORN has been involved in voter fraud in the United States for years and served as the venue for the Obama's work as a "community organizer" . This report comes from today's Wall Street Journal. Tad Taube


Obama supported by J Street (Jewish org):
" The hiding of information about Obama all this time invited in J Steet and Rabbis for Obama and all the game playing about how Obama is just as good for Israel as McCain. J Steet wants to destroy AIPACand RJC. They have called out the hate Israel dogs to try to censor AIPAC 7 RJC ads, send us hate emails. The anti War and anti Israel left now has both in its sights. AIPAC and Israel will pay the price. So will American Jewry."


* Per the above info we can conclude that Israel and Obama issue will be solved in an aggressive way, by Obama, Leftist and with some Jewish supporters:

"Palestinian ‘Right of Return' Is Not ‘Inalienable' "
by Michael Sharnoff
Pajamas Media
October 13, 2008
www.jewishpolicycenter.org/article/345

"On September 14, Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas lamented the lack of recent progress in Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, stating, "I cannot say that there has been an agreement on a single issue. The gap between the sides is very large. We presented our ideas and demands regarding the six issues, and have yet to receive any answer from the Israeli side."

Abbas accuses the Israelis of stalling on the issue of the so-called "right of return." He believes that some 800,000 Palestinians displaced during aggressive Arab wars against Israel have a "right" to return to their homes...."


I will send out rebuttals. If they exist.


Jesse Jackson: Expects Obama to stop "putting Israel's interests first" in making Mideast policy.

"The most important change would occur in the Middle East, where "decades of putting Israel's interests first" would end.
Jackson believes that, although "Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades" remain strong, they'll lose a great deal of their clout when Barack Obamaenters the White House.
"Obama is about change," Jackson told me in a wide-ranging conversation. "And the change that Obama promises is not limited to what we do in America itself. It is a change of the way America looks at the world and its place in it."

Jackson warns that he isn't an Obama confidant or adviser, "just a supporter." But he adds that Obama has been "a neighbor or, better still, a member of the family." Jackson's son has been a close friend of Obama for years, and Jackson's daughter went to school with Obama's wife Michelle.

"We helped him start his career," says Jackson. "And then we were always there to help him move ahead. He is the continuation of our struggle for justice not only for the black people but also for all those who have been wronged."

Will Obama's election close the chapter of black grievances linked to memories of slavery? The reverend takes a deep breath and waits a long time before responding.

"No, that chapter won't be closed," he says. "However, Obama's victory will be a huge step in the direction we have wanted America to take for decades."


THE O JESSE KNOWS - JACKSON ON OBAMA'S AMERICA
Obama to stop "putting Israel's interests first" in making Mideast policy."

Jackson: Expects Obama to stop "putting Israel's interests first" in making Mideast policy.
AMIR TAHERI"

October 14, 2008
EVIAN, FRANCE
PREPARE for a new America: That's the message that the Rev. Jesse Jackson conveyed to participants in the first World Policy Forum, held at this French lakeside resort last week.

He promised "fundamental changes" in US foreign policy - saying America must "heal wounds" it has caused to other nations, revive its alliances and apologize for the "arrogance of the Bush administration."

The most important change would occur in the Middle East, where "decades of putting Israel's interests first" would end.
Jackson believes that, although "Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades" remain strong, they'll lose a great deal of their clout when Barack Obama enters the White House.
"Obama is about change," Jackson told me in a wide-ranging conversation. "And the change that Obama promises is not limited to what we do in America itself. It is a change of the way America looks at the world and its place in it."

Jackson warns that he isn't an Obama confidant or adviser, "just a supporter." But he adds that Obama has been "a neighbor or, better still, a member of the family." Jackson's son has been a close friend of Obama for years, and Jackson's daughter went to school with Obama's wife Michelle.

"We helped him start his career," says Jackson. "And then we were always there to help him move ahead. He is the continuation of our struggle for justice not only for the black people but also for all those who have been wronged."

Will Obama's election close the chapter of black grievances linked to memories of slavery? The reverend takes a deep breath and waits a long time before responding.

"No, that chapter won't be closed," he says. "However, Obama's victory will be a huge step in the direction we have wanted America to take for decades."
Jackson rejects any suggestion that Obama was influenced by Marxist ideas in his youth. "I see no evidence of that," he says. "Obama's thirst for justice and equality is rooted in his black culture."
But is Obama - who's not a descendant of slaves - truly a typical American black?

Jackson emphatically answers yes: "You don't need to be a descendant of slaves to experience the oppression, the suffocating injustice and the ugly racism that exists in our society," he says. "Obama experienced the same environment as all American blacks did. It was nonsense to suggest that he was somehow not black enough to feel the pain."

Is Jackson worried about the "Bradley effect" - that people may be telling pollsters they favor the black candidate, but won't end up voting for him?

"I don't think this is how things will turn out," he says. "We have a collapsing economy and a war that we have lost in Iraq. In Afghanistan, we face a resurgent Taliban. New threats are looming in Pakistan. Our liberties have been trampled under feet . . . Today, most Americans want change, and know that only Barack can deliver what they want. Young Americans are especially determined to make sure that Obama wins."

He sees a broad public loss of confidence in the nation's institutions: "We have lost confidence in our president, our Congress, our banking system, our Wall Street and our legal system to protect our individual freedoms. . . I don't see how we could regain confidence in all those institutions without a radical change of direction."

Jackson declines to be more concrete about possible policy changes. After all, he insists, he isn't part of Obama's policy team. Yet he clearly hopes that his views, reflecting the position of many Democrats, would be reflected in the policies of an Obama administration.

On the economic front, he hopes for "major changes in our trading policy."

"We cannot continue with the open-door policy," he says. "We need to protect our manufacturing industry against unfair competition that destroys American jobs and creates ill-paid jobs abroad."
Would that mean an abrogation of the NAFTA treaty with Canada and Mexico?

Jackson dismisses the question as "premature": "We could do a great deal without such dramatic action."

His most surprising position concerns Iraq. He passionately denounces the toppling of Saddam Hussein as "an illegal and unjust act." But he's now sure that the United States "will have to remain in Iraq for a very long time."

What of Obama's promise to withdraw by 2010? Jackson believes that position will have to evolve, reflecting "realities on the ground."
"We should work with our allies in Iraq to consolidate democratic institutions there," he says. "We must help the people of Iraq decide and shape their future in accordance with their own culture and faith."

On Iran, he strongly supports Obama's idea of opening a direct dialogue with the leadership in Tehran. "We've got to talk to tell them what we want and hear what they want," Jackson says. "Nothing is gained by not talking to others."

Would that mean ignoring the four UN Security Council resolutions that demand an end to Iran's uranium-enrichment program? Jackson says direct talks wouldn't start without preparations.
"Barack wants an aggressive and dynamic diplomacy," he says. "He also wants adequate preparatory work. We must enter the talks after the ground has been prepared," he says.

Jackson is especially critical of President Bush's approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict.

"Bush was so afraid of a snafu and of upsetting Israel that he gave the whole thing a miss," Jackson says. "Barack will change that," because, as long as the Palestinians haven't seen justice, the Middle East will "remain a source of danger to us all."
"Barack is determined to repair our relations with the world of Islam and Muslims," Jackson says. "Thanks to his background and ecumenical approach, he knows how Muslims feel while remaining committed to his own faith." Amir Taheri's next book, "The Persian Night: Iran Under the Khomeinist Revolution," is due out next month.

Obama's 95% Illusion
It depends on what the meaning of 'tax cut' is.

* One of Barack Obama's most potent campaign claims is that he'll cut taxes for no less than 95% of "working families." He's even promising to cut taxes enough that the government's tax share of GDP will be no more than 18.2% -- which is lower than it is today.

AP
It's a clever pitch, because it lets him pose as a middle-class tax cutter while disguising that he's also proposing one of the largest tax increases ever on the other 5%. But how does he conjure this miracle, especially since more than a third of all Americans already pay no income taxes at all? There are several sleights of hand, but the most creative is to redefine the meaning of "tax cut."
For the Obama Democrats, a tax cut is no longer letting you keep more of what you earn. In their lexicon, a tax cut includes tens of billions of dollars in government handouts that are disguised by the phrase "tax credit." Mr. Obama is proposing to create or expand no fewer than seven such credits for individuals:
- A $500 tax credit ($1,000 a couple) to "make work pay" that phases out at income of $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 per couple.

- A $4,000 tax credit for college tuition.

- A 10% mortgage interest tax credit (on top of the existing mortgage interest deduction and other housing subsidies).

- A "savings" tax credit of 50% up to $1,000.

- An expansion of the earned-income tax credit that would allow single workers to receive as much as $555 a year, up from $175 now, and give these workers up to $1,110 if they are paying child support.

- A child care credit of 50% up to $6,000 of expenses a year.

- A "clean car" tax credit of up to $7,000 on the purchase of certain vehicles.

Here's the political catch. All but the clean car credit would be "refundable," which is Washington-speak for the fact that you can receive these checks even if you have no income-tax liability. In other words, they are an income transfer -- a federal check -- from taxpayers to nontaxpayers. Once upon a time we called this "welfare," or in George McGovern's 1972 campaign a "Demogrant." Mr. Obama's genius is to call it a tax cut.
The Tax Foundation estimates that under the Obama plan 63 million Americans, or 44% of all tax filers, would have no income tax liability and most of those would get a check from the IRS each year.

The Heritage Foundation's Center for Data Analysis estimates that by 2011, under the Obama plan, an additional 10 million filers would pay zero taxes while cashing checks from the IRS.
The total annual expenditures on refundable "tax credits" would rise over the next 10 years by $647 billion to $1.054 trillion, according to the Tax Policy Center. This means that the tax-credit welfare state would soon cost four times actual cash welfare. By redefining such income payments as "tax credits," the Obama campaign also redefines them away as a tax share of GDP. Presto, the federal tax burden looks much smaller than it really is.
The political left defends "refundability" on grounds that these payments help to offset the payroll tax. And that was at least plausible when the only major refundable credit was the earned-income tax credit. Taken together, however, these tax credit payments would exceed payroll levies for most low-income workers.
It is also true that John McCain proposes a refundable tax credit -- his $5,000 to help individuals buy health insurance. We've written before that we prefer a tax deduction for individual health care, rather than a credit. But the big difference with Mr. Obama is that Mr. McCain's proposal replaces the tax subsidy for employer-sponsored health insurance that individuals don't now receive if they buy on their own. It merely changes the nature of the tax subsidy; it doesn't create a new one.

There's another catch: Because Mr. Obama's tax credits are phased out as incomes rise, they impose a huge "marginal" tax rate increase on low-income workers. The marginal tax rate refers to the rate on the next dollar of income earned. As the nearby chart illustrates, the marginal rate for millions of low- and middle-income workers would spike as they earn more income.

Some families with an income of $40,000 could lose up to 40 cents in vanishing credits for every additional dollar earned from working overtime or taking a new job. As public policy, this is contradictory. The tax credits are sold in the name of "making work pay," but in practice they can be a disincentive to working harder, especially if you're a lower-income couple getting raises of $1,000 or $2,000 a year. One mystery -- among many -- of the McCain campaign is why it has allowed Mr. Obama's 95% illusion to go unanswered.


All of the concerns about Obama have been ignored by mainstream Jewry and Jewish media, or they just don't care.

Obama opposed Security Fence, calling it a "Wall between the Peoples"

Obama as did his running mate Biden opposed Ambassador Bolton, the man who helped to repeal Zionism is Racism at the UN Obama as did his running mate Biden opposed naming Iranian Rev Guard Council a terrorist entity (Biden did too)Obama ignored racist and anti-Semitic statements and positions of his Chicago Middle East
mentors(Khalidi, Said, Wright, Flegler, Farrakhan -- Obama went to Million Man March)

Obama 's advisors, some dismissed only after scrutiny- Worldview of hostility to Israel by: (Malley, McPeak, Cirincione --his nuclear
proliferation advisor who castigated Israel over their successful attack onthe Syrian-North Korean reactor--plus Powers, Samantha Rice, Tony Lake)Obama only fired Malley after
he actually met with Hamas.


Obama has repeatedly praised Z Brzezinsky.
Obama raised funds for a PLO terror camp.He has been endorsed, funded, and campaigned for by Israeli enemies far and
wide.


Obama had to return substantial amounts of money to donors from Gaza.

Obama sat on Board that gave money to Am Arab Action Network (groups callsfounding ofIsrael a Naqba--catastrophe).

Obama believe no one suffers more than Palestinians
THE ELECTRONIC INTIFADA ON SENATOR OBAMA

Somali Pirates Hijack Dirty Bomb Iranian Ship

The incident described in the story below has received virtually no media coverage or investigative reporting. We have no way at this time to confirm the veracity of all the details in the story.

However, enough details in the story ring true that we believe it our duty to make sure our members are aware of this. The key paragraph of the story is this:
Although American intelligence and government sources are maintaining a strictly observed silence, the same does not apply to the Russians and so it is that we learn the real story of the MV Iran Deyanat. She was an enormous floating dirty bomb, intended to detonate after exiting the Suez Canal at the eastern end of the Mediterranean and in proximity to the coastal cities of Israel. The entire cargo of radioactive sand, obtained by Iran from China (the latter buys desperately needed oil from the former) and sealed in containers which, when the charges on the ship are set off after the crew took to the boats, will be blasted high into the air where prevailing winds will push the highly dangerous and radioactive cloud ashore.
Even if what this story reports turns out to be inaccurate, the fact remains that the Iranian government’s stated intention – the destruction of Israel and the United States – coupled with its ongoing efforts to manufacture nuclear weapons of mass destruction, make the scenario below very plausible…if not now, sometime in the future.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hijacked Iranian Ship Was A Dirty Bomb Meant For Israel On Yom Kippur

October 15th, 2008 Posted By drillanwr.



The ship has since been released and story found here.

Hijacked Iranian Ship was a Dirty Bomb Meant for Israel on Yom Kippur

On August 21st, 2008, the MV Iran Deyant, 44,458 dead weight bulk carrier was heading towards the Suez Canal. As it was passing the Horn of Africa, about 80 miles southeast of al-Makalla in Yemen, the ship was surrounded by speedboats filled with members of a gang of Somalian pirates who grab suitable commercial ships and hold them and their cargos and crews for ransom. The captain was defenseless against the 40 pirates armed with AK-47s and rocket-propelled grenades blocking his passage. He had little choice other than to turn his ship over to them. What the pirates were not banking on, however, was that this was no ordinary ship.

The MV Iran Deyanat is owned and operated by the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL) - a state-owned company run by the Iranian military that was sanctioned by the U.S. Department of the Treasury on September 10, shortly after the ship’s hijacking.

According to the U.S. Government, the company regularly falsifies shipping documents in order to hide the identity of end users, uses generic terms to describe shipments to avoid the attention of shipping authorities, and employs the use of cover entities to circumvent United Nations sanctions to facilitate weapons proliferation for the Iranian Ministry of Defense. The MV Iran Deyanat departed Nanjing, China, July 28, and, according to its manifest, planned to sail to Rotterdam, where it would offload 42,500 tons of iron ore and “industrial products” purchased by an unidentified “ German client”. The ship has a crew of 29 men, including a Pakistani captain, an Iranian engineer, 13 other Iranians, 3 Indians, 2 Filipinos, and 10 Eastern Europeans, stated to be Albanians.

The MV Iran Deyanat was brought to Eyl, a sleepy fishing village in northeastern Somalia, and was secured by a larger gang of pirates - 50 onboard and 50 onshore. The Somali pirates attempted to inspect the ship’s seven cargo containers but the containers were locked. The crew claimed that they did not have the “access codes” and could not open them. Pirates have stated they were unable to open the hold without causing extensive damage to the ship, and threatened to blow it up. The Iranian ship’s captain and the engineer were contacted by cell phone and demanded to disclose the actual nature of the mysterious “powdered cargo” but the captain and his officers were very evasive. Initially they said that the cargo contained “crude oil” but then claimed it contained “minerals.” Following this initial rebuff, the pirates broke open one of the containers and discovered it to be filled with packets of what they said was “a powdery fine sandy soil” ….

Within a period of three days, those pirates who had boarded the ship and opened the cargo container with its gritty sand-like contents, all developed strange health complications, to include serious skin burns and loss of hair. And within two weeks, sixteen of the pirates subsequently died, either on the ship or on shore.

News about the illness and the toxic cargo quickly reached Garowe, seat of the government for the autonomous region of Puntland. Angered over the wave of piracy and suspicious about the Iranian ship, authorities dispatched a delegation led by Minister of Minerals and Oil Hassan Allore Osman to investigate the situation on September 4. and they witnessed some of the deaths due to exposure to ‘something on that ship.’

The Somali pirates initially set the ship’s ransom at $2 million and the Iranian government provided $200,000 to a local broker “to facilitate the exchange.” The $2 million dollar ransom agreement, which was supposedly secured on September 6th, never took place for reasons unknown. After September 10th, sanctions on IRISL were applied specifically because the company was said to engaged in illicit operations on behalf of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Serious negotiations were broken off completely. Iranian authorities subsequently denied that it agreed to the price nor had paid any money to the pirates. Nevertheless, after sanctions were applied to IRISL on September 10, Osman says, the Iranians told the pirates that the deal was off. “They told the pirates that they could not come because of the presence of the U.S. Navy.” The region is patrolled by the multinational Combined Taskforce 150, which includes ships from the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet. Subsequently, it was disclosed that the U.S. government had offered to pay $7 million to the pirates to “receive entry permission and search the vessel.” Officials in the Pentagon and the Department of State have consistently refused to comment on the situation.

The exact nature of the cargo remains officially a mystery but officials in Puntland and Baidoa are convinced the ship was carrying weapons to Eritrea for Islamist insurgents. “We cannot inspect the cargo yet,” Osman said, “but we are sure that it is weapons.”

The US Navy (and the French and the Russians) have been hove to off the coast of Eyl, going anywhere once released, it will be seized once it gets to sea. The specific clauses that have been approved in both the UN and in Congress would allow the US Navy to seize the ship under the suspicion clause. The claims that there are weapons onboard, and the possibility there might be chemical weapons, has insured there is at the very minimum, an inspection of the ship by outside authority will be mandated. At this writing, the MV Iran Deyanat is at anchor, watched closely by American, French and Russian naval units.

Although American intelligence and government sources are maintaining a strictly observed silence, the same does not apply to the Russians and so it is that we learn the real story of the MV Iran Deyanat. She was an enormous floating dirty bomb, intended to detonate after exiting the Suez Canal at the eastern end of the Mediterranean and in proximity to the coastal cities of Israel. The entire cargo of radioactive sand, obtained by Iran from China (the latter buys desperately needed oil from the former) and sealed in containers which, when the charges on the ship are set off after the crew took to the boats, will be blasted high into the air where prevailing winds will push the highly dangerous and radioactive cloud ashore.

Given the large number of deaths from the questing Somali pirates, it should be obvious that when the contents of the ship’s locked cargo containers finally descended onto the land, the death toll would be enormous. This ship was nothing more nor less than the long-anticipated Iranian attack on Israel. Not the expected rocket attacks (which could be intercepted by the Israelis) but an even more deadly and unexpected attack by sea. It is very interesting to note that the Israeli government has in the past few weeks, been loudly demanding that the United States establish a naval blockade of Iran.

The reason for this blockade would be to prevent any more Iranian ships with deadly cargos from attacking either Israel or other targets from the sea.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


American Congress for Truth
P.O. Box 6884
Virginia Beach, VA 23456
member@americancongressfortruth.org
http://www.americancongressfortruth.org